Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exposure–response analyses of BRAF- and MEK-inhibitors dabrafenib plus trametinib in melanoma patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Dabrafenib and trametinib are currently administered at fixed doses, at which interpatient variability in exposure is high. The aim of this study was to investigate whether drug exposure is related to efficacy and toxicity in a real-life cohort of melanoma patients treated with dabrafenib plus trametinib.

Patients and methods

An observational study was performed in which pharmacokinetic samples were collected as routine care. Using estimated dabrafenib Area Under the concentration–time Curve and trametinib trough concentrations (Cmin), univariable and multivariable exposure–response analyses were performed.

Results

In total, 140 patients were included. Dabrafenib exposure was not related to either progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Trametinib exposure was related to survival, with Cmin ≥ 15.6 ng/mL being identified as the optimal threshold. Median OS was significantly longer in patients with trametinib Cmin ≥ 15.6 ng/mL (22.8 vs. 12.6 months, P = 0.003), with a multivariable hazard ratio of 0.55 (95% CI 0.36–0.85, P = 0.007). Median PFS in patients with trametinib Cmin levels ≥ 15.6 ng/mL (37%) was 10.9 months, compared with 6.0 months for those with Cmin below this threshold (P = 0.06). Multivariable analysis resulted in a hazard ratio of 0.70 (95% CI 0.47–1.05, P = 0.082). Exposure to dabrafenib and trametinib was not related to clinically relevant toxicities.

Conclusions

Overall survival of metastasized melanoma patients with trametinib Cmin levels ≥ 15.6 ng/mL is ten months longer compared to patients with Cmin below this threshold. This would theoretically provide a rationale for therapeutic drug monitoring of trametinib. Although a high proportion of patients are underexposed, there is very little scope for dose increments due to the risk of serious toxicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available upon reasonable request by contacting the corresponding author.

References

  1. Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, Stephens P, Edkins S, Clegg S et al (2002) Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 417:949–954

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. The Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2015) Genomic classification of cutaneous melanoma. Cell 161:1681–1696

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Rozeman EA, Dekker TJA, Haanen JBAG, Blank CU (2018) Advanced melanoma: current treatment options, biomarkers, and future perspectives. Am J Clin Dermatol 19:303–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ouellet D, Gibiansky E, Leonowens C, O’Hagan A, Haney P, Switzky J et al (2014) Population pharmacokinetics of dabrafenib, a BRAF inhibitor: effect of dose, time, covariates, and relationship with its metabolites. J Clin Pharmacol 54:696–706

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ouellet D, Kassir N, Chiu J, Mouksassi MS, Leonowens C, Cox D et al (2016) Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response of trametinib, a MEK inhibitor, in patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 77:807–817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Verheijen RB, Yu H, Schellens JHM, Beijnen JH, Steeghs N, Huitema ADR (2017) Practical recommendations for therapeutic drug monitoring of kinase inhibitors in oncology. Clin Pharmacol Ther 102:765–776

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Menzies AM, Ashworth MT, Swann S, Kefford RF, Flaherty K, Weber J et al (2015) Characteristics of pyrexia in BRAFV600E/K metastatic melanoma patients treated with combined dabrafenib and trametinib in a phase I/II clinical trial. Ann Oncol 26:415–421

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Balakirouchenane D, Guegan S, Csajka C, Jouinot A, Heidelberger V, Puszkiel A et al (2020) Population pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma. Cancers (Basel) 58:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rousset M, Dutriaux C, Bosco-Lévy P, Prey S, Pham-Ledard A, Dousset L et al (2017) Trough dabrafenib plasma concentrations can predict occurrence of adverse events requiring dose reduction in metastatic melanoma. Clin Chim Acta 472:26–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim HY, Duong JK, Gonzalez M, Long GV, Menzies AM, Rizos H et al (2019) Pharmacokinetic and cytokine profiles of melanoma patients with dabrafenib and trametinib-induced pyrexia. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 83:693–704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Herbrink M, De Vries N, Rosing H, Huitema ADR, Nuijen B, Schellens JHM et al (2018) Development and validation of a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry analytical method for the therapeutic drug monitoring of eight novel anticancer drugs. Biomed Chromatogr 32:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Y, Chia Y, Nedelman J, Schran H, Mahon F, Molimard M (2009) A therapeutic drug monitoring algorithm for refining the imatinib trough level obtained at different sampling times. Ther Drug Monit 31:579–584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Janssen JM, Dorlo TPC, Beijnen JH, Huitema ADR (2020) Evaluation of extrapolation methods to predict trough concentrations to guide therapeutic drug monitoring of oral anticancer drugs. Ther Drug Monit 42:532 (ePub ahead of print 5 May 2020)

  14. Infante JR, Fecher LA, Falchook GS, Nallapareddy S, Gordon MS, Becerra C et al (2012) Safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and efficacy data for the oral MEK inhibitor trametinib: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet 13:773–781

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Summary of product characteristics dabrafenib. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/tafinlar-epar-productinformation_en.pdf

  16. Schemper M, Smith TL (1996) A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. Control Clin Trials 17:343–346

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. R Core Development Team (2016) A language and environment for statistical computing. R Found Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.r-project.org/

  18. Falchook GS, Lewis KD, Infante JR, Gordon MS, Vogelzang NJ, DeMarini DJ et al (2012) Activity of the oral MEK inhibitor trametinib in patients with advanced melanoma: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial. Lancet Oncol 13:782–789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). European medicines. Trametinib European Public Assessment Report. 2014. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/mekinist-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf

  20. Gilmartin AG, Bleam MR, Groy A, Moss KG, Minthorn EA, Kulkarni SG et al (2011) GSK1120212 (JTP-74057) is an inhibitor of MEK activity and activation with favorable pharmacokinetic properties for sustained in vivo pathway inhibition. Clin Cancer Res 17:989–1000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Corcoran RB, Settleman J, Engelman JA (2011) Potential therapeutic strategies to overcome acquired resistance to BRAF or MEK inhibitors in BRAF mutant cancers. Oncotarget 2:336–346

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hatzivassiliou G, Song K, Yen I, Brandhuber BJ, Anderson DJ, Alvarado R et al (2010) RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth. Nature 464:431–435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Heidorn SJ, Milagre C, Whittaker S, Nourry A, Niculescu-Duvas I, Dhomen N et al (2010) Kinase-dead BRAF and oncogenic RAS cooperate to drive tumor progression through CRAF. Cell 140:209–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Poulikakos PI, Zhang C, Bollag G, Shokat KM, Rosen N (2010) RAF inhibitors transactivate RAF dimers and ERK signalling in cells with wild-type BRAF. Nature 464:427–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. European Medicines Agency. European Public Assessment Report Dabrafenib. 2013. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/tafinlar-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf

  26. Falchook GS, Long GV, Kurzrock R, Kim KB, Arkenau HT, Brown MP et al (2014) Dose selection, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib (GSK2118436). Clin Cancer Res 20:4449–4458

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wollenberg L, Marchand M, Merdjan H, Litwiler K (2018) Development of a population pharmacokinetic model for binimetinib with subsequent exposure-response analyses in NRAS mutant melanoma. Am Conf Pharmacometr:T-051

  28. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use. European Medicines Agency. European Public Assessment Report Binimetinib. 2018. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/mektovi-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf. Accessed 28 Dec 2022

  29. Schadendorf D, Long GV, Stroiakovski D, Karaszewska B, Hauschild A, Levchenko E et al (2017) Three-year pooled analysis of factors associated with clinical outcomes across dabrafenib and trametinib combination therapy phase 3 randomised trials. Eur J Cancer 82:45–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding has been received for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefanie L. Groenland.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No author has received support for the work in this manuscript. JBAGH served as a consultant advisor for Achilles Therapeutics, AIMM, Amgen, BioNTech, BMS, Bayer, Celsius Therapeutics, Gadeta, GSK, Ipsen, Immunocore, MSD, Merck Serono, Neogene Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Third Rock Ventures and Vaximm, and received research funding from BMS, BioNTech, Novartis and MSD. CUB served as a consultant advisor for BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, GSK, AZ, Pfizer, Lilly, GenMab, Pierre Fabre and Third Rock Ventures, received research funding from BMS, Novartis and Nanostring, reports stock ownership of Uniti Cars and is cofounder of Immagene B.V. JHB is a part-time employee, shareholder and patent holder of Modra Pharmaceuticals (a spin-out company developing oral taxane formulations, not related to this work). NS served as a consultant advisor for AIMM Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ellipses Pharma, and received research funding for the institute from AB Science, Abbvie, Actuate Therapeutics, Amgen, Array, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cantargia, CellCentric, Cytovation, Deciphera, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merus, Molecular Partners, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, Taiho, Takeda (outside the submitted work). All remaining authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Groenland, S.L., Janssen, J.M., Nijenhuis, C.M. et al. Exposure–response analyses of BRAF- and MEK-inhibitors dabrafenib plus trametinib in melanoma patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 91, 447–456 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04517-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-023-04517-8

Keywords

Navigation