Abstract
Purpose
To assist in planning before the endoscopic prelacrimal recess (PLR) approach, we aimed to investigate the relationship between morphometry and variations of PLR in maxillary sinus (MS) pneumatizations.
Methods
Retrospective analysis of the paranasal sinus computed tomography images of 150 patients was conducted to determine the pneumatization patterns of the MS, PLR variations, and the applicability of the PLR approach. The results were compared based on lateralization, gender, and age groups.
Results
The PLRwidth, the anteroposterior diameter of the nasolacrimal duct (NLD), the vertical and horizontal diameters of the MS were the highest in hyperplasic MS, and decreased significantly with increasing age (p = 0.005, p = 0.017, p = 0.000), respectively. Most of the morphometric measurements were higher in hyperplasic MS, while the medial wall thickness of PLR was higher in hypoplasic MS. The PLRwidth for feasibility of the PLR approach were Type I (48%) in hypoplasic MS and Type III (80%) in hyperplasic MS (p < 0.001), respectively. The PLR medial wall thickness was higher in Type I, while the piriform aperture angle (PAA), MS volume, length, and slope of the NLD were higher in Type III PLRwidth (p = 0.000), respectively. The highest anterior and separation-type variations of the PLR were observed in hyperplasic MS, whereas 31.0% of hypoplasic MS had no PLR (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
This study revealed that PLRwidth and PAA were the highest in hyperplasic MS, which allows the endoscopic PLR approach to be performed more easily. For safer and uncomplicated surgery, surgeon should be aware of the PLR anatomy in different MS pneumatization patterns.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data supporting this study's findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Change history
03 July 2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03194-9
References
Aktuna Belgin C, Colak M, Adiguzel O, Akkus Z, Orhan K (2019) Three-dimensional evaluation of maxillary sinus volume in different age and sex groups using CBCT. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276:1493–1499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05383-y
Andrianakis A, Moser U, Wolf A, Kiss P, Holzmeister C, Andrianakis D, Tomazic PV (2021) Gender-specific differences in feasibility of pre-lacrimal window approach. Sci Rep 11:7791. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87447-w
Arosio AD, Valentini M, Canevari FR, Volpi L, Karligkiotis A, Terzakis D, Battaglia P, Georgalas C, Bignami M, Castelnuovo P, Turri-Zanoni M (2021) Endoscopic endonasal prelacrimal approach: radiological considerations, morbidity, and outcomes. Laryngoscope 131:1715–1721. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29330
Chen Z, Wang J, Wang Q, Lu Q, Zheng Z (2020) Assessment of the prelacrimal recess in maxillary sinus in different sex and age groups using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 277:777–783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05749-2
Chen Z, Wang Q, Wang P (2021) Prevalence of the prelacrimal recess in maxillary sinus and its medial bony wall dimensions. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 278:1099–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06400-1
Craiu C, Rusu MC, Hostiuc S, Săndulescu M, Derjac-Aramă AI (2017) Anatomic variation in the pterygopalatine angle of the maxillary sinus and the maxillary bulla. Anat Sci Int 92:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-015-0320-z
Duman SB, Gumussoy İ (2021) Assesment of prelacrimal recess in patients with maxillary sinus hypoplasia using cone beam computed tomography. Am J Rhinol Allergy 35:361–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1945892420959592
Iwanaga J, Wilson C, Lachkar S, Tomaszewski KA, Walocha JA, Tubbs RS (2019) Clinical anatomy of the maxillary sinus: application to sinus floor augmentation. Anat Cell Biol 52:17–24. https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2019.52.1.17
Kashlan K, Craig J (2018) Dimensions of the medial wall of the prelacrimal recess. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 8:751–755. https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22090
Khong GC, Medikeri G, Tierney C, Leong SC (2020) Adjunctive techniques to improve access of the endoscopic prelacrimal recess approach. Laryngoscope 130:1857–1863. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28259
Kim H, Jung T, Park JY, Lee J, Cho JH, Kim JK (2022) A retrospective CT analysis for prelacrimal window access to maxillary sinus. J Rhinol 29:38–42. https://doi.org/10.18787/jr.2021.00394
Lee JJ, Ahmad ZAM, Kim D, Ryu G, Kim HY, Dhong HJ, Chung SK, Hong SD (2019) Comparison between endoscopic prelacrimal medial maxillectomy and caldwell-luc approach for benign maxillary sinus tumors. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 12:287–293. https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2018.01165
Lessa AMG, Oliveira VS, Costa RBA, Meneses ATR, Crusoé-Rebello I, Costa FWG, Neves FS (2023) Anatomical study of the maxillary sinus: which characteristics can influence its volume? Surg Radiol Anat 45:81–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-022-03055-x
Lin Z, Kamath N, Malik A (2021) Morphometric differences in normal bony nasolacrimal anatomy: comparison between four ethnic groups. Surg Radiol Anat 43(2):179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02614-4
Lock PSX, Siow GW, Karandikar A, Goh JPN, Siow JK (2019) Anterior maxillary wall and lacrimal duct relationship in Orientals: CT analysis for prelacrimal access to the maxillary sinus. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276:2237–2241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05446-0
Sieskiewicz A, Buczko K, Janica J, Lukasiewicz A, Lebkowska U, Piszczatowski B, Olszewska E (2017) Minimally invasive medial maxillectomy and the position of nasolacrimal duct: the CT study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274:1515–1519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4376-8
Simmen D, Veerasigamani N, Briner HR, Jones N, Schuknecht B (2017) Anterior maxillary wall and lacrimal duct relationship - CT analysis for prelacrimal access to the maxillary sinus. Rhinology 55:170–174. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhino16.318
Sirikçi A, Bayazit Y, Gümüsburun E, Bayram M, Kanlikana M (2000) A new approach to the classification of maxillary sinus hypoplasia with relevant clinical implications. Surg Radiol Anat 22:243–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-000-0243-8
Tatlisumak E, Aslan A, Cömert A, Ozlugedik S, Acar HI, Tekdemir I (2010) Surgical anatomy of the nasolacrimal duct on the lateral nasal wall as revealed by serial dissections. Anat Sci Int 85:8–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-009-0044-z
Wang X, Chen X, Zheng M, Liu C, Wang C, Zhang L (2019) The Relationships between the nasolacrimal duct and the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus. Laryngoscope 129:1030–1034. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27420
Whyte A, Boeddinghaus R (2019) The maxillary sinus: physiology, development and imaging anatomy. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 48:20190205. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20190205
Yu QQ, Guan G, Zhang NK, Zhang XW, Jiang Y, Lian YY, Liu TT, Jiang XD, Li N (2018) Intranasal endoscopic prelacrimal recess approach for maxillary sinus inverted papilloma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275:2297–2302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5078-1
Zhou B, Han DM, Cui SJ, Huang Q, Wei YX, Liu HC, Liu M (2007) Endoscopic nasal lateral wall dissection approach to maxillary sinus [inChinese]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 42:743–748
Funding
No funds, grants, or other support were received. The authors have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SR, AG, GAS: Methodology, Software. SR, AG, AD: Visualization, Investigation. SR, GAS, AD: Data curation, Original draft preparation. AG, ÇAE: Validation, Supervision. SR, AG: Figures and tables preparation. SR, AG, ÇAE, GAS, AD: Writing and Reviewing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest or competing interests.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was given by the Ethics Committee of Necmettin Erbakan University, approval number 2022/3703.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: In this article some author affiliation are incorrectly given. It has been corrected.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Soyal, R., Açar, G., Çiçekcibaşı, A.E. et al. Assessment of the prelacrimal recess in different maxillary sinus pneumatizations in relation to endoscopic prelacrimal recess approaches: a computed tomography study. Surg Radiol Anat 45, 963–972 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03181-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03181-0