Skip to main content
Log in

Coil Embolization of True, Common and Proper, Hepatic Artery Aneurysms: Technique, Safety and Outcome

  • CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
  • Embolisation (arterial)
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To retrospectively assess the safety and efficacy of coil embolization for catheter-directed true common and proper hepatic artery aneurysm exclusion.

Materials and Methods

Nine consecutive patients (2005–2021) in two university centers presenting with true common and proper hepatic artery aneurysms (> 2 cm in diameter) were treated with ‘frontdoor-backdoor’ coil embolization. Patients presenting with a hepatic artery pseudoaneurysm, mycotic aneurysm or patients with small (< 2 cm diameter) aneurysms and followed up by imaging were excluded. Technical and clinical success was defined as complete coil-exclusion of the aneurysm on completion angiography and absence of post-embolization adverse events, in particular mass effect or hemorrhage, respectively. Patient characteristics, technical and clinical success, liver function tests and follow-up results were assessed based on the patients’ electronic medical records.

Results

Technical and 30-day clinical success was achieved in all procedures (100%). No major procedural complications were reported. Liver function test values were available in 6/9 patients, showing transient elevation of bilirubin in one patient. No end organ ischemia was reported. The mean clinical follow-up period of the study patients was 72 months (12–168 months). Long-term stable occlusion of the hepatic aneurysms was achieved in 9/9 patients (100%). One patient showed late complication (3 years) with coil migration into a bulbar ulcer, without aneurysm recanalization, however with fatal outcome.

Conclusion

Coil embolization for the endovascular exclusion of true common and proper hepatic artery aneurysms is safe and effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jesinger RA, Thoreson AA, Lamba R. Abdominal and pelvic aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms: imaging review with clinical, radiologic, and treatment correlation. Radiographics. 2013;33:E71–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rebonato A, Rossi M, Rebonato S, Cagini L, Scialpi M. Giant hepatic artery aneurysm: a fatal evolution. J Emerg Med. 2013;45:e217–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stark J, Eisenberg N, Mafeld S, McGilvray I, Roche-Nagle G, Howe K. Assessment of open surgical and endovascular management of true hepatic artery aneurysms over 20 years highlights increased rupture risk in females. J Vasc Surg. 2022;75:1334–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Abbas M, Fowl R, Stone W, Panneton J, Oldenburg W, Bower T, et al. Hepatic artery aneurysm: factors that predict complications. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38:41–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Belli AM, Markose G, Morgan R. The role of interventional radiology in the management of abdominal visceral artery aneurysms. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2012;35:234–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barrionuevo P, Malas MB, Nejim B, Haddad A, Morrow A, Ponce O, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the management of visceral artery aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70(5):1694–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaer R, Abularrage C, Coleman D, Eslami M, Kashyap V, Rockman C, Murad H. The society for vascular surgery clinical practice guidelines on the management of visceral aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72:3S-39S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Venturini M, Marra P, Colombo M, Panzeri M, Gusmini S, Sallemi C, et al. Endovascular repair of 40 visceral artery aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms with the viabahn stent-graft: technical aspects, clinical outcome and mid-term patency. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2018;41:385–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Erben Y, De Martino R, Bjarnason H, Duncan A, Kalra M, Oderich G, et al. Operative management of hepatic artery aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62:610–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chirica M, Alkofer B, Sauvanet A, Vullierme MP, Levy Y, Belghiti J. Hepatic artery ligation: a simple and safe technique to treat extrahepatic aneurysms of the hepatic artery. Am J Surg. 2008;196:333–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rossi U, Petrocelli F. Hepatic artery aneurysms: endovascular therapeutic options. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2021;25:167–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Filippiadis DK, Binkert C, Pellerin O, Hoffman RT, Krajina A, Pereira PL. Cirse quality assurance document and standards for classification of complications: the cirse classification system. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2017;40:1141–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Angle JF, Siddiqi NH, Wallace MJ, Kundu S, Stokes L, Wojak JC, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transcatheter embolization. Society of interventional radiology standards of practice committee. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(10):1479–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ramesh Babu CS, Sharma M. Biliary tract anatomy and its relationship with venous drainage. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2014;4:S18–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Charnsangavej C, Chuang VP, Wallace S, Soo CS, Bowers T. Angiographic classification of hepatic arterial collaterals. Radiology. 1982;144:485–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mine T, Murata S, Ueda T, Takeda M, Onozawa S, Yamaguchi H, et al. Contribution of extrahepatic collaterals to liver parenchymal circulation after proper hepatic artery embolization. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29:1515–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pedersoli F, Van den Bosch V, Sieben P, Barzakova E, Schulze-Hagen M, Isfort P, et al. Stent graft placement by pseudoaneurysm of the hepatic arteries: efficacy and patency rate in follow-up. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022;45:21–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tipaldi M, Krokidis M, Orgera G, Pignatelli M, Ronconi E, Laurino F, Laghi A, Rossi M. Endovascular management of giant visceral artery aneurysms. Sci Rep. 2021;11:700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Pellerin O, Maleux G, Déan C, Pernot S, Golzarian J, Sapoval M. Microvascular plug: a new embolic material for heaptic arterial skeletonization. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2014;37:1597–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lumsden A, Mattar S, Allen R, Bacha E. Hepatic artery aneurysms: the management of 22 patients. J Surg Res. 1996;60:345–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nomura Y, Gotake Y, Okada T, Yamaguchi M, Sugimoto K, Okita Y. Coil migration to the duodenum 1 year following embolisation of a ruptured giant common hepatic artery aneurysm. EJVES Short Rep. 2018;39:33–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Pratap A, Pokala B, Vargas LM, Oleynikov D, Kothari V. Laparoscopic endoscopic combined surgery for removal of migrated coil after embolization of ruptured splenic artery aneurysm. J Surg Case Rep. 2018;2:1–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Caragher S, Wang D, Moonsany P, Fagerholz P. Hepatic arterial haemorrhage caused by duodenal ulcer. BMJ Case Rep. 2022;15:e249523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was not supported by any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the writing of the text and they all read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Maleux.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Consent Information

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Consent of Publication

For this type of study, consent for publication is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Holsbeeck, A., Dhondt, E., Marrannes, J. et al. Coil Embolization of True, Common and Proper, Hepatic Artery Aneurysms: Technique, Safety and Outcome. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 46, 480–487 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-023-03379-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-023-03379-0

Keywords

Navigation