Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phase I/IIa study of sequential chemotherapy regimen of bendamustine/irinotecan followed by etoposide/carboplatin in untreated patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer (EDSCLC)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The sequence bendamustine (B) + Irinotecan (I) followed by etoposide (E) + carboplatin (C) was hypothesized to increase progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in untreated extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (EDSCLC) patients compared to historical controls by exploiting mitotic catastrophe. Absent expression of ERCC-1 and expression of topoisomerases were hypothesized to be predictive for PFS and OS.

Methods

This was a phase I/IIa trial in 30 patients to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of B + I and the PFS of B + I E + C with secondary end points including overall response rate (ORR) and OS. Biomarkers measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) obtained from diagnostic specimens were correlated with outcome.

Results

The MTD of B + I was not reached. During treatment with B + I, there were two grade 5 toxicities from neutropenic sepsis and metabolic encephalopathy. Other toxicities included fatigue, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, and weight loss. For the sequence, the PFS and OS were 6.0 months and 10 months, respectively. The ORR for B + I and the sequence were 82% and 83%, respectively. Topoisomerase-2 expression was predictive for TTP and OS, but absent ERCC-1 expression was not, contrary to our hypothesis.

Conclusions

B + I is an active regimen in EDSCLC. Toxicities included two grade 5 events but were otherwise manageable. The novel sequence B + I E + C increased PFS and OS compared to historical controls. Correlative studies are conflicting regarding the mechanism of action of this novel sequence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z et al (2014) Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64:9–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. American Cancer Society (2014) Cancer Facts & Figures 2014. American Cancer Society, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  3. Simon M, Argiris A, Miurren JR (2004) Progress in the therapy of small cell lung cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 49:119–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chute JP, Chen T, Feigal E et al (1999) Twenty years of phase III trials for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: perceptible progress. J Clin Oncol 17:1294–1801

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rasschaert M, Schrijvero D, Van den Brande J et al (2007) A phase I study of bendamustine hydrochloride administered once every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors. Anticancer Drugs 18(5):587–595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rasschaert M, Schrijvero D, Van den Brande J et al (2007) A phase I study of bendamustine hydrochloride administered day 1 + 2 every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors. Br J Cancer 961:1692–1698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmittel A, Knadler M, Hortig P et al (2007) Phase II trial of second-line bendamustine chemotherapy in relapsed small cell lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer 55:109–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koster W, Heider A, Niederle N et al (2007) Phase II trial with carboplatin and bendamustine in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2:312–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vakifahmetoglu H, Olsson M, Zhivatovsky B (2008) Death through a tragedy: mitotic catastrophe. Cell Death Differ 15:1153–1162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bergstralh DT, Sekelsky J (2008) Interstrand crosslink repair: can XPF-ERCC-1 be left off the hook? Trends Genet 24:70–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shirota Y, Stoehlmacher J, Brabender J et al (2001) ERCC-1 and thymidylate synthase in mRNA levels predict survival for colorectal cancer patients receiving combination oxaliplatin and fluorouracil chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 19:4298–4304

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bonner JA, Kozelsky TF (1996) The significance of the sequence of administration of topotecan and etoposide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 39:109–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment of solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Roth BJ, Johnson DH, Einhorn LH et al (1992) Randomized study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus etoposide and cisplatin versus alternation of these two regimens in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 10:282–291

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pujol JL, Carestia L, Daures JP (2000) Is there a case for cisplatin in the treatment of small cell lung cancer? A meta-analysis of randomized trials of a cisplatin-containing regimen versus a regimen without this alkylating agent. Br J Cancer 83:8–15

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Friboulet L, Olaussen KA, Pignon JP et al (2013) ERCC-1 isoform expression and DNA repair in non-small cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 368:1101–1110

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by NCI 5P30 CA 13148. This study was approved and funded by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Oncology Research Program from general research support provided by Cephalon, Inc. d/b/a Teva Pharmaceuticals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Robert.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the UAB Institutional Review Board for Human Use, our Institution’s (UAB) Scientific Review Committee, and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allendorf, D.J., Bordoni, R.E., Grant, S.C. et al. Phase I/IIa study of sequential chemotherapy regimen of bendamustine/irinotecan followed by etoposide/carboplatin in untreated patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer (EDSCLC). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 76, 949–955 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-015-2869-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-015-2869-6

Keywords

Navigation