Abstract
Purpose
To assess efficacy and safety of prostatic artery embolization (PAE) in patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa).
Materials and Methods
In this prospective single-center, single-arm, pilot study, 9 men with advanced PCa underwent PAE. PAE was performed with the use of 250–400 µm Embozene microspheres (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts, USA). International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), urinary peak flow (Qmax) and post-void residual urine volume (PVR) was assessed at 12 weeks and up to 12 months. Changes in total prostate volume (TPV) and tumor responses by PSA, changes in tumor volume and evaluation of tumor regression by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging were assessed at 12 weeks after PAE.
Results
IPSS reduction in median 6 points (0–19) and a significant decrease in PVR from median 70 (20–600) mL to 10 (0–280) mL could be achieved within 12 weeks after PAE. Median TPV and tumor volumes (TV) increased slightly from 19.7 (6.4–110.8) mL to 23.4 (2.4–66.3) mL and 6.4 (4.6–18.3) mL to 8.1 (2.4–25.6) mL at a median of 12 weeks after the procedure. Significant tumor necrosis (≥ 50%) was found in one patient. Eight patients showed > 50% of viable tumor on post-PAE MRI according to MRI. Only one Clavien-Dindo Grade 1 adverse event related to PAE occurred.
Conclusions
PAE with the use of 250–400 µm microspheres is feasible, safe and effective in some patients with advanced PCa regarding functional outcomes. A cytoreductive effect might be achieved in individual patients but must be further assessed.
Trials registration: NCT03457805.
Graphic Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berry SJ, Coffey DS, Walsh PC, Ewing LL. The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. J Urol. 1984;132(3):474–9.
Al. GSe. EAU Guidelines on Management of Non-Neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS), incl. Benign Prostatic Obstruction (BPO). 2022
Abt D, Hechelhammer L, Mullhaupt G, Markart S, Gusewell S, Kessler TM, et al. Comparison of prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomised, open label, non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2018;361: k2338.
Zumstein V, Betschart P, Vetterlein MW, Kluth LA, Hechelhammer L, Mordasini L, et al. Prostatic artery embolization versus standard surgical treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2019;5(6):1091–100.
Hoffmann K, Glimm H, Radeleff B, Richter G, Heining C, Schenkel I, et al. Prospective, randomized, double-blind, multi-center, Phase III clinical study on transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with Sorafenib versus TACE plus placebo in patients with hepatocellular cancer before liver transplantation - HeiLivCa [ISRCTN24081794]. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:349.
Burkhardt O, Abt D, Engeler D, Schmid HP, Mullhaupt G, Zumstein V. Prostatic artery embolization in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol Focus. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2023.02.005.
Alemayehu B, Buysman E, Parry D, Becker L, Nathan F. Economic burden and healthcare utilization associated with castration-resistant prostate cancer in a commercial and Medicare Advantage US patient population. J Med Econ. 2010;13(2):351–61.
Satkunasivam R, Kim AE, Desai M, Nguyen MM, Quinn DI, Ballas L, et al. Radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy vs no local therapy for survival benefit in metastatic prostate cancer: a seer-medicare analysis. J Urol. 2015;194(2):378–85.
Faiena I, Singer EA, Pumill C, Kim IY. Cytoreductive prostatectomy: evidence in support of a new surgical paradigm (Review). Int J Oncol. 2014;45(6):2193–8.
Mathieu R, Korn SM, Bensalah K, Kramer G, Shariat SF. Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in metastatic prostate cancer: Does it really make sense? World J Urol. 2017;35(4):567–77.
Mordasini L, Hechelhammer L, Diener PA, Diebold J, Mattei A, Engeler D, et al. Prostatic artery embolization in the treatment of localized prostate cancer: a bicentric prospective proof-of-concept study of 12 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29(5):589–97.
General Assembly of the World Medical A. World medical association declaration of helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Coll Dent. 2014;81(3):14–8.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.
Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S, Villeirs G, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(4):746–57.
Malling B, Røder MA, Lindh M, Frevert S, Brasso K, Lönn L. Palliative prostate artery embolization for prostate cancer: a case series. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019;42(10):1405–12.
Tapping CR, Crew J, Proteroe A, Boardman P. Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for prostatic origin bleeding in the context of prostate malignancy. Acta Radiol Open. 2019;8(6):2058460119846061.
Guan Y, Wang W, Zhang T, Liao L, Chen J, Zhang Z, et al. Epirubicin-loaded beads transarterial prostatic arterial chemoembolization is a promising treatment for advanced prostate cancer with lower urinary tract obstruction or hematuria-a case series report. Transl Androl Urol. 2022;11(4):480–94.
Abt D, Mullhaupt G, Mordasini L, Gusewell S, Markart S, Zumstein V, et al. Outcome prediction of prostatic artery embolization: post hoc analysis of a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial. BJU Int. 2019;124(1):134–44.
Peacock J, Sikaria D, Maun-Garcia L, Javedan K, Yamoah K, Parikh N. A proof-of-concept study on the use of prostate artery embolization before definitive radiation therapy in prostate cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021;6(3): 100619.
Haddad H, Hermani H, Bischoff P, Hanitzsch H, Heidrich A, Schaefer A, et al. Permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer implementing neoadjuvant prostatic artery embolization. Brachytherapy. 2022;21(3):308–16.
Frandon J, Bey E, Hamard A, Mohammad H, Gonzalez S, Greffier J, et al. Early results of unilateral prostatic artery embolization as a focal therapy in patients with prostate cancer under active surveillance: cancer prostate embolisation, a pilot study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021;32(2):247–55.
Pisco J, Bilhim T, Costa NV, Ribeiro MP, Fernandes L, Oliveira AG. Safety and efficacy of prostatic artery chemoembolization for prostate cancer-initial experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29(3):298–305.
Wang MQ, Zhang JL, Duan F, Yuan B, Xin H, Fu JX, et al. Prostate arterial chemoembolization for treatment of refractory hematuria and urinary retention in patients with localized advanced prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023;26(1):88–95.
Mouli SK, Raiter S, Harris K, Mylarapu A, Burks M, Li W, et al. Yttrium-90 radioembolization to the prostate gland: proof of concept in a canine model and clinical translation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021;32(8):1103-12e12.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the Clinical Trials Unit, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, and initial trial statistician Sabine Güsewell. Boston Scientific provided Embozene microspheres for study patients free of charge. The company did not influence design, conduct, and analysis of the study.
Funding
Costs for the trial were covered by the research funds of the participating departments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed Consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent for Publication
Consent for publication was obtained for every individual person’s data included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Burkhardt, O., Abt, D., Hechelhammer, L. et al. Prostatic Artery Embolization in Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Single Center Pilot Study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03679-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03679-z