Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phase II trial of gemcitabine plus UFT as salvage treatment in oxaliplatin, irinotecan and fluoropyrimidine-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the efficacy of gemcitabine plus uracil–tegafur (UFT) combination chemotherapy as a salvage treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).

Methods

This single-arm phase II study was conducted at three institutions in Korea. Patients with MCRC refractory to fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan were enrolled. Gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 was administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15. UFT 200 mg/m2/day was taken orally in three divided doses on days 1–21. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks, and tumor evaluation was carried out every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint of this study was 8-week progression-free survival (PFS) rate.

Results

Forty-one patients were enrolled. Fourteen patients received gemcitabine/UFT as a third-line treatment and 37 patients as a fourth-line or later-line therapy. Toxicities were easily manageable, and non-hematologic toxicities of ≥grade 3 were rare. The most common toxicity of ≥grade 3 was neutropenia (20.0 %). One patient showed partial response (response rate, 2.4 %) and 14 (34.1 %) showed stable disease. The 8-week PFS rate was 42.3 %. The median PFS was 1.7 months [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.6–1.8 months], and the median overall survival was 9.2 months (95 % CI 5.8–12.6 months).

Conclusions

Overall efficacy of gemcitabine/UFT in refractory MCRC was unsatisfactory. However, we could find a minor proportion of patients who showed prolonged tumor stabilization to gemcitabine/UFT. Further studies are warranted to identify a patient subgroup that might have benefits from gemcitabine/UFT therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Seo HG, Lee JS (2013) Prediction of cancer incidence and mortality in Korea, 2013. Cancer Res Treat 45:15–21

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cancer M-AGi (1998) Efficacy of intravenous continuous infusion of fluorouracil compared with bolus administration in advanced colorectal cancer. Meta-analysis group in cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:301–308

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van Cutsem E, Twelves C, Cassidy J, Allman D, Bajetta E, Boyer M, Bugat R, Findlay M, Frings S, Jahn M, McKendrick J, Osterwalder B, Perez-Manga G, Rosso R, Rougier P, Schmiegel WH, Seitz JF, Thompson P, Vieitez JM, Weitzel C, Harper P (2001) Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:4097–4106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G, Cox J, Kocha W, Kuperminc M, Maroun J, Walde D, Weaver C, Harrison E, Burger HU, Osterwalder B, Wong AO, Wong R (2001) Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:2282–2292

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grothey A, Sargent D, Goldberg RM, Schmoll HJ (2004) Survival of patients with advanced colorectal cancer improves with the availability of fluorouracil–leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin in the course of treatment. J Clin Oncol 22:1209–1214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, Cartwright T, Hainsworth J, Heim W, Berlin J, Baron A, Griffing S, Holmgren E, Ferrara N, Fyfe G, Rogers B, Ross R, Kabbinavar F (2004) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2335–2342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Cutsem E, Kohne CH, Lang I, Folprecht G, Nowacki MP, Cascinu S, Shchepotin I, Maurel J, Cunningham D, Tejpar S, Schlichting M, Zubel A, Celik I, Rougier P, Ciardiello F (2011) Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status. J Clin Oncol 29:2011–2019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bitossi R, Sculli CM, Tampellini M, Alabiso I, Brizzi MP, Ferrero A, Ottone A, Bellini E, Gorzegno G, Berruti A, Dogliotti L (2008) Gemcitabine and protracted 5-fluorouracil infusion as third-line chemotherapy in refractory colorectal cancer patients. Anticancer Res 28:3055–3060

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Iqbal S, Yang D, Cole S, El-Khoueiry AB, Boswell W, Agafitei R, Lujan R, Lenz HJ (2009) Phase II study of capecitabine and gemcitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts) 27: (suppl; abstr e15077)

  11. Salgado M, Reboredo M, Mendez JC, Quintero G, Pellon ML, Romero C, Jorge M, Montes AF, Valladares-Ayerbes M, Ramos M, Varela S, Alonso MA (2013) Gemcitabine and capecitabine as third- or later-line therapy for refractory advanced colorectal cancer: a retrospective study. Anticancer Res 33:4089–4096

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moore DF Jr, Pazdur R, Daugherty K, Tarassoff P, Abbruzzese JL (1992) Phase II study of gemcitabine in advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma. Invest New Drugs 10:323–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mani S, Kugler JW, Knost JA, Sciortino DF, Gibbons J, Garcia JC, Ansari RH, Schilsky RL, Vokes EE (1998) Phase II trial of 150-minute weekly infusion of gemcitabine in advanced colorectal cancer: minimal activity in colorectal cancer. Invest New Drugs 16:275–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Merl M, Hoimes C, Pham T, Saif MW (2009) Is there a palliative benefit of gemcitabine plus fluoropyrimidines in patients with refractory colorectal cancer? A review of the literature previously presented: poster at the 2008 Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium (Abstract No. 512). Expert Opin Investig Drugs 18:1257–1264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pachon V, Garcia-Alfonso P, Iglesias L, Siso I, Abad G, Khosravi P, Diaz V, Perez-Manga G (2005) Gemcitabine plus continuous infusion of 5-FU for heavily pretreated advanced colorectal cancer patients. Phase I/II study. J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts) 23: abstract 3735

  16. Qiu M, Bi F, Liu J, Li Q, Yi C (2011) Gemcitabine and capecitabine as third-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of irinotecan and oxaliplatin. J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts) 29: (suppl 4; abstr 620)

  17. Saif MW, Kaley K, Penney R, Hotchkiss S, Syrigos KN, Strimpakos AS (2011) The efficacy of gemcitabine as salvage treatment in patients with refractory advanced colorectal cancer (CRC): a single institution experience. Anticancer Res 31:2971–2974

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hernandez M, Jiménez P, Garcia LF, Alvarez C, Pérez Q, Rodriguez DJ, Ruiz AL, Sánchez L, Torres W, Esther Uriol E, Menendez MD, Prado J (2013) Biweekly gemcitabine and capecitabine in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts) 31: (suppl; abstr e14617)

  19. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, Humblet Y, Hendlisz A, Neyns B, Canon JL, Van Laethem JL, Maurel J, Richardson G, Wolf M, Amado RG (2007) Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:1658–1664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Tebbutt NC, Simes RJ, Chalchal H, Shapiro JD, Robitaille S, Price TJ, Shepherd L, Au HJ, Langer C, Moore MJ, Zalcberg JR (2008) K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 359:1757–1765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Amado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M, Van Cutsem E, Siena S, Freeman DJ, Juan T, Sikorski R, Suggs S, Radinsky R, Patterson SD, Chang DD (2008) Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:1626–1634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A, Siena S, Falcone A, Ychou M, Humblet Y, Bouche O, Mineur L, Barone C, Adenis A, Tabernero J, Yoshino T, Lenz HJ, Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Cihon F, Cupit L, Wagner A, Laurent D (2013) Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 381:303–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Madajewicz S, Waterhouse DM, Ritch PS, Khan MQ, Higby DJ, Leichman CG, Malik SK, Hentschel P, Gill JF, Zhao L, Nicol SJ (2012) Multicenter, randomized phase II trial of bevacizumab plus folinic acid, fluorouracil, gemcitabine (FFG) versus bevacizumab plus folinic acid, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) as first-line therapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Invest New Drugs 30:772–778

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bennouna J, Saunders M, Douillard JY (2009) The role of UFT in metastatic colorectal cancer. Oncology 76:301–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lembersky BC, Wieand HS, Petrelli NJ, O’Connell MJ, Colangelo LH, Smith RE, Seay TE, Giguere JK, Marshall ME, Jacobs AD, Colman LK, Soran A, Yothers G, Wolmark N (2006) Oral uracil and tegafur plus leucovorin compared with intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin in stage II and III carcinoma of the colon: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol C-06. J Clin Oncol 24:2059–2064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim TW, Kang HJ, Ahn JH, Lee K, Chang HM, Kang YK, Lee JS (2002) Phase II study of gemcitabine, UFT and leucovorin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Acta Oncol 41:689–694

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sym SJ, Hong J, Ahn HJ, Park J, Cho EK, Lee JH, Lee WS, Baek JH, Park YH, Shin DB (2013) A phase II trial of salvage treatment with gemcitabine and S-1 combination in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts) 31: (suppl; abstr 3595)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by grants from Yuhan Cooporation (Seoul, Korea). Gemcitabine and UFT were provided by Yuhan Corporation and Jeil Pharmaceutical (Seoul, Korea), respectively. We thank Medical Research Collaborating Center at Seoul National University Hospital for statistical assistance. We are also grateful to Yong Min Shin and Eun-Kyung Kim (Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) for their supports as clinical research coordinators.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jee Hyun Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, KW., Kim, Y.J., Lee, KH. et al. Phase II trial of gemcitabine plus UFT as salvage treatment in oxaliplatin, irinotecan and fluoropyrimidine-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 74, 447–455 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-014-2515-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-014-2515-8

Keywords

Navigation