Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Combining Melphalan Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab in Advanced Uveal Melanoma: First Safety and Efficacy Data from the Phase Ib Part of the Chopin Trial

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Interventional Oncology
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To define a safe treatment dose of ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) when applied in combination with percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (M-PHP) in metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) patients (NCT04283890), primary objective was defining a safe treatment dose of IPI/NIVO plus M-PHP. Toxicity was assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 (CTCAEv4.03). Secondary objective was response rate, PFS and OS.

Materials and Methods

Patients between 18–75 years with confirmed measurable hepatic mUM according to RECIST 1.1 and WHO performance score 0–1 were included. Intravenous IPI was applied at 1 mg/kg while NIVO dose was increased from 1 mg/kg in cohort 1 to 3 mg/kg in cohort 2. Transarterial melphalan dose for M-PHP was 3 mg/kg (maximum of 220 mg) in both cohorts. Treatment duration was 12 weeks, consisting of four 3-weekly courses IPI/NIVO and two 6-weekly M-PHPs.

Results

Seven patients were included with a median age of 63.6 years (range 50–74). Both dose levels were well tolerated without dose-limiting toxicities or deaths. Grade III/IV adverse events (AE) were observed in 2/3 patients in cohort 1 and in 3/4 patients in cohort 2, including Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), febrile neutropenia and cholecystitis. Grade I/II immune-related AEs occurred in all patients, including myositis, hypothyroidism, hepatitis and dermatitis. There were no dose-limiting toxicities. The safe IPI/NIVO dose was defined as IPI 1 mg/kg and NIVO 3 mg/kg. There was 1 complete response, 5 partial responses and 1 stable disease (3 ongoing responses with a median FU of 29.1 months).

Conclusion

Combining M-PHP with IPI/NIVO was safe in this small cohort of patients with mUM at a dose of IPI 1 mg/kg and NIVO 3 mg/kg.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh AD, Turell ME, Topham AK. Uveal melanoma: trends in incidence, treatment, and survival. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(9):1881–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Kooij MK, Joosse A, Speetjens FM, Hospers GA, Bisschop C, de Groot JW, et al. Anti-PD1 treatment in metastatic uveal melanoma in the Netherlands. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(1):101–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rossi E, Pagliara MM, Orteschi D, Dosa T, Sammarco MG, Caputo CG, et al. Pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2019;68(7):1179–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Algazi AP, Tsai KK, Shoushtari AN, Munhoz RR, Eroglu Z, Piulats JM, et al. Clinical outcomes in metastatic uveal melanoma treated with PD-1 and PD-L1 antibodies. Cancer. 2016;122(21):3344–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelderman S, van der Kooij MK, van den Eertwegh AJM, Soetekouw PMMB, Jansen RLH, van den Brom RRH, Hospers GAP, Haanen JBAG, Kapiteijn E, Blank CU. Ipilimumab in pretreated metastastic uveal melanoma patients. Results of the dutch working group on immunotherapy of oncology (WIN-O). Acta Oncologica. 2013;52(8):1786–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2013.786839.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heppt MV, Amaral T, Kähler KC, Heinzerling L, Hassel JC, Meissner M, et al. Combined immune checkpoint blockade for metastatic uveal melanoma: a retrospective, multi-center study. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7(1):299.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Najjar YG, Navrazhina K, Ding F, Bhatia R, Tsai K, Abbate K, et al. Ipilimumab plus nivolumab for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma: a multicenter, retrospective study. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(1):e000331.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Piulats JM, Espinosa E, de la Cruz ML, Varela M, Alonso Carrion L, Martin-Algarra S, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab for treatment-naive metastatic uveal melanoma: an open-label, multicenter, phase II trial by the spanish multidisciplinary melanoma group (GEM-1402). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(6):586–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pelster MS, Gruschkus SK, Bassett R, Gombos DS, Shephard M, Posada L, et al. Nivolumab and ipilimumab in metastatic uveal melanoma: results from a single-arm phase II study. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(6):599–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nathan P, Hassel JC, Rutkowski P, Baurain J-F, Butler MO, Schlaak M, et al. Overall survival benefit with tebentafusp in metastatic uveal melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(13):1196–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Diener-West M, Reynolds SM, Agugliaro DJ, Caldwell R, Cumming K, Earle JD, et al. Development of metastatic disease after enrollment in the COMS trials for treatment of choroidal melanoma: Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group Report No. 26. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(12):1639–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rowcroft A, Loveday BPT, Thomson BNJ, Banting S, Knowles B. Systematic review of liver directed therapy for uveal melanoma hepatic metastases. HPB. 2020;22(4):497–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gonsalves CF, Adamo RD, Eschelman DJ. Locoregional therapies for the treatment of uveal melanoma hepatic metastases. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2020;37(5):508–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Pingpank JF, Libutti SK, Chang R, Wood BJ, Neeman Z, Kam AW, et al. Phase I study of hepatic arterial melphalan infusion and hepatic venous hemofiltration using percutaneously placed catheters in patients with unresectable hepatic malignancies. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3465–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hughes MS, Zager J, Faries M, Alexander HR, Royal RE, Wood B, et al. Results of a randomized controlled multicenter phase iii trial of percutaneous hepatic perfusion compared with best available care for patients with melanoma liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(4):1309–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. de Leede EM, Burgmans MC, Meijer TS, Martini CH, Tijl FGJ, Vuyk J, et al. Prospective clinical and pharmacological evaluation of the delcath system’s second-generation (GEN2) hemofiltration system in patients undergoing percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40(8):1196–205.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Meijer TS, Burgmans MC, Fiocco M, de Geus-Oei LF, Kapiteijn E, de Leede EM, et al. Safety of Percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan in patients with unresectable liver metastases from ocular melanoma using the delcath systems’ second-generation hemofiltration system: a prospective non-randomized phase II trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019;42(6):841–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Meijer TS, Burgmans MC, de Leede EM, de Geus-Oei LF, Boekestijn B, Handgraaf HJM, et al. Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Melphalan in Patients with Unresectable Ocular Melanoma Metastases Confined to the Liver: A Prospective Phase II Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(2):1130–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Karydis I, Chan PY, Wheater M, Arriola E, Szlosarek PW, Ottensmeier CH. Clinical activity and safety of Pembrolizumab in Ipilimumab pre-treated patients with uveal melanoma. Oncoimmunology. 2016;5(5):e1143997.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Rozeman EA, Prevoo W, Meier MAJ, Sikorska K, Van TM, van de Wiel BA, et al. Phase Ib/II trial testing combined radiofrequency ablation and ipilimumab in uveal melanoma (SECIRA-UM). Melanoma Res. 2020;30(3):252–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tong TML, van der Kooij MK, Speetjens FM, van Erkel AR, van der Meer RW, Lutjeboer J, et al. Combining hepatic percutaneous perfusion with ipilimumab plus nivolumab in advanced uveal melanoma (CHOPIN): study protocol for a phase Ib/randomized phase II trial. Trials. 2022;23(1):137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Burgmans MC, de Leede EM, Martini CH, Kapiteijn E, Vahrmeijer AL, van Erkel AR. Percutaneous isolated hepatic perfusion for the treatment of unresectable liver malignancies. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016;39(6):801–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. de Leede EM, Burgmans MC, Martini CH, Tijl FG, van Erkel AR, Vuyk J, et al. Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) with melphalan as a treatment for unresectable metastases confined to the liver. J Vis Exp. 2016;113:e53795.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Meijer TS, Geus-Oei LF, Martini CH, Tijl FGJ, Sitsen ME, Erkel ARV, et al. Embolization of variant hepatic arteries in patients undergoing percutaneous hepatic perfusion for unresectable liver metastases from ocular melanoma. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019;25(6):451–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_8.5x11.pdf. Accessed 1 September 2021.

  26. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Europ J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Seymour L, Bogaerts J, Perrone A, Ford R, Schwartz LH, Mandrekar S, et al. iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(3):e143–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Lencioni R, Llovet J. Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 2010;30(01):052–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Blomen CL, Kött J, Hartung TI, Torster LK, Gebhardt C. Combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and liver-specific therapies in liver-metastatic uveal melanoma: can we thus overcome its high resistance? Cancers. 2021;13(24):6390. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13246390.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Johansson J, Kiffin R, Andersson A, Lindnér P, Naredi PL, Olofsson Bagge R, et al. Isolated limb perfusion with melphalan triggers immune activation in melanoma patients. Front Oncol. 2018;8:570.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Johansson J, Siarov J, Kiffin R, Molne J, Mattsson J, Naredi P, et al. Presence of tumor-infiltrating CD8(+) T cells and macrophages correlates to longer overall survival in patients undergoing isolated hepatic perfusion for uveal melanoma liver metastasis. Oncoimmunology. 2020;9(1):1854519.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Larkin J, Hodi FS, Wolchok JD. Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab or monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(13):1270–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R, Grob JJ, Rutkowski P, Lao CD, et al. Five-year survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(16):1535–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lebbe C, Meyer N, Mortier L, Marquez-Rodas I, Robert C, Rutkowski P, et al. Evaluation of two dosing regimens for nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma: results from the phase IIIb/IV checkmate 511 Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(11):867–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Minor DR, Kim KB, Tong RT, Wu MC, Kashani-Sabet M, Orloff M, et al. A pilot study of hepatic irradiation with yttrium-90 microspheres followed by immunotherapy with Ipilimumab and nivolumab for metastatic uveal melanoma. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2022;37(1):11–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Rantala ES, Hernberg M, Kivela TT. Overall survival after treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Melanoma Res. 2019;29(6):561–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Khoja L, Atenafu EG, Suciu S, Leyvraz S, Sato T, Marshall E, et al. Meta-analysis in metastatic uveal melanoma to determine progression free and overall survival benchmarks: an international rare cancers initiative (IRCI) ocular melanoma study. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(8):1370–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Aedo-Lopez V, Gérard CL, Boughdad S, Moura BG, Berthod G, Digklia A, Homicsko K, Schaefer N, Duran R, Cuendet MA, Michielin O. Safety and efficacy of ipilimumab plus nivolumab and sequential selective internal radiation therapy in hepatic and extrahepatic metastatic uveal melanoma. Cancers. 2022;14(5):1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051162.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Gerrit Kracht for his help in producing the figures.

Funding

Contribution in kind by Bristol Myers Squibb and Delcath Systems Inc. Bristol Myers Squibb contributes to the study with the supply of ipilimumab and nivolumab. Delcath Systems contributes to the study by supplying the kits for the percutaneous hepatic perfusion procedure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Kapiteijn.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

EK and MB have received consultancy fees from Delcath Systems. EK has consultancy/advisory relationships with Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Merck, Pierre Fabre, and received research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb and Pierre Fabre. CB has an advisory role for MSD, Roche, Novartis, GSK, AZ, Pfizer, Lilly, GenMab, Pierre Fabre, Third Rock Ventures, receives research funding from BMS, Novartis, NanoString and 4SC, has stockownership in Immagene BV and a pending patent for WO 2021/177822 A1. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for Publication

Consent for publication was obtained for every individual person’s data included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1932 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tong, T.M.L., Burgmans, M.C., Speetjens, F.M. et al. Combining Melphalan Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Ipilimumab Plus Nivolumab in Advanced Uveal Melanoma: First Safety and Efficacy Data from the Phase Ib Part of the Chopin Trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 46, 350–359 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-022-03338-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-022-03338-1

Keywords

Navigation