Skip to main content
Log in

Dispersal and spatial heterogeneity: single species

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A recent result for a reaction-diffusion equation is that a population diffusing at any rate in an environment in which resources vary spatially will reach a higher total equilibrium biomass than the population in an environment in which the same total resources are distributed homogeneously. This has so far been proven by Lou for the case in which the reaction term has only one parameter, \(m(x)\), varying with spatial location \(x\), which serves as both the intrinsic growth rate coefficient and carrying capacity of the population. However, this striking result seems rather limited when applies to real populations. In order to make the model more relevant for ecologists, we consider a logistic reaction term, with two parameters, \(r(x)\) for intrinsic growth rate, and \(K(x)\) for carrying capacity. When \(r(x)\) and \(K(x)\) are proportional, the logistic equation takes a particularly simple form, and the earlier result still holds. In this paper we have established the result for the more general case of a positive correlation between \(r(x)\) and \(K(x)\) when dispersal rate is small. We review natural and laboratory systems to which these results are relevant and discuss the implications of the results to population theory and conservation ecology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amarasekare P (2004) The role of density-dependent dispersal in source-sink dynamics. J Theor Biol 226:159–168

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Amezcua AB, Holyoak M (2000) Empirical evidence for predator-prey source-sink dynamics. Ecology 81:3087–3098

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg H (1983) Random Walks in Biology. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce MS (1984) Restitution of r- and K-selection as a model of density-dependent natural selection. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:427–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell RS, Cosner C (2003) Spatial ecology via reaction-diffusion equations. Wiley, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM, Leibold MA (2003) Ecological Niches. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cosner C (2014) Reaction-diffusion-advection models for the effects and evolution of dispersal. Discrete Contin Dyn Syst 34:1701–1745

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Czaran T (1998) Spatiotemporal Models of Populations and Community Dynamics. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dias PC (1996) Sources and sinks in population biology. Trends Ecol Evol 11:326–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockery J, Hutson V, Mischaikow K, Pernarowski M (1998) The evolution of slow dispersal rates: A reaction-diffusion model. J Math Biol 37:61–83

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Donahue MJ, Holyoak M, Feng C (2003) Patterns of dispersal and dynamics among habitat patches varying in quality. Am Nat 162:302–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings A (1983) Can spatial variation alone lead to selection for dispersal? Theor Popul Biol 24:244–251

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • He XQ, Ni WM (2013) The effects of diffusion and spatial variation in Lotka-Volterra competition-diffusion system I: heterogeneity vs. homogeneity. J Diff Equ 254:528–546

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • He XQ, Ni WM (in review) Global dynamics of the Lotka-Volterra competition-diffusion system: diffusion and spatial heterogeneity, I

  • Holt RD (1993) Ecology at the mesoscale: the influence of regional processes on local communities. In: Ricklefs RE, Schluter D (eds) Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 77–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt RD (1997) On the evolutionary stability of sink populations. Evol Ecol 11:723–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe R, Davis WGJ, Mosca V (1991) The demographic significance of sink populations. Biol Conserv 57:239–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu SB (1978) Limiting behavior for competing species. SIAM J Appl Math 34:760–763

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kadmon R, Allouche O (2007) Integrating the effects of area, isolation, and habitat heterogeneity on species diversity: a unification of island biogeography and niche theory. Am Nat 170:443–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva P (1983) Local movements in herbivorous insects: applying a passive diffusion model to mark-recapture field experiments. Ecol Monogr 52:261–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddy PA (1981) Experimental demography of the sand-dune annual, Cakile-Edentula, growing along an environmental gradient in Nova-Scotia. J Ecol 69:615–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddy PA (1982) Population ecology on an environmental gradient - Cakile-Edentula on a sand dune. Oecologia 52:348–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam KY, Ni WM (2012) Uniqueness and complete dynamics in the heterogeneous competition-diffusion systems. SIAM J Appl Math 72:1695–1712

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, DeAngelis DL (1997) Source-sink dynamics and the coexistence of species on a single resource. Theor Popul Biol 51:79–93

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lou Y (2006) On the effects of migration and spatial heterogeneity on single and multiple species. J Diff Equ 223:400–426

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Luckinbill LS (1978) R and K selection in experimental populations of Escherichia coli. Science 202:1201–1203

  • Malchow HS, Petrovski V, Venturino E (2008) Spatiotemporal patterns in ecology and epidemiology: theory, models, and simulation. Chapman and Hall/CRC, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallet J (2012) The struggle for existence: how the notion of carrying capacity, K, obscures the links between demography, Darwinian evolution, and speciation. Evol Ecol Res 14:627–665

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod SR (1997) Is the concept of carrying capacity useful in variable environments? Oikos 79:529–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouquet N, Loreau M (2002) Coexistence in metacommunities: the regional similarity hypothesis. Am Nat 159:420–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouquet N, Loreau M (2003) Community patterns in source-sink metacommunities. Am Nat 162:544–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okubo A (1980) Diffusion and ecological problems: mathematical models. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ovaskainen O, Luoto M, Ikonen I, Rekola H, Meyke E, Kuussaari M (2008) An empirical test of a diffusion model: predicting clouded apollo movements in a novel environment. Am Nat 171:610–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry GD (1981) The meaning of r- and K-selection. Oecologia 48:260–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianka ER (1970) On r- and K-selection. Am Nat 104:592–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am Nat 132:652–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR, Danielson BJ (1991) Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am Nat 137:S50–S66

  • Ritchie ME (1997) Wildlife and landscape ecology: effects of pattern and scale. Springer, New York

  • Ritchie ME (2010) Scale, heterogeneity, and the structure and diversity of ecological communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Skellam JG (1951) Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika 38:196–218

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Tamburello L, Benedetti-Cecchi L, Masini L, Bulleri F (2013) Habitat heterogeneity promotes the coexistence of exotic seaweeds. Oecologia 172:505–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turchin P (1998) Quantitative analysis of movement. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyken JD, Muller MJI, Mack KML, Desai MM (2013) Spatial population expansion promotes the evolution of cooperation in an experimental prisoners dilemma. Current Biol 23:919–923

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkinson AR (1985) On the abundance of plants along an environmental gradient. J Ecol 73:569–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkinson AR, Sutherland WJ (1995) Sources, sinks and pseudo-sinks. J Anim Ecol 64:126–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson HB (2001) The evolution of dispersal from source to sink populations. Evol Ecol Res 3:27–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Li X, DeAngelis D, Ni WM, Wang G (2015) Effects of dispersal on total biomass in a patchy, heterogeneous system: analysis and experiment. Math Biosci. doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2015.03.005

Download references

Acknowledgments

Research supported in part by NSF (USA), NSFC (PRC), “111-Project” (PRC) and “1000 Talents Project” (PRC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei-Ming Ni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DeAngelis, D.L., Ni, WM. & Zhang, B. Dispersal and spatial heterogeneity: single species. J. Math. Biol. 72, 239–254 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-015-0879-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-015-0879-y

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation