Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Conventional radiography of the hands and wrists in rheumatoid arthritis. What a rheumatologist should know and how to interpret the radiological findings

  • Review
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the synovial membrane, leading to joint damage and bone destruction. Conventional radiography (CR) of the hands and wrists has been, for many years, the primary imaging modality used to diagnose and monitor RA. On the other hand, many investigators in clinical trials and observational studies used CR of the hands and wrists to demonstrate drug effectiveness and structural damage progression. The purpose of this review is to discuss the evaluation and interpretation of the hands and wrists by CR in RA patients and the radiographic changes occurring in a specific joint. Thus, the literature was reviewed until January 2019 for studies regarding RA radiological evaluation of the hands and wrists, as well as radiological progression using CR. The assessment of joint pathology in RA patients should begin with CR which is the best imaging modality to evaluate any subtle changes occurring at the bone level. Once high-quality radiographs are obtained in appropriate views/projections, then an accurate evaluation can often be made without any further imaging studies. Therefore, CR is a valuable tool for RA screening. It is an easy-to-perform technique and gives important information assisting in differentiating between RA from other arthritides. In contrary CR does not provide good information when early RA changes start to appear, such as synovial inflammation or other soft-tissue structural changes. Nevertheless, it still remains the most commonly used imaging tool in rheumatology and has a number of advantages: it is easily available in most rheumatologists and readily accessible in most patients. It is inexpensive and relatively safe. It provides immediate information and can be interpreted easily by the requested rheumatologist. Finally, the data are reproducible and can be used for serial evaluation and follow-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alamanos Y, Drosos AA (2005) Epidemiology of adult rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmun Rev 4:130–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Drosos AA, Alamanos I, Voulgari PV et al (1997) Epidemiology of adult rheumatoid arthritis in northwest Greece 1987–1995. J Rheumatol 24:2129–2133

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alamanos Y, Voulgari PV, Drosos AA (2006) Incidence and prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis, based on the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria: a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 36:182–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ et al (2010) 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 62:2569–2581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Llopis E, Kroon HM, Acosta J, Bloem JL (2017) Conventional radiology in rheumatoid arthritis. Radiol Clin N Am 55:917–941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Salaffi F, Carotti M, Carlo MD (2016) Conventional radiography in rheumatoid arthritis: new scientific insights and practical application. Int J Clin Exp Med 9:17012–17027

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sommer OJ, Kladosek A, Weiler V, Czembirek H, Boeck M, Stiskal M (2005) Rheumatoid arthritis: a practical guide to state-of-the-art imaging, image interpretation, and clinical implications. Radiographics 25:381–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wakefield RJ, Gibbon WW, Conaghan PG et al (2000) The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography. Arthritis Rheum 43:2762–2770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grassi W, Filippucci E, Farina A, Salaffi F, Cervini C (2001) Ultrasonography in the evaluation of bone erosions. Ann Rheum Dis 60(2):98–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ejbjerg BJ, Vestergaard A, Jacobsen S, Thomsen HS, Ostergaard M (2005) The smallest detectable difference and sensitivity to change of magnetic resonance imaging and radiographic scoring of structural joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis finger, wrist, and toe joints: a comparison of the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score applied to different joint combinations and the Sharp/van der Heijde radiographic score. Arthritis Rheum 52:2300–2306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mcqueen FM, Stewart N, Crabbe J et al (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals progression of erosions despite clinical improvement. Ann Rheum Dis 58:156–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Jans L, de Kock I, Herregods N et al (2018) Dual-energy CT: a new imaging modality for bone marrow oedema in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 77(6):958–960

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee CH, Srikhum W, Burghardt AJ, Virayavanich W, Imboden JB, Link TM et al (2015) Correlation of structural abnormalities of the wrist and metacarpophalangeal joints evaluated by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography, 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and conventional radiographs in rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Rheum Dis 18:628–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hartley RM, Liang MH, Weissman BN, Sosman JL, Katz R, Charlton JR (1984) The value of conventional views and radiographic magnification in evaluating early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 27:744–751

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ostergaard M, Emery P, Conaghan PG et al (2011) Significant improvement in synovitis, osteitis, and bone erosion following golimumab and methotrexate combination therapy as compared with methotrexate alone: a magnetic resonance imaging study of 318 methotrexate-naïve rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Rheum 63(12):3712–3722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Irnbjerg LM, Ostergaard M, Boyesen P et al (2013) Impact of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor treatment on radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis patients in clinical practice: results from the nationwide Danish DANBIO registry. Ann Rheum Dis 72:57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, Kitas GD (2011) Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatol Int 31(11):1409–1417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Loredo RA, Sorge DG, Garcia G (2005) Radiographic evaluation of the wrist: a vanishing art. Semn Roentgenol 40(3):248–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB (2016) Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 388(10055):2023–2038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brower AC (1997) Evaluation of the hand film. In: Brower AC (ed) Arthritis in black and white, 2nd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 33–67

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brower AC (1997) Rheumatoid arthritis. In: Brower AC (ed) Arthritis in black and white, 2nd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 195–224

    Google Scholar 

  22. Resnick D, Kyriakos M, Greenway GD (2002) Rheumatoid arthritis. Diagnosis of bone and joint disorders, 4th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 891–974

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jacobson JA, Girish G, Jiang Y et al (2008) Radiographic evaluation of arthritis: inflammatory conditions. Radiology 248(2):378–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Resnick D, Kransdorf M (2004) Rheumatoid arthritis and the seronegative spondyloarthropathies: radiographic and pathologic concepts Bone and joint imaging, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 220–221

    Google Scholar 

  25. Haugen IK, Cotofana S, Englund M, Kvien TK, Dreher D et al (2012) Hand joint space narrowing and osteophytes are associated with magnetic resonance imaging-defined knee cartilage thickness and radiographic knee osteoarthritis: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. J Rheumatol 39(1):161–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bielefeld T, Neumann DA (2005) The unstable metacarpophalangeal joint in rheumatoid arthritis: anatomy, pathomechanics, and physical rehabilitation considerations. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 35(8):502–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Swagerty DL, Hellinger D (2001) Radiographic assessment of osteoarthritis. Am Fam Physician 64(2):279–287

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ory PA, Gladman D, Mease PJ (2005) Psoriatic arthritis and imaging. Ann Rheum Dis 64:ii55–ii57

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Pelechas E, Kaltsonoudis E, Voulgari PV, Drosos AA (2019) Rheumatoid arthritis. In: Pelechas E (ed) Illustrated handbook of rheumatic and musculo-skeletal diseases. Springer, Cham, pp 45–76

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Markatseli TE, Papagoras C, Drosos AA (2010) Prognostic factors for erosive rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 28:114–123

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Papadopoulos NG, Alamanos Y, Voulgari PV, Epagelis EK, Tsifetaki N, Drosos AA (2005) Does cigarette smoking influence disease expression, activity and severity in early rheumatoid arthritis patients? Clin Exp Rheumatol 23:861–866

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Klareskog L, Stolt P, Lundberg K et al (2006) A new model for an etiology of rheumatoid arthritis: smoking may trigger HLA-DR (shared epitope)-restricted immune reactions to autoantigens modified by citrullination. Arthritis Rheum 54:38–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Eriksson K, Nise L, Alfredsson L et al (2018) Seropositivity combined with smoking is associated with increased prevalence of periodontitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 77:1236–1238

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hedström AK, Stawiarz L, Klareskog L, Alfredsson L (2018) Smoking and susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis in a Swedish population-based case–control study. Eur J Epidemiol 33:415–423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Berglin E, Johansson T, Sundin U et al (2006) Radiological outcome in rheumatoid arthritis is predicted by presence of antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide before and at disease onset, and by IgA-RF at disease onset. Ann Rheum Dis 65:453–458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Markatseli TE, Voulgari PV, Alamanos Y, Drosos AA (2011) Prognostic factors of radiological damage in rheumatoid arthritis: a 10-year retrospective study. J Rheumatol 38:44–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Forslind K, Kälvesten J, Hafström I, Svensson B, BARFOT Study Group (2012) Does digital X-ray radiogrammetry have a role in identifying patients at increased risk for joint destruction in early rheumatoid arthritis? Arthritis Res Ther. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar4058

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Dirven L, Visser K, Klarenbeek NB et al (2012) Towards personalized treatment: predictors of short-term HAQ response in recent-onset active rheumatoid arthritis are different from predictors of rapid radiological progression. Scand J Rheumatol 41:15–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Drosos AA, Karantanas AH, Psychos D, Tsampoulas C, Moutsopoulos HM (1990) Can treatment with methotrexate influence the radiological progression of rheumatoid arthritis? Clin Rheumatol 9:342–345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Drosos AA, Tsifetaki N, Tsiakou EK et al (1997) Influence of methotrexate on radiographic progression in rheumatoid arthritis: a sixty-month prospective study. Clin Exp Rheumatol 15:263–267

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Alarcón GS, López-Méndez A, Walter J et al (1992) Radiographic evidence of disease progression in methotrexate treated and nonmethotrexate disease modifying antirheumatic drug treated rheumatoid arthritis patients: a meta-analysis. J Rheumatol 19:1868–1873

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Drosos AA, Lanchbury JS, Panayi GS, Moutsopoulos HM (1992) Rheumatoid arthritis in Greek and British patients. A comparative clinical, radiologic, and serologic study. Arthritis Rheum 35:745–748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lerd LR, Visser H, Speyer I, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, Zwinderman AH, Breedveld FC, Hazes JM (2001) Early versus delayed treatment in patients with recent-onset rheumatoid arthritis: comparison of two cohorts who received different treatment strategies. Am J Med 111:446–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Van Aken J, Lard LR, Le Cessie S, Hazes JM, Breedveld FC, Huizinga TW (2004) Radiological outcome after four years of early versus delayed treatment strategy in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 63:274–279

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Van Der Heijde D, Van Der Helm-Van Mil AH, Aletaha D et al (2013) EULAR definition of erosive disease in light of the 2010 ACR/EULAR rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria. Ann Rheum Dis 72:479–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Smolen JS, Landewé R, Breedveld FC et al (2014) EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update. Ann Rheum Dis 73:492–509

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Boini S, Guillemin F (2001) Radiographic scoring methods as outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis: properties and advantages. Ann Rheum Dis 60:817–827

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Larsen A, Dale K, Eek M (1977) Radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions by standard reference films. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 18:481–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Sharp JT, Lidsky MD, Collins LC, Moreland J (1971) Methods of scoring the progression of radiologic changes in rheumatoid arthritis. Correlation of radiologic, clinical and laboratory abnormalities. Arthritis Rheum 14:706–720

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sharp JT, Young DY, Bluhm GB et al (1985) How many joints in the hands and wrists should be included in a score of radiologic abnormalities used to assess rheumatoid arthritis? Arthritis Rheum 28:1326–1335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Van Der Heijde D (1999) How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. J Rheumatol 26:743–745

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Van Der Heijde D, Boonen A, Boers M, Kostense P, Van Der Linden S (1999) Reading radiographs in chronological order, in pairs or as single films has important implications for the discriminative power of rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Rheumatol (Oxf) 38:1213–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is dedicated to Professor Haralampos M. Moutsopoulos, Professor/Chair immunology-Medicine Athens Academy, who taught us the beauty and the art of rheumatology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, 45110, Greece

    Alexandros A. Drosos, Eleftherios Pelechas & Paraskevi V. Voulgari

Authors
  1. Alexandros A. Drosos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eleftherios Pelechas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paraskevi V. Voulgari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

No part of the review, including images and graphics, is copied from elsewhere.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandros A. Drosos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Drosos, A.A., Pelechas, E. & Voulgari, P.V. Conventional radiography of the hands and wrists in rheumatoid arthritis. What a rheumatologist should know and how to interpret the radiological findings. Rheumatol Int 39, 1331–1341 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-019-04326-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-019-04326-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation