Abstract
Introduction
Dabrafenib and trametinib are currently administered at fixed doses, at which interpatient variability in exposure is high. The aim of this study was to investigate whether drug exposure is related to efficacy and toxicity in a real-life cohort of melanoma patients treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib.
Patients and methods
An observational study was performed in which pharmacokinetic samples were collected as routine care. Using estimated dabrafenib Area Under the concentration–time Curve and trametinib trough concentrations (Cmin), univariable and multivariable exposure–response analyses were performed.
Results
In total, 140 patients were included. Dabrafenib exposure was not related to either progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Trametinib exposure was related to survival, with Cmin ≥ 15.6 ng/mL being identified as the optimal threshold. Median OS was significantly longer in patients with trametinib Cmin ≥ 15.6 ng/mL (22.8 vs. 12.6 months, P = 0.003), with a multivariable hazard ratio of 0.55 (95% CI 0.36–0.85, P = 0.007). Median PFS in patients with trametinib Cmin levels ≥ 15.6 ng/mL (37%) was 10.9 months, compared with 6.0 months for those with Cmin below this threshold (P = 0.06). Multivariable analysis resulted in a hazard ratio of 0.70 (95% CI 0.47–1.05, P = 0.082). Exposure to dabrafenib and trametinib was not related to clinically relevant toxicities.
Conclusions
Overall survival of metastasized melanoma patients with trametinib Cmin levels ≥ 15.6 ng/mL is ten months longer compared to patients with Cmin below this threshold. This would theoretically provide a rationale for therapeutic drug monitoring of trametinib. Although a high proportion of patients are underexposed, there is very little scope for dose increments due to the risk of serious toxicity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data are available upon reasonable request by contacting the corresponding author.
References
Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, Stephens P, Edkins S, Clegg S et al (2002) Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 417:949–954
The Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2015) Genomic classification of cutaneous melanoma. Cell 161:1681–1696
Rozeman EA, Dekker TJA, Haanen JBAG, Blank CU (2018) Advanced melanoma: current treatment options, biomarkers, and future perspectives. Am J Clin Dermatol 19:303–317
Ouellet D, Gibiansky E, Leonowens C, O’Hagan A, Haney P, Switzky J et al (2014) Population pharmacokinetics of dabrafenib, a BRAF inhibitor: effect of dose, time, covariates, and relationship with its metabolites. J Clin Pharmacol 54:696–706
Ouellet D, Kassir N, Chiu J, Mouksassi MS, Leonowens C, Cox D et al (2016) Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response of trametinib, a MEK inhibitor, in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 77:807–817
Verheijen RB, Yu H, Schellens JHM, Beijnen JH, Steeghs N, Huitema ADR (2017) Practical recommendations for therapeutic drug monitoring of kinase inhibitors in oncology. Clin Pharmacol Ther 102:765–776
Menzies AM, Ashworth MT, Swann S, Kefford RF, Flaherty K, Weber J et al (2015) Characteristics of pyrexia in BRAFV600E/K metastatic melanoma patients treated with combined dabrafenib and trametinib in a phase I/II clinical trial. Ann Oncol 26:415–421
Balakirouchenane D, Guegan S, Csajka C, Jouinot A, Heidelberger V, Puszkiel A et al (2020) Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 58:1–19
Rousset M, Dutriaux C, Bosco-Lévy P, Prey S, Pham-Ledard A, Dousset L et al (2017) Trough dabrafenib plasma concentrations can predict occurrence of adverse events requiring dose reduction in metastatic melanoma. Clin Chim Acta 472:26–29
Kim HY, Duong JK, Gonzalez M, Long GV, Menzies AM, Rizos H et al (2019) Pharmacokinetic and cytokine profiles of melanoma patients with dabrafenib and trametinib-induced pyrexia. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 83:693–704
Herbrink M, De Vries N, Rosing H, Huitema ADR, Nuijen B, Schellens JHM et al (2018) Development and validation of a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry analytical method for the therapeutic drug monitoring of eight novel anticancer drugs. Biomed Chromatogr 32:1–9
Wang Y, Chia Y, Nedelman J, Schran H, Mahon F, Molimard M (2009) A therapeutic drug monitoring algorithm for refining the imatinib trough level obtained at different sampling times. Ther Drug Monit 31:579–584
Janssen JM, Dorlo TPC, Beijnen JH, Huitema ADR (2020) Evaluation of extrapolation methods to predict trough concentrations to guide therapeutic drug monitoring of oral anticancer drugs. Ther Drug Monit 42:532 (ePub ahead of print 5 May 2020)
Infante JR, Fecher LA, Falchook GS, Nallapareddy S, Gordon MS, Becerra C et al (2012) Safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and efficacy data for the oral MEK inhibitor trametinib: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet 13:773–781
Summary of product characteristics dabrafenib. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/tafinlar-epar-productinformation_en.pdf
Schemper M, Smith TL (1996) A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. Control Clin Trials 17:343–346
R Core Development Team (2016) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Found Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.r-project.org/
Falchook GS, Lewis KD, Infante JR, Gordon MS, Vogelzang NJ, DeMarini DJ et al (2012) Activity of the oral MEK inhibitor trametinib in patients with advanced melanoma: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet Oncol 13:782–789
Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). European medicines. Trametinib European Public Assessment Report. 2014. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/mekinist-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf
Gilmartin AG, Bleam MR, Groy A, Moss KG, Minthorn EA, Kulkarni SG et al (2011) GSK1120212 (JTP-74057) is an inhibitor of MEK activity and activation with favorable pharmacokinetic properties for sustained in vivo pathway inhibition. Clin Cancer Res 17:989–1000
Corcoran RB, Settleman J, Engelman JA (2011) Potential therapeutic strategies to overcome acquired resistance to BRAF or MEK inhibitors in BRAF mutant cancers. Oncotarget 2:336–346
Hatzivassiliou G, Song K, Yen I, Brandhuber BJ, Anderson DJ, Alvarado R et al (2010) RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth. Nature 464:431–435
Heidorn SJ, Milagre C, Whittaker S, Nourry A, Niculescu-Duvas I, Dhomen N et al (2010) Kinase-dead BRAF and oncogenic RAS cooperate to drive tumor progression through CRAF. Cell 140:209–221
Poulikakos PI, Zhang C, Bollag G, Shokat KM, Rosen N (2010) RAF inhibitors transactivate RAF dimers and ERK signalling in cells with wild-type BRAF. Nature 464:427–430
Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. European Medicines Agency. European Public Assessment Report Dabrafenib. 2013. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/tafinlar-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf
Falchook GS, Long GV, Kurzrock R, Kim KB, Arkenau HT, Brown MP et al (2014) Dose selection, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (GSK2118436). Clin Cancer Res 20:4449–4458
Wollenberg L, Marchand M, Merdjan H, Litwiler K (2018) Development of a population pharmacokinetic model for binimetinib with subsequent exposure-response analyses in NRAS mutant melanoma. Am Conf Pharmacometr:T-051
Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. European Medicines Agency. European Public Assessment Report Binimetinib. 2018. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/mektovi-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2022
Schadendorf D, Long GV, Stroiakovski D, Karaszewska B, Hauschild A, Levchenko E et al (2017) Three-year pooled analysis of factors associated with clinical outcomes across dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy phase 3 randomised trials. Eur J Cancer 82:45–55
Funding
No funding has been received for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No author has received support for the work in this manuscript. JBAGH served as a consultant advisor for Achilles Therapeutics, AIMM, Amgen, BioNTech, BMS, Bayer, Celsius Therapeutics, Gadeta, GSK, Ipsen, Immunocore, MSD, Merck Serono, Neogene Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Third Rock Ventures and Vaximm, and received research funding from BMS, BioNTech, Novartis and MSD. CUB served as a consultant advisor for BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, GSK, AZ, Pfizer, Lilly, GenMab, Pierre Fabre and Third Rock Ventures, received research funding from BMS, Novartis and Nanostring, reports stock ownership of Uniti Cars and is cofounder of Immagene B.V. JHB is a part-time employee, shareholder and patent holder of Modra Pharmaceuticals (a spin-out company developing oral taxane formulations, not related to this work). NS served as a consultant advisor for AIMM Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ellipses Pharma, and received research funding for the institute from AB Science, Abbvie, Actuate Therapeutics, Amgen, Array, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cantargia, CellCentric, Cytovation, Deciphera, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merus, Molecular Partners, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Taiho, Takeda (outside the submitted work). All remaining authors have declared no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Groenland, S.L., Janssen, J.M., Nijenhuis, C.M. et al. Exposure–response analyses of BRAF- and MEK-inhibitors dabrafenib plus trametinib in melanoma patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 91, 447–456 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04517-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04517-8