Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Phase II study of bendamustine combined with rituximab in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: efficacy, tolerability, and safety findings

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In most cases of relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), patients respond to salvage therapy, though typically responses are partial and/or transient followed by disease progression, even with newer agents (e.g., ibrutinib). In this multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study, patients with relapsed/refractory non-blastoid MCL received bendamustine 90 mg/m2 (days 1 and 2) and rituximab 375 mg/m2 (day 1) for 6 planned 28-day cycles. Functional imaging with 18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) was conducted at baseline and after cycle 6. Forty-five patients were enrolled (median age, 70 years; 82 % stage IV disease; median number of prior chemotherapies, 2 [range, 1–4]), showing an overall response rate (ORR; primary efficacy measure) of 82 % (complete response [CR], 40 %; partial response, 42 %). In the 32 patients with complete 18F-FDG PET/CT data, 75 % achieved a complete metabolic response. Median duration of response was 1.6 years, 1-year progression-free survival was 67 %, and 3-year overall survival was 55 %. Main non-hematologic adverse events were nausea (69 %), fatigue (56 %), decreased appetite (42 %), constipation (38 %), diarrhea (36 %), vomiting (36 %), and decreased weight (31 %). Grade 3/4 neutropenia and lymphopenia occurred in 44 and 89 % of patients, respectively. ORR and CR rate compared favorably with single-agent ibrutinib (ORR, 67 %; CR, 23 %); bendamustine-rituximab is an effective therapy with manageable toxicity in relapsed/refractory MCL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dreyling M, Geisler C, Hermine O et al (2014) Newly diagnosed and relapsed mantle cell lymphoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 25(Suppl 3):iii83–iii92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. The Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Classification Project (1997) A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Blood 89(11):3909–3918

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goy A, Kahl B (2011) Mantle cell lymphoma: the promise of new treatment options. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 80(1):69–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ruan J, Coleman M, Leonard JP (2009) Management of relapsed mantle cell lymphoma: still a treatment challenge. Oncology (Williston Park) 23(8):683–690

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rummel MJ, Al-Batran SE, Kim SZ et al (2005) Bendamustine plus rituximab is effective and has a favorable toxicity profile in the treatment of mantle cell and low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 23(15):3383–3389

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Robinson KS, Williams ME, van der Jagt RH et al (2008) Phase II multicenter study of bendamustine plus rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent B-cell and mantle cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 26(27):4473–4479

  7. Rigacci L, Puccini B, Cortelazzo S et al (2012) Bendamustine with or without rituximab for the treatment of heavily pretreated non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients: a multicenter retrospective study on behalf of the Italian Lymphoma Foundation (FIL). Ann Hematol 91(7):1013–1022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rummel MJ, Niederle N, Maschmeyer G et al (2013) Bendamustine plus rituximab versus CHOP plus rituximab as first-line treatment for patients with indolent and mantle-cell lymphomas: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet 381(9873):1203–1210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Flinn IW, van der Jagt RH, Kahl BS et al (2014) Randomized trial of bendamustine-rituximab or R-CHOP/R-CVP in first-line treatment of indolent NHL or MCL: the BRIGHT study. Blood 123(19):2944–2952

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang JE, Kahl BS (2012) Bendamustine: more ammunition in the battle against mantle cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 53(7):1249–1250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. van der Jagt R, Laneuville P, MacDonald D, Stewart D, Christofides A, Sehn LH (2012) A Canadian perspective on bendamustine for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Curr Oncol 19(3):160–168

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME et al (2007) Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 25(5):579–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Meignan M, Gallamini A, Meignan M, Gallamini A, Haioun C (2009) Report on the First International Workshop on Interim-PET-scan in lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 50(8):1257–1260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Friedberg JW, Vose JM, Kelly JL et al (2011) The combination of bendamustine, bortezomib, and rituximab for patients with relapsed/refractory indolent and mantle cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 117(10):2807–2812

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Weide R, Hess G, Köppler H et al (2007) High anti-lymphoma activity of bendamustine/mitoxantrone/rituximab in rituximab pretreated relapsed or refractory indolent lymphomas and mantle cell lymphomas: a multicenter phase II study of the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG). Leuk Lymphoma 48(7):1299–1306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rummel MJ, Balser C, Kaiser U et al (2014) Bendamustine plus rituximab versus fludarabine plus rituximab in patients with relapsed follicular, indolent, or mantle cell lymphomas—8-year follow-up results of the randomized phase III study NHL 2-2003 on behalf of the StiL (Study Group Indolent Lymphomas, Germany). Blood 124(21):145

    Google Scholar 

  17. Warsch S, Hosein PJ, Maeda LS, Alizadeh AA, Lossos IS (2012) A retrospective study evaluating the efficacy and safety of bendamustine in the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 53(7):1299–1305

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. García-Noblejas A, Martínez Chamorro C, Navarro Matilla B et al (2014) Bendamustine as salvage treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma patients: a retrospective study of the Spanish experience. Ann Hematol 93(9):1551–1558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kane RC, Dagher R, Farrell A et al (2007) Bortezomib for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 13(18 Pt 1):5291–5294

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. (2013) Revlimid [package insert]. Celgene Corporation; Summit, NJ

  21. Mato AR, Svoboda J, Feldman T et al (2012) Post-treatment (not interim) positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan status is highly predictive of outcome in mantle cell lymphoma patients treated with R-HyperCVAD. Cancer 118(14):3565–3570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hosein PJ, Pastorini VH, Paes FM et al (2011) Utility of positron emission tomography scans in mantle cell lymphoma. Am J Hematol 86(10):841–845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Visco C, Finotto S, Zambello R et al (2013) Combination of rituximab, bendamustine, and cytarabine for patients with mantle-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma ineligible for intensive regimens or autologous transplantation. J Clin Oncol 31(11):1442–1449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gressin R, Callanan M, Daguindau N et al (2014) Frontline therapy with the Ribvd regimen elicits high clinical and molecular response rates and long PFS in elderly patients mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); final results of a prospective phase II trial by the Lysa group. Blood 124(21):148

    Google Scholar 

  25. Campo E, Rule S (2015) Mantle cell lymphoma: evolving management strategies. Blood 125(1):48–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Burger JA (2014) Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors in clinical trials. Curr Hematol Malig Rep 9(1):44–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. A study of the Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib given in combination with bendamustine and rituximab in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma. ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01776840?term=ibrutinib+AND+phase+3+AND+mantle+cell+lymphoma&rank=2. Accessed 21 May 2015

  28. Wang ML, Rule S, Martin P et al (2013) Targeting BTK with ibrutinib in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 369(6):507–516

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fisher RI, Bernstein SH, Kahl BS et al (2006) Multicenter phase II study of bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 24(30):4867–4874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Goy A, Sinha R, Williams ME et al (2013) Single-agent lenalidomide in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma who relapsed or progressed after or were refractory to bortezomib: phase II MCL-001 (EMERGE) study. J Clin Oncol 31(29):3688–3695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hess G, Herbrecht R, Romaguera J et al (2009) Phase III study to evaluate temsirolimus compared with investigator’s choice therapy for the treatment of relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 27(23):3822–3829

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang M, Rule S, Martin P et al (2014) Single-agent ibrutinib demonstrates safety and durability of response at 2 years follow-up in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma: updated results of an international, multicenter, open-label phase 2 study. Blood 124(21):445

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was sponsored by and conducted by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., Frazer, PA. Statistical support was provided by Ling Chen, PhD (Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.). Medical writing assistance (including literature searches, editing and fact checking, graphic support, and at the request of and with guidance from the authors, assistance with the preparation of the outline and drafting of this manuscript) was provided by The Curry Rockefeller Group, LLC, Tarrytown, NY, and was funded by Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. (Frazer, PA). Teva provided a full review of the article. We wish to thank all the site investigators who contributed to this study and their staff for their support, as well as all the patients and their families for their dedication to research and this study. A special thank you is also given to Glen Davis and Coleen Myers from Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., for their complete dedication in ensuring the data collection was available adequately.

Conflict of interest

The authors received research funding for this study from Teva Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. MSC has served as consultant to Teva Pharmaceuticals and Mundipharma, and has received an honorarium for serving as an educational meeting chairman for Mundipharma. AG has served as a member of the Board of Directors/advisory committees of Pharmacyclics, JNJ, Celgene, and Millennium; participated in the speakers’ bureaus of Pharmacyclics, JNJ, Celgene, and Millennium; and served as a consultant for and received honoraria from Celgene. He has also received research funding for clinical trials through his institution. DL and DAG declare that they have no conflict of interest. MCM is an employee and shareholder of Teva, and has owned stock/held an ownership interest in Janssen. RHvdJ has served as a consultant for, participated in speakers’ bureaus for, and has received honoraria and research funding from Teva Pharmaceuticals and Lundbeck.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committees and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myron S. Czuczman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Czuczman, M.S., Goy, A., Lamonica, D. et al. Phase II study of bendamustine combined with rituximab in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma: efficacy, tolerability, and safety findings. Ann Hematol 94, 2025–2032 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-015-2478-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-015-2478-9

Keywords

Navigation