Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effective dose to patient measurements for flat-detector computed tomography protocols in acute stroke care

  • Vascular-Interventional
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aim was to measure the effective dose of flat-detector CT (FDCT) whole-brain imaging, biphasic FDCT angiography (FDCT-A), and FDCT perfusion (FDCT-P) protocols and compare it to previously reported effective dose values of multidetector CT (MDCT) applications.

Materials

We measured effective dose according to the IRCP 103 using an anthropomorphic phantom equipped with thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Placement was according to anatomical positions of each organ. In total, 60 TLDs (≥ 4 TLDs/organ) were placed into and onto the phantom to account for all relevant organs. Organs within the primary beam were covered with more TLDs. Additionally, we measured dose to the eye lens with two TLDs per eye. Protocols which we routinely use in clinical practice were measured on a biplane angiography system.

Results

The effective dose of the 20-s protocol/7-s protocol for whole-brain imaging was 2.6 mSv/2.4 mSv. The radiation dose to the eye lens was 24/23 mGy. For the biphasic high-/low-dose FDCT-A protocol, the effective dose was 8.9/2.8 mSv respectively. The eye lens dose was 60/14 mGy. The contribution of bolus tracking to the effective dose was 0.66 mSv (assuming average duration of 14 s). The multisweep FDCT-P protocol had an effective dose of 5.9 mSv and an eye lens dose of 46 mGy.

Conclusion

Except for the high-dose biphasic FDCT-A protocol, FDCT applications used in neuroradiology have effective doses, which do not deviate more than 1 mSv from previously reported values for MDCT applications. However, the effective dose to the eye lens in commonly used stroke paradigms exceeds the recommended annual dose twofold.

Key Points

• Flat-detector computed tomography (FDCT) can be used for acute and periinterventional imaging of acute stroke patients and in neurointerventions.

• Except for the high-dose FDCT angiography protocol, the effective doses do not deviate more than 1 mSv from previously reported values for multidetector CT applications.

• Strategies to decrease the effective lens dose especially in younger patients should be evaluated in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FDCT:

Flatpanel-detector CT

FDCT-A:

FDCT angiography

FDCT-P:

FDCT perfusion

MDCT:

Multidetector CT

TLD:

Thermoluminescent dosimeter

References

  1. Psychogios MN, Behme D, Schregel K et al (2017) One-stop management of acute stroke patients: minimizing door-to-reperfusion times. Stroke 48:3152–3155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoelter P, Goelitz P, Lang S et al (2019) Visualization of large vessel occlusion, clot extent, and collateral supply using volume perfusion flat detector computed tomography in acute stroke patients. Acta Radiol 60(11):1504–1511

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brehm A, Tsogkas I, Maier IL et al (2019) One-stop management with perfusion for transfer patients with stroke due to a large-vessel occlusion: feasibility and effects on in-hospital times. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 40(8):1330–1334

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Leyhe JR, Tsogkas I, Hesse AC et al (2017) Latest generation of flat detector CT as a peri-interventional diagnostic tool : a comparative study with multidetector CT. J Neurointerv Surg 9(12):1253–1257. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012866

  5. Lian Y, Xiao J, Ji X et al (2015) Protracted low-dose radiation exposure and cataract in a cohort of Chinese industry radiographers. Occup Environ Med 72(9):640–647

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Elmaraezy A, Morra ME, Mohammed AT et al (2019) Risk of cataract among interventional cardiologists and catheterization lab staff : a systematic review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 90(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  7. Internationalen Strahlenschutzkommission (2007) Veröffentlichungen der Internationalen Strahlenschutzkommission Deutsche Ausgabe herausgegeben vom Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz

  8. Yang P, Niu K, Wu Y et al (2017) Evaluation of collaterals and clot burden using time-resolved C-arm conebeam CT angiography in the angiography suite: a feasibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 38(4):747–752

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Maier XIL, Leyhe XJR, Tsogkas XI et al (2018) Diagnosing early ischemic changes with the latest-generation flat detector CT: a comparative study with multidetector CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39(5):881–886

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Struffert T, Hauer M, Banckwitz R, Köhler C, Royalty K, Doerfler A (2014) Effective dose to patient measurements in flat-detector and multislice computed tomography: a comparison of applications in neuroradiology. Eur Radiol 24(6):1257–1265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin HC, Lai TJ, Tseng HC, Wang CH, Tseng YL, Chen CY (2019) Radiation doses with various body weights of phantoms in brain 128-slice MDCT examination. J Radiat Res 60(4):466–475

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Fiorella D, Turk A, Chaudry I et al (2014) A prospective, multicenter pilot study investigating the utility of flat detector derived parenchymal blood volume maps to estimate cerebral blood volume in stroke patients. J Neurointerv Surg 6(6):451–456

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang P, Niu K, Wu Y et al (2015) New capability for one-stop-shop acute ischemic. Stroke 46(12):3383–3389

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Psychogios M, Schramm P, Frölich AM et al (2013) Alberta stroke program early CT scale evaluation of multimodal computed tomography in predicting clinical outcomes of stroke patients treated with aspiration thrombectomy. Stroke 44(8):2188–2193

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Psychogios M-N, Schramm P, Buhk J et al (2010) Angiographic CT after intravenous contrast agent application: a noninvasive follow-up tool after intracranial angioplasty and stenting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31(10):1886–1891

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schregel K, Tsogkas I, Peter C et al (2018) Outcome prediction using perfusion parameters and collateral scores of multi-phase and single-phase CT angiography in acute stroke: need for one, two, three, or thirty scans? J Stroke 20(3):362–372

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ainsbury EA, Barnard S, Bright S et al (2016) Ionizing radiation induced cataracts: recent biological and mechanistic developments and perspectives for future research. Mutat Res 770(Pt B):238–261

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dauer LT, Ainsbury EA, Dynlacht J et al (2017) Guidance on radiation dose limits for the lens of the eye: overview of the recommendations in NCRP Commentary No. 26. Int J Radiat Biol 93(10):1015–1023

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bolch WE, Dietze G, Petoussi-henss N, Zankl M (2015) Dosimetric models of the eye and lens of the eye and their use in assessing dose coefficients for ocular exposures. Ann ICRP 44(1 Suppl):91–111

  20. Fahrig R, Dixon R, Payne T, Morin RL, Ganguly A, Strobel N (2006) Dose and image quality for a cone-beam C-arm CT system. Med Phys 33(12):4541–4550

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kalender WA, Kyriakou Y (2007) Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Eur Radiol 17(11):2767–2779

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this specific study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuroradiology, Clinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland

    Alex Brehm & Marios-Nikos Psychogios

  2. Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany

    Georg Stamm

  3. Department of Radiology and Medical Physics, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany

    Matthias Lüpke

  4. Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany

    Christian Riedel

  5. Department of Research, Clinic of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    Bram Stieltjes

Authors
  1. Alex Brehm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Georg Stamm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthias Lüpke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christian Riedel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bram Stieltjes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marios-Nikos Psychogios
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Brehm.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Marios-Nikos Psychogios.

Conflict of interest

Grant: Siemens. Comments: research grant with the Department of Neuroradiology (University Medical Center Göttingen); money paid to the institution

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

No informed consent was necessary, because no patients or probands have been included in this study.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was not required because it was a phantom study, not including any patients or animals.

Methodology

• experimental

• performed at one institution

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brehm, A., Stamm, G., Lüpke, M. et al. Effective dose to patient measurements for flat-detector computed tomography protocols in acute stroke care. Eur Radiol 30, 5082–5088 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06891-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06891-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation