Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Conservation benefits of no-take marine reserves outweigh modest benefits of partially protected areas for targeted coral reef fishes

  • Report
  • Published:
Coral Reefs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 19 January 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Inshore coral reefs support unique ecosystems that are subject to a variety of threats and disturbances. Marine protected areas are powerful conservation tools and often include zones which vary in the level of fishing restriction, including fully protected (no-take) zones, partially protected zones (limited fishing), and less protected “open” fishing zones. Here, we compare outcomes from fully protected, partially protected, and “open” fishing zones on inshore fringing reefs of the Great Barrier Reef with a history of cyclone-induced habitat disturbance. Biomass of target and non-target fish groups, along with the coral cover and structural complexity of benthic habitats, was compared among zones. There was a strong positive effect of full protection from fishing on targeted fish biomass, and a comparatively modest effect of partial protection, even in areas where spearfishing was prohibited. Fully protected zones supported more than three times the biomass of highly targeted coral trout (Plectropomus spp.) compared to open fishing zones, and more than twice the biomass observed in partially protected zones. Similar outcomes occurred for primary targets collectively; conversely, there were no zoning-related differences for non-target fishes. Structural complexity was a consistent positive driver of fish biomass for all fish groups and among all zones. Notably high target fish biomass occurred at NTMR sites with the highest structural complexity, highlighting the importance of both habitat and protection in supporting population hotspots for targeted reef fishes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  • Beukers JS, Jones GP (1998) Habitat complexity modifies the impact of piscivores on a coral reef fish population. Oecologia 114:50–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boaden AE, Kingsford MJ (2015) Predators drive community structure in coral reef fish assemblages. Ecosphere 6:art46

  • Bobiles RU, Nakamura Y (2019) Partially protected marine areas as a conservation tool for commercially important fishes in the Philippines: Do age, size, and design matter? Reg Stud Mar Sci 25

  • Brodie JE, Kroon FJ, Schaffelke B, Wolanski EC, Lewis SE, Devlin MJ, Bohnet IC, Bainbridge ZT, Waterhouse J, Davis AM (2012) Terrestrial pollutant runoff to the Great Barrier Reef: An update of issues, priorities and management responses. Mar Poll Bull 65:81–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli D, Emslie M, Richards ZT (2016) Post-disturbance stability of fish assemblages measured at coarse taxonomic resolution masks change at finer scales. PLoS ONE 11:e0156232

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli DM, Evans RD, Logan M, Mantel P, Puotinen M, Petus C, Russ GR, Williamson DH (2020) Long-term dynamics and drivers of coral and macroalgal cover on inshore reefs of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Ecol App 30:e02008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinner J (2014) Coral reef livelihoods. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 7:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coker DJ, Wilson SK, Pratchett MS (2014) Importance of live coral habitat for reef fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fish 24:89–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell SD, Kingsford MJ (1998) Spatial, temporal and habitat related variation in the abundance of large predatory fish at One Tree Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs 17:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curley BG, Glasby TM, Curley AJ, Creese RG, Kingsford MJ (2013) Enhanced numbers of two temperate reef fishes in a small, partial-take marine protected area related to spearfisher exclusion. Biol Conserv 167:435–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling ES, Graham NAJ, Januchowski-Hartley FA, Nash KL, Pratchett MS, Wilson SK (2017) Relationships between structural complexity, coral traits, and reef fish assemblages. Coral Reefs 36:561–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day JC, Kenchington RA, Tanzer JM, Cameron DS (2019) Marine zoning revisited: How decades of zoning the Great Barrier Reef has evolved as an effective spatial planning approach for marine ecosystem-based management. Aquat Cons: Mar Fresh Eco 29:9–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denny CM, Babcock RC (2004) Do partial marine reserves protect reef fish assemblages? Biol Conserv 116:119–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgar GJ, Stuart-Smith RD, Willis TJ, Kininmonth S, Baker SC, Banks S, Barrett NS, Becerro MA, Bernard AT, Berkhout J, Buxton CD, Thomson RJ (2014) Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features. Nature 506:216-+

  • Emslie M, Cheal A, Sweatman H, Delean S (2008) Recovery from disturbance of coral and reef fish communities on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 371:177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emslie MJ, Logan M, Williamson DH, Ayling AM, MacNeil MA, Ceccarelli D, Cheal AJ, Evans RD, Johns KA, Jonker MJ, Miller IR, Sweatman HPA (2015) Expectations and outcomes of reserve network performance following re-zoning of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Curr Biol 25:983–992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander AM, Brown EK, Jokiel PL, Smith WR, Rodgers KS (2003) Effects of habitat, wave exposure, and marine protected area status on coral reef fish assemblages in the Hawaiian archipelago. Coral Reefs 22:291–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch AJ, Baker R, Hobbs JPA, Nankervis L (2008) A quantitative comparison of recreational spearfishing and linefishing on the Great Barrier Reef: implications for management of multi-sector coral reef fisheries. Coral Reefs 27:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch AJ, Cole AJ, Hobbs J-PA, Rizzari JR, Munkres KP (2012) Effects of Spearfishing on Reef Fish Populations in a Multi-Use Conservation Area. PLoS ONE 7:e51938

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Froese R, Pauly D (2021) Fishbase

  • Gell FR, Roberts CM (2003) Benefits beyond boundaries: the fishery effects of marine reserves. Trends Ecol Evol 18:448–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham NAJ, Ainsworth TD, Baird AH, Ban NC, Bay LK, Cinner JE, De Freitas DM, Diaz-Pulido G, Dornelas M, Dunn SR, Fidelman PI, Williamson DH (2011) From microbes to people: Tractable benefits of no-take areas for coral reefs. In: Gibson RN, Atkinson RJA, Gordon JDM (eds) Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, Vol 49, pp105–135

  • Green R (1979) Sampling design and statistical methods for environmental biologists. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall AE, Kingsford MJ (2021) Habitat type and complexity drive fish assemblages in a tropical seascape. J Fish Biol 99:1364–1379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall AE, Cameron DS, Kingsford MJ (2021) Partially protected areas as a management tool on inshore reefs. Rev Fish Biol Fish 31:631–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall A, Cameron D, Kingsford M (2022) Prohibiting spearfishing boosts conservation outcomes for partially protected areas. Biol Conserv 272:109662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan KD, McMahon SJ, Munday PL, Rummer JL (2021) Contrasting effects of constant and fluctuating pCO2 conditions on the exercise physiology of coral reef fishes. Mar Environ Res 163:105224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harasti D, Williams J, Mitchell E, Lindfield S, Jordan A (2018) Increase in relative abundance and size of snapper Chrysophrys auratus within partially-protected and no-take areas in a temperate marine protected area. Front Mar Sci 5

  • Harrison HB, Williamson DH, Evans RD, Almany GR, Thorrold SR, Russ GR, Feldheim KA, Van Herwerden L, Planes S, Srinivasan M, Berumen ML, Jones GP (2012) Larval export from marine reserves and the recruitment benefit for fish and fisheries. Curr Biol 22:1023–1028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes TP (2008) Human impact on coral reefs. In: Hutchings PA, Kingsford MJ, Hoegh-Guldberg O (eds) The Great Barrier Reef: biology, environment and management. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, pp 85–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes TP, Kerry JT, Alvarez-Noriega M, Alvarez-Romero JG, Anderson KD, Baird AH, Babcock RC, Beger M, Bellwood DR, Berkelmans R, Bridge TC, Wilson SK (2017) Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals. Nature 543:373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones GP, McCormick ML, Srinivasan M, Eagle JV (2004) Coral decline threatens fish biodiversity in marine reserves. Proc Nat Acad Sci 101:8251–8253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kerry JT, Bellwood DR (2012) The effect of coral morphology on shelter selection by coral reef fishes. Coral Reefs 31:415–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsford MJ (2009) Contrasting patterns of reef utilization and recruitment of coral trout (Plectropomus leopardus) and snapper (Lutjanus carponotatus) at One Tree Island, southern Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 28:251–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam VYY, Chaloupka M, Thompson A, Doropoulos C, Mumby PJ (2018) Acute drivers influence recent inshore Great Barrier Reef dynamics. Proc Royal Soc B: Bio Sci 285:20182063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester SE, Halpern BS (2008) Biological responses in marine no-take reserves versus partially protected areas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 367:49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm HA, Williams J, Schultz AL, Neilson J, Johnstone N, Knott NA, Harasti D, Coleman MA, Jordan A (2018) Targeted fishes are larger and more abundant in “no-take” areas in a subtropical marine park. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 212:118–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClanahan TR, Graham NAJ, Calnan JM, MacNeil MA (2007) Toward pristine biomass: Reef fish recovery in coral reef marine protected areas in Kenya. Ecol App 17:1055–1067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClure EC, Richardson LE, Graba-Landry A, Loffler Z, Russ GR, Hoey AS (2019) Cross-Shelf Differences in the Response of Herbivorous Fish Assemblages to Severe Environmental Disturbances. Diversity 11:13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCook LJ, Ayling T, Cappo M, Choat JH, Evans RD, De Freitas DM, Heupel M, Hughes TP, Jones GP, Mapstone B, Marsh H, Williamson DH (2010) Adaptive management of the Great Barrier Reef: A globally significant demonstration of the benefits of networks of marine reserves. Proc Nat Acad Sci 107:18278–18285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mellin C, Aaron MacNeil M, Cheal AJ, Emslie MJ, Julian Caley M (2016) Marine protected areas increase resilience among coral reef communities. Ecol Lett 19:629–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan JL, Hall AE, Kingsford MJ (2022) Interrelationships between soft corals and reef-associated fishes on inshore-reefs of the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 698:15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumby PJ, Harborne AR (2010) Marine reserves enhance the recovery of corals on Caribbean reefs. PLoS ONE 5:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumby PJ, Dahlgren CP, Harborne AR, Kappel CV, Micheli F, Brumbaugh DR, Holmes KE, Mendes JM, Broad K, Sanchirico JN, Buch K, Gill AB (2006) Fishing, trophic cascades, and the process of grazing on coral reefs. Science 311:98–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nash KL, Graham NAJ, Wilson SK, Bellwood DR (2013) Cross-scale habitat structure drives fish body size distributions on coral reefs. Ecosystems 16:478–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratchett MS, Coker DJ, Jones GP, Munday PL (2012) Specialization in habitat use by coral reef damselfishes and their susceptibility to habitat loss. Ecol Evol 2:2168–2180

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Russ GR, Alcala AC (2010) Decadal-scale rebuilding of predator biomass in Philippine marine reserves. Oecologia 163:1103–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russ GR, Alcala AC, Maypa AP, Calumpong HP, White AT (2004) Marine reserve benefits local fisheries. Ecol App 14:597–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russ GR, Cheal AJ, Dolman AM, Emslie MJ, Evans RD, Miller I, Sweatman H, Williamson DH (2008) Rapid increase in fish numbers follows creation of world’s largest marine reserve network. Curr Biol 18:R514–R515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sciberras M, Jenkins SR, Mant R, Kaiser MJ, Hawkins SJ, Pullin AS (2015) Evaluating the relative conservation value of fully and partially protected marine areas. Fish Fish 16:58–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sievers KT, McClure EC, Abesamis RA, Russ GR (2020) Non-reef habitats in a tropical seascape affect density and biomass of fishes on coral reefs. Ecol Evol 10:13673–13686

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull JW, Johnston EL, Clark GF (2021) Evaluating the social and ecological effectiveness of partially protected marine areas. Conserv Biol 35:921–932

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Webley J, McInnes K, Tiexeira D, Lawson A, Quinn R (2015) Statewide Recreational Fishing Survey 2013–14. Department of Agriculture and Fisheries

  • Wenger AS, Williamson DH, da Silva ET, Ceccarelli DM, Browne NK, Petus C, Devlin MJ (2015) Effects of reduced water quality on coral reefs in and out of no-take marine reserves. Conserv Biol 30:142–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DM, Hatcher A (1983) Structure of fish communities on outer slopes of inshore, mid-shelf and outer-shelf reefs of the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 10:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson D, Ceccarelli D, Evans R, Jones G, Russ GR (2014) Habitat dynamics, marine reserve status, and the decline and recovery of coral reef fish communities. Ecol evol 4:337–354

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson DH, Ceccarelli DM, Jones GP, Russ GR (2019) Assessing the ecological effects of management zoning on inshore reefs of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville, Australia

  • Williamson DH, Ceccarelli DM, Evans RD, Hill JK, Russ GR (2015) Derelict Fishing Line Provides a Useful Proxy for Estimating Levels of Non-Compliance with No-Take Marine Reserves. PLoS ONE 9:e114395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson SK, Burgess SC, Cheal AJ, Emslie M, Fisher R, Miller I, Polunin NV, Sweatman HPA (2008) Habitat utilization by coral reef fish: implications for specialists vs generalists in a changing environment. J Anim Ecol 77:220–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woolsey E, Bainbridge SJ, Kingsford MJ, Byrne M (2012) Impacts of cyclone Hamish at One Tree Reef: integrating environmental and benthic habitat data. Mar Biol 159:793–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zupan M, Fragkopoulou E, Claudet J, Erzini K, Costa BHE, Goncalves EJ (2018) Marine partially protected areas: drivers of ecological effectiveness. Front Ecol Enviro 16:381–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Stephanie Garra, Jaimee Moynihan, and Daniella Martinez for assistance with field work, and Murray Logan for advice on statistical analyses. The project was funded by a Environmental Enhancement Fund from Evolution Mining awarded to A. E. Hall.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Science and Engineering and ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Building 34, 1 James Cook Drive, Douglas, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia

    April E. Hall, Katie T. Sievers & Michael J. Kingsford

  2. Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia

    April E. Hall

Authors
  1. April E. Hall
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katie T. Sievers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael J. Kingsford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to April E. Hall.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This research was carried out under an approved animal ethics permit # A2438. The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 42 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hall, A.E., Sievers, K.T. & Kingsford, M.J. Conservation benefits of no-take marine reserves outweigh modest benefits of partially protected areas for targeted coral reef fishes. Coral Reefs 42, 319–333 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-022-02340-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-022-02340-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation