Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measurement and mapping of cavitation energy in leather and Material Processing vessels using an ultrasonic horn

  • Published:
Applied Physics A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultrasound technology is widely studied for advanced manufacturing. In the present paper, measurement, analysis of ultrasound-induced cavitation and characterization of energy distribution in horn-type ultrasonic probe (20 kHz) are presented. Mapping was made with variation in ultrasound power (USP) [150–500 W], using ultrasonic cavitation energy (UCE) sensor in a cylindrical process vessel of two capacities (1 and 3 L) and energy profiles plotted as 3D graphical representation for different conditions (dp, Hs, Vs) applicable to any given generic process. The results indicate maximum UCE at center of the vessel, coinciding with ultrasound probe axis. There is about 8–16.7% reduction of UCE due to the presence of leather for 3-L and 1-L beaker for various USPs. However, average UCE increases with an increase in USP 150 to 500 W for 3-L beaker, with and without leather. Ultrasound absorption coefficient (α) in goat leather has been calculated to be in the range of 9.5–10 and 19.5–10.4 (m2) Sabins, respectively, for 3-L and 1-L beaker experiments. In 1-L beaker, distance from US probe tip to leather surface at d = 3 and 4 cm provides better UCE: 8.8 and 6.3 W/cm2, respectively, and corresponding better enhancement factor in %Exhaustion: 32.3 and 28.7 in leather dyeing with ultrasound, compared to control. Prediction model of UCE from ultrasound power density, independent of configuration and regression model for various USPs was proposed, found to be comparable with experimental values. This analysis could be useful in design and development of ultrasound system for scale-up in a broader perspective and for leather in specific.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Material

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. K.S. Suslick, Science 147, 1439 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. F. Contamine, F. Faid, A.M. Wilhelm, J. Berlan, H. Delmas, Chem. Engg. Sci. 49(24B), 5865 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. V. Sivakumar, G. Swaminathan, P.G. Rao, T. Ramasami, Chem. Eng. Process 47(12), 2076 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Pantano, D. Cerniglia, Appl. Phys. A 91, 521 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. V. Sivakumar, P.G. Rao, J. Cleaner Prod. 9(1), 25 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. V. Sivakumar, G. Swaminathan, P.G. Rao, T. Ramasami, Ultrason. Sonochem. 16(1), 116 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. V. Sivakumar, J. Am. Leather. Chem. Assoc. 115(7), 239 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. Sivakumar, G. Swaminathan G, P.G. Rao, T. Ramasami T (2009), Int. J. Adv. Manuf Technol. 45, 41.

  9. V. Sivakumar, P.G. Rao, Ultrason. Sonochem. 10(2), 85 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. V. Sivakumar, P.G. Rao, Environ. Sci. Technol. 38(5), 1616 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A.J. Mortimer, B.J. Trollope, E.J. Villeneuve, O.Z. Roy, Ultrasonics 26, 348 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. I. Lenart, D. Ausländer, Ultrasonics 18, 216 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Kumar, Indian Chem. Engr. J. 36(1–2), 3 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. D.V. Prasad Naidu, R. Rajan, R. Kumar, K.S. Gandhi, V.H. Arakeri, S. Chanrasekaran 1994, Chem. Engg. Sci. 49, 877.

  15. R. Rajan, R. Kumar, K.S. Gandhi, Chem. Engg. Sci. 53(2), 255 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. V.S. Moholkar, S.P. Sable, A.B. Pandit, AIChE J. 46, 684 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. F.J. Keil, S. Dähnke, Hung. J. Ind. Chem. 25, 71 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Dähnke, K.M. Swamy, F.J. Keil, 6(4), 221 (1999).

  19. Pérez-Sánchez, J.A. Segura., C. Rubio-Gonzalez,., L.A. Baldenegro-Pérez, J.A. Soto-Cajiga, Sensors and Actuators A, Physical 311, 112035 (2020).

  20. H. Peng, P. Zhu, P. Lu, Sens. Actuator A Phys. 263, 744 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. K.S.F. Lew, E. Klaseboer, B.C. Khoo, Sens. Actuator A Phys. 1331, 161 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. L. Gaete-Garretón, Y. Vargas-Hernández, S. Pino-Dubreuil, F. Sens. Actuator A Phys. 37–38, 410 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. V. Sivakumar, G. Swaminathan, P.G. Rao, C. Muralidharan, A.B. Mandal, T. Ramasami, Ultrason. Sonochem. 17(6), 1054 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Xu, J. Tu, F. Niu, P. Yang, Appl. Acoust. 101(2016), 179–184 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. L. Escobar-Alarcón, E. Velarde Granados, D.A. Solís-Casados, O. Olea-Mejía, M. Espinosa-Pesqueira, E. Haro-Poniatowski, Appl. Phys. A 122, 433 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. S. Chen, A. Sabato, C. Niezrecki, P. Avitabile, T. Huber, J. Sound Vib. 432, 33 (2018)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Frohly, S. Labouret, C. Bruneel, I. Looten-Baquet, R. Torguet, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 2012 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. V. Sivakumar, P.G. Rao, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc. 98(6), 230 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  29. M Vorlander, Auralization: Fundamentals of acoustics, modelling, simulation, algorithms and acoustic virtual reality, 2nd Edn. (Springer, Dordrecht, 2007), pp. 307.

  30. D. Davis, Carolyn, D (Second Edition, Focal Press, USA, Sound System Engineering, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

V.S thanks and is indebted to the Department of Science Technology (DST)—Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), New Delhi, GoI, India, for the research grant and fund provided for this project Ref. No. EMR/2015/000202. He also thanks CSIR-CLRI for the support. He is grateful to all his guides and mentors for their encouragement and motivation. He also thanks the anonymous reviewers for the manuscript for their valuable comments in improving the quality of the paper.

Funding

This study was funded by the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), New Delhi, GoI, India, project Ref. No. EMR/2015/000202.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VS was involved in conceptualization, methodology and supervision, and RM was involved in investigation and visualization.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Venkatasubramanian Sivakumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Code Availability

No software or custom codes were used in this research paper.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sivakumar, V., Mohan, R. Measurement and mapping of cavitation energy in leather and Material Processing vessels using an ultrasonic horn. Appl. Phys. A 128, 27 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-021-04977-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-021-04977-w

Keywords

Navigation