Skip to main content
Log in

Non-strangulated adhesive small bowel obstruction: CT findings predicting outcome of conservative treatment

  • Gastrointestinal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To clarify CT findings that predict outcome of conservative treatment in patients with non-strangulated adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO).

Methods

Unenhanced and contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT studies in 189 patients with adhesive SBO who had initial conservative treatment were reviewed. The CT findings included transition zone, beak signs, maximum bowel diameter, bowel diameter ratio, decreased bowel wall enhancement, increased unenhanced bowel wall attenuation, anterior parietal adhesion, bowel wall thickening, closed-loop obstruction, small bowel feces sign, whirl sign, mesenteric haziness, mesenteric, peritoneal fluid, and submucosal edema. These findings were statistically compared according to the success or failure of treatment.

Results

Conservative treatment succeeded in 144 patients (76.2%) and failed in 45 patients (23.8%). At multivariate analysis, the lack of small bowel feces sign, focal, diffuse mesenteric haziness, and moderate amount of mesenteric fluid were independent findings predicting failure of conservative treatment, with odds ratios of 5.23, 5.5, 13.55, and 4.89, respectively. The presence of all significant findings showed a high specificity of 97.2% with positive likelihood ratio of 8.8. If CT scans showed none of the three significant findings, the negative predictive value was 97.6% and negative likelihood ratio was 0.08.

Conclusions

The lack of small bowel feces sign, focal, diffuse mesenteric haziness, and moderate amount of mesenteric fluid are independent CT findings predicting the failure of conservative treatment in patients with non-strangulated adhesive SBO. The combination of all CT findings suggests the need for surgery; absence of two or all CT findings should suggest an attempt for conservative treatment.

Key Points

• To minimize delayed operation, it is important to identify non-strangulated adhesive small bowel obstruction patients in whom initial conservative treatment is likely to fail.

• The lack of small bowel feces sign, the presence of mesenteric haziness, and a moderate amount of mesenteric fluid are independent factors predicting the failure of conservative treatment in patients with non-strangulated adhesive small bowel obstruction.

• The combination of all three CT findings suggests the need for surgery; absence of two or all three CT findings should suggest an attempt for conservative treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

APCT:

Abdominopelvic CT

CI:

Confidence interval

C-loop:

Closed-loop

ICC:

Interclass correlation coefficient

ĸ:

Cohen’s unweighted kappa

NLR:

Negative likelihood ratio

NPV:

Negative predictive value

OR:

Odds ratio

PLR:

Positive likelihood ratio

PPV:

Positive predictive value

SBO:

Small bowel obstruction

References

  1. Millet I, Ruyer A, Alili C et al (2014) Adhesive small-bowel obstruction: value of CT in identifying findings associated with the effectiveness of nonsurgical treatment. Radiology 273:425–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ten Broek RPG, Issa Y, van Santbrink EJP et al (2013) Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysis. BMJ 347:f5588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hayanga AJ, Bass-Wilkins K, Bulkley GB (2005) Current management of small-bowel obstruction. Adv Surg 39:1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Markogiannakis H, Messaris E, Dardamanis D et al (2007) Acute mechanical bowel obstruction: clinical presentation, etiology, management and outcome. World J Gastroenterol 13:432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zins M, Millet I, Taourel P (2020) Adhesive small bowel obstruction: predictive radiology to improve patient management. Radiology 296:480–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mucha P Jr (1987) Small intestinal obstruction. Surg Clin North Am 67:597–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Komatsu I, Tokuda Y, Shimada G, Jacobs JL, Onodera H (2010) Development of a simple model for predicting need for surgery in patients who initially undergo conservative management for adhesive small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 200:215–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McEntee G, Pender D, Mulvin D et al (1987) Current spectrum of intestinal obstruction. Br J Surg 74:976–980

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mosley JG, Shoaib A (2000) Operative versus conservative management of adhesional intestinal obstruction. Br J Surg 87:368–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fevang BT, Fevang JM, Søreide O, Svanes K, Viste A (2003) Delay in operative treatment among patients with small bowel obstruction. Scand J Surg 92:131–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bender JS, Busuito MJ, Graham C, Allaben RD (1989) Small bowel obstruction in the elderly. Am Surg 55:385–388

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hwang J-Y, Lee JK, Lee JE, Baek SY (2009) Value of multidetector CT in decision making regarding surgery in patients with small-bowel obstruction due to adhesion. Eur Radiol 19:2425–2431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deshmukh SD, Shin DS, Willmann JK, Rosenberg J, Shin L, Jeffrey RB (2011) Non-emergency small bowel obstruction: assessment of CT findings that predict need for surgery. Eur Radiol 21:982–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zielinski MD, Eiken PW, Bannon MP et al (2010) Small bowel obstruction-who needs an operation? A multivariate prediction model. World J Surg 34:910–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pricolo VE, Curley F (2016) CT scan findings do not predict outcome of nonoperative management in small bowel obstruction: retrospective analysis of 108 consecutive patients. Int J Surg 27:88–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chuong AM, Corno L, Beaussier H et al (2016) Assessment of bowel wall enhancement for the diagnosis of intestinal ischemia in patients with small bowel obstruction: value of adding unenhanced CT to contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 280:98–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Megibow AJ, Gordon RB, Whelan CA, Hulnick DH (1992) Closed-loop and strangulating intestinal obstruction: CT signs. Radiology 185:769–775

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sheedy SP, Earnest F 4th, Fletcher JG, Fidler JL, Hoskin TL (2006) CT of small-bowel ischemia associated with obstruction in emergency department patients: diagnostic performance evaluation. Radiology 241:729–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Geffroy Y, Boulay-Coletta I, Jullès M-C, Nakache S, Taourel P, Zins M (2014) Increased unenhanced bowel-wall attenuation at multidetector CT is highly specific of ischemia complicating small-bowel obstruction. Radiology 270:159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jancelewicz T, Vu LT, Shawo AE, Yeh B, Gasper WJ, Harris HW (2009) Predicting strangulated small bowel obstruction: an old problem revisited. J Gastrointest Surg 13:93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khaled W, Millet I, Corno L et al (2018) Clinical relevance of the feces sign in small-bowel obstruction due to adhesions depends on its location. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210:78–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nakashima K, Ishimaru H, Fujimoto T et al (2015) Diagnostic performance of CT findings for bowel ischemia and necrosis in closed-loop small-bowel obstruction. Abdom Radiol 40:1097–1103

    Google Scholar 

  23. Millet I, Boutot D, Faget C et al (2017) Assessment of strangulation in adhesive small bowel obstruction on the basis of combined CT findings: implications for clinical care. Radiology 285:798–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zalcman M, Sy M, Donckier V, Closset J, Gansbeke DV (2000) Helical CT signs in the diagnosis of intestinal ischemia in small-bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:1601–1607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Scrima A, Lubner MG, King S, Pankratz J, Kennedy G, Pickhardt PJ (2017) Value of MDCT and clinical and laboratory data for predicting the need for surgical intervention in suspected small bowel obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208:785–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rondenet C, Millet I, Corno L et al (2020) CT diagnosis of closed loop bowel obstruction mechanism is not sufficient to indicate emergent surgery. Eur Radiol 30:1105–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study has received funding by the Dasol Life Science Inc.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yedaun Lee.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Yedaun Lee.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• retrospective

• observational

• performed at one institution

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J., Lee, Y., Yoon, JH. et al. Non-strangulated adhesive small bowel obstruction: CT findings predicting outcome of conservative treatment. Eur Radiol 31, 1597–1607 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07406-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07406-3

Keywords

Navigation