Skip to main content
Log in

Anthropometric and clinical analysis of the distal ulna and extensor carpi ulnaris tendon using MRI

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the ulnar groove (UG), extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) tendon, and ulnar styloid process (USP) parameters in asymptomatic individuals without ulnar-sided wrist abnormalities, to determine whether these values can be anthropometric markers of age and gender and identify their correlations for use in clinical decision-making.

Materials and methods

The MRI T1W axial, T2W sagittal, coronal PW and DESS sequences were evaluated in 100 cases (62 women). The UG width, depth and groove opening angle (GOA), ECU tendon width and thickness, and USP base width and length were measured.

Results

For gender, the cut-off, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy values were 8.58 mm, 67, 68 and 66%, respectively, for UG width; 5.3 mm, 53, 68 and 62%, respectively, for ECU width; and 6.4 mm, 55, 74, and 67%, respectively, for USP length. There was no difference concerning age. The tendon width was 63% of the UG width and depth was approximately 51% out of the UG. UG depth was correlated with GOA and tendon thickness (p < 0.001 and 0.03, respectively); UG width with GOA, tendon thickness, and USP base width and length (p = 0.005, 0.01, 0.016, and 0.02, respectively); tendon width–thickness with USP base width and length (p = 0.05); and US base width with US length (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The gender differences in distal ulnar measurements can be beneficial for surgery and forensic science. UG is wider than ECU tendon, and this is the cause of normal subluxation. Therefore, rather than deepening UG, surgeons should focus on tendon sheath abnormalities as a physiological solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allende C, Le Viet D (2005) Extensor carpi ulnaris problems at the wrist–classification, surgical treatment and results. J Hand Surg Br 30:265–272

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Biyani A, Mehara A, Bhan S (1990) Morphological variations of the ulnar styloid process. J Hand Surg Br 15:352–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang CY, Huang AJ, Bredella MA, Kattapuram SV, Torriani M (2014) Association between distal ulnar morphology and extensor carpi ulnaris tendon pathology. Skeletal Radiol 43:793–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Giachino AA, McIntyre AI, Guy KJ, Conway AF (2007) Ulnar styloid triquetral impaction. Hand Surg 12:123–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hauck RM, Skahen J 3rd, Palmer AK (1996) Classification and treatment of ulnar styloid nonunion. J Hand Surg Am 21:418–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Iorio ML, Bayomy AF, Huang JI (2014) Morphology of the extensor carpi ulnaris groove and tendon. J Hand Surg Am 39:2412–2416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee KS, Ablove RH, Singh S, De Smet AA, Haaland B, Fine JP (2009) Ultrasound imaging of normal displacement of the extensor carpi ulnaris tendon within the ulnar groove in 12 forearm-wrist positions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:651–655

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. MacLennan AJ, Nemechek NM, Waitayawinyu T, Trumble TE (2008) Diagnosis and anatomic reconstruction of extensor carpi ulnaris subluxation. J Hand Surg Am 33:59–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakashima T, Hojo T (1993) Furukawa H. Deep and shallow forms of the sulcus for extensor carpi ulnaris. J Anat 183:635–638

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Pfirrmann CW, Theumann NH, Chung CB, Botte MJ, Trudell DJ, Resnick D (2001) What happens to the triangular fibrocartilage complex during pronation and supination of the forearm? Analysis of its morphology and diagnostic assessment with MR arthrography. Skeletal Radiol 30:677–685

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pratt RK, Hoy GA, Bass Franzcr C (2004) Extensor carpi ulnaris subluxation or dislocation? Ultrasound measurement of tendon excursion and normal values. Hand Surg 9:137–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh R, Patel A, Roulohamin N, Turner R (2016) A classification for extensor carpi ulnaris groove morphology as an aid for ulnar sided wrist pain. J Hand Surg Asian Pac 21:246–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. van Der Heijden B, Groot S, Schuurman AH (2005) Evaluation of ulnar styloid length. J Hand Surg Am 30:954–959 (Erratum in: J Hand Surg [Am]. 2007A 2007;32:923)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yanagida H, Ishii S, Short WH, Werner FW, Weiner MM, Masaoka S (2002) Radiologic evaluation of the ulnar styloid. J Hand Surg Am 27:49–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Toprak: protocol, project development, data collection, manuscript writing. Turkoglu: data collection and management.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ugur Toprak.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

The authors performed this research while working at “Faculty of Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University, TR-32260, Isparta, Turkey”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toprak, U., Turkoglu, S. Anthropometric and clinical analysis of the distal ulna and extensor carpi ulnaris tendon using MRI. Surg Radiol Anat 40, 989–994 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-018-2028-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-018-2028-y

Keywords

Navigation