Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical dissection of thrombotic microangiopathy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Differential treatment strategies are applied in thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) according to the sub-classifications. Hence, it is worthwhile to overview clinical manifestations and outcomes of overall TMA patients according to sub-classifications. We analyzed TMA patients whose serum lactate dehydrogenase levels >250 IU/L, with the presence of schistocytes in their peripheral blood smear, or with typical vascular pathologic abnormalities in their renal biopsy. We compared clinical manifestations including overall survival (OS) and renal survival according to TMA causes. A total of 117 TMA patients (57 primary and 60 secondary TMA) were analyzed. Renal symptom was the most common manifestation in whole patients, while renal function at diagnosis was worst in pregnancy-related TMA group. Primary TMA patients had more frequent CNS symptom and hematologic manifestation compared to secondary TMAs. Among secondary TMAs, pregnancy- and HSCT-related TMA patients showed prevalent hemolytic features. During 150.2 months of follow-up, 5-year OS rate was 64.8%. Poor prognostic factors included older age, combined hematologic and solid organ malignancies, lower hemoglobin levels, and lower serum albumin levels. There was no significant difference in OS between primary and secondary TMAs. Seventy-eight percent of patients experienced AKI during TMA. Five-year death-censored renal survival rate was poor with only 69.2%. However, excellent renal outcome was observed in pregnancy-associated TMA. TMA showed various clinical manifestations according to their etiology. Notably, both OS and renal survival were poor regardless of their etiologies except pregnancy-associated TMA. Physicians should differentiate a variety of TMA categories and properly manage this complex disease entity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. George JN, Nester CM (2014) Syndromes of thrombotic microangiopathy. N Engl J Med 371:654–666

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moake JL (2002) Thrombotic microangiopathies. N Engl J Med 347:589–600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barbour T, Johnson S, Cohney S, Hughes P (2012) Thrombotic microangiopathy and associated renal disorders. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27:2673–2685

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Brodsky RA (2015) Complement in hemolytic anemia. Blood 126:2459–2465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Scully M, Cataland S, Coppo P et al (2017) Consensus on the standardization of terminology in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and related thrombotic microangiopathies. J Thromb Haemost 15:312–322

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shah N, Rutherford C, Matevosyan K et al (2013) Role of ADAMTS13 in the management of thrombotic microangiopathies including thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). Br J Haematol 163:514–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jang MJ, Chong SY, Kim IH et al (2011) Clinical features of severe acquired ADAMTS13 deficiency in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: the Korean TTP registry experience. Int J Hematol 93:163–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Group KDIGOKAKIW (2012) KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Inter (Suppl.): 1–138

  9. von Baeyer H (2002) Plasmapheresis in thrombotic microangiopathy-associated syndromes: review of outcome data derived from clinical trials and open studies. Ther Apher 6:320–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Saultz JN, Wu HM, Cataland S (2015) Headache prevalence following recovery from TTP and aHUS. Ann Hematol 94:1473–1476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Martinez MT, Bucher C, Stussi G et al (2005) Transplant-associated microangiopathy (TAM) in recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants. Bone Marrow Transplant 36:993–1000

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jodele S, Laskin BL, Dandoy CE et al (2015) A new paradigm: diagnosis and management of HSCT-associated thrombotic microangiopathy as multi-system endothelial injury. Blood Rev 29:191–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hosler GA, Cusumano AM, Hutchins GM (2003) Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndrome are distinct pathologic entities. A review of 56 autopsy cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 127:834–839

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eremina V, Cui S, Gerber H et al (2006) Vascular endothelial growth factor a signaling in the podocyte-endothelial compartment is required for mesangial cell migration and survival. J Am Soc Nephrol 17:724–735

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Markowitz GS, Bomback AS, Perazella MA (2015) Drug-induced glomerular disease: direct cellular injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 10:1291–1299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Noris M, Remuzzi G (2010) Thrombotic microangiopathy after kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 10:1517–1523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kavanagh D, Goodship TH, Richards A (2013) Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Semin Nephrol 33:508–530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Nayer A, Asif A (2016) Atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome: a clinical review. Am J Ther 23:e151–e158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dahlan R, Sontrop JM, Li L et al (2015) Primary and secondary thrombotic microangiopathy referred to a single plasma exchange center for suspected thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: 2000-2011. Am J Nephrol 41:429–437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Uderzo C, Bonanomi S, Busca A et al (2006) Risk factors and severe outcome in thrombotic microangiopathy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Transplantation 82:638–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Laskin BL, Goebel J, Davies SM, Jodele S (2011) Small vessels, big trouble in the kidneys and beyond: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy. Blood 118:1452–1462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Karthikeyan V, Parasuraman R, Shah V et al (2003) Outcome of plasma exchange therapy in thrombotic microangiopathy after renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 3:1289–1294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. de Fontbrune FS, Galambrun C, Sirvent A et al (2015) Use of eculizumab in patients with allogeneic stem cell transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy: a study from the SFGM-TC. Transplantation 99:1953–1959

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bridoux F, Vrtovsnik F, Noel C et al (1998) Renal thrombotic microangiopathy in systemic lupus erythematosus: clinical correlations and long-term renal survival. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13:298–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zafrani L, Mariotte E, Darmon M et al (2015) Acute renal failure is prevalent in patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with low plasma ADAMTS13 activity. J Thromb Haemost 13:380–389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Caprioli J, Noris M, Brioschi S et al (2006) Genetics of HUS: the impact of MCP, CFH, and IF mutations on clinical presentation, response to treatment, and outcome. Blood 108:1267–1279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ritz E, Orth SR (1999) Nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 341:1127–1133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Krolewski M, Eggers PW, Warram JH (1996) Magnitude of end-stage renal disease in IDDM: a 35 year follow-up study. Kidney Int 50:2041–2046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chou YH, Lien YC, Hu FC et al (2012) Clinical outcomes and predictors for ESRD and mortality in primary GN. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7:1401–1408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Frimat L, Briancon S, Hestin D et al (1997) IgA nephropathy: prognostic classification of end-stage renal failure. L’Association des Nephrologues de l'Est. Nephrol Dial Transplant 12:2569–2575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee H, Hwang JH, Paik JH et al (2014) Long-term prognosis of clinically early IgA nephropathy is not always favorable. BMC Nephrol 15:94

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Xie J, Kiryluk K, Wang W et al (2012) Predicting progression of IgA nephropathy: new clinical progression risk score. PLoS One 7:e38904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Jin DC, Yun SR, Lee SW et al (2015) Lessons from 30 years’ data of Korean end-stage renal disease registry, 1985-2015. Kidney Res Clin Pract 34:132–139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Vilalta R, Lara E, Madrid A et al (2012) Long-term eculizumab improves clinical outcomes in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol 27:2323–2326

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Gediz F, Payzin BK, Ecemis S et al (2016) Efficacy and safety of eculizumab in adult patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a single center experience from Turkey. Transfus Apher Sci 55:357–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. George JN, Al-Nouri ZL (2012) Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in the thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndromes. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2012:604–609

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bae WK, Lee YK, Cho MS et al (2006) A case of hemolytic uremic syndrome caused by Escherichia coli O104:H4. Yonsei Med J 47:437–439

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hajeong Lee or Youngil Koh.

Ethics declarations

This study was approved by the institutional review board at our institution (number: H-1509-070-703). All procedures were performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Table 1

(DOCX 16 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, E., Yoo, S.H., Oh, D. et al. Clinical dissection of thrombotic microangiopathy. Ann Hematol 96, 1715–1726 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-017-3063-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-017-3063-1

Keywords

Navigation