Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Conserving idealized landscapes: past history, public perception and future management in the New Forest (UK)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The New Forest is one of the most visited regions of Britain. It has recently been designated a National Park in recognition of its unique wood pasture ecosystems, a traditional land-use system, its magnificent scenery and recreational potential, and its biodiversity importance. The Forest’s highly prized Ancient and Ornamental (A&O) woodlands are a result of complex interactions among human activities of several kinds and the ecology of the dominant species–beech and oak—under the climate conditions of the last one to two millennia. Major changes in management practices over the 20th century, combined with the historical imprint of previous centuries of use, have set the A&O woodlands on a trajectory that means their nature and appearance will inevitably change over the coming decades. When the potential stresses that will be imposed by 21st century climate change are also considered, it will be challenging to find a management strategy to maintain A&O woodlands in their present form. Beech, which owes its current dominance largely to human disturbances of the woodland ecosystem, will be particularly stressed under future conditions. Future conservation policies, and hence management strategies, must be flexible as to the species composition and structure of future woodlands. However, the wide range of users and their different values add further complexity to forest management, and managers must also focus on issues of public perception. For example visitors idealize current landscapes, and this exerts a pressure to maintain the status quo as far as appearance is concerned that will be hard to achieve in practice. Management strategies will be greatly constrained unless conflicts about values and uses are resolved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Björkman L (1999) The establishment of Fagus sylvatica at the stand-scale in southern Sweden. Holocene 9:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright K St G, Findlay WPK (1946) Decay of timber and its prevention. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatters C (1995) The management of “ancient and ornamental” and other unenclosed woods in the New Forest. Hampshire Wildlife Trust, Eastleigh

  • DEFRA (2002) Blackdown hills ESA (PB 6989/BH), DEFRA Publications, London

  • DETR (2000) Our countryside: the future. HMSO, Norwich

  • Edwards ME (2005) Land-use history in the uplands of Norway and Britain: comparisons, contradictions. In: Thompson DBA, Price MF, Galbraith CA (eds) Mountains of northern Europe: conservation, management, people and nature. Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh, pp 163–178

    Google Scholar 

  • EEC (1992) Council directive on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (the habitats and species directive). (92/43/EEC), European Economic Community, Brussels

  • ERM (2004) http://www.woodland-trust.org.uk/campaigns/images/qol.pdf. Cited 10 Sept 2005

  • Forestry Commission (2004) http://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/NewForestFacts.pdf/$FILE/NewForestFacts.pdf Cited 10 Sept 2005

  • Flower N (1980) The management history and structure of unenclosed woods in the New-Forest, Hampshire. J Biogeogr 7:311–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flower N, Tubbs CR (1982) The New Forest, Hampshire. Management proposals for unenclosed woodlands of special importance in the statutory inclosures. NCC, Lyndhurst

  • Grant MJ (2005) The palaeoecology of human impact in the New Forest. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southampton

  • IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. A report of working group II, intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • JNCC (2002) Natura 2000 data form. http://www.jncc.gov.uk/protectedsites/SACselection/n2kforms/UK0012557.pdf. Cited 21 Mar 2006

  • Jones M (1991) The elusive reality of landscape: problems of interpretation. Nor J Geogr 45:229–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby K (1988a) Changes in the ground flora under plantations on ancient woodland sites. Forestry 61:317–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby K (1988b) NVC key to woodland and scrub. English Nature, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby K (2001) Is beech best? The place of beech in woodland conservation strategies in England. In: Render MG (ed) Goodbye to beech—farewell to Fagus? Transnational Woodland Industries Group Report, Oxford, pp 7–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal D (1999) From landscapes of the future to landscapes of the past. Nor J Geogr 53:139–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manners JG, Edwards PJ (1986) Death of old beech trees in the New Forest. Proc H Field Club Archaeol Soc 42:155–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Mountford EP, Peterken GE (2003) Long-term change and implications for the management of wood pastures: experience over 40 years from Denny Wood, New Forest. Forestry 76:19–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Forest Committee (2003) Strategy for the New Forest. New Forest Committee, Lyndhurst

  • Mountford EP, Peterken GF, Edwards PJ, Manners JG (1999) Long-term change in growth, mortality and regeneration of trees in Denny Wood, an old-growth wood-pasture in the New Forest (UK). Perspect Ecol Evol Syst 2:223–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olwig KR (1996) Recovering the substantive nature of landscape. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 86:630–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olwig KR (2000) The place ecology of landscape. In: Skärbäck E (eds) Planering för landskap. Stad & Land 166, Sveriges landbruksuniversitetet, SLU, Alnarp, pp 37–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken GF (1993) Woodland conservation and management. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken GF, Tubbs CR (1965) Woodland regeneration in the New Forest, Hampshire, since 1650. J Appl Ecol 2:159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterken GF, Spencer JW, Field AB (1996) Maintaining the ancient & ornamental woodlands of the New Forest. Forestry Commission, Lyndhurst

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken GF, Spencer JW, Field AB (1999) Plan for the ancient & ornamental woodlands of the New Forest. Forestry Commission, Lyndhurst

    Google Scholar 

  • Rackham O (2003) Ancient woodland. Castlepoint Press, Colvend

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe DA (1977) A nature conservation review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Render M (2002a) Wodland management—the owners’ views. Q J Forestry 96:143–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Render M (2002b) Woodland management—the views of the public. Q J Forestry 96:210–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrick S (2001) Beech, birch or broadleaves—does it matter? In: Render MG (eds) Goodbye to beech—farewell to Fagus? Transnational Woodland Industries Group Report, Oxford, pp 38–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose F, James PW (1974) Regional studies on the British Lichen Flora. 1. The corticolous and lignicolous species of the New Forest, Hampshire. Lichenologist 6:1–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seagrief SC (1959) Pollen diagrams from Southern England: Wareham, Dorset and Nursling. New Phytol 58:316–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tubbs CR (2001) The New Forest. New Forest Ninth Centenary Trust, Lyndhurst

    Google Scholar 

  • UKBAP (1994) Biodiversity: the UK action plan. HMSO, London

  • UNEP (United Nations Environmental Programme) (1992) Convention on biological diversity. United Nations Environmental Programme, Nairobi, Kenya

  • Vandvik V, Heegaard E, Måren IE, Aarrestad PA (2005) Managing heterogeneity: the importance of grazing and environmental variation on post-fire succession in heathlands. J Appl Ecol 42:139–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller MP, Schofield JE (2006) Mid to late Holocene vegetation and land use history in the Weald of South-eastern England: multiple pollen profiles from the Rye area. Veget Hist Archaeobot, published online, DOI: 10.1007/s00334-006-0042-1

  • Watt AS (1923) On the ecology of British beechwoods with special reference to their regeneration. Part I. The cause of failure of natural regeneration of the beech (Fagus silvatica L.) J Ecol 11:1–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb NR (1998) The traditional management of European Heathlands. J Appl Ecol 35:987–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesche S (2003) The implications of climate change for the conservation of beech woodlands and associated flora in the UK. English Nature Research Reports 528, English Nature, Peterborough

Download references

Acknowledgements

Part of this research was funded through a Ph.D. scholarship awarded to MJG jointly by the School of Geography, University of Southampton, and the John Lewis Partnership. Radiocarbon dates were provided by NERC and analysed at the NERC Radiocarbon Laboratory, East Kilbride. We thank Prof. Keith Barber, Dr. Alastair Brown, Tim Daley, Dr. Leanne Franklin-Smith, Dr. Paul Hughes, Dr. Paul Combes, Dr. Jenny Schultz and Sue Way for their assistance during fieldwork. We also thank Dr. Jonathan Spencer of the Forestry Commission for allowing access to carry out fieldwork. We thank Prof. Marie-José Gaillard for the invitation to present this paper at the HITE-PolLandCal Conference in Umeå, Sweden, 13–14 November 2005, and the PolLandCal Network, sponsored by NorFA (Nordic Council of Advanced Studies), for providing financial assistance to participate in the conference. Two anonymous referees are thanked for comments and suggestions that led to the improvement of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Grant.

Additional information

Communicated by M.-J. Gaillard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grant, M.J., Edwards, M.E. Conserving idealized landscapes: past history, public perception and future management in the New Forest (UK). Veget Hist Archaeobot 17, 551–562 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-007-0100-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-007-0100-3

Keywords

Navigation