Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term outcomes after percutaneous cryoablation of abdominal wall endometriosis

  • Vascular-Interventional
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To retrospectively evaluate the long-term outcomes after percutaneous cryoablation of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE).

Method

The Institutional Review Board approved this retrospective observational review of 40 consecutive patients, of a median age of 37 years (interquartile range [IQR] 32–40 years), presenting with a total of 52 symptomatic AWE nodules. All patients underwent cryoablation between January 2013 and May 2022 with a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. Outcomes were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) that measured pain, as well as by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The pain-free survival rates were derived using the Kaplan–Meier estimator. Adverse events were analyzed and graded using the classification system of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe.

Results

The median follow-up time was 40.5 months (IQR 26.5–47.2 months). The median VAS score before cryoablation was 8 (IQR 7–9). Complete relief of symptoms was documented in 80% (32/40) of patients at 3 months after initial cryoablation and correlated with the absence of residual endometriosis nodules on MRI. The median pain-free survival rates were 89.2% [95% CI, 70.1–96.4%] at 36 months and 76.8% [95% CI, 55.3–83.8%] after 60 months. No patient or lesion characteristics were found to be prognostic of failure. No major adverse events or side effects were reported in long term.

Conclusion

Cryoablation safely and effectively afforded long-term pain relief for patients with AWE nodules.

Clinical relevance statement

AWE cryoablation was found to be safe and effective in the long-term.

Key Points

• Cryoablation is highly effective with 80% of patients experiencing complete relief of AWE symptoms after a single procedure.

• Cryoablation is safe without long-term adverse events or side effects.

• The median pain-free survival rates are 89.2% at 36 months and 76.8% at 60 months.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AWE:

Abdominal wall endometriosis

CI:

Confidence interval

CT:

Computed tomography

IQR:

Interquartile range

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

US:

Ultrasound

VAS:

Visual analog scale

References

  1. Carsote M, Terzea DC, Valea A, Gheorghisan-Galateanu AA (2020) Abdominal wall endometriosis (a narrative review). Int J Med Sci 17:536–542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Leite GKC, de Carvalho LFP, Korkes H, Guazzelli TF, Kenj G, de VianaToledo A (2009) Scar endometrioma following obstetric surgical incisions: retrospective study on 33 cases and review of the literature. Sao Paulo Med J. 127:270–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Horton JD, DeZee KJ, Ahnfeldt EP, Wagner M (2008) Abdominal wall endometriosis: a surgeon’s perspective and review of 445 cases. Am J Surg 196:207–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Najdawi M, Razakamanantsoa L, Mousseaux C et al (2023) Resolution of pain after percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of extraperitoneal endometriosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 34:1192–1198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar RR (2021) Spontaneous abdominal wall endometrioma: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 78:180–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang E, Chen GD, Liao YH (2023) Spontaneous abdominal wall endometriosis: a case report and review of the literature. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 62:155–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ideyi SC, Schein M, Niazi M, Gerst PH (2003) Spontaneous endometriosis of the abdominal wall. Dig Surg 20:246–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Raddaoui E, Ameeri S (2010) Abdominal wall endometriosis: a report of 2 cases with primary diagnosis by fine needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 54:214–216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barat M, Dohan A, Kohi M et al (2023) Treatment of adenomyosis, abdominal wall endometriosis and uterine leiomyoma with interventional radiology: A review of current evidences. Diagn Interv Imaging 7:S2211-5684(23)00219-X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2023.11.005

  10. Cornelis F, Petitpierre F, Lasserre AS et al (2014) Percutaneous cryoablation of symptomatic abdominal scar endometrioma: initial reports. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 37:1575–1579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maillot J, Brun JL, Dubuisson V, Bazot M, Grenier N, Cornelis FH (2017) Mid-term outcomes after percutaneous cryoablation of symptomatic abdominal wall endometriosis: comparison with surgery alone in a single institution. Eur Radiol 27:4298–4306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dibble EH, D’Amico KC, Bandera CA, Littrup PJ (2017) Cryoablation of abdominal wall endometriosis: a minimally invasive treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 209:690–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jouffrieau C, Cazzato RL, Gabriele V et al (2023) Percutaneous imaging-guided cryoablation of endometriosis scars of the anterior abdominal wall. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 30:890-896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2023.06.018

  14. Welch BT, Ehman EC, VanBuren WM et al (2020) Percutaneous cryoablation of abdominal wall endometriosis: the Mayo Clinic approach. Abdom Radiol (NY) 45(6):1813–1817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith KA, Welch BT, Kurup AN et al (2022) Feasibility and safety of percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of abdominal wall endometriosis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 47(8):2669–2673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hensen JHJ, Van Breda Vriesman AC, Puylaert JBCM (2006) Abdominal wall endometriosis: clinical presentation and imaging features with emphasis on sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:616–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marcelin C, Brun JL, Caprais J et al (2024) Percutaneous cryoablation of symptomatic uterine adenomyomas: initial experience. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 53:102727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Havez M, Lippa N, Al-Ammari S et al (2014) Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation in inoperable extra-abdominal desmoid tumors: a study of tolerability and efficacy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 37:1500–1506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cornelis F, Neuville A, Labreze C et al (2013) Percutaneous cryotherapy of vascular malformation: initial experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36:853–856

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Filippiadis DK, Binkert C, Pellerin O, Hoffmann RT, Krajina A, Pereira PL (2017) Cirse Quality Assurance Document and Standards for Classification of Complications: The Cirse Classification System. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40:1141–1146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer j45:228–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Barat M, Jannot AS, Dohan A, Soyer P (2022) How to report and compare quantitative variables in a radiology article. Diagn Interv Imaging 103:571–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Littrup PJ, Bang HJ, Currier BP et al (2013) Soft-tissue cryoablation in diffuse locations: feasibility and intermediate term outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol 24:1817–1825

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Cornelis F, Havez M, Lippa N et al (2013) Radiologically guided percutaneous cryotherapy for soft tissue tumours: a promising treatment. Diagn Interv Imaging 94:364–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsoumakidou G, Buy X, Garnon J, Enescu J, Gangi A (2011) Percutaneous thermal ablation: how to protect the surrounding organs. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 14:170–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kujak JL, Liu PT, Johnson GB, Callstrom MR (2010) Early experience with percutaneous cryoablation of extra-abdominal desmoid tumors. Skeletal Radiol 39:175–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao L, Deng Y, Wei Q, Chen J, Zhao C (2018) Comparison of ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation and surgery for abdominal wall endometriosis. Int J Hyperthermia 35:528–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Carrafiello G, Fontana F, Pellegrino C et al (2009) Radiofrequency ablation of abdominal wall endometrioma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32:1300–1303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang Y, Wang W, Wang L, Wang J, Tang J (2011) Ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for abdominal wall endometriosis: preliminary results. Eur J Radiol 79:56–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Callstrom MR, Kurup AN (2009) Percutaneous ablation for bone and soft tissue metastases–why cryoablation? Skeletal Radiol 3:835–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cornelis FH, Labrèze C, Pinsolle V et al (2017) Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation as second-line therapy of soft-tissue venous vascular malformations of extremities: a prospective study of safety and 6-month efficacy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 40:1358–1366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Melis M, Zager JS, Sondak VK (2008) Multimodality management of desmoid tumors: how important is a negative surgical margin? J Surg Oncol. 98:594–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Horton JD, DeZee KJ, Ahnfeldt EP, Wagner M (2008) Abdominal wall endometriosis: a surgeon’s perspective and review of 445 cases. Am J Surg 196:207–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Shafrir AL, Farland LV, Shah DK et al (2018) Risk for and consequences of endometriosis: a critical epidemiologic review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 51:1–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Blanco RG, Parithivel VS, Shah AK, Gumbs MA, Schein M, Gerst PH (2003) 2003 Abdominal wall endometriomas. Am J Surg 185:596–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Reddi Rani P, Soundararaghavan S, Rajaram P (1991) Endometriosis in abdominal scars - review of 27 cases. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 36(3):215–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bektaş H, Bilsel Y, Sari YS et al (2010) Abdominal wall endometrioma; a 10-year experience and brief review of the literature. J Surg Res 164:e77-81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Marras S, Pluchino N, Petignat P et al (2019) Abdominal wall endometriosis: an 11-year retrospective observational cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X 4:100096

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Encalada Soto D, Rassier S, Green IC, Burnett T, Khan Z, Cope A (2022) Endometriosis biomarkers of the disease: an update. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 34:210–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Picod G, Boulanger L, Bounoua F, Leduc F, Duval G (2006) Abdominal wall endometriosis after caesarean section: report of fifteen cases. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 34:8–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Touleimat S, Darwish B, Vassilieff M, Stochino Loi E, Hennetier C, Roman H (2017) Abdominal wall endometriosis following cesarean section: a study of the growth rate of parietal endometriosis implants. Minerva Ginecol 69:440–446

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Razzouk K, Roman H, Chanavaz-Lacheray I, Scotté M, Verspyck E, Marpeau L (2007) Mixed clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma arising in parietal endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest 63:140–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

MSK is funded through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748.

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clément Marcelin.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Francois H. Cornelis, MD, PhD.

Conflict of interest

Francois H. Cornelis is a consultant for GE HealthCare, Varian and IceCure.

The remaining authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Study subjects or cohorts overlap

Some study subjects or cohorts have been previously reported in Maillot J, Brun JL, Dubuisson V, Bazot M, Grenier N, Cornelis FH. Mid-term outcomes after percutaneous cryoablation of symptomatic abdominal wall endometriosis: comparison with surgery alone in a single institution. Eur Radiol. oct 2017;27(10):4298‑306.

Methodology

• retrospective

• cross-sectional study

• observational

• performed at one institution

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marcelin, C., Maas, P., Jambon, E. et al. Long-term outcomes after percutaneous cryoablation of abdominal wall endometriosis. Eur Radiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10689-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10689-5

Keywords

Navigation