Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Can computed tomography scanning in adults lead to an increased risk of thyroid cancer? A nationwide nested case–control study

  • Computed Tomography
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the association between computed tomography (CT) scanning and newly diagnosed thyroid cancer cases in relation to the confounding effect of the healthcare utilization rate.

Methods

This nested case–control study used the Korean National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort 2002–2015: 3557 adult thyroid cancer cases were matched to 17,785 controls by age, sex, and diagnosis date. Odds ratios (ORs) were estimated for thyroid cancer associated with cumulative exposure to CT scanning > 3 years before cancer diagnosis. Changes in estimated ORs with and without adjustment for outpatient visit frequency were investigated.

Results

ORs for newly diagnosed thyroid cancer increased according to the higher number of total CT scans and thyroid-exposing CT scans (CT scans of the head, neck, or chest compartment; OR and 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 [1.03–1.16] and 1.28 [1.05–1.57], respectively). ORs for thyroid cancer increased according to higher outpatient visit frequency. The association between thyroid cancer incidence and CT scans became insignificant when outpatient visit frequency was adjusted in the models (OR [95% CI], 1.03 [0.97–1.10]: total CT scans, 1.14 [0.93–1.41]: thyroid-exposing CT scans). Subgroup analyses stratified by age, sex, and history of other malignancies did not reveal independent associations between CT scanning and thyroid cancer.

Conclusions

The high incidence of thyroid cancer in adults exposed to ionizing radiation during CT scanning can be largely explained by the confounding effect of the healthcare utilization rate. These effects should be considered to avoid overestimation of the CT scanning–associated risk of thyroid cancer.

Key Points

Studies indicate that diagnostic imaging using low-ionizing radiation may increase risks for thyroid cancer in adults.

• Our findings suggest that the risk for radiation-induced thyroid cancer following CT scanning in adults may have been overestimated in observational studies due to medical surveillance–related biases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

C73:

Code for thyroid cancer (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision)

CCI:

Charlson Comorbidity Index

CI:

Confidence interval

CT:

Computed tomography

ICD-10:

Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision

NA:

Not applicable

NHI:

National Health Insurance

NHIS-NSC:

National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort

NHS:

National Health Screening

OR:

Odds ratio

References

  1. Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A et al (2015) The Global Burden of Cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol 1:505–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Udelsman R, Zhang Y (2014) The epidemic of thyroid cancer in the United States: the role of endocrinologists and ultrasounds. Thyroid 24:472–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Morris LG, Sikora AG, Tosteson TD, Davies L (2013) The increasing incidence of thyroid cancer: the influence of access to care. Thyroid 23:885–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Colbeth HL, Genere N, Hall CB et al (2020) Evaluation of medical surveillance and incidence of post-September 11, 2001, thyroid cancer in World Trade Center-exposed firefighters and emergency medical service workers. JAMA Intern Med. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0950

  5. Li N, Du XL, Reitzel LR, Xu L, Sturgis EM (2013) Impact of enhanced detection on the increase in thyroid cancer incidence in the United States: review of incidence trends by socioeconomic status within the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results registry, 1980-2008. Thyroid 23:103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Horn-Ross PL, Lichtensztajn DY, Clarke CA et al (2014) Continued rapid increase in thyroid cancer incidence in California: trends by patient, tumor, and neighborhood characteristics. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 23:1067–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Seib CD, Sosa JA (2019) Evolving understanding of the epidemiology of thyroid cancer. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 48:23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kitahara CM, Sosa JA (2020) Understanding the ever-changing incidence of thyroid cancer. Nat Rev Endocrinol 16:617–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kitahara CM, Sosa JA (2016) The changing incidence of thyroid cancer. Nat Rev Endocrinol 12:646–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vigneri R, Malandrino P, Vigneri P (2015) The changing epidemiology of thyroid cancer: why is incidence increasing? Curr Opin Oncol 27:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ivanov VK, Kashcheev VV, Chekin SY et al (2012) Radiation-epidemiological studies of thyroid cancer incidence in Russia after the Chernobyl accident (estimation of radiation risks, 1991-2008 follow-up period). Radiat Prot Dosimetry 151:489–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Furukawa K, Preston D, Funamoto S et al (2013) Long-term trend of thyroid cancer risk among Japanese atomic-bomb survivors: 60 years after exposure. Int J Cancer 132:1222–1226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Harvey HB, Brink JA, Frush DP (2015) Informed consent for radiation risk from CT is unjustified based on the current scientific evidence. Radiology 275:321–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tubiana M, Feinendegen LE, Yang C, Kaminski JM (2009) The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. Radiology 251:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Siegel JA, Brooks AL, Fisher DR et al (2019) A critical assessment of the linear no-threshold hypothesis: its validity and applicability for use in risk assessment and radiation protection. Clin Nucl Med 44:521–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Han MA, Kim JH (2018) Diagnostic X-ray exposure and thyroid cancer risk: systematic review and meta-analysis. Thyroid 28:220–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Memon A, Rogers I, Paudyal P, Sundin J (2019) Dental X-rays and the risk of thyroid cancer and meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current epidemiological evidence. Thyroid 29:1572–1593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346:f2360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hong JY, Han K, Jung JH, Kim JS (2019) Association of exposure to diagnostic low-dose ionizing radiation with risk of cancer among youths in South Korea. JAMA Netw Open 2:e1910584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Meulepas JM, Ronckers CM, Smets A et al (2019) Radiation exposure from pediatric CT scans and subsequent cancer risk in the Netherlands. J Natl Cancer Inst 111:256–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Y, Chen Y, Huang H et al (2015) Diagnostic radiography exposure increases the risk for thyroid microcarcinoma: a population-based case-control study. Eur J Cancer Prev 24:439–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shao YH, Tsai K, Kim S, Wu YJ, Demissie K (2020) Exposure to tomographic scans and cancer risks. JNCI Cancer Spectr 4:pkz072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lubin JH, Adams MJ, Shore R et al (2017) Thyroid cancer following childhood low-dose radiation exposure: a pooled analysis of nine cohorts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102:2575–2583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoang JK, Choudhury KR, Eastwood JD et al (2014) An exponential growth in incidence of thyroid cancer: trends and impact of CT imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 35:778–783

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wiltshire JJ, Balasubramanian SP (2015) ‘Diagnostic radiography and thyroid cancer’ - causation or simply an association? Eur J Cancer Prev 24:454–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hall SF, Irish J, Groome P, Griffiths R (2014) Access, excess, and overdiagnosis: the case for thyroid cancer. Cancer Med 3:154–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee J, Lee JS, Park SH, Shin SA, Kim K (2017) Cohort profile: the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC), South Korea. Int J Epidemiol 46:e15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee YK, Hwangbo Y, Lee S et al (2020) Aspirin use is not associated with lower thyroid cancer risk: a nationwide nested case-control study. Thyroid 30:829–837

  29. Lal G, Groff M, Howe JR, Weigel RJ, Sugg SL, Lynch CF (2012) Risk of subsequent primary thyroid cancer after another malignancy: latency trends in a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 19:1887–1896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Veiga LH, Holmberg E, Anderson H et al (2016) Thyroid cancer after childhood exposure to external radiation: an updated pooled analysis of 12 studies. Radiat Res 185:473–484

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Szklo M, Nieto FJ (2014) Epidemiology: beyond the basics. Jones & Bartlett Learning, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  32. Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S et al (2007) Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998. Radiat Res 168:1–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Committee to Assess Health Risks From Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation and National Research Council (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2. The National Academies Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare (1520240) and the National Cancer Center, Korea (1810153).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hyo Soung Cha or Yul Hwangbo.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Yul Hwangbo.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

One of the authors (Sangwon Lee) has significant statistical expertise.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• Retrospective

• Observational

• Performed at one institution

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 58 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, Y.K., Lee, S., Lee, E.K. et al. Can computed tomography scanning in adults lead to an increased risk of thyroid cancer? A nationwide nested case–control study. Eur Radiol 32, 415–423 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08186-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-021-08186-0

Keywords

Navigation