Skip to main content
Log in

Quantifying calcium changes in the fetal spine using quantitative susceptibility mapping as extracted from STAGE imaging

  • Musculoskeletal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 15 November 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate calcium deposition in the fetal spine in vivo during the second and third trimesters using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM).

Methods

Fifty-four pregnant women in their second and third trimesters underwent a 2D multi-echo STrategically Acquired Gradient Echo (STAGE) MR imaging protocol at 3T covering the fetal spine. The first echo data was used for QSM processing. A linear regression model was used to assess the correlation between magnetic susceptibility and gestational age (GA). A paired sample t-test was used to compare the consistency of QSM measurements from each sequence.

Results

The magnetic susceptibility of the fetal spine decreased linearly with advancing GA, with a slope of −52.3 parts per billion (ppb)/week and a Pearson correlation coefficient (r) of 0.83 (p < 0.001). In 37 subjects for whom the STAGE local QSM data were available from both flip angles, the average magnetic susceptibility values were −1111 ± 278 ppb and −1081 ± 262 ppb for FA = 8° and FA = 40°, respectively. These means were not statistically different according to a paired sample t-test (p = 0.156).

Conclusions

QSM is a reliable technique for evaluating calcium deposition and bone mineral density of fetal vertebrae. Our results demonstrate an increase in fetal calcium levels as a function of GA. These measures might be able to provide reference values for calcium content in the fetal spine during the second and third trimesters.

Key Points

• Calcium deposition and mineralization in the fetal spine, evaluated by vertebral magnetic susceptibility, increased with advancing gestational age.

• Our results provide reference values for calcium content in the fetal spine during the second and third trimesters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Abbreviations

BMD:

Bone mineral density

FA:

Flip angle

GA:

Gestational age

GRE:

Gradient recalled echo

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

QSM:

Quantitative susceptibility mapping

ROI:

Region of interest

STAGE:

Strategically Acquired Gradient Echo

References

  1. Kaplan KM, Spivak JM, Bendo JA (2005) Embryology of the spine and associated congenital abnormalities. Spine J 5:564–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wynne-Davies R (1975) Congenital vertebral anomalies: aetiology and relationship to spina bifida cystica. J Med Genet 12:280–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schick F, Nagele T, Lutz O, Pfeffer K, Giehl J (1994) Magnetic susceptibility in the vertebral column. J Magn Reson B 103:39–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hopkins JA, Wehrli FW (1997) Magnetic susceptibility measurement of insoluble solids by NMR: magnetic susceptibility of bone. Magn Reson Med 37:494–500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kovacs CS (2011) Calcium and bone metabolism disorders during pregnancy and lactation. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 40:795–826

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gallagher JC, Goldgar D, Moy A (1987) Total bone calcium in normal women: effect of age and menopause status. J Bone Miner Res 2:491–496

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kovacs CS (2014) Bone development and mineral homeostasis in the fetus and neonate: roles of the calciotropic and phosphotropic hormones. Physiol Rev 94:1143–1218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Oyedepo AC, Henshaw DL (1997) Calcification of the lumbar vertebrae during human fetal development. Calcif Tissue Int 61:179–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Roschger P, Grabner BM, Rinnerthaler S et al (2001) Structural development of the mineralized tissue in the human L4 vertebral body. J Struct Biol 136:126–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghassaban K, Liu S, Jiang C, Haacke EM (2019) Quantifying iron content in magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 187:77–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Haacke EM, Liu S, Buch S, Zheng W, Wu D, Ye Y (2015) Quantitative susceptibility mapping: current status and future directions. Magn Reson Imaging 33:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bray TJP, Karsa A, Bainbridge A et al (2019) Association of bone mineral density and fat fraction with magnetic susceptibility in inflamed trabecular bone. Magn Reson Med 81:3094–3107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen Y, Guo Y, Zhang X, Mei Y, Feng Y, Zhang X (2018) Bone susceptibility mapping with MRI is an alternative and reliable biomarker of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Eur Radiol 28:5027–5034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Diefenbach MN, Meineke J, Ruschke S, Baum T, Gersing A, Karampinos DC (2019) On the sensitivity of quantitative susceptibility mapping for measuring trabecular bone density. Magn Reson Med 81:1739–1754

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dimov AV, Liu Z, Spincemaille P, Prince MR, Du J, Wang Y (2018) Bone quantitative susceptibility mapping using a chemical species-specific R2* signal model with ultrashort and conventional echo data. Magn Reson Med 79:121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo Y, Chen Y, Zhang X et al (2019) Magnetic susceptibility and fat content in the lumbar spine of postmenopausal women with varying bone mineral density. J Magn Reson Imaging 49:1020–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo Y, Liu Z, Wen Y et al (2019) Quantitative susceptibility mapping of the spine using in-phase echoes to initialize inhomogeneous field and R2* for the nonconvex optimization problem of fat-water separation. NMR Biomed 32:e4156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ma YJ, Jerban S, Jang H, Chang D, Chang EY, Du J (2020) Quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging of bone: an update. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 11:567417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen Y, Liu S, Wang Y, Kang Y, Haacke EM (2018) STrategically Acquired Gradient Echo (STAGE) imaging, part I: creating enhanced T1 contrast and standardized susceptibility weighted imaging and quantitative susceptibility mapping. Magn Reson Imaging 46:130–139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gharabaghi S, Liu S, Wang Y et al (2020) Multi-echo quantitative susceptibility mapping for Strategically Acquired Gradient Echo (STAGE) imaging. Front Neurosci 14:581474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Haacke EM, Chen Y, Utriainen D et al (2020) STrategically Acquired Gradient Echo (STAGE) imaging, part III: technical advances and clinical applications of a rapid multi-contrast multi-parametric brain imaging method. Magn Reson Imaging 65:15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang Y, Chen Y, Wu D et al (2018) STrategically Acquired Gradient Echo (STAGE) imaging, part II: correcting for RF inhomogeneities in estimating T1 and proton density. Magn Reson Imaging 46:140–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Qu F, Sun T, Chen Y et al (2021) Fetal brain tissue characterization at 1.5 T using STrategically Acquired Gradient Echo (STAGE) imaging. Eur Radiol 31:5586–5594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Loughead JL, Mughal Z, Mimouni F, Tsang RC, Oestreich AE (1990) Spectrum and natural history of congenital hyperparathyroidism secondary to maternal hypocalcemia. Am J Perinatol 7:350–355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stuart C, Aceto T Jr, Kuhn JP, Terplan K (1979) Intrauterine hyperparathyroidism. Postmortem findings in two cases. Am J Dis Child 133:67–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Richa CG, Issa AI, Echtay AS, El Rawas MS (2018) Idiopathic hypoparathyroidism and severe hypocalcemia in pregnancy. Case Rep Endocrinol 2018:8316017

    Google Scholar 

  27. Abdul-Rahman HS, Gdeisat MA, Burton DR, Lalor MJ, Lilley F, Moore CJ (2007) Fast and robust three-dimensional best path phase unwrapping algorithm. Appl Opt 46:6623–6635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schweser F, Deistung A, Lehr BW, Reichenbach JR (2011) Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: an approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism? Neuroimage 54:2789–2807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Haacke EM, Tang J, Neelavalli J, Cheng YC (2010) Susceptibility mapping as a means to visualize veins and quantify oxygen saturation. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:663–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tang J, Liu S, Neelavalli J, Cheng YC, Buch S, Haacke EM (2013) Improving susceptibility mapping using a threshold-based K-space/image domain iterative reconstruction approach. Magn Reson Med 69:1396–1407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Scaal M (2016) Early development of the vertebral column. Semin Cell Dev Biol 49:83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang S, Yuan X, Peng Z et al (2021) Normal fetal development of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine: a postmortem study based on magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 41:989–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Glorieux FH, Salle BL, Travers R, Audra PH (1991) Dynamic histomorphometric evaluation of human fetal bone formation. Bone 12:377–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Trotter M, Hixon BB (1974) Sequential changes in weight, density, and percentage ash weight of human skeletons from an early fetal period through old age. Anat Rec 179:1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ziegler EE, O’Donnell AM, Nelson SE, Fomon SJ (1976) Body composition of the reference fetus. Growth 40:329–341

  36. World Health Organization, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2004) Vitamin and mineral requirements in human nutrition, 2nd edition. World Health Organization, Geneva. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42716/1/9241546123.pdf?ua=1.  Accessed 1 Dec  2016

  37. World Health Organization (2013) Guideline: calcium supplementation in pregnant women. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland

  38. Zhang X, Guo Y, Chen Y et al (2019) Reproducibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping in lumbar vertebra. Quant Imaging Med Surg 9:691–699

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Acquaah F, Robson Brown KA, Ahmed F, Jeffery N, Abel RL (2015) Early trabecular development in human vertebrae: overproduction, constructive regression, and refinement. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 6:67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bonnard GD (1968) Cortical thickness and diaphysial diameter of the metacarpal bones from the age of three months to eleven years. Helv Paediatr Acta 23:445–463

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Rauch F, Schoenau E (2001) The developing bone: slave or master of its cells and molecules? Pediatr Res 50:309–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Rodriguez JI, Palacios J, Rodriguez S (1992) Transverse bone growth and cortical bone mass in the human prenatal period. Biol Neonate 62:23–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Trotter M (1971) The density of bones in the young skeleton. Growth 35:221–231

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the study subjects and their families for consenting to participate in this study. We also thank the radiography staff at the Shandong Provincial Hospital for their help in collecting imaging data. This research was supported, in part, by the Perinatology Research Branch, Division of Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (NICHD/NIH/DHHS); and, in part, with Federal funds from NICHD/NIH/DHHS under Contract No. HHSN275201300006C.

Funding

This work was supported by funds from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81671668).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guangbin Wang or E. Mark Haacke.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Guangbin Wang.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• Prospective

• Observational study

• Performed at one institution

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: Affiliation 2 was incomplete in the original article and has been corrected to read 'Department of Radiology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, C., Ghassaban, K., Song, J. et al. Quantifying calcium changes in the fetal spine using quantitative susceptibility mapping as extracted from STAGE imaging. Eur Radiol 33, 606–614 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09042-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09042-5

Keywords

Navigation