Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-proxy analysis of waterlogged preserved Late Neolithic canine excrements

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multi-proxy analysis of the coprolites which were found during excavations at two Late Neolithic (fourth millennium bc) pile-dwelling sites (Črnelnik and Stare gmajne) in Slovenia yielded some new insights into human–dog relations and behaviour. The digested content is presented in a multidisciplinary approach, in which palynological, palaeoparasitological, archaeobotanical and archaeozoological features are studied and genetic signs are tested. Beside the origin of the coprolites, the size of an animal and the diet, the faeces provided some additional information, such as health, status, nutrition habits, environment and season.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akeret Ö, Jacomet S (1997) Analysis of plant macrofossils in goat/sheep faeces from the Neolithic lake shore settlement of Horgen Scheller—an indication of prehistoric transhumance? Veget Hist Archaeobot 6:235–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Akeret Ö, Hass JN, Leuzinger U, Jacomet S (1999) Plant macrofossil and pollen in goat/sheep faeces from the Neolithic lake-shore settlement Arbon Bleice 3, Schwitzerland. Holocene 9:175–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrič M, Kroflič B, Toman MJ, Ogrinc N, Dolenec T, Dobnikar M, Čermelj B (2008) Late Quaternary vegetation and hydrological change at Ljubljansko barje (Slovenia). Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 270:150–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash LR, Orihel TC (2007) Atlas of human parasitology, 5th edn. American Society for Clinical Pathology Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Baeten J, Mees F, Marinova E et al (2018) Late Pleistocene coprolites from Qurta (Egypt) and the potential of interdisciplinary research involving micromorphology, plant macrofossil and biomarker analyses. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 259:93–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2018.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartosiewicz L (2002) Dogs from the Ig pile dwellings in the National Museum of Slovenia. Arheološki vestnik 53:77–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett KD, Willis KJ (2002) Pollen. In: Smol JP, Birks HJ, Last WM (eds) Tracking environmental changes using lake sediments. 3. Terrestrial, algal and siliceous indicators. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 5–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Bon C, Berthonaud V, Maksud F et al (2012) Coprolites as a source of information on the genome and diet of the cave hyena. Proc R Soc B 279(1739):2,825-2,830

    Google Scholar 

  • Brönnimann D, Pümpin C, Ismail-Meyer K, Rentzel P, Egüez N (2017) Excrements of omnivores and carnivores. In: Nicosia C, Stoops G (eds) Archaeological soil and sediment micromorphology. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 67–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant VM, Dean GW (2006) Archaeological coprolite science: the legacy of Eric O. Callen (1912–1970). Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 237:51–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler VL, Schroeder RA (1998) Do digestive processes leave diagnostic traces on fish bones? J Archaeol Sci 25:957–971

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne D (1973) Prehistoric coprolites: a study of human and dog coprolites from prehistoric archaeological sites in the North Island of New Zealand. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland

  • Cappers RTJ, Bekker RM, Jans JEA (2006) Digitale Zadenatlas van Nederland (Digital seed atlas of the Netherlands). Groningen Archaeological Studies 4. Barkhuis Publishing, Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A, Serjeantson D (1996) A manual for the identification of bird bones from archaeological sites. Archetype Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Delhon C, Martin L, Argant J, Thiebault S (2008) Shepherds and plants in the Alps: multi-proxy archaeobotanical analysis of Neolithic dung from »La Grande Rivoire« (Isere, France). J Archaeol Sci 35:2937–2952

    Google Scholar 

  • Drobne K (1973) Favna koliščarskih naselbin na Ljubljanskem barju (Fauna der Pfahlbautensiedlungen auf dem Moor von Ljubljana). Arheološki vestnik 24:217–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour B, Le Bailly M (2013) Testing new parasite egg extraction methods in paleoparasitology and an attempt at quantification. Int J Paleopathol 3:199–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunseth ZC, Fuks D, Langgut D et al (2019) Archaeobotanical proxies and archaeological interpretation: a comparative study of phytoliths, seeds and pollen in dung pellets and refuse deposits at Early Islamic Shivta, Negev, Israel. Quat Sci Rev 211:166–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson PGP (1987) Interpretations of archaeological bird remains: a taphonomic approach. J Archaeol Sci 14:65–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Govedič M (2004) Fishes from the archeological site at Hočevarica. In: Velušček A (ed) Hočevarica, an Eneolithic pile dwelling in the Ljubljansko barje. Opera Instituti Archaeologici Sloveniae, vol 8. Institute of archaeology at ZRC SAZU, Ljubljana, pp 133–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Granadeiro JP, Silva MA (2000) The use of otoliths and vertebrae in the identification and size-estimation of fish in predator-prey studies. Cybium 24:383–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrocks M, Irwin GJ (2003) Pollen, phytoliths and diatoms in prehistoric coprolites from Kohika, Bay of Plenty, New Zealand. J Archaeol Sci 30:13–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail-Meyer K, Rentzel P (2004) Mikromorphologische untersuchung der schichtabfolge. In: Jacomet S, Leuzinger U, Schibler J (eds) Die jungsteinzeitliche Seeufersiedlung von arbon bleiche 3: umwelt und wirtschaft archäologie im thurgau 12. Amt für Archäologie, Frauenfeld, pp 66–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Janžekovič F, Malez V (2004) Birds (Aves) at the Eneolithic pile dwelling at Hočevarica. In: Velušček A (ed) Hočevarica, an Eneolithic pile dwelling in the Ljubljansko barje. Opera Instituti Archaeologici Sloveniae, vol 8. Institute of archaeology at ZRC SAZU, Ljubljana, pp 155–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones AKG (1986) Fish bone survival in the digestive systems of the pig, dog and man: some experiments. In: Brinkhuizen DC, Clason AT (eds) Fish and Archaeology: studies in osteometry, taphonomy, seasonality and fishing methods BAR internat ser, vol 294. BAR, Oxford, pp 53–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Križnar M, Kovalchuk OM (2016) Quaternary fish remains from Ljubljansko barje and Križna jama in the paleontological collections of the Slovenian Museum of Natural History; Summary (Ostanki kvartarnih sladkovodnih rib z Ljubljanskega barja in iz Križne jame iz paleontoloških zbirk Prirodoslovnega muzeja Slovenije). Arheološki vestnik 67:389–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühn M, Maier U, Herbig C, Ismail-Meyer K, Le Bailly M, Wick L (2013) Methods for the examination of cattle, sheep and goat dung in prehistoric wetland settlements with examples of the sites Alleshausen-Täschenwiesen and Alleshausen-Grundwiesen (around cal 2900 bc) at Lake Federsee, south-west Germany. Environ Archaeol 18:43–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau SY, Dvash L, Ryan P, Saltz D, Deutch T, Rosen SA (2020) Faecal pellets, rock shelters, and seasonality: the chemistry of stabling in the Negev of Israel in late prehistory. J Arid Environ 181:104219

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bailly M, Araújo A (2016) Past intestinal parasites. Microbiol Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.PoH-0013-2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bailly M, Leuzinger U, Bouchet F (2003) Dioctophymidae eggs from coprolites from neolithic site of Arbon-Bleiche 3 (Switzerland). J Parasitol 89:1,073-1,076

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Bailly M, Leuzinger U, Schlichtherle H, Bouchet F (2005) Diphyllobothrium: neolithic parasite? J Parasitol 91:957–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Macphail RI (2000) Soils and microstratigraphy: a soil micromorphological and micro-chemical approach. In: Lawson AJ (ed) Potterne, 1982–5: animal husbandry in later prehistoric Wiltshire. Wessex archaeology report, vol 17. Wessex Archaeology, Salisbury, pp 47–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Maicher C, Hoffmann A, Côté NML, Palomo Pérez A, Saña Segui M, Le Bailly M (2017) Paleoparasitological investigations on the Neolithic lakeside settlement of La Draga (Lake Banyoles, Spain). Holocene 27:1659–1668

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinova E, Ryan P, van Neer W, Friedman R (2013) Animal dung from arid environments and archaeobotanical methodologies for its analysis: an example from animal burials of the Predynastic elite cemetery HK6 at Hierakonpolis. Egypt Environ Archaeol 18:58–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore PD, Webb JA, Collinson ME (1991) Pollen analysis, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Reille M (1992) Pollen et Spores d’Europe et d’Afrique Du Nord. Laboratoire de Botanique Historique et Palynologie, Marseille

    Google Scholar 

  • Reille M (1995) Pollen et Spores d’Europe et d’Afrique Du Nord (Supplement). Laboratoire de Botanique Historique et Palynologie, Marseille

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhard KJ, Bryant VM (1992) Coprolite analysis. A biological perspective on archaeology. In: Shiffer M (ed) Archaeological method and theory, vol 4. University of Arizona Press, Tuscon, pp 245–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhard K, Ferreira LF, Bouchet F et al (2013) Food, parasites, and epidemiological transitions: a broad perspective. Int J Paleopathol 3:150–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell N, Twiss KC (2017) Digesting the data: dogs as taphonomic agents at Neolithic Çatalhöyük, Turkey. In: Mashkour M, Beech M (eds) Archaeozoology of the near east, vol 9. Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp 59–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid E (1972) Atlas of animal bones for prehistorians, archaeologists and quaternary geologists. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Skrbinšek T (2010) Navodila za sodelovanje pri raziskavi volkov s pomočjo genetike. Univerza v Ljubljani, Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za biologijo, Ljubljana. https://www.volkovi.si/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/brosura-genetika-slowolf-web1.pdf

  • Smith A, Proctor L, Hart TC, Stein GJ (2019) The burning issue of dung in archaeobotanical samples: a case-study integrating macro-botanical remains, dung spherulites, and phytoliths to assess sample origin and fuel use at Tell Zeidan, Syria. Veget Hist Archaeobot 28:229–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-018-0692-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockmarr J (1971) Tablets with spores used in absolute pollen analysis. Pollen Spores 13:615–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MA, Coop RL, Wall R (2007) Veterinary parasitology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolar T, Galik A (2019) A study of dog coprolite from Late Neolithic pile-dwelling site in Slovenia. Archaeol Discov 7:20–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolar T, Jacomet S, Velušček A, Čufar K (2011) Plant economy at a late Neolithic lake dwelling site in Slovenia at the time of the Alpine Iceman. Veget Hist Archaeobot 20:207–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Toškan B, Achino KF, Velušček A (2019) Faunal remains mirroring social and functional differentiation? The copper age pile-dwelling site of Maharski prekop (Ljubljansko barje, Slovenia). In: Francesca AK, Toškan B, Velušček A (eds) Depicting the past of Balkan and Appennine Peninsulas between Eneolithic and Bronze Age: artefacts and ecofacts as means of functional differentiation and social stratification. Quat Int 539:62–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2019.01.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velušček A (2009) Stare gmajne pile-dwelling settlement and its era. Opera Instituti Archaeologici Sloveniae, vol 16. Institute of archaeology at ZRC SAZU, Ljubljana

    Google Scholar 

  • Velušček A, Toškan B, Čufar K (2011) Zaton kolišč na Ljubljanskem barju. Arheološki vestnik 62:51–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Velušček A, Podpečan B, Tolar T, Toškan B, Turk J, Merela M, Čufar K (2018) Črnelnik and Devce, newly discovered copper age sites at Ljubljansko barje. Arheološki vestnik 69:9–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigne J-D (1995) Détermination ostéologique des principaux éléments du squelette appendiculaire d’Arvicola, d’Elyomis, de Glis et de Rattus. Fiches d’ostéologie animale pour l’archéologie, Série B: mammifères, vol 6. Centre de Recherches Archéologiques du CNRS, Valbonne

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood JR, Wilmshurst JM (2016) A protocol for subsampling late quaternary coprolites for multi-proxy analysis. Quat Sci Rev 138:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood JR, Crown A, Cole TL, Wilmshurst JM (2016) Microscopic and ancient DNA profiling of Polynesian dog (kurī) coprolites from northern New Zealand. J Archaeol Sci Rep 6:496–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachary CD, Fuks D, Langgut D et al (2019) Archaeobotanical proxies and archaeological interpretation: a comparative study of phytoliths, pollen and seeds in dung pellets and refuse deposits at Early Islamic Shivta, Negev, Israel. Quat Sci Rev 211:166–185

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project is financed by the Slovenian Research Agency (SRA; Funding Nos. J7-2598; P6-0064 (B); J7-6857 and Young Research Program of the SRA). Many thanks to technical assistant Dragotin Valoh for preparing figures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tjaša Tolar.

Additional information

Communicated by M. Primavera.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tolar, T., Galik, A., Le Bailly, M. et al. Multi-proxy analysis of waterlogged preserved Late Neolithic canine excrements. Veget Hist Archaeobot 30, 107–118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-020-00805-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-020-00805-y

Keywords

Navigation