Skip to main content
Log in

Bone marrow edema in non-traumatic hip: high accuracy of dual-energy CT with water-hydroxyapatite decomposition imaging

  • Musculoskeletal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT with water-hydroxyapatite (HAP) imaging for bone marrow edema in patients with non-traumatic hip pain.

Methods

Forty patients (mean age, 58 years; 16 male and 24 female) who underwent rapid kVp-switching dual-energy CT and MRI within 1 month between April 2018 and February 2019 with hip pain but no trauma were enrolled. Two radiologists retrospectively evaluated 80 hip joints for the presence, extent (femoral head involved, head and neck, and head to intertrochanter), and severity (mild edema, moderate, severe) of bone marrow edema on dual-energy water-HAP images. Water mass density (mg/cm3) on water-HAP images was determined with region of interest–based quantitative analysis. MRI served as the standard of reference.

Results

Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of readers 1 and 2 for the identification of bone marrow edema in water-HAP images were 85% and 85%, 93% and 73%, and 89% and 79%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.96 for reader 1 and 0.91 for reader 2 for differentiation of the presence of edema from no edema. The optimal water mass density to classify the presence of edema for reader 1 was 951 mg/cm3 with 93% sensitivity and 93% specificity and for reader 2 was 957 mg/cm3 with 80% sensitivity and 80% specificity. The more severe the edema, the higher was the mean water density value (p < 0.035).

Conclusion

Dual-energy water-HAP images showed good diagnostic performance for bone marrow edema in patients with non-traumatic hip pain.

Key Points

• Dual-energy water-HAP imaging depicts bone marrow edema in patients with non-traumatic hip pain and may serve as an alternative to MRI in select patients.

• A cutoff value of 951 mg/cm 3 mean water mass density results in 93% sensitivity and 93% specificity for the detection of bone marrow edema.

• The more severe the bone marrow edema, the higher the mean water density value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AUROC:

Area under the receiver operating characteristic

CI:

Confidence interval

CT:

Computed tomography

CTDI:

Computed tomography dose index

DECT:

Dual-energy computed tomography

HAP:

Hydroxyapatite

ICC:

Interclass correlation coefficient

MR:

Magnetic resonance

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

NPV:

Negative predictive value

PPV:

Positive predictive value

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

ROI:

Region of interest

References

  1. Link TM, Steinbach LS, Ghosh S et al (2003) Osteoarthritis: MR imaging findings in different stages of disease and correlation with clinical findings. Radiology 226:373–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Murphey MD, Foreman KL, Klassen-Fischer MK, Fox MG, Chung EM, Kransdorf MJ (2014) From the radiologic pathology archives imaging of osteonecrosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 34:1003–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kijowski R, Stanton P, Fine J, De Smet A (2006) Subchondral bone marrow edema in patients with degeneration of the articular cartilage of the knee joint. Radiology 238:943–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Taljanovic MS, Graham AR, Benjamin JB et al (2008) Bone marrow edema pattern in advanced hip osteoarthritis: quantitative assessment with magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with clinical examination, radiographic findings, and histopathology. Skeletal Radiol 37:423–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Felson DT, McLaughlin S, Goggins J et al (2003) Bone marrow edema and its relation to progression of knee osteoarthritis. Ann Intern Med 139:330–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iida S, Harada Y, Shimizu K et al (2000) Correlation between bone marrow edema and collapse of the femoral head in steroid-induced osteonecrosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:735–743

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ito H, Matsuno T, Minami A (2006) Relationship between bone marrow edema and development of symptoms in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1761–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ragab Y, Emad Y, Abou-Zeid A (2008) Bone marrow edema syndromes of the hip: MRI features in different hip disorders. Clin Rheumatol 27:475–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mallinson PI, Coupal TM, McLaughlin PD, Nicolaou S, Munk PL, Ouellette HA (2016) Dual-energy CT for the musculoskeletal system. Radiology 281:690–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Booz C, Nöske J, Martin SS et al (2018) Virtual noncalcium dual-energy CT: detection of lumbar disk herniation in comparison with standard gray-scale CT. Radiology 290:446–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu H, Zhang G, Shi L et al (2018) Axial spondyloarthritis: dual-energy virtual noncalcium CT in the detection of bone marrow edema in the sacroiliac joints. Radiology 290:157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kellock TT, Nicolaou S, Kim SS et al (2017) Detection of bone marrow edema in nondisplaced hip fractures: utility of a virtual noncalcium dual-energy CT application. Radiology 284:798–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stevens K, Tao C, Lee S-U et al (2003) Subchondral fractures in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: comparison of radiography, CT, and MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:363–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang CK, Tsai JM, Chuang MT,Wang MT, Huang KY, Lin RM (2013) Bone marrow edema in vertebral compression fractures: detection with dual-energy CT. Radiology 269:525–533

  15. Kaup M, Wichmann JL, Scholtz JE et al (2016) Dual-energy CT–based display of bone marrow edema in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: impact on diagnostic accuracy of radiologists with varying levels of experience in correlation to MR imaging. Radiology 280:510–519

  16. Pache G, Krauss B, Strohm P et al (2010) Dual-energy CT virtual noncalcium technique: detecting posttraumatic bone marrow lesions—feasibility study. Radiology 256:617–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Patino M, Prochowski A, Agrawal MD et al (2016) Material separation using dual-energy CT: current and emerging applications. Radiographics 36:1087–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mendonça PR, Lamb P, Sahani DV (2013) A flexible method for multi-material decomposition of dual-energy CT images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 33:99–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guggenberger R, Gnannt R, Hodler J et al (2012) Diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT for the detection of traumatic bone marrow lesions in the ankle: comparison with MR imaging. Radiology 264:164–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reddy T, McLaughlin P, Mallinson P et al (2015) Detection of occult, undisplaced hip fractures with a dual-energy CT algorithm targeted to detection of bone marrow edema. Emerg Radiol 22:25–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kosmala A, Weng AM, Krauss B, Knop S, Bley TA, Petritsch B (2018) Dual-energy CT of the bone marrow in multiple myeloma: diagnostic accuracy for quantitative differentiation of infiltration patterns. Eur Radiol 28:5083–5090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Akisato K, Nishihara R, Okazaki H et al (2019) Dual-energy CT of material decomposition analysis for detection with bone marrow edema in patients with vertebral compression fractures. Acad Radiol

  23. Kumar V, Abbas AK, Aster JC (2014) Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease, 9th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia

  24. Gartner LP, Hiatt JL (2013) Color atlas and text of histology, 6th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore Philadelphia

  25. Ai S, Qu M, Glazebrook KN et al (2014) Use of dual-energy CT and virtual non-calcium techniques to evaluate post-traumatic bone bruises in knees in the subacute setting. Skeletal Radiol 43:1289–1295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (1992) Photon, electron, proton and neutron interaction data for body tissues (ICRU--46). Bethesda, MD

  27. Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM (1995) Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 additional substances of dosimetric interest. National Inst. of Standards and Technology - Ionizing Radiation Division. Gaithersburg, MD

  28. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Diekhoff T, Hermann K, Pumberger M, Hamm B, Putzier M, Fuchs M (2017) Dual-energy CT virtual non-calcium technique for detection of bone marrow edema in patients with vertebral fractures: a prospective feasibility study on a single-source volume CT scanner. Eur J Radiol 87:59–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Karachalios T, Karantanas AH, Malizos K (2007) Hip osteoarthritis: what the radiologist wants to know. Eur J Radiol 63:36–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Koo K-H, Mont MA, Jones LC (2014) Osteonecrosis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

  32. Malizos KN, Karantanas AH, Varitimidis SE, Dailiana ZH, Bargiotas K, Maris T (2007) Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: etiology, imaging and treatment. Eur J Radiol 63:16–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank research scientist Yunsub Jung and CT application specialist Kyoung-A Um for their technical support and help in preparing the manuscript.

Funding

The authors state that this work has not received any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chankue Park.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Chankue Park.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

One of the authors (Chankue Park) has significant statistical expertise.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• Retrospective

• Observational

• Performed at one institution

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Son, W., Park, C., Jeong, H.S. et al. Bone marrow edema in non-traumatic hip: high accuracy of dual-energy CT with water-hydroxyapatite decomposition imaging. Eur Radiol 30, 2191–2198 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06519-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06519-8

Keywords

Navigation