Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety and efficacy of ocrelizumab in rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Safety and Pharmacovigillance
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We conducted this systematic reviews and meta-analysis to investigate the safety and efficacy of ocrelizumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who exhibited resistance or intolerance to methotrexate or biological therapy. We performed a web-based literature search of PubMed, Google Scholar, EBSCO, Scopus, Embase, and Web of science for studies that compared ocrelizumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate plus placebo in RA patients. Data were extracted from eligible studies and pooled as risk ratios (RR), using RevMan software. Pooling data from four RCTs (2230 patients) showed that ocrelizumab plus methotrexate were superior to methotrexate plus placebo at 24 weeks in terms of improvement on the American college of rheumatology (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70) criteria (p < 0.00001), disease activity score 28-ESR (RR = 3.77, 95% CI [2.47, 5.74], p < 0.00001), and Sharp/van der Heijde radiological score (RR = 1.63, 95% CI [1.43, 1.85], p < 0.00001). These effects were consistent among all ocrelizumab doses. The rates of serious adverse events were comparable between the ocrelizumab and placebo containing groups (RR = 1, 95% CI [0.78, 1.28], p = 0.98). However, infusion related reactions were significantly higher in ocrelizumab group (RR = 2.13, 95% CI [1.69, 2.68], p < 0.00001), compared to placebo group. The combination of ocrelizumab plus methotrexate was superior to methotrexate plus placebo on all clinical and radiographic improvement scales. The incidence of adverse events, including serious adverse events, was comparable between both groups. Future trials should investigate the efficacy of ocrelizumab alone and develop strategies to alleviate its related infusion reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACR:

American college of rheumatology

DAS:

Disease activity score

DMARDs:

Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs

EULAR:

European League of Associations for Rheumatology

HAQ-DI:

Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index

MTX:

Methotrexate

OCR:

Ocrelizumab

RA:

Rheumatoid Arthritis

RTX:

Rituximab

SHS:

Sharp/van der Heijde Score

TNF:

Tumor necrosis factor

References

  1. Sangha O (2000) Epidemiology of rheumatic diseases. 39(Suppl 2):3–12

  2. Smith JB, Haynes MK (2002) Rheumatoid arthritis—a molecular understanding. Ann Intern Med 136:908–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brooks PM (2006) The burden of musculoskeletal disease—a global perspective. Clin Rheumatol 25:778–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smolen JS, Landewé R, Breedveld FC et al (2014) EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update. Ann Rheum Dis 73:492–509. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Metlay JP, Puré E, Steinman RM (1989) Control of the immune response at the level of antigen-presenting cells: a comparison of the function of dendritic cells and B lymphocytes. Adv Immunol 47:45–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Edwards JC, Cambridge G, Abrahams VM (1999) Do self-perpetuating B lymphocytes drive human autoimmune disease? Immunology 97:188–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Dörner T, Burmester GR (2003) The role of B cells in rheumatoid arthritis: mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Curr Opin Rheumatol 15:246–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Emery P, Deodhar A, Rigby WF et al (2010) Efficacy and safety of different doses and retreatment of rituximab: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in patients who are biological naive with active rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate (Study Evaluating Rituximab’s Effi. Ann Rheum Dis 69:1629–1635. doi:10.1136/ard.2009.119933

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Emery P, Fleischmann R, Filipowicz-Sosnowska A et al (2006) The efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment: results of a phase IIB randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial. Arthritis Rheum 54:1390–1400. doi:10.1002/art.21778

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kausar F, Mustafa K, Sweis G et al (2009) Ocrelizumab: a step forward in the evolution of B-cell therapy. Expert Opin Biol Ther 9:889–895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Clark EA, Shu G, Ledbetter JA (1985) Role of the Bp35 cell surface polypeptide in human B-cell activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:1766–1770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Genovese MC, Kaine JL, Lowenstein MB et al (2008) Ocrelizumab, a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a phase I/II randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. Arthritis Rheum 58:2652–2661. doi:10.1002/art.23732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rigby W, Tony H-P, Oelke K et al (2012) Safety and efficacy of ocrelizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a forty-eight–week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase III trial. Arthritis Rheum 64:350–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harigai M, Tanaka Y, Maisawa S et al (2012) Safety and efficacy of various dosages of ocrelizumab in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate therapy: a placebo-controlled double-blind parallel-group study. J Rheumatol 39:486–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tak PP, Mease PJ, Genovese MC et al (2012) Safety and efficacy of ocrelizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to at least one tumor necrosis factor inhibitor: results of a forty-eight-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase III trial. Arthritis Rheum 64:360–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Higgins JP, Green S (2008) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration. doi:10.1002/9780470712184

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Boers M et al (1995) American College of Rheumatology preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 38:727–735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Riel PLCM, van Gestel AM (2000) Clinical outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 59:i28–i31

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fransen J, Van Riel P (2005) The Disease Activity Score and the EULAR response criteria. Clin Exp Rheumatol 23:S93

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maska L, Anderson J, Michaud K (2011) Measures of functional status and quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ), Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ), Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ), Health Assessment Questionnaire II (HAQ-II), Improved Health Assessment Questionnaire (Improved HAQ), and Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life (RAQoL). Arthritis Care Res 63:S4–S13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Van der Heijde D (1999) How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. J Rheumatol 26:743–745

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clin Res 315:629–634. doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7129.469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Boross P, Leusen JHW (2012) Mechanisms of action of CD20 antibodies. Am J Cancer Res 2:676–690

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bossaller L, Rothe A (2013) Monoclonal antibody treatments for rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin Biol Ther 13:1257–1272. doi:10.1517/14712598.2013.811230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bruce SP (2009) Recent developments in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. J Pharm Pract 22:65–74. doi:10.1177/0897190008322290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Buch MH, Emery P (2011) New therapies in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 23:245–251. doi:10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283454124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Edwards JC, Leandro MJ, Cambridge G (2004) Anti-CD20 for rheumatoid arthritis. BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP BRITISH MED ASSOC HOUSE, TAVISTOCK SQUARE, LONDON WC1H 9JR, ENGLAND, pp 25–25

  29. Kappos L, Leppert D, Tinbergen J et al (2012) Risk of infections and malignancies after treatment with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies: ocrelizumab and rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 18:424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Avivi I, Stroopinsky D, Katz T (2013) Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies: beyond B-cells. Blood Rev 27:217–223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Huffstutter JE, Taylor J, Schechtman J et al (2011) Single-versus dual-infusion of B-cell-depleting antibody ocrelizumab in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the phase III FEATURE trial. Int J Clin Rheumatol 6:689–696. doi:10.2217/ijr.11.55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bokarewa M, Lindholm C, Zendjanchi K et al (2007) Efficacy of anti-CD20 treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis resistant to a combination of methotrexate/anti-TNF therapy. Scand J Immunol 66:476–483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stohl W, Gomez-Reino J, Olech E et al (2012) Safety and efficacy of ocrelizumab in combination with methotrexate in MTX-naive subjects with rheumatoid arthritis: the phase III FILM trial. Ann Rheum Dis 71:1289–1296. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200706

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Chirinos-Rojas C, Ilivanova E, Boyd P, others (2008) The safety and efficacy of ocrelizumab; a humanized anti CD20 antibody administered as a single infusion regimen to patients with active rheumatoid arthritis [abstract OP-0250]. EULAR

  35. Genovese MC, Kaine JL, Kohen MD et al (2006) Safety and clinical activity of ocrelizumab (a humanized antibody targeting C D20 + B cells) in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in moderate-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients (pts)(Ph I/II ACTION study). Arthritis Rheum 54:S66–S67

    Google Scholar 

  36. Anandarajah AP (2011) Clinical aspects of rheumatoid arthritis: highlights from the 2010 ACR conference (Part II). Int J 6:393–399

  37. Lee YH, Bae S-C, Song GG (2011) The efficacy and safety of rituximab for the treatment of active rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Rheumatol Int 31:1493–1499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Vital EM, Rawstron AC, Dass S et al (2011) Reduced-dose rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: efficacy depends on degree of B cell depletion. Arthritis Rheum 63:603–608

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kappos L, Li D, Calabresi PA et al (2011) Ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. The Lancet 378:1779–1787

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hauser SL, Comi GC, Hartung H-P, et al (2015) Efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis-results of the interferon-beta-1a-controlled, double-blind, Phase III OPERA I and II studies. In: Multiple Sclerosis Journal. SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD 1 OLIVERS YARD, 55 CITY ROAD, LONDON EC1Y 1SP, ENGLAND, pp 61–62

  41. Morschhauser F, Marlton P, Vitolo U et al (2010) Results of a phase I/II study of ocrelizumab, a fully humanized anti-CD20 mAb, in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. Ann Oncol 21:1870–1876

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mysler EF, Spindler AJ, Guzman R et al (2013) Efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab in active proliferative lupus nephritis: results from a randomized, double-blind, Phase III Study. Arthritis Rheum 65:2368–2379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdelrahman Ibrahim Abushouk.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 33 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 130 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abushouk, A.I., Ahmed, H., Ismail, A. et al. Safety and efficacy of ocrelizumab in rheumatoid arthritis patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatol Int 37, 1053–1064 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-017-3675-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-017-3675-8

Keywords

Navigation