Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome with magnetic resonance imaging: Three patterns of uterine remnants and related anatomical features and clinical settings

  • Urogenital
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To characterize the anatomical features and clinical settings of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome and correlate them with patterns of uterine involvement.

Methods

Pelvic magnetic resonance images and medical records of 92 MRKH patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were subgrouped by uterine morphology: uterine agenesis, unilateral rudimentary uterus and bilateral rudimentary uteri. Uterine volume, presence of endometrium, location of ovary, endometriosis and pelvic pain were compared among groups.

Results

The mean uterine volume was 33.5 ml (17.5–90.0 ml) for unilateral uterine remnants, and 16.1 ml (3.5–21.5 ml) for bilateral uterine rudiments (p<0.01). The incidence of presence of endometrium (100% vs. 22%, p<0.001), haematometra (56% vs. 3%, p<0.001) and ovarian endometriosis (22% vs. 3%, p<0.01) was significantly increased in the group of unilateral rudimentary uteri as compared with the group of bilateral uterine remnants. Thirty-one patients (38%) showed ectopic ovaries. Pelvic pain was more common in individuals with unilateral rudimentary uterus than those who had no (56% vs. 5%, p<0.01) or bilateral uterine remnants (56% vs. 14%, p<0.05).

Conclusion

MRKH patients with different patterns of uterine involvement may have differentiated anatomical features and clinical settings.

Key Points

• Rudimentary uteri, especially bilateral rudimentary uteri, were quite common in MRKH syndrome.

• Uterine remnants can be relatively large, especially the unilateral rudimentary uterus.

• Presence of endometrium and related complications are not rare in MRKH syndrome.

• Existence of endometrium and complications are more frequent in unilateral rudimentary uterus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MRKH:

Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

References

  1. Patnaik SS, Brazile B, Dandolu V, Ryan PL, Liao J (2015) Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: a historical perspective. Gene 555:33–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Oppelt PG, Lermann J, Strick R, Dittrich R, Strissel P, Rettig I (2012) Malformations in a cohort of 284 women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome (MRKH). Reprod Biol Endocrinol 10:57

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Herlin M, Hojland AT, Petersen MB (2014) Familial occurrence of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet A 164A:2276–2286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pizzo A, Lagana AS, Sturlese E, Retto G, Retto A, De Dominici R (2013) Mayer-rokitansky-kuster-hauser syndrome: embryology, genetics and clinical and surgical treatment. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2013:628717

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bombard DS 2nd, Mousa SA (2014) Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: complications, diagnosis and possible treatment options: a review. Gynecol Endocrinol 30:618–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Behr SC, Qayyum A (2012) Imaging of mullerian duct anomalies. Radiographics 32:E233–E250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rousset P, Raudrant D, Peyron N, Buy JN, Valette PJ, Hoeffel C (2013) Ultrasonography and MRI features of the Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Clin Radiol 68:945–952

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoo RE, Cho JY, Kim SY, Kim SH (2015) A systematic approach to the magnetic resonance imaging-based differential diagnosis of congenital Mullerian duct anomalies and their mimics. Abdom Imaging 40:192–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Londra L, Chuong FS, Kolp L (2015) Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: a review. Int J Womens Health 7:865–870

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rall K, Eisenbeis S, Henninger V, Henes M, Wallwiener D, Bonin M (2015) Typical and atypical associated findings in a group of 346 patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuester-Hauser syndrome. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 28:362–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hall-Craggs MA, Williams CE, Pattison SH, Kirkham AP, Creighton SM (2013) Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 269:787–792

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Preibsch H, Rall K, Wietek BM, Brucker SY, Staebler A, Claussen CD (2014) Clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: diagnosis of associated malformations, uterine rudiments and intrauterine endometrium. Eur Radiol 24:1621–1627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rall K, Barresi G, Wallwiener D, Brucker SY, Staebler A (2013) Uterine rudiments in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome consist of typical uterine tissue types with predominantly basalis-like endometrium. Fertil Steril 99:1392–1399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marsh CA, Will MA, Smorgick N, Quint EH, Hussain H, Smith YR (2013) Uterine remnants and pelvic pain in females with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 26:199–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Allen JW, Cardall S, Kittijarukhajorn M, Siegel CL (2012) Incidence of ovarian maldescent in women with mullerian duct anomalies: evaluation by MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:W381–W385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pan HX, Luo GN (2016) Phenotypic and clinical aspects of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome in a Chinese population: an analysis of 594 patients. Fertil Steril 106:1190–1194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoo RE, Cho JY, Kim SY, Kim SH (2013) Magnetic resonance evaluation of Mullerian remnants in Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Korean J Radiol 14:233–239

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Doyle JO, Laufer MR (2009) Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome with a single septate uterus: a novel anomaly and description of treatment options. Fertil Steril 92:e317–e399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pompili G, Munari A, Franceschelli G, Flor N, Meroni R, Frontino G (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative assessment of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Radiol Med 114:811–826

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Huebner M, Rall K, Brucker SY, Reisenauer C, Siegmann-Luz KC, DeLancey JO (2014) The rectovaginal septum: visible on magnetic resonance images of women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome (Mullerian agenesis). Int Urogynecol J 25:323–327

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Dariane C, Moszkowicz D, Peschaud F (2016) Concepts of the rectovaginal septum: implications for function and surgery. Int Urogynecol J 27:839–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

An abstract containing similar content was accepted for oral presentation at ECR 2017

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jingjing Lu or Lan Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Prof. Jingjing Lu.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Funding

The study was funded by the ‘Excellent Talents of Beijing Dongcheng District program, year 2012 and year 2015’.

Statistics and biometry

No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• retrospective

• observational

• performed at one institution

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Lu, J., Zhu, L. et al. Evaluation of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome with magnetic resonance imaging: Three patterns of uterine remnants and related anatomical features and clinical settings. Eur Radiol 27, 5215–5224 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4919-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4919-4

Keywords

Navigation