Abstract
Purpose
The sequence bendamustine (B) + Irinotecan (I) followed by etoposide (E) + carboplatin (C) was hypothesized to increase progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in untreated extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (EDSCLC) patients compared to historical controls by exploiting mitotic catastrophe. Absent expression of ERCC-1 and expression of topoisomerases were hypothesized to be predictive for PFS and OS.
Methods
This was a phase I/IIa trial in 30 patients to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of B + I and the PFS of B + I E + C with secondary end points including overall response rate (ORR) and OS. Biomarkers measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) obtained from diagnostic specimens were correlated with outcome.
Results
The MTD of B + I was not reached. During treatment with B + I, there were two grade 5 toxicities from neutropenic sepsis and metabolic encephalopathy. Other toxicities included fatigue, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, and weight loss. For the sequence, the PFS and OS were 6.0 months and 10 months, respectively. The ORR for B + I and the sequence were 82% and 83%, respectively. Topoisomerase-2 expression was predictive for TTP and OS, but absent ERCC-1 expression was not, contrary to our hypothesis.
Conclusions
B + I is an active regimen in EDSCLC. Toxicities included two grade 5 events but were otherwise manageable. The novel sequence B + I E + C increased PFS and OS compared to historical controls. Correlative studies are conflicting regarding the mechanism of action of this novel sequence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z et al (2014) Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64:9–29
American Cancer Society (2014) Cancer Facts & Figures 2014. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
Simon M, Argiris A, Miurren JR (2004) Progress in the therapy of small cell lung cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 49:119–133
Chute JP, Chen T, Feigal E et al (1999) Twenty years of phase III trials for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: perceptible progress. J Clin Oncol 17:1294–1801
Rasschaert M, Schrijvero D, Van den Brande J et al (2007) A phase I study of bendamustine hydrochloride administered once every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors. Anticancer Drugs 18(5):587–595
Rasschaert M, Schrijvero D, Van den Brande J et al (2007) A phase I study of bendamustine hydrochloride administered day 1 + 2 every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors. Br J Cancer 961:1692–1698
Schmittel A, Knadler M, Hortig P et al (2007) Phase II trial of second-line bendamustine chemotherapy in relapsed small cell lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer 55:109–113
Koster W, Heider A, Niederle N et al (2007) Phase II trial with carboplatin and bendamustine in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2:312–316
Vakifahmetoglu H, Olsson M, Zhivatovsky B (2008) Death through a tragedy: mitotic catastrophe. Cell Death Differ 15:1153–1162
Bergstralh DT, Sekelsky J (2008) Interstrand crosslink repair: can XPF-ERCC-1 be left off the hook? Trends Genet 24:70–76
Shirota Y, Stoehlmacher J, Brabender J et al (2001) ERCC-1 and thymidylate synthase in mRNA levels predict survival for colorectal cancer patients receiving combination oxaliplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 19:4298–4304
Bonner JA, Kozelsky TF (1996) The significance of the sequence of administration of topotecan and etoposide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 39:109–112
Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment of solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216
Roth BJ, Johnson DH, Einhorn LH et al (1992) Randomized study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus etoposide and cisplatin versus alternation of these two regimens in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 10:282–291
Pujol JL, Carestia L, Daures JP (2000) Is there a case for cisplatin in the treatment of small cell lung cancer? A meta-analysis of randomized trials of a cisplatin-containing regimen versus a regimen without this alkylating agent. Br J Cancer 83:8–15
Friboulet L, Olaussen KA, Pignon JP et al (2013) ERCC-1 isoform expression and DNA repair in non-small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 368:1101–1110
Funding
This study was supported by NCI 5P30 CA 13148. This study was approved and funded by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Oncology Research Program from general research support provided by Cephalon, Inc. d/b/a Teva Pharmaceuticals.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the UAB Institutional Review Board for Human Use, our Institution’s (UAB) Scientific Review Committee, and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Allendorf, D.J., Bordoni, R.E., Grant, S.C. et al. Phase I/IIa study of sequential chemotherapy regimen of bendamustine/irinotecan followed by etoposide/carboplatin in untreated patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer (EDSCLC). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 76, 949–955 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-015-2869-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-015-2869-6