Skip to main content
Log in

A robust optimization approach to enhancing reliability in production planning under non-compliance risks

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
OR Spectrum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Certain regulated industries are monitored by inspections that ensure adherence (compliance) to regulations. These inspections can often be with very short notice and can focus on particular aspects of the business. Failing such inspections can bring great losses to a company; thus, evaluating the risks of failure against various inspection strategies can help it ensure a robust operation. In this paper, we investigate a game-theoretic setup of a production planning problem under uncertainty in which a company is exposed to the risk of failing authoritative inspections due to non-compliance with enforced regulations. In the proposed decision model, the inspection agency is considered an adversary to the company whose production sites are subject to inspections. The outcome of an inspection is uncertain and is modeled as a Bernoulli-distributed random variable whose parameter is the mean of non-compliance probabilities of products produced at the inspected site and, therefore, is a function of production decisions. If a site fails an inspection, then all its products are deemed adulterated and cannot be used, jeopardizing the reliability of the company in satisfying customers’ demand. In the proposed framework, we address two sources of uncertainty facing the company. First, through the adversarial setting, we address the uncertainty arising from the inspection process as the company does not know a priori which sites the agency will choose to inspect. Second, we address data uncertainty via robust optimization. We model products’ non-compliance probabilities as uncertain parameters belonging to polyhedral uncertainty sets and maximize the worst-case expected profit over these sets. We derive tractable and compact formulations in the form of a mixed integer program that can be solved efficiently via readily available standard software. Furthermore, we give theoretical insights into the structure of optimal solutions and worst-case uncertainties. The proposed approach offers the flexibility of matching solutions to the level of conservatism of the decision maker via two intuitive parameters: the anticipated number of sites to be inspected, and the number of products at each site that are anticipated to be at their worst-case non-compliance level. Varying these parameters when solving for the optimal products allocation provides different risk-return tradeoffs and thus selecting them is an essential part of decision makers’ strategy. We believe that the robust approach holds much potential in enhancing reliability in production planning and other similar frameworks in which the probability of random events depends on decision variables and in which the uncertainty of parameters is prevalent and difficult to handle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams C, von Kanel J, Muller S, Pfitzmann B, Ruschka-Taylor S (2007) Optimized enterprise risk management. IBM Syst J 46(2):219–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberger KA (2010) Technologies of compliance: risk and regulation in a digital age. Tex Law Rev 88:670–739

    Google Scholar 

  • Bental A, Nemirovski A (1999) Robust solutions of uncertain linear programs. Oper Res Lett 25:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bental A, Nemirovski A (2000) Robust solutions of linear programming problems contaminated with uncertain data. Math Program 88:411–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bental A, El Ghaoui L, Nemirovski A (2009) Robust optimization. Princeton series in applied mathematics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Beroggi GEG, Wallace WA (1994) Operational risk management: a new paradigm for decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 24(10):1450–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertsimas D, Sim M (2004) The price of robustness. Oper Res 52(1):35–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billinton R, Allan RN (1992) Reliability evaluation of engineering systems: concepts and techniques, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Billinton R, Allan RN (1996) Reliability evaluation of power systems, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • El Ghaoui L, Lebert H (1997) Robust solutions to least-square problems with uncertain data. SIAM J Matrix Anal Appl 18(4):1035–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Ghaoui L, Oustry F, Lebert H (1998) Robust solutions to uncertain semidefinite programs. SIAM J Optim 9:33–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elisseeff A, Pellet J-P, Pratsini E (2010) Causal networks for risk and compliance: methodology and applications. IBM J Res Dev 54(3):6:1–6:12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frigo ML, Anderson RJ (2009) A strategic framework for governance, risk, and compliance. Strateg Finance 44:20–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Facts about current good manufacturing practices (cGMPs), U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2013. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/Manufacturing/ucm169105.htm

  • Graves SC (2022) Manufacturing planning and control. In: Resende M, Paradalos P (eds) Handbook of applied optimizationpp. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 728–746

  • Laumanns M, Pratsini E, Prestwich S, Tiseanu C-S (2010) Production planning for pharmaceutical companies under non-compliance risk. In: Hu B, Morasch K, Pickl S, Siegle M (eds) Operations research proceedings 2010. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 545–550. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20009-0_86

  • Liebenbergm AP, Hoyt RE (2003) The determinants of enterprise risk management: evidence from the appointment of chief risk officers. Risk Manag Insur Rev 6:37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil AJ, Frey R, Embrechts P (2005) Quantitative risk management: concepts, techniques, and tools. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Mula J, Poler R, Garcia-Sabater JP, Lario FC (2006) Models for production planning under uncertainty: a review. Int J Prod Econ 103:271–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller S, Supatgiat C (2007) A quantitative optimization model for dynamic risk-based compliance management. IBM J Res Dev 51:295–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratsini E, Dean D (2005) Regulatory compliance of pharmaceutical supply chains. ERCIM News 60:51–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen M (2008) Corporate integrity: strategic direction for GRC, 2008 GRC drivers, trends, and market directions

  • Sahinidis NV (2004) Optimization under uncertainty: state-of-the-art and opportunities. Comput Chem Eng 28:971–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrijver A (1986) Theory of linear and integer programming. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver EA, Pyke DF, Peterson R (1998) Inventory management and production planning and scheduling, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

  • Soyster A (1973) Convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming. Oper Res 21:1151–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLay L, Rothschild C, Guikema S (2012) Robust adversarial risk analysis: a level-k approach. Decision Anal 9:41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey JM, Vanderbei RJ, Zenios SA (1995) Robust optimization of large-scale systems. Oper Res 43:477–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takriti S, Ahmed S (2004) On robust optimization of two-stage systems. Math Program 99(1):109–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks R, Harel M (2006) An economic game theory model of subcontractor resource allocation behaviour. Constr Manag Econ 24(8):869–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tambe M (2011) Security and game theory: algorithms, deployed systems, lessons learned. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nisan N, Roughgarden T, Tardos E, Vazirani VV (2007) Algorithmic game theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank two anonymous reviewers for their critical comments and valuable recommendations which helped improve this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ban Kawas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kawas, B., Laumanns, M. & Pratsini, E. A robust optimization approach to enhancing reliability in production planning under non-compliance risks. OR Spectrum 35, 835–865 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-013-0339-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-013-0339-2

Keywords

Navigation