Skip to main content
Log in

A probabilistic view on the deterministic mutation–selection equation: dynamics, equilibria, and ancestry via individual lines of descent

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We reconsider the deterministic haploid mutation–selection equation with two types. This is an ordinary differential equation that describes the type distribution (forward in time) in a population of infinite size. This paper establishes ancestral (random) structures inherent in this deterministic model. In a first step, we obtain a representation of the deterministic equation’s solution (and, in particular, of its equilibria) in terms of an ancestral process called the killed ancestral selection graph. This representation allows one to understand the bifurcations related to the error threshold phenomenon from a genealogical point of view. Next, we characterise the ancestral type distribution by means of the pruned lookdown ancestral selection graph and study its properties at equilibrium. We also provide an alternative characterisation in terms of a piecewise-deterministic Markov process. Throughout, emphasis is on the underlying dualities as well as on explicit results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Athreya KB, Ney P (1972) Branching processes. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Athreya SR, Swart JM (2005) Branching-coalescing particle systems. Probab Theory Relat Fields 131:376–414

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Baake E, Wiehe T (1997) Bifurcations in haploid and diploid sequence space models. J Math Biol 35:321–343

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Baake E, Lenz U, Wakolbinger A (2016) The common ancestor type distribution of a \(\varLambda \)-Wright–Fisher process with selection and mutation. Electron Commun Probab 21:1–14

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bürger R (2000) The mathematical theory of selection, recombination, and mutation. Wiley, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford P, Sudbury A (1985) A sample path proof of the duality for stochastically monotone Markov processes. Ann Probab 13:558–565

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cordero F (2017a) The deterministic limit of the Moran model: a uniform central limit theorem. Markov Process Relat Fields 23:313–324

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cordero F (2017b) Common ancestor type distribution: a Moran model and its deterministic limit. Stoch Process Appl 127:590–621

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Crow JF, Kimura M (1956) Some genetic problems in natural populations. In: Neyman J (ed) Proceedings of third Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, vol 4, pp 1–22

  • Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper & Row, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly P, Kurtz TG (1999) Particle representations for measure-valued population models. Ann Probab 27:166–205

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Durrett R (2008) Probability models for DNA sequence evolution, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Eigen M (1971) Self-organization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules. Naturwissenschaften 58:465–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigen M, McCaskill J, Schuster P (1989) The molecular quasi-species. Adv Chem Phys 75:149–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethier SN, Kurtz TG (1986) Markov processes: characterization and convergence. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ewens W (2004) Mathematical population genetics 1: theoretical introduction. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnhead P (2002) The common ancestor at a nonneutral locus. J Appl Probab 39:38–54

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Feller W (1951) Diffusion processes in genetics. In: Neyman J (ed) Proceedings of second Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability 1950. University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, CA, pp 227–246

  • Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Georgii H-O, Baake E (2003) Supercritical multitype branching processes: the ancestral types of typical individuals. Adv Appl Probab 35:1090–1110

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jagers P (1989) General branching processes as Markov fields. Stoch Process Appl 32:183–212

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jagers P (1992) Stabilities and instabilities in population dynamics. J Appl Probab 29:770–780

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen S, Kurt N (2014) On the notion(s) of duality for Markov processes. Probab Surv 11:59–120

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Karlin S, McGregor J (1957) The classification of birth and death processes. Trans Am Math Soc 86:366–400

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Krone SM, Neuhauser C (1997) Ancestral processes with selection. Theor Popul Biol 51:210–237

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz TG (1970) Solutions of ordinary differential equations as limits of pure jump Markov Processes. J Appl Probab 7:49–58

  • Lenz U, Kluth S, Baake E, Wakolbinger A (2015) Looking down in the ancestral selection graph: a probabilistic approach to the common ancestor type distribution. Theor Popul Biol 103:27–37

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liggett TM (2010) Continuous time Markov processes. An introduction. American Mathematical Society, Providence

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Malécot G (1948) Les Mathématiques de l’Hérédité. Masson, Paris

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mano S (2009) Duality, ancestral and diffusion processes in models with selection. Theor Popul Biol 75:164–175

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moran PAP (1958) Random processes in genetics. Math Proc Camb Philos Soc 54:60–71

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Norris JR (1998) Markov chains, 2nd edn. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shiga T, Uchiyama K (1986) Stationary states and their stability of the stepping stone model involving mutation and selection. Probab Theory Relat Fields 73:87–117

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor JE (2007) The common ancestor process for a Wright–Fisher diffusion. Electron J Probab 12:808–847

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wakeley J (2009) Coalescent theory: an introduction. Roberts & Co, Greenwood Village

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1931) Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanini F, Puller V, Brodin J, Albert J, Neher RA (2017) In vivo mutation rates and the landscape of fitness costs of HIV-\(1\). Virus Evol 3:vex003

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

It is our pleasure to thank Anton Wakolbinger and Ute Lenz for stimulating and fruitful discussions. Furthermore, we are grateful to Anton Wakolbinger, Jay Taylor, and an unknown referee for helpful comments on the manuscript. This project received financial support from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Priority Programme SPP 1590 Probabilistic Structures in Evolution, Grant No. BA 2469/5-1, and CRC 1283 Taming Uncertainty, Project C1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellen Baake.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baake, E., Cordero, F. & Hummel, S. A probabilistic view on the deterministic mutation–selection equation: dynamics, equilibria, and ancestry via individual lines of descent. J. Math. Biol. 77, 795–820 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-018-1228-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-018-1228-8

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation