Abstract
We investigated associations of obesity and tobacco smoking with health-related quality of life (HRQoL), pain, fatigue, and functional impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Furthermore, we explored whether there was an effect modification between these two factors. We included adult SLE patients from the Linköping University Hospital (n = 325) in the present cross-sectional analysis. We further included population-based controls and performed cardinality matching to balance age and sex distributions with cases (n = 224). HRQoL was assessed with the EQ-5D index score; pain, fatigue, and overall SLE-related health state with visual analogue scales (VAS; 0 [best] to 100 [worst]); and functional impairment with the HAQ-DI. Unacceptable outcomes were defined as VAS scores corresponding to the 90th percentile derived from the matched controls. SLE patients reported worse scores than controls in all measures, and approximately 30% experienced unacceptable outcomes. When compared with normal-weight, obese SLE patients reported lower HRQoL, and greater functional impairment and risk of unacceptable pain (OR: 3.2; 95% CI 1.6–6.7) and fatigue (OR: 2.1; 95% CI 1.0–4.3). Similarly, the current smokers reported higher levels of functional impairment and a greater risk of unacceptable pain (OR: 3.8; 95% CI 1.8–8.2) and fatigue (OR: 2.8; 95% CI 1.3–5.9) than never smokers. The associations were independent of age, sex, disease duration, disease activity, and organ damage. There was no evidence of a synergistic effect between increased BMI and smoking on any outcome. In summary, obesity and smoking are risk factors for unacceptable patient-reported outcomes in SLE, regardless of clinical activity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease that can affect most organ systems with a varying degree of severity and exhibits unpredictable disease course patterns. The heterogeneity and the complexity of SLE impose challenges when monitoring patients over time, with discrepancies in disease evaluation reported by healthcare providers and SLE patients being common [1, 2]. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of a patient’s health state requires the measurement of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), to capture highly relevant disease facets which otherwise may be omitted [3].
Even though several drugs used in the management of SLE decrease disease activity, prevent damage progression [4,5,6], and improve patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) [7,8,9,10], a substantial proportion of patients still fail to achieve an optimal health state as per self-reports. Among patients who achieve clinical response to treatment in randomised clinical trial (RCT) settings, up to one third report adverse physical HRQoL outcomes, and one fourth report severe fatigue [11]. In this scenario, non-pharmacological interventions constitute appealing strategies for improving PROs in these patients [12].
Obesity and tobacco smoking are modifiable factors that could be targeted to improve PROs. Obesity has been associated with impaired HRQoL, pain, and fatigue [13,14,15,16]. Using data from two international RCTs, we previously reported associations between obesity and clinically important impairments in physical aspects of HRQoL, fatigue, and social functioning [15]. Despite the large sample size and ethnical diversity of the patients included, this does not necessarily resemble the target population in a real-world setting, as most individuals from clinical practices do not meet the eligibility criteria for RCT programmes [17].
Tobacco smoking has been linked with several detrimental effects, including an increased risk of atherosclerosis [18], cardiovascular events [19], nephritis [19], cutaneous manifestations [20], anti-double stranded DNA positivity [21] and reduced efficacy of hydroxychloroquine and belimumab [22,23,24,25]. The effect of smoking on different PROs is less understood, with some studies conducted in limited study populations reporting associations between smoking and impaired physical HRQoL [26, 27], increased pain, and fatigue [26, 28]. Particularly, there is a scarcity of data from Scandinavian populations, with previous reports primarily addressing fatigue [28]. Furthermore, whether the negative effects of obesity and smoking on PROs are enhanced by co-exposure to both has not been explored in the SLE population.
In the present study, we investigated associations of obesity and tobacco smoking with an extensive set of PROs in patients with SLE from a Swedish referral centre, comprising HRQoL, pain, fatigue, and functional impairment. Furthermore, we explored whether there was an effect modification between these two factors.
Methods
Study design and population
Patients diagnosed with SLE from the Linköping University Hospital meeting the 1982 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) [29] and/or the 2012 Systemic Lupus Erythematosus International Collaborating Clinics Group (SLICC) criteria [30] (n = 325) were included in the present cross-sectional analysis of data captured at visits between January 2008 and September 2021. An extensive characterisation of this cohort was recently published [31]. Among consecutive visits, the first visit with complete demographic, clinical, and patient-reported data was selected for the present analysis. Following this approach, we performed complete case analyses, and no missing data imputation was needed.
The study was conducted in compliance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. Ethical permission for the present investigation was obtained from the Regional Ethics Board in Linköping (ref. M75-08).
Comparisons with controls from the general population
We further collected information on demographics and self-reported outcome measures from population-based controls. Those individuals were required to be adults residing in areas of Östergötland County or the Stockholm Region, with no diagnosis of a rheumatic disease. Data were collected using electronic forms in the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) system, hosted at Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
We performed cardinality matching to balance age and sex distributions between cases and controls, while keeping the total number of SLE cases, using the MatchIt package in R, with optimisation performed by GLPK [32]. The resulting subsample of non-SLE controls (n = 224) was used for comparisons of the different self-reported measures with the SLE cases, as well as for calculating cut-offs for defining unacceptable outcomes (as detailed below). Supplementary Figure S1 shows the flow diagram for the selection of patients and controls.
Body mass index and smoking [Exposures]
For patients, body mass index (BMI) was calculated based on anthropometric measurements performed by certified nurses from the Rheumatology Clinic at the Linköping University Hospital. BMI categories were based on the World Health Organization classification: underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 25 kg/m2), overweight (25 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2), and obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). For comparisons across BMI groups, we defined normal weight as the reference group.
Smoking status was self-reported and categorised as never, former, and current smoker. For comparisons across smoking status groups, we defined never smoker as the reference group.
Patient-reported outcomes
PROs evaluated in this analysis included HRQoL, fatigue, pain, overall SLE-related health state, and functional impairment. HRQoL was assessed using the 3-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L) index scores, derived from the United Kingdom value set [33]. Visual analogue scales (VAS; 0–100) were used to capture self-reported fatigue, pain, and overall SLE-related health state within the preceding 7 days. Higher levels represented more severe fatigue and pain, and more impaired overall SLE-related health state. Functional impairment was evaluated using the Swedish version of the Health Assessment Questionnaires Disability Index (HAQ-DI) [34].
Owing to the lack of validated definitions of unacceptable outcomes using VAS scales in the SLE population, we defined unacceptable outcomes as scores equal to or greater than the 90th percentile derived from the matched subsample of non-SLE controls, i.e., scores corresponding to the 10% among non-SLE population-based individuals reporting worst outcomes. Similar procedures have been previously followed for Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) 36-item Short Form (SF-36) data [11, 35]. The calculated cut-offs were: VAS pain score ≥ 35.1; VAS fatigue score ≥ 60.3; VAS overall SLE-related health state score ≥ 50.6.
Clinical measures
We collected demographic and clinical information for every participant, including age, sex, comorbidities (either directly or using prescribed medications as proxies), disease duration, disease activity, global organ damage, daily glucocorticoid dose and antirheumatic agents prescribed. Disease activity was evaluated using the clinical SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (cSLEDAI-2 K; serology excluded), whereas organ damage was assessed with the SLICC/ACR Damage Index (SDI) [31].
Statistical analysis
We compared categorical variables using the chi-squared test, and distributions of continuous variables using the Mann–Whitney U-test. We further performed multivariable linear regression analysis to adjust for confounders. For binary outcomes, we estimated crude and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). One set of models was adjusted for age and sex, and a subsequent set of models was further adjusted for disease duration, SDI score, and cSLEDAI-2 K score. The same set of confounders was deemed appropriate for both main exposures. We assessed possible synergistic effects between obesity and smoking (effect modification) on the different binary outcomes by estimating measures of interaction on the multiplicative scale for odds ratio, as well as the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) as a measure of additive interaction, using the interactionR package in R [36]. Differences yielding a P value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
We used the R software version 4.2.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) for data management, statistical analyses, and illustrations.
Results
Patient characteristics
Table 1 shows demographics and clinical characteristics of the patients stratified by BMI category, whereas Table 2 shows data stratified by smoking status. Most patients were women of White background. The median age of the cohort was 51 (interquartile range [IQR]: 37–77) years. Furthermore, most patients had adequate disease control, with low median cSLEDAI-2 K scores (0 (IQR: 0–2)) and prednisone equivalent doses (2.5 (IQR: 0.0–5.0) mg/day). Approximately 15% of the individuals were prescribed antidepressants or levothyroxine; no statistically significant differences were observed in the proportions of patients using these medications across BMI or smoking status categories (Supplementary Tables S1–S2).
Comparisons with non-SLE controls
After cardinality matching, a subsample of 224 non-SLE controls was kept (Supplementary Figure S1), which was balanced regarding age and sex with the SLE cases. SLE patients reported lower scores than controls from the general population in all self-reported measures (Supplementary Figure S2; Supplementary Table S3). The proportion of SLE patients reporting unacceptable levels of pain was 32.0%, followed by unacceptable levels of fatigue (27.7%), and unacceptable overall SLE-related health state (26.5%).
Associations between BMI and patient-reported outcomes
In the pooled study population, five patients (1.5%) were classified as underweighted, 111 (34.2%) as overweighted, and 55 (16.9%) as obese (Table 1). Due to the low number of underweighted individuals, statistical comparisons were performed between normal-weight and overweighted or obese individuals.
Compared with normal-weight individuals, obese SLE patients reported higher VAS fatigue scores (50 (IQR: 27–73) versus 32 (IQR: 7–60); p = 0.008), also after adjustments in linear regression models (Fig. 1; Supplementary Table S4). Accordingly, obese patients had 2 times higher odds of reporting unacceptable levels of fatigue (adjusted OR: 2.1; 95% CI 1.0–4.3; p = 0.042; Table 3) relative to normal-weight patients. We did not observe differences between overweighted and normal-weight individuals.
Concerning pain, obese SLE patients reported higher VAS pain scores than both normal-weight and overweighted patients, resulting in higher odds of unacceptable levels of pain compared with the normal-weight group (adjusted OR: 3.2; 95% CI 1.6–6.7; p = 0.001).
Furthermore, obese patients reported lower EQ-5D index scores compared with normal-weight patients (0.73 (IQR: 0.44–0.80) versus 0.78 (IQR: 0.69–0.85); p = 0.014), which was further confirmed in adjusted linear regression models (β coefficient for BMI: – 0.165; p < 0.001; Supplementary Table S4).
Despite no significant differences in VAS overall SLE-related health state score distributions across groups, increasing BMI was associated with impaired SLE-related health in adjusted linear regression models (β coefficient for BMI: 0.166; p = 0.004; Supplementary Table S4). Obesity was associated with two-fold higher odds of severe SLE-related health state compared with normal weight in logistic regression models, but the difference was not statistically significant (Table 3).
Concerning functional impairment, obese individuals reported higher HAQ-DI scores than normal-weight and overweighted individuals, whereas there were no differences between overweighted and normal-weight patients (Fig. 1).
Associations between smoking and patient-reported outcomes
In the pooled study population, 172 individuals (54.8%) were classified as non-smokers, 103 (32.8%) as former smokers, and 39 (12.4%) as current smokers.
When compared with non-smokers, both former and current smokers reported higher VAS fatigue scores (Fig. 2; Supplementary Table S5). In adjusted regression analysis, current smokers had nearly 3 times higher odds of severe fatigue than non-smokers (adjusted OR: 2.8; 95% CI 1.3–5.9; p = 0.006; Table 4).
The current smokers reported higher VAS pain scores than both never smokers and former smokers, resulting in nearly 4 times higher odds of unacceptable levels of pain compared with non-smokers in adjusted models (adjusted OR: 3.8; 95% CI 1.8–8.2; p < 0.001).
Concerning HRQoL, former, but not current, smokers reported slightly lower EQ-5D scores compared with non-smokers (0.73 (IQR: 0.52–0.80) versus 0.76 (IQR: 0.69–0.85); p = 0.014).
The mean VAS overall SLE-related health state scores and the proportion of patients experiencing an unacceptable state were not significantly different across groups.
Finally, we observed a dose − response relationship between smoking status and functional impairment, with former (0.25 (IQR: 0.0–0.88); p = 0.031) and current smokers (IQR: 0.63 (0.19–1.07); p = 0.001) reporting higher HAQ-DI scores than non-smokers (0.13 (IQR: 0.00–0.63)).
Effect modification between BMI and smoking
We next assessed whether the effect of BMI on the different PROs differed according to smoking status, by estimating measures of additive and multiplicative interaction (Supplementary Tables S6–S8). There were no indications of a positive interaction between obesity and smoking status for unacceptable fatigue, unacceptable levels or pain, or unacceptable experience of overall SLE-related health state. Importantly, compared with non-obese and non-smoker individuals, non-obese and smoker, smoker and non-obese, as well as obese and smoker patients presented higher odds of unacceptable levels of pain and fatigue.
Discussion
In a population of SLE patients from the Östergötland County in Sweden, we studied associations between (i) BMI and (ii) tobacco smoking and several PROs, and explored whether there was a synergistic effect between these two exposures. Patients with SLE experienced considerably poorer HRQoL and greater levels of fatigue, pain, and functional impairment compared with population-based non-SLE individuals matched for age, sex, and region of residence. Although disease activity levels did not differ significantly between obese and normal weight patients, obese SLE patients reported lower HRQoL, and higher levels of fatigue, pain, and functional impairment than normal weight individuals. Similarly, the current smokers reported higher levels of fatigue, pain, and functional impairment than never smokers. The observed associations were independent of age, sex, disease duration, disease activity, and organ damage. However, there was no evidence of a synergistic effect between increased BMI and smoking on any of the self-reported outcomes.
Our study adds to a growing body of evidence linking increased BMI with unsatisfactory self-reports in several domains. Consistent with our previous report from a large population from an RCT setting [15], pain, fatigue, and functional impairment were herein amongst the most affected domains in obese compared with normal weight SLE patients. While validation of the cut-offs to signify unacceptable patient experience in SLE populations is needed, our observations collectively underscore the clinical significance of the reported associations, evidenced by the absolute differences > 10 mm in mean VAS pain and fatigue scores between normal weight and obese patients, along with HAQ-DI scores showing differences > 0.22 [37, 38]; these differences exceeded half a standard deviation for each measure [39]. Furthermore, the observations of increasingly unfavourable outcomes with higher BMI, along with previous associations between excess adiposity and worse PROs [16], give lend to a biological plausibility for these associations, and advocate for weight control strategies as potential interventions for improving PROs. Nevertheless, multiple interventions are available for weight management (e.g., diet, physical exercise, pharmacotherapy, surgery, and combinations thereof), each expected to exhibit varying degree of efficacy in improving diverse health-related outcomes [40]. This variability arises, partly, because the effects of some interventions may not be solely mediated through changes in body weight. Consequently, RCTs are essential to estimate the effects of different weight management strategies on various PROs in SLE populations that are at risk of experiencing poor outcomes.
When compared with patients who had not been exposed to tobacco, smokers reported reduced HRQoL and higher levels of fatigue, pain, and functional impairment. The differences were notably more pronounced in current smokers than in those who had quit smoking, resulting in a substantial absolute risk (40–60%) of unacceptable outcomes. Even though we lacked detailed information on smoking, these findings are consistent with previous reports linking pack-years of smoking and poor physical HRQoL [27], further supporting the clinical significance of these associations. Mechanisms through which smoking could increase pain and fatigue include reduced lung and cardiovascular function, skeletal muscle dysfunction, and low-grade systemic inflammation [41, 42]. Furthermore, some evidence supports the hypothesis that smoking contributes to immune dysregulation in SLE, including associations between smoking and (i) occurrence of anti-dsDNA antibodies [21], (ii) increased BAFF [43], and (iii) a reduced effect to hydroxychloroquine [22] and belimumab in SLE [23,24,25], as well as methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis [44, 45]; in the case of biologics, this could presumably be attributed to the generation of anti-drug antibodies [46]. To get a broader and deeper understanding of the pathways involved, gene polymorphism-smoking interaction analyses constitute an appealing approach, as previously attempted for other outcomes [19, 47, 48].
Interestingly, the detrimental associations between obesity or smoking and different PROs remained even in patients who had an adequate disease control. It is worth nothing that such associations with increasing BMI have also been reported after a one-year intervention in an RCT setting [49, 50], collectively suggesting that obese patients and smokers are at risk of experiencing adverse outcomes regardless of the underlying degree of clinical activity. As per the recently released EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological management of SLE and systemic sclerosis, physical exercise and smoking cessation should be regarded as fundamental components of patient care [12]. During a shared decision-making process, we expect that patients may be more motivated to adhere to such interventions, driven by evidence-based information that some of the outcomes that are most relevant for them – such as pain, fatigue, and daily functioning – may improve. We advocate for systematically measuring PROs with validated instruments during clinical visits as a crucial step towards identification of needs and implementation of strategies to address those.
In the interaction analyses, we did not observe a synergistic effect between obesity and smoking on any of the binary outcomes explored. Instead, we could corroborate that even carrying one of the risk factors (being obese and non-smoker, or of normal weight and smoker) was associated with an increased probability of experiencing unacceptable outcomes, particularly pain and fatigue. Overall, these observations provide support for interventions addressing smoking and obesity as a strategy for improving these outcomes where pharmacological agents apparently have limited effects [51, 52]. Although the current evidence on the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions in patients with SLE mostly encompasses unimodal interventions [40], weight control and smoking cessation strategies could be delivered alone or in combination, tailored to the patients’ needs and preferences [12]. Importantly, the optimal target population, setting, delivery method, feasibility, and efficacy of more complex multimodal interventions are heavily underexplored.
Our study has certain limitations. The cross-sectional design prevented us from establishing causality. Furthermore, the number of individuals included was relatively low, hindering statistical power to detect some effects and interactions. Smoking status was self-reported by the patients, and we lacked information on pack-years, creating a risk of misclassification in our analysis. Moreover, we lacked information on heredity and some relevant comorbidities; we mitigated the latter by including comparisons of the use of certain medications, which we used as proxies for comorbid conditions. Finally, even though we adjusted for some demographic and disease-specific covariates, we cannot exclude residual confounding due to socioeconomical variables, such as income and marital status [21, 28, 53]. The study population consisted predominantly of women of White background who received care in an academic centre in mid-Sweden. Given the known impact of social determinants on obesity, tobacco smoking, and disease outcomes, including self-perception of health [54], our findings cannot be considered directly generalisable to all SLE populations.
The strengths of our study include the systematic capture of multiple PROs in routine clinical practice – encompassing HRQoL, fatigue, pain, overall SLE-related health state, and functional impairment –, which, to our knowledge, constitutes the most comprehensive description of PROs in relation to obesity and smoking in a Scandinavian SLE population. A major strength was the high degree of data completeness, which allowed us to perform multivariable regression analyses, despite the relatively limited sample size. The very high coverage of SLE patients from the county of Östergötland in the KLURING cohort, which has been estimated to be ≥ 97% of all cases [31], eliminated the selection bias in our investigation. Furthermore, the inclusion of controls and the use of matching procedures allowed us to perform comparisons between the SLE population and non-SLE population-based individuals and derive cut-offs for unacceptable outcomes specific for our SLE population.
In conclusion, we herein report from a single-centre Swedish academic setting that obese SLE patients experienced lower HRQoL and higher levels of fatigue, pain, and functional impairment than normal weight individuals, and that current smokers experienced higher levels of fatigue, pain, and functional impairment than never smokers. Interventions targeting obesity and smoking, tailored to meet the individual patient’s needs and preferences, may not only improve metabolic and cardiovascular outcomes, but also pain, fatigue, and daily function, disease components which are of particular interest for the patients.
Data availability
Data supporting the findings described in this manuscript are available upon reasonable request.
References
Golder V, Ooi JJY, Antony AS et al (2018) Discordance of patient and physician health status concerns in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 27(3):501–506
Alarcon GS, McGwin G Jr, Brooks K et al (2002) Systemic lupus erythematosus in three ethnic groups. XI. Sources of discrepancy in perception of disease activity: a comparison of physician and patient visual analog scale scores. Arthritis Rheum 47(4):408–13
Bjork M, Dahlstrom O, Wettero J, Sjowall C (2015) Quality of life and acquired organ damage are intimately related to activity limitations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:188
Urowitz MB, Ohsfeldt RL, Wielage RC, Kelton KA, Asukai Y, Ramachandran S (2019) Organ damage in patients treated with belimumab versus standard of care: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 78(3):372–379
Fessler BJ, Alarcon GS, McGwin G Jr et al (2005) Systemic lupus erythematosus in three ethnic groups: XVI. Association of hydroxychloroquine use with reduced risk of damage accrual. Arthritis Rheum 52(5):1473–80
Akhavan PS, Su J, Lou W, Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Fortin PR (2013) The early protective effect of hydroxychloroquine on the risk of cumulative damage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 40(6):831–841
Gomez A, Parodis I (2022) Do biological agents improve health-related quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus? Results from a systematic search of the literature. Autoimmun Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103188
Gomez A, Soukka S, Johansson P, et al. (2020) Use of antimalarial agents is associated with favourable physical functioning in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Med 9 (6):1813
Leong KP, Tan JC-W, Thong BYH et al (2023) Medications impact different aspects of the quality of life of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Int J Rheum Dis 26(1):99–107
Parodis I, Lopez Benavides AH, Zickert A et al (2019) The impact of belimumab and rituximab on health-related quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res 71(6):811–821
Gomez A, Qiu V, Cederlund A et al (2021) Adverse health-related quality of life outcome despite adequate clinical response to treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus. Front Med (Lausanne) 8:651249
Parodis I, Girard-Guyonvarc’h C, Arnaud L et al (2023) EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological management of systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2023-224416
Tamayo T, Fischer-Betz R, Beer S, Winkler-Rohlfing B, Schneider M (2010) Factors influencing the health related quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: long-term results (2001–2005) of patients in the German Lupus Erythematosus Self-Help Organization (LULA Study). Lupus 19(14):1606–1613
Zhu LW, Zhang T, Pan HF, Li XP, Ye DQ (2010) BMI, disease activity, and health-related quality-of-life in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol 29(12):1413–1417
Gomez A, Hani Butrus F, Johansson P et al (2021) Impact of overweight and obesity on patient-reported health-related quality of life in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford) 60(3):1260–1272
Patterson SL, Schmajuk G, Jafri K, Yazdany J, Katz P (2019) Obesity is independently associated with worse patient-reported outcomes in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res 71(1):126–133
Dyball S, Collinson S, Sutton E, McCarthy EM, Bruce IN, Parker B (2021) Lupus clinical trial eligibility in a real-world setting: results from the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-Biologics Register (BILAG-BR). Lupus Sci Med 8(1):07
Tektonidou MG, Kravvariti E, Konstantonis G, Tentolouris N, Sfikakis PP, Protogerou A (2017) Subclinical atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: comparable risk with diabetes mellitus and rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmun Rev 16(3):308–312
Reid S, Hagberg N, Sandling JK et al (2021) Interaction between the STAT4 rs11889341(T) risk allele and smoking confers increased risk of myocardial infarction and nephritis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis 80(9):1183–1189
Arevalo-Bermudez MD, Paradela S, Balboa-Barreiro V, Fonseca E (2020) Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: factors related to cutaneous activity and damage in a cohort of 260 patients from A Coruna, Spain. Lupus 29(9):1021–1030
Barbhaiya M, Tedeschi SK, Lu B et al (2018) Cigarette smoking and the risk of systemic lupus erythematosus, overall and by anti-double stranded DNA antibody subtype, in the Nurses’ Health Study cohorts. Ann Rheum Dis 77(2):196–202
Parisis D, Bernier C, Chasset F, Arnaud L (2019) Impact of tobacco smoking upon disease risk, activity and therapeutic response in systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmun Rev 18(11):102393
Parodis I, Sjowall C, Jonsen A et al (2017) Smoking and pre-existing organ damage reduce the efficacy of belimumab in systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmun Rev 16(4):343–351
Parodis I, Gomez A, Frodlund M et al (2018) Smoking reduces the efficacy of belimumab in mucocutaneous lupus. Expert Opin Biol Ther 18(8):911–920
Gatto M, Saccon F, Zen M et al (2020) Early disease and low baseline damage as predictors of response to belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus in a real-life setting. Arthritis Rheumatol 72(8):1314–1324
Barta Z, Harrison MJ, Wangrangsimakul T et al (2010) Health-related quality of life, smoking and carotid atherosclerosis in white British women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 19(3):231–238
Vordenbaumen S, Kleefisch M, Sokolowski A et al (2023) Beneficial effects associated to a healthy lifestyle in systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross-sectional study. Lupus 32(7):855–863
Pettersson S, Bostrom C, Eriksson K, Svenungsson E, Gunnarsson I, Henriksson EW (2015) Lifestyle habits and fatigue among people with systemic lupus erythematosus and matched population controls. Lupus 24(9):955–965
Hochberg MC (1997) Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 40(9):1725
Petri M, Orbai AM, Alarcon GS et al (2012) Derivation and validation of the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 64(8):2677–2686
Arkema EV, Saleh M, Simard JF, Sjowall C (2023) Epidemiology and damage accrual of systemic lupus erythematosus in central sweden: a single-center population-based cohort study over 14 years from Ostergotland County. ACR Open Rheumatol 5(8):426–432
Niknam BA, Zubizarreta JR (2022) Using cardinality matching to design balanced and representative samples for observational studies. JAMA 327(2):173–174
Dolan P (1997) Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35(11):1095–1108
Ekdahl C, Eberhardt K, Andersson SI, Svensson B (1988) Assessing disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Use of a Swedish version of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. Scand J Rheumatol 17(4):263–71
Druce KL, Jones GT, Macfarlane GJ, Basu N (2015) Patients receiving anti-TNF therapies experience clinically important improvements in RA-related fatigue: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 54(6):964–971
Alli BY (2021) InteractionR: An R package for full reporting of effect modification and interaction. Softw Impacts 10:100147
Wells GA, Tugwell P, Kraag GR, Baker PR, Groh J, Redelmeier DA (1993) Minimum important difference between patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the patient’s perspective. J Rheumatol 20(3):557–560
Pope JE, Khanna D, Norrie D, Ouimet JM (2009) The minimally important difference for the health assessment questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis clinical practice is smaller than in randomized controlled trials. J Rheumatol 36(2):254–259
Farivar SS, Liu H, Hays RD (2004) Half standard deviation estimate of the minimally important difference in HRQOL scores? Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 4(5):515–523
Parodis I, Gomez A, Tsoi A et al (2023) Systematic literature review informing the EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological management of systemic lupus erythematosus and systemic sclerosis. RMD Open 9(3):e003297
Darabseh MZ, Maden-Wilkinson TM, Welbourne G et al (2021) Fourteen days of smoking cessation improves muscle fatigue resistance and reverses markers of systemic inflammation. Sci Rep 11(1):12286
Degens H, Gayan-Ramirez G, van Hees HW (2015) Smoking-induced skeletal muscle dysfunction: from evidence to mechanisms. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 191(6):620–625
Raymond WD, Hamdorf M, Furfaro M, Eilertsen GO, Nossent JC (2021) Smoking associates with increased BAFF and decreased interferon-gamma levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus Sci Med 8(1):e000537
Saevarsdottir S, Wallin H, Seddighzadeh M et al (2011) Predictors of response to methotrexate in early DMARD naive rheumatoid arthritis: results from the initial open-label phase of the SWEFOT trial. Ann Rheum Dis 70(3):469–475
Ling S, Bluett J, Barton A (2018) Prediction of response to methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 14(5):419–429
Brun MK, Goll GL, Jorgensen KK et al (2022) Risk factors for anti-drug antibody formation to infliximab: Secondary analyses of a randomised controlled trial. J Intern Med 292(3):477–491
Cui J, Raychaudhuri S, Karlson EW et al (2020) Interactions between genome-wide genetic factors and smoking influencing risk of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol 72(11):1863–1871
Saghaeian Jazi M, Mohammadi S, Zare Ebrahimabad M et al (2021) Genetic variation in CYP1A1 and AHRR genes increase the risk of systemic lupus erythematosus and exacerbate disease severity in smoker patients. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 35(12):e22916
Borg A, Gomez A, Cederlund A et al (2021) Contribution of abnormal BMI to adverse health-related quality of life outcomes after a 52-week therapy in patients with SLE. Rheumatology 60(9):4205–4217
Borg A, Lindblom J, Gomez A et al (2023) Obesity is associated with pain and impaired mobility despite therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus. Front Med (Lausanne) 10:1247354
Nordmark G, Bengtsson C, Larsson A, Karlsson FA, Sturfelt G, Ronnblom L (2005) Effects of dehydroepiandrosterone supplement on health-related quality of life in glucocorticoid treated female patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmunity 38(7):531–540
Skoglund O, Walhelm T, Thyberg I, Eriksson P, Sjowall C (2022) Fighting fatigue in systemic lupus erythematosus: experience of dehydroepiandrosterone on clinical parameters and patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Med 11(18):5300
Ekblom-Kullberg S, Kautiainen H, Alha P, Leirisalo-Repo M, Miettinen A, Julkunen H (2014) Smoking, disease activity, permanent damage and dsDNA autoantibody production in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol Int 34(3):341–345
Parodis I, Lanata C, Nikolopoulos D, Blazer A, Yazdany J (2023) Reframing health disparities in SLE: A critical reassessment of racial and ethnic differences in lupus disease outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2023.101894
Gomez A, Parodis I, Sjowall C (2022) Obesity and tobacco smoking are independently associated with poor patient-reported outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus from a Swedish Tertiary referral centre. Ann Rheum Dis 81:1402
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Professor Mathilda Björk for her support and expertise, as well as all the clinicians at the Rheumatology Unit in Linköping for their efforts.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institute. This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Rheumatism Association (R-941095 to IP and R-939149 to CS); King Gustaf V’s 80-year Foundation (FAI-2020–0741 to IP and FAI-2020–0663 to CS); Professor Nanna Svartz Foundation (2020–00368 to IP); Swedish Society of Medicine (SLS-974449 to IP); Nyckelfonden (OLL-974804 to IP); Ulla and Roland Gustafsson Foundation (2021–26 to CS); Region Östergötland (ALF Grants; RÖ-932055 to CS); Region Stockholm (FoUI-955483 to IP); and Karolinska Institutet (to IP).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors conceived and designed the study. CS acquired data from SLE patients, whereas all authors acquired data from non-SLE controls. AG performed the analysis under the supervision of IP and CS. All authors interpreted the results, drafted the manuscript, and approved the final version that was submitted for publication. All authors had access to the data and take full responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of all aspects of the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
IP has received research funding and/or honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Elli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Otsuka, and Roche. CS has received speaker’s honoraria from AstraZeneca, Novartis and Bristol-Myers Squibb. AG declares that he has no conflicts of interest related to this work. The funders had no role in the design of the study, the analyses or interpretation of data, or the writing of the manuscript.
Ethical standards
The study was conducted in compliance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. Ethical permission for the present investigation was obtained from the Regional Ethics Board in Linköping (reference: M75-08; date of approval: 2008-05-22).
Congress abstract publication
Data from the current work have been previously presented at one scientific meeting [55].
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gomez, A., Parodis, I. & Sjöwall, C. Obesity and tobacco smoking are independently associated with poor patient-reported outcomes in SLE: a cross-sectional study. Rheumatol Int 44, 851–861 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-024-05546-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-024-05546-z