Abstract
Objectives
Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV), developmental spinal canal stenosis, lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration are all common lumbar spine conditions. This study explores the relationship between these entities.
Methods
Five hundred and five patients (254 females, 251 males), mean age 57 ± 13 years, who underwent abdominopelvic CT examinations were studied. Vertebral body cross-sectional area (CSA), spinal canal CSA, width and depth were measured from L1 to L5. The presence of LSTV was documented and the severity of disc/facet joint degeneration graded.
Results
LSTV was present in 155 (31%) of 505 patients, being twice as common in males than in females. After controlling for age, height and weight, vertebral body CSAs from L1 to L5 in male LSTV patients were, on average, 9.8% larger than those in male non-LSTV patients (p < 0.0001 for all) while vertebral body areas at L3 and L4 were 4.5% larger in female LSTV patients than in non-LSTV female patients. Disc degeneration from L2/3 to L5/S1 and facet joint degeneration from L2/3 to L4/5 were more severe in LSTV patients. LSTV Castellvi Type II patients appear to be most prone to disc and facet degeneration.
Conclusions
LSTV patients, and particularly male patients, have an increased vertebral body CSA compared to non-LSTV patients throughout the lumbar spine. LSTV patients also have more severe disc and facet joint degeneration. The increase in vertebral body area may be contributing to the increased lumbar and facet joint degeneration seen in LSTV patients.
Key Points
• LSTV patients have increased vertebral body cross-sectional area throughout their lumbar spine compared to non-LSTV patients. This vertebral body area increase was more pronounced in male patients and also apparent in younger patients with LSTV.
• LSTV patients have increased disc and facet joint degeneration affecting most of the lumbar spine than non-LSTV patients.
• Increased vertebral body area may contribute to the increased lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration seen in LSTV patients.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ANCOVA:
-
Analysis of covariance
- CSA:
-
Cross-sectional area
- LSTV:
-
Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
- SE:
-
Standard error
References
Nardo L, Alizai H, Virayavanich W et al (2012) Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: association with low back pain. Radiology 265:497–503
Griffith JF, Huang J, Law SW et al (2016) Population reference range for developmental lumbar spinal canal size. Quant Imaging Med Surg 6:671–679
Tang M, Yang XF, Yang SW et al (2014) Lumbosacral transitional vertebra in a population-based study of 5860 individuals: prevalence and relationship to low back pain. Eur J Radiol 83:1679–1682
Hanhivaara J, Määttä JH, Niinimäki J, Nevalainen MT (2020) Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae are associated with lumbar degeneration: retrospective evaluation of 3855 consecutive abdominal CT scans. Eur Radiol 30:3409–3416
Mannion AF, Fekete TF, Pacifico D et al (2017) Dural sac cross-sectional area and morphological grade show significant associations with patient-rated outcome of surgery for lumbar central spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 26:2552–2564
Carapuço M, Nóvoa A, Bobola N, Mallo M (2005) Hox genes specify vertebral types in the presomitic mesoderm. Genes Dev 19:2116–2121
Griffith JF (2020) Advanced quantitative spine imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 24:413–427
Link TM, Dören M, Lewing G, Meier N, Heinecke A, Rummeny E (2000) Cross-sectional area of lumbar vertebrae in peri- and postmenopausal patients with and without osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 11:304–309
Junno JA, Paananen M, Karppinen J et al (2015) Age-related trends in vertebral dimensions. J Anat 226:434–439
Mahato NK (2011) Disc spaces, vertebral dimensions, and angle values at the lumbar region: a radioanatomical perspective in spines with L5-S1 transitions: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 15:371–379
Tureli D, Ekinci G, Baltacioglu F (2014) Is any landmark reliable in vertebral enumeration? A study of 3.0-Tesla lumbar MRI comparing skeletal, neural, and vascular markers. Clin Imaging 38:792–796
Luoma K, Vehmas T, Raininko R, Luukkonen R, Riihimäki H (2004) Lumbosacral transitional vertebra: relation to disc degeneration and low back pain. Spine 29:200–205
Aly I, Chapman JR, Oskouian RJ, Loukas M, Tubbs RS (2016) Lumbar ribs: a comprehensive review. Childs Nerv Syst 32:781–785
Tins BJ, Balain B (2016) Incidence of numerical variants and transitional lumbosacral vertebrae on whole-spine MRI. Insights Imaging 7(2):199–203
Funding
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is James F. Griffith.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors has significant statistical expertise.
Jason Chi Shun Leung
The Chinese University of Hong Kong Jockey Club Centre for Osteoporosis Care and Control
Informed consent
Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
Methodology
• prospective
• cross-sectional study
• performed at one institution
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Griffith, J.F., Xiao, F., Hilkens, A. et al. Increased vertebral body area, disc and facet joint degeneration throughout the lumbar spine in patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae. Eur Radiol 32, 6238–6246 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08736-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08736-0