Abstract
A recent result for a reaction-diffusion equation is that a population diffusing at any rate in an environment in which resources vary spatially will reach a higher total equilibrium biomass than the population in an environment in which the same total resources are distributed homogeneously. This has so far been proven by Lou for the case in which the reaction term has only one parameter, \(m(x)\), varying with spatial location \(x\), which serves as both the intrinsic growth rate coefficient and carrying capacity of the population. However, this striking result seems rather limited when applies to real populations. In order to make the model more relevant for ecologists, we consider a logistic reaction term, with two parameters, \(r(x)\) for intrinsic growth rate, and \(K(x)\) for carrying capacity. When \(r(x)\) and \(K(x)\) are proportional, the logistic equation takes a particularly simple form, and the earlier result still holds. In this paper we have established the result for the more general case of a positive correlation between \(r(x)\) and \(K(x)\) when dispersal rate is small. We review natural and laboratory systems to which these results are relevant and discuss the implications of the results to population theory and conservation ecology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amarasekare P (2004) The role of density-dependent dispersal in source-sink dynamics. J Theor Biol 226:159–168
Amezcua AB, Holyoak M (2000) Empirical evidence for predator-prey source-sink dynamics. Ecology 81:3087–3098
Berg H (1983) Random Walks in Biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Boyce MS (1984) Restitution of r- and K-selection as a model of density-dependent natural selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:427–447
Cantrell RS, Cosner C (2003) Spatial ecology via reaction-diffusion equations. Wiley, Chichester
Chase JM, Leibold MA (2003) Ecological Niches. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Cosner C (2014) Reaction-diffusion-advection models for the effects and evolution of dispersal. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst 34:1701–1745
Czaran T (1998) Spatiotemporal Models of Populations and Community Dynamics. Chapman and Hall, London
Dias PC (1996) Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends Ecol Evol 11:326–330
Dockery J, Hutson V, Mischaikow K, Pernarowski M (1998) The evolution of slow dispersal rates: A reaction-diffusion model. J Math Biol 37:61–83
Donahue MJ, Holyoak M, Feng C (2003) Patterns of dispersal and dynamics among habitat patches varying in quality. Am Nat 162:302–317
Hastings A (1983) Can spatial variation alone lead to selection for dispersal? Theor Popul Biol 24:244–251
He XQ, Ni WM (2013) The effects of diffusion and spatial variation in Lotka-Volterra competition-diffusion system I: heterogeneity vs. homogeneity. J Diff Equ 254:528–546
He XQ, Ni WM (in review) Global dynamics of the Lotka-Volterra competition-diffusion system: diffusion and spatial heterogeneity, I
Holt RD (1993) Ecology at the mesoscale: the influence of regional processes on local communities. In: Ricklefs RE, Schluter D (eds) Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 77–88
Holt RD (1997) On the evolutionary stability of sink populations. Evol Ecol 11:723–731
Howe R, Davis WGJ, Mosca V (1991) The demographic significance of sink populations. Biol Conserv 57:239–255
Hsu SB (1978) Limiting behavior for competing species. SIAM J Appl Math 34:760–763
Kadmon R, Allouche O (2007) Integrating the effects of area, isolation, and habitat heterogeneity on species diversity: a unification of island biogeography and niche theory. Am Nat 170:443–454
Kareiva P (1983) Local movements in herbivorous insects: applying a passive diffusion model to mark-recapture field experiments. Ecol Monogr 52:261–282
Keddy PA (1981) Experimental demography of the sand-dune annual, Cakile-Edentula, growing along an environmental gradient in Nova-Scotia. J Ecol 69:615–630
Keddy PA (1982) Population ecology on an environmental gradient - Cakile-Edentula on a sand dune. Oecologia 52:348–355
Lam KY, Ni WM (2012) Uniqueness and complete dynamics in the heterogeneous competition-diffusion systems. SIAM J Appl Math 72:1695–1712
Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967
Loreau M, DeAngelis DL (1997) Source-sink dynamics and the coexistence of species on a single resource. Theor Popul Biol 51:79–93
Lou Y (2006) On the effects of migration and spatial heterogeneity on single and multiple species. J Diff Equ 223:400–426
Luckinbill LS (1978) R and K selection in experimental populations of Escherichia coli. Science 202:1201–1203
Malchow HS, Petrovski V, Venturino E (2008) Spatiotemporal patterns in ecology and epidemiology: theory, models, and simulation. Chapman and Hall/CRC, London
Mallet J (2012) The struggle for existence: how the notion of carrying capacity, K, obscures the links between demography, Darwinian evolution, and speciation. Evol Ecol Res 14:627–665
McLeod SR (1997) Is the concept of carrying capacity useful in variable environments? Oikos 79:529–542
Mouquet N, Loreau M (2002) Coexistence in metacommunities: the regional similarity hypothesis. Am Nat 159:420–426
Mouquet N, Loreau M (2003) Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. Am Nat 162:544–557
Okubo A (1980) Diffusion and ecological problems: mathematical models. Springer, Berlin
Ovaskainen O, Luoto M, Ikonen I, Rekola H, Meyke E, Kuussaari M (2008) An empirical test of a diffusion model: predicting clouded apollo movements in a novel environment. Am Nat 171:610–619
Parry GD (1981) The meaning of r- and K-selection. Oecologia 48:260–264
Pianka ER (1970) On r- and K-selection. Am Nat 104:592–597
Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am Nat 132:652–661
Pulliam HR, Danielson BJ (1991) Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am Nat 137:S50–S66
Ritchie ME (1997) Wildlife and landscape ecology: effects of pattern and scale. Springer, New York
Ritchie ME (2010) Scale, heterogeneity, and the structure and diversity of ecological communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Skellam JG (1951) Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika 38:196–218
Tamburello L, Benedetti-Cecchi L, Masini L, Bulleri F (2013) Habitat heterogeneity promotes the coexistence of exotic seaweeds. Oecologia 172:505–513
Turchin P (1998) Quantitative analysis of movement. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Van Dyken JD, Muller MJI, Mack KML, Desai MM (2013) Spatial population expansion promotes the evolution of cooperation in an experimental prisoners dilemma. Current Biol 23:919–923
Watkinson AR (1985) On the abundance of plants along an environmental gradient. J Ecol 73:569–578
Watkinson AR, Sutherland WJ (1995) Sources, sinks and pseudo-sinks. J Anim Ecol 64:126–130
Wilson HB (2001) The evolution of dispersal from source to sink populations. Evol Ecol Res 3:27–35
Zhang B, Li X, DeAngelis D, Ni WM, Wang G (2015) Effects of dispersal on total biomass in a patchy, heterogeneous system: analysis and experiment. Math Biosci. doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2015.03.005
Acknowledgments
Research supported in part by NSF (USA), NSFC (PRC), “111-Project” (PRC) and “1000 Talents Project” (PRC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DeAngelis, D.L., Ni, WM. & Zhang, B. Dispersal and spatial heterogeneity: single species. J. Math. Biol. 72, 239–254 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-015-0879-y
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-015-0879-y