Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety and Efficacy of Totally Percutaneous Femoral Access for Fenestrated–Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair of Pararenal–Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Arterial Interventions
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of totally percutaneous femoral access (TPFA) for fenestrated–branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR) of pararenal–thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (PRAs/TAAAs).

Methods

We reviewed all consecutive patients enrolled in single-center prospective non-randomized single-arm study to investigate F/B-EVAR for PRAs/TAAAs (2013–2017). Percutaneous approach was selected in all patients when anatomically feasible; otherwise, surgical femoral access (SFA), with or without construction of temporary prosthetic conduit, was selected. Primary outcomes were technical success, mortality, major adverse events (MAEs) and major vascular access complications.

Results

A total of 231 patients were included in the study: TPFA was possible in 163 (70%) with technical success rate of 93%, while 68 (30%) required SFA. Patients with TPFA and SFA had similar mortality rate of 1%. The rate of MAEs for TPFA was 20% versus 38% for SFA (p = .07). The trend was mainly driven by reduced rates of estimated blood loss (EBL) ≥ 1L (6% vs 21%, p = .001) and acute myocardial infarction (2% vs 9%, p = .03). Similarly, TPFA carried a significantly lower rate of major vascular access complications as compared with SFA (6% vs 21%, p < .001; adjusted OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.3–8.9, p = .01).

Conclusion

A percutaneous-first approach for elective F/B-EVAR of PRAs/TAAAs is safe, feasible and effective when proper patient selection is provided. When the presence of hostile iliofemoral anatomy requires open-vessel exposure, higher rates of perioperative major bleeding, cardiac events and access complications may be expected.

Level of Evidence

Level 3 (single-center prospective non-randomized single-arm study).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Van Herzeele I, et al. European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57:8–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nelson PR, Kracjer Z, Kansal N, et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of totally percutaneous access versus open femoral exposure for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (the PEVAR trial). J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:1181–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Oderich GS, Ribeiro MS, de Souza LR, et al. Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms using fenestrated and branched endografts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:S32–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Verhoeven ELG, Katsargyris A, Bekkema F, et al. Editor’s Choice—Ten year experience with endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: results from 166 consecutive patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49:524–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Timaran DE, Soto M, Knowles M, et al. Safety and effectiveness of total percutaneous access for fenestrated endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2016;64:896–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL, et al. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1048–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. de Souza LR, Oderich GS, Banga PV, et al. Outcomes of total percutaneous endovascular aortic repair for thoracic, fenestrated, and branched endografts. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62:1442–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Malkawi AH, Hinchliffe RJ, Holt PJ, et al. Percutaneous access for endovascular aneurysm repair: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39:676–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dwivedi K, Regi JM, Cleveland TJ, et al. Long-term evaluation of percutaneous groin access for EVAR. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019;42:28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Siracuse JJ, Farber A, Kalish K, et al. Comparison of access type on perioperative outcomes after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68:91–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eisenack M, Umscheid T, Tessarek J, et al. Percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: a prospective evaluation of safety, efficiency, and risk factors. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16:708–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bechara CF, Barshes NR, Pisimisis G, et al. Predicting the learning curve and failures of total percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57:72–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mousa AY, Campbell JE, Broce M, et al. Predictors of percutaneous access failure requiring open femoral surgical conversion during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:1213–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Manunga JM, Gloviczki P, Oderich GS, et al. Femoral artery calcification as a determinant of success for percutaneous access for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:1208–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Arthurs ZM, Starnes BW, Sohn VY, et al. Ultrasound-guided access improves rate of access-related complications for totally percutaneous aortic aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg. 2008;22:736–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Seto AH, Abu-Fadel MS, Sparling JM, et al. Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates femoral arterial access and reduces vascular complications: FAUST (Femoral Arterial Access with Ultrasound Trial). J Am coll Cardiol Intv. 2010;3:751–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Oguzkurt L, Gurel K, Eker E, et al. Ultrasound-guided puncture of the femoral artery for total percutaneous aortic aneurysm repair. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012;18:92–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chee YE, Liu SE, Irwin MG. Management of bleeding in vascular surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117:ii85–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bursi F, Barbieri A, Politi L, et al. Perioperative red blood cell transfusion and outcome in stable patients after elective major vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37:311–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kougias P, Orcutt S, Pak T, et al. Impact of postoperative nadir hemoglobin and blood transfusion on outcomes after operations for atherosclerotic vascular disease. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57:1331–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Obi AT, Park YJ, Bove P, et al. The association of perioperative transfusion with 30-day morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing major vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:1000–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Osborne Z, Hanson K, Brooke BS, et al. Variation in transfusion practices and the association with perioperative adverse events in patients undergoing open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and lower extremity arterial bypass in the Vascular Quality Initiative. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;46:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Buck DB, Karthaus EG, Soden PA, et al. Percutaneous versus femoral cutdown access for endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62:16–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cao Z, Wu W, Zhao K, et al. Safety and efficacy of totally percutaneous access compared with open femoral exposure for endovascular aneurysm repair: a meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24:246–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsilimparis N, Dayama A, Perez S, et al. Iliac conduits for endovascular repair of aortic pathologies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013;45:443–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gupta PK, Sundaram A, Kent CK. Morbidity and mortality after use of iliac conduits for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62:22–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gallitto E, Gargiulo M, Faggioli G, et al. Impact of iliac artery anatomy on the outcome of fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66:1659–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Maurel B, Delclaux N, Sobocinski J, et al. Editor’s Choice—The impact of early pelvic and lower limb reperfusion and attentive peri-operative management on the incidence of spinal cord ischemia during thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm endovascular repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49:248–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rowse JW, Morrow K, Bena JF, et al. Iliac conduits remain safe in complex endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70:424–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Antoniou SA, et al. Percutaneous access for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vascular. 2016;24:638–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario D’Oria.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

G.S.O. has received consulting fees and grants from Cook Medical, W.L. Gore and GE Healthcare (all paid to Mayo Clinic with no personal income).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Oria, M., Oderich, G.S., Tenorio, E.R. et al. Safety and Efficacy of Totally Percutaneous Femoral Access for Fenestrated–Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair of Pararenal–Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 43, 547–555 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02414-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02414-8

Keywords

Navigation