Abstract
Purpose
Although irinotecan monotherapy is often used in third-line treatment after the failure of taxanes in Japanese clinical practice, its survival benefit is still unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan monotherapy as third-line treatment.
Methods
Clinical data from consecutive patients in whom irinotecan had been initiated as third-line treatment between December 2003 and July 2015 in Shizuoka Cancer Center were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who were refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidine with or without platinum in first-line treatment and subsequent therapy with taxanes were included in this study. Irinotecan was administered at 150 mg/m2 every 2 weeks.
Results
The data of 50 patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The overall response rate was 18.4 % (7/38) among the patients with measurable disease. The median progression-free survival time was 66 days, and the median survival time was 180 days from the initiation of irinotecan therapy. The major grade 3 or 4 adverse events including neutropenia, fatigue, and anorexia were observed in 12 (24 %), 8 (16 %), and 7 (14 %), respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Thirteen patients (26 %) required a dose reduction to 120 mg/m2 or less from the initiation of irinotecan.
Conclusions
This study suggests that irinotecan as third-line treatment has an anti-tumor effect and is feasible with optimal dose modification for advanced gastric cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ferlay J SI, Ervik M, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. Lyon, France: International agency for research on Cancer; 2013. http://globocan.iarc.fr (accessed Oct 7, 2015)
Statistics and Information Department MoH, Labour and Welfare. Vital statistics in 2014 (in Japanese). http://www.mhlwgojp/Accessed 1 Nov 2015
Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T et al (2008) S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 9:215–221. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(08)70035-4
Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H et al (2009) Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 10:1063–1069. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70259-1
Thuss-Patience PC, Kretzschmar A, Bichev D et al (2011) Survival advantage for irinotecan versus best supportive care as second-line chemotherapy in gastric cancer–a randomised phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO). Eur J Cancer 47:2306–2314. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2011.06.002
Kang JH, Lee SI, Lim do H et al (2012) Salvage chemotherapy for pretreated gastric cancer: a randomized phase III trial comparing chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care alone. J Clin Oncol 30:1513–1518. doi:10.1200/jco.2011.39.4585
Ford HE, Marshall A, Bridgewater JA et al (2014) Docetaxel versus active symptom control for refractory oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (COUGAR-02): an open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15:78–86. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70549-7
Fuchs CS, Tomasek J, Yong CJ et al (2014) Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 383:31–39. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61719-5
Hironaka S, Ueda S, Yasui H et al (2013) Randomized, open-label, phase III study comparing irinotecan with paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer without severe peritoneal metastasis after failure of prior combination chemotherapy using fluoropyrimidine plus platinum: WJOG 4007 trial. J Clin Oncol 31:4438–4444. doi:10.1200/jco.2012.48.5805
Wilke H, Muro K, Van Cutsem E et al (2014) Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:1224–1235. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70420-6
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Gastric Cancer v.3 2015, accessed Nov 9, 2015, at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/gastric.pdf
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458. doi:10.1038/bmt.2012.244
Shimoyama R, Yasui H, Boku N et al (2009) Weekly paclitaxel for heavily treated advanced or recurrent gastric cancer refractory to fluorouracil, irinotecan, and cisplatin. Gastric Cancer 12:206–211. doi:10.1007/s10120-009-0524-9
Li J, Qin S, Xu J et al (2016) Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial of Apatinib in Patients With Chemotherapy-Refractory Advanced or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or Gastroesophageal Junction. J Clin Oncol 34:1448–1454. doi:10.1200/jco.2015.63.5995
Kang EJ, Im SA, Oh DY et al (2013) Irinotecan combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin third-line chemotherapy after failure of fluoropyrimidine, platinum, and taxane in gastric cancer: treatment outcomes and a prognostic model to predict survival. Gastric Cancer 16:581–589. doi:10.1007/s10120-012-0227-5
Higuchi K, Tanabe S, Shimada K et al (2014) Biweekly irinotecan plus cisplatin versus irinotecan alone as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: a randomised phase III trial (TCOG GI-0801/BIRIP trial). Eur J Cancer 50:1437–1445. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2014.01.020
Nishikawa K, Fujitani K, Inagaki H et al (2015) Randomised phase III trial of second-line irinotecan plus cisplatin versus irinotecan alone in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to S-1 monotherapy: TRICS trial. Eur J Cancer 51:808–816. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2015.02.009
Ohtsu A, Ajani JA, Bai YX et al (2013) Everolimus for previously treated advanced gastric cancer: results of the randomized, double-blind, phase III GRANITE-1 study. J Clin Oncol 31:3935–3943. doi:10.1200/jco.2012.48.3552
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the patients and their families for their participation in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kawakami, T., Machida, N., Yasui, H. et al. Efficacy and safety of irinotecan monotherapy as third-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 78, 809–814 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3138-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3138-z