Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Czech Republic: Technical Results from the Year 2016

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Stroke/Neurointerventions
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Purpose

Experienced multidisciplinary stroke team and well-organized hospital management are considered necessary to achieve good results after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic stroke patients. We analyzed the technical results of MT performed in the Czech Republic in the year 2016 to provide relevant data for further quality improvement.

Material and Methods

All centers performing MT in the CR were called for detailed technical and clinical data from year 2016, which were anonymously analyzed and relevant technical key time intervals were compared. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to the HERMES meta-analysis.

Results

In the 2016, 1053 MTs were performed in the CR. Of 15 dedicated centers, the data from 12 centers and from 886 (84%) patients (49.2% males, mean age 69.8 ± 12.3 years) were analyzed. The overall median of time from hospital arrival to groin puncture (GP) was 77 min with a range from 40 to 109 min among individual hospitals, from GP to first passage of stent retriever 20 (15–40) min and from GP to maximal reached recanalization 42 (33–80) min. The median of recanalization time was 240 (219–320) min. The recanalization (TICI 2b-3) was achieved in 81.7% of patients, 44.1% of patients had a good 3-month clinical outcome and 6.3% suffered from symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage. Peri-procedural complications were recorded in 89 (10%) patients.

Conclusion

Despite achieved good overall results, a great variability in some of the analyzed key time intervals among individual centers performing MT warrants further quality improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berkhemer OA, Fransen PPS, Beumer D, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(1):11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, et al. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(11):1019–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, et al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2285–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, et al. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2296–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell BC, Mitchel PJ, Kleinig HM, et al. Endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(11):1009–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Powers WJ, Derdeyn CP, Biller J, et al. American Heart Association/American Stroke Association focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment: a guideline for healthcare professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46(10):3020–35. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000074.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wahlgren N, Moreira T, Michel P, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: consensus statement by ESO-Karolinska stroke update 2014/2015, supported by ESO, ESMINT, ESNR and EAN. Int J Stroke. 2016;11(1):134–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, et al. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1706442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, et al. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1713973.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;387:1723–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sacks D, Baxter B, Campbell BCV, et al. Multisociety consensus quality improvement revised consensus statement for endovascular therapy of acute ischemic stroke. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29:441–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2017.11.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tomek A, Bar M, Mikulík R, et al. The impact of nationwide centrally organized stroke care system on recanalization rates: Czech Republic Experience [abstract]. Eur J Stroke. 2017;2(IS):59.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Šaňák D, Neumann J, Tomek A, et al. Guidelines for recanalisation therapy of acute cerebral infarction—version 2016. Cesk Slov Neurol N. 2016;79/112(2):231–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Higashida RT, Furlan AJ. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:109–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Eriksson N, et al. Multivariable analysis of outcome predictors and adjustment of main outcome results to baseline data profile in randomized controlled trials: safe implementation of thrombolysis in stroke-monitoring study (SITS-MOST). Stroke. 2008;39:3316–22. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.107.510768.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Volny O, Krajina A, Belaskova S, et al. Mechanical thrombectomy performs similarly in real world practice: a nationwide study from the Czech Republic. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013534.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Serles W, Gattringer T, Mutzenbach S, et al. Endovascular stroke therapy in Austria: a nationwide 1-year experience. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23:906–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.12958.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Turk AS, Feri D, Fiorella D, et al. ADAPT FAST study: a direct aspiration first pass technique for acute stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6:260–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lapergue B, Blanc R, Guedin P, et al. A direct aspiration, first pass technique (ADAPT) versus stent retrievers for acute stroke therapy: an observational comparative study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37:1860–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kammerer S, de du Rochemont RM, Wagner M, et al. Efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy using stent retriever and balloon-guiding catheter. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;41:699–705.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hausseger KA, Uberoi R. DAWN: another boost for endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;41:363–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank Dr. Karol Kovačič for his contribution in data collection and preparation of analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Šaňák.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Informed Consent

For this type of study, informed consent does not apply.

Consent for Publication

For this type of study, the consent for publication is not required.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Köcher, M., Šaňák, D., Zapletalová, J. et al. Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Czech Republic: Technical Results from the Year 2016. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 41, 1901–1908 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-2068-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-2068-z

Keywords

Navigation