Skip to main content
Log in

Volume-assisted estimation of liver function based on Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced MR relaxometry

  • Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To determine whether liver function as determined by indocyanine green (ICG) clearance can be estimated quantitatively from hepatic magnetic resonance (MR) relaxometry with gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA).

Methods

One hundred and seven patients underwent an ICG clearance test and Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced MRI, including MR relaxometry at 3 Tesla. A transverse 3D VIBE sequence with an inline T1 calculation was acquired prior to and 20 minutes post-Gd-EOB-DTPA administration. The reduction rate of T1 relaxation time (rrT1) between pre- and post-contrast images and the liver volume-assisted index of T1 reduction rate (LVrrT1) were evaluated. The plasma disappearance rate of ICG (ICG-PDR) was correlated with the liver volume (LV), rrT1 and LVrrT1, providing an MRI-based estimated ICG-PDR value (ICG-PDRest).

Results

Simple linear regression model showed a significant correlation of ICG-PDR with LV (r = 0.32; p = 0.001), T1post (r = 0.65; p < 0.001) and rrT1 (r = 0.86; p < 0.001). Assessment of LV and consecutive evaluation of multiple linear regression model revealed a stronger correlation of ICG-PDR with LVrrT1 (r = 0.92; p < 0.001), allowing for the calculation of ICG-PDRest.

Conclusions

Liver function as determined using ICG-PDR can be estimated quantitatively from Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced MR relaxometry. Volume-assisted MR relaxometry has a stronger correlation with liver function than does MR relaxometry.

Key Points

Measurement of T1 relaxation times in Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced MR imaging quantifies liver function.

Volume-assisted Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced MR relaxometry has stronger correlation with ICG-PDR than does Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced MR relaxometry.

Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced MR relaxometry may provide robust parameters for detecting and characterizing liver disease.

Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced MR relaxometry may be useful for monitoring liver disease progression.

Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced MR relaxometry has the potential to become a novel liver function index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ICG:

Indocyanine green

Gd-EOB-DTPA:

Gadoxetic acid

LV:

Liver volume

ROI:

Regions of interest

rrT1:

Reduction rate of T1 relaxation times

LVrrT1:

Volume-assisted index of the reduction rate of T1 relaxation times

ICG-PDRest :

Estimated ICG-PDR value

PDR:

Plasma disappearance rate

T1post :

T1 relaxometry measurements 20 min after Gd-EOB-DTPA administration

CPA:

Child-Pugh A

CPB:

Child-Pugh B

CPC:

Child-Pugh C

NLF:

Normal liver function

References

  1. Ribero D, Amisano M, Bertuzzo F et al (2013) Measured versus estimated total liver volume to preoperatively assess the adequacy of the future liver remnant: which method should we use? Ann Surg 258:801–806, discussion 806-807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yigitler C, Farges O, Kianmanesh R, Regimbeau JM, Abdalla EK, Belghiti J (2003) The small remnant liver after major liver resection: how common and how relevant? Liver Transpl 9:S18–S25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Guglielmi A, Ruzzenente A, Conci S, Valdegamberi A, Iacono C (2012) How much remnant is enough in liver resection? Dig Surg 29:6–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burra P, Masier A (2004) Dynamic tests to study liver function. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 8:19–21

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sakka SG (2007) Assessing liver function. Curr Opin Crit Care 13:207–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamm B, Staks T, Muhler A et al (1995) Phase I clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA as a hepatobiliary MR contrast agent: safety, pharmacokinetics, and MR imaging. Radiology 195:785–792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nassif A, Jia J, Keiser M et al (2012) Visualization of hepatic uptake transporter function in healthy subjects by using gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 264:741–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Sou H et al (2009) Liver parenchymal enhancement of hepatocyte-phase images in Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced MR imaging: which biological markers of the liver function affect the enhancement? J Magn Reson Imaging 30:1042–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ryeom HK, Kim SH, Kim JY et al (2004) Quantitative evaluation of liver function with MRI Using Gd-EOB-DTPA. Korean J Radiol 5:231–239

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Verloh N, Haimerl M, Zeman F et al (2014) Assessing liver function by liver enhancement during the hepatobiliary phase with Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced MRI at 3 Tesla. Eur Radiol 24:1013–1019

  11. Kukuk GM, Schaefer SG, Fimmers R et al (2014) Hepatobiliary magnetic resonance imaging in patients with liver disease: correlation of liver enhancement with biochemical liver function tests. Eur Radiol 24:2482–2490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamada A, Hara T, Li F et al (2011) Quantitative evaluation of liver function with use of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 260:727–733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoneyama T, Fukukura Y, Kamimura K et al (2014) Efficacy of liver parenchymal enhancement and liver volume to standard liver volume ratio on Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced MRI for estimation of liver function. Eur Radiol 24:857–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schreckenbach T, Liese J, Bechstein WO, Moench C (2012) Posthepatectomy liver failure. Dig Surg 29:79–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wibmer A, Prusa AM, Nolz R, Gruenberger T, Schindl M, Ba-Ssalamah A (2013) Liver failure after major liver resection: risk assessment by using preoperative Gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3-T MR imaging. Radiology 269:777–786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Paugam-Burtz C, Janny S, Delefosse D et al (2009) Prospective validation of the "fifty-fifty" criteria as an early and accurate predictor of death after liver resection in intensive care unit patients. Ann Surg 249:124–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Manizate F, Hiotis SP, Labow D, Roayaie S, Schwartz M (2010) Liver functional reserve estimation: state of the art and relevance to local treatments. Oncology 78:131–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clavien PA, Petrowsky H, DeOliveira ML, Graf R (2007) Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation. N Engl J Med 356:1545–1559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim T, Murakami T, Hasuike Y et al (1997) Experimental hepatic dysfunction: evaluation by MRI with Gd-EOB-DTPA. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:683–688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shimizu J, Dono K, Gotoh M et al (1999) Evaluation of regional liver function by gadolinium-EOB-DTPA–enhanced MR imaging. Dig Dis Sci 44:1330–1337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. de Graaf W, Hausler S, Heger M et al (2011) Transporters involved in the hepatic uptake of (99m)Tc-mebrofenin and indocyanine green. J Hepatol 54:738–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Leonhardt M, Keiser M, Oswald S et al (2010) Hepatic uptake of the magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA: role of human organic anion transporters. Drug Metab Dispos 38:1024–1028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kubota K, Tamura T, Aoyama N et al (2012) Correlation of liver parenchymal gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid enhancement and liver function in humans with hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Lett 3:990–994

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Utsunomiya T, Shimada M, Hanaoka J et al (2012) Possible utility of MRI using Gd-EOB-DTPA for estimating liver functional reserve. J Gastroenterol 47:470–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Katsube T, Okada M, Kumano S et al (2011) Estimation of liver function using T1 mapping on Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Investig Radiol 46:277–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hashimoto M, Watanabe G (2000) Hepatic parenchymal cell volume and the indocyanine green tolerance test. J Surg Res 92:222–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou XP, Lu T, Wei YG, Chen XZ (2007) Liver volume variation in patients with virus-induced cirrhosis: findings on MDCT. Am J Roentgenol 189:W153–W159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Treier R, Steingoetter A, Fried M, Schwizer W, Boesiger P (2007) Optimized and combined T1 and B1 mapping technique for fast and accurate T1 quantification in contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI. Magn Reson Med 57:568–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chung S, Kim D, Breton E, Axel L (2010) Rapid B1+ mapping using a preconditioning RF pulse with TurboFLASH readout. Magn Reson Med 64:439–446

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The scientific guarantor of this publication is PD Dr. Philipp Wiggermann. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. One of the authors has significant statistical expertise (Florian Zeman). Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study. Methodology: prospective, diagnostic or prognostic study / experimental, performed at one institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Haimerl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haimerl, M., Schlabeck, M., Verloh, N. et al. Volume-assisted estimation of liver function based on Gd-EOB-DTPA–enhanced MR relaxometry. Eur Radiol 26, 1125–1133 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3919-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3919-5

Keywords

Navigation