Skip to main content
Log in

Observations from Australia’s National Surgical Mortality Audit

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Australia is the only country with a national surgical mortality audit. Every Australian surgical mortality is independently and externally reviewed by another surgeon. Extensive educational feedback to surgeons and hospitals is provided through individual patient reviews, state and national symposia and reports, and the distribution of deidentified informative cases. This study reports a longitudinal analysis of the Australian surgical morality audit.

Methods

The standardised mortality ratio (SMR) was calculated for each state and territory, nine surgical specialties and nationally. The index year used was 2016, or every 5 years for those states with earlier data. Overall data were analysed in three groups—all deaths, postoperative deaths and non-operative deaths. Overall specialty data were analysed nationally.

Results

There was a consistent progressive fall, usually in excess of 20%, in the SMR in each state and territory and by specialty when compared to the index year. This was statistically significant nationally (p = 0.044). The same change was observed in earlier years in states with longer-term data.

Conclusion

The period of this observational study has been associated with a nationwide fall in surgical mortality. As other improvements in care will have occurred during this period, the contribution that Australia’s national mortality audit made towards the lower surgical mortality cannot be stated with certainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The ANZASM data will not be available to third parties.

References

  1. Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality. https://www.surgeons.org/en/research-audit/surgical-mortality-audits. Accessed January 2023

  2. Azzam DG, Neo A, Itotoh FE, Aitken RJ (2013) The Western Australian Audit of Surgical Mortality: outcomes from the first 10 years. Med J Aust 199:539–542. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja13.10256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. The Scottish Audit of Surgical Mortality. NHS National Services Scotland. ISD Scotland https://www.sasm.scot.nhs.uk/index.htm Accessed 27 March 2023

  4. National reports and publications. The Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality. The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. https://www.surgeons.org/research-audit/surgical-mortality-audits/national-reports-publications#Publications. https://www.surgeons.org/research-audit/surgical-mortality-audits/national-reports-publications#Publications. Accessed January 2023

  5. Health Insurance (Quality Assurance Activity - Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality. Declaration 2022. Australian Government. Federal Registry of Legislation. https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2022L00633 Accessed January 2023

  6. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Population. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population Accessed 7 October 2022

  7. Haynes AB, Wieser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat A-HS, Dellinger EP et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. New Engl J Med 360:491–499. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa08101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Emergency surgery (2015). Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. https://www.surgeons.org/about-racs/position-papers/emergency-surgery-2015. Accessed January 2023

  9. Emergency Surgery Guidelines. Surgical Services Taskforce. NSW Health. GL2009_009. Sydney. June 2009

  10. A Framework for emergency surgery in Victorian public health services. State of Victoria, Department of Health (2012). https://content.health.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/files/collections/policies-and-guidelines/e/emergency-surgery-framework---pdf.pdf Accessed January 2023

  11. Aitken RJ (2022) Pancreatoduodenectomy in Australia: a continuous quality improvement registry is long overdue. ANZ J Surg 92:6–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yau HC, Lester L, Johansson M (2022) Transition to a high volume centre for Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy in Western Australia, a single centre experience. ANZ J Surg 92:86–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. National Case Note Review Booklet. Lessons from the Audit. 2022 22. Futile Procedures. The Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. https://www.surgeons.org/-/media/Project/RACS/surgeons-org/files/surgical-mortality-audits/ANZASM-CNRB/2022-06-01-ANZASM-CNRB-2022-Vol-22.pdf? Accessed 19 August 2023

  14. Lettie P, Kuponic K, Aitken RJ (2023) The low mortality following emergency laparotomy in Australia is a reflection of its national surgical mortality audit impacting on futile surgery. Br J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Western Australia Audit of Surgical Mortality. 2022 Report. 5-year review Jan 2017–Dec 2021. The Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. https://www.surgeons.org/-/media/Project/RACS/surgeons-org/files/surgical-mortality-audits/waasm/2022-10-13-RPT-WAASM-2022-Annual-Report.pdfAccessed August 2023

  16. National consensus statement (2015) Essential elements for safe and high quality end-of-life care. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Heath Care. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/publications-and-resources/resource-library/national-consensus-statement-essential-elements-safe-and-high-quality-end-life-care. Accessed January 2023

  17. Javanmard-Emamghissi H, Lockwood S, Nare S, Lund JN, Tierney GM, Moug SJ (2022) The false dichotomy of surgical futility in the emergency laparotomy setting: scoping review. BJS open. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac023

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. McIlveen EC, Wright E, Shaw M, Edwards J, Vella M, Quasim T, Moug SJ (2020) A prospective cohort study characterising patients declined emergency laparotomy: survival in the “NoLap” population. Anaesthesia 75:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson AM, Ashraf Z, Burton H, Stonebridge PA (2005) Mapping changes in surgical mortality over 9 years by peer review audit. Br J Surg 92:1449–1452. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5082. (PMID: 15997442)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Young JA, Waugh L, McPhillips G, Steele RJ, Thompson AM (2013) Use of the high dependency unit, increased consultant involvement and reduction in adverse events in patients who die after colorectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis 15:824–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Thompson AM, Stonebridge PA (2005) Building a framework for trust: critical event analysis of deaths in surgical care. BMJ 330:1139–1142. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7500.1139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Thompson AM, Ritchie W, Stonebridge PA (2005) Could sequential individual peer reviewed mortality audit data be used in appraisal? Surgeon 3:288–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1479-666x(05)80094-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Demetriou C, Hu L, Smith TO, Hing CB (2019) Hawthorne effect on surgical studies. ANZ J Surg 89:1567–1576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Murshed I, Gupata AK, Camilos AN et al (2023) Surgical interhospital transfer mortality: national analysis. Br J Surg 110:591–598. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znad042

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sepsis Clinical Care Standards (2022) Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Heath Care. Sydney: ACSQHC. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/standards/clinical-care-standards/sepsis-clinical-care-standard. Accessed January 2023

  26. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Hospital Standardized Mortality Ratio (Hospital Deaths) (2019) Re-Baselining of HSMR Results https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/hsmr-infosheet-2019-en-web.pdf Accessed 21 April 2023

  27. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Hospital Standardized Mortality Ratio Methodology Notes December 2022 https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/hospital-standardized-mortality-ratio-meth-notes-en.pdf Accessed 21 April 2023

  28. Public Health Scotland. HSMR - technical specifications (2022) Technical specification document: August 2019 onwards. https://www.isdscotland.org/Health-Topics/Quality-Indicators/HSMR/Methodology/_docs/HSMR-Technical-Specifications-2022.pdf Accessed 21 April 2023

  29. Scott IA, Brand CA, Phelps GE, Barker AL, Cameron PA (2011) Using hospital standardised mortality ratios to assess quality of care—proceed with extreme caution. Med J Aust 194:645–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Reports & data. Hospitals. Hospitals info and downloads. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/myhospitals/content/data-downloads?search=%7B%22SearchTerm%22:%226%22,%22Subtopics%22:%5B%2238%22%5D,%22ShowRelatedTopics%22:false%7D Accessed August 2023

  31. Framework for Australian clinical quality registries - national standard for clinical safety and quality collections and reporting. Second Edition. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Heath Care. Sydney: ACSQHC (2022). https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/our-work/health-and-human-research/national-arrangements-clinical-quality-registries. Accessed January 2023

  32. Maximising the Value of Australia’s Clinical Quality Outcomes Data. A national strategy for Clinical Quality Registry and Virtual Registries. 2020–2030. Australian Government. https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/national_clinical_quality_registry_and_virtual_registry_strategy_2020-2030. Accessed January 2023

  33. McCahy P, Tayyaba I, Andrew M et al (2020) Assessment of accuracy of Australian health service death data: implications for the audits of surgical mortality. ANZ J Surg 90:725–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.15827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ojeda-Thies C, Sáez-López P, Currie CT, Tarazona-Santalbina FJ, Alarcón T, Muñoz-Pascual A et al (2019) Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (RNFC): analysis of its first annual report and international comparison with other established registries. Osteoporos Int 30:1243–1254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-019-04939-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. National Emergency Laparotomy Audit in England and Wales (NELA). Royal College of Anaesthetists. https://www.nela.org.uk/NELA_home. Accessed January 2023

  36. Fegen G, Barazanchi AWH, Coulter G, Leeman M, Hill AG, Eglinton TW (2021) New Zealand and Australian emergency laparotomy rates compare favourably to international outcomes: a systemic review. ANZ J Surg 91:2583–2591. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.16563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Second ANZELA-QI program summary report. 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2021 (2022) Australian and New Zealand National Emergency Laparotomy Audit -Quality Improvement. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons and Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. https://www.surgeons.org/-/media/Project/RACS/surgeons-org/files/Lettie-Pule/ANZELA-QI-National-Report-2020-2021---9-November-2022---Final-Report.pdf?rev=8c7fbe7f23a0483da4f01cb0f58e29e7&hash=4D0287DBE451CD6C1822FE1506A61762

  38. Evidence Check - Governance, accreditation and quality assurance of clinical quality registries; a report prepared by the Rosemary Bryant AO Research Centre for the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Heath Care. Sydney: ACSQHC (2019). https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-11/evidence-check-governance-accreditation-and-quality-assurance-of-clinical-quality-registries-final-report-nov-2021.pdf. Accessed January 2023

  39. Economic evaluation of clinical quality registries (2016) The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Final report. Sydney: ACSQHC. https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated/Economic-evaluation-of-clinical-quality-registries-Final-report-Nov-2016.pdf Accessed January 2023

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality is organised by individual Australia state and territories. Each has a Clinical Director and office with supporting staff. It is co-ordinated from the Royal Australian College of Surgeons (RACS) Adelaide office. The support and help of many individuals are acknowledged with thanks.

Funding

The Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality is funded by state and territory health departments and managed through Royal Australasian College of Surgeons. Funders have not played any role in the conceptualisation collection, extraction, analysis or the opinions expressed in this report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. James Aitken.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have a conflict of interest.

Ethics and informed consent

The activities of ANZASM receive protection under the Commonwealth Qualified Privilege Scheme, under part VC of the Health Insurance Act 1973 under which it has ethical approval as a declared Quality Assurance Activity.

Meeting presentations

This work was presented at the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Annual Scientific Congress on 2nd May 2023.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Figure S1

SMR for all surgical mortalities deaths under a surgeon in each state and territory by year based on each state’s own population. The index year for each state is shown by the orange square and line. (JPG 438 kb)

Figure S2

SMR for all surgical mortalities deaths under a surgeon shown nationally and for each state and territory based on the national population. The index year is based on the national population and shown by the orange square and line. (JPG 407 kb)

Figure S3

SMR for all mortalities deaths under a surgeon for each surgical specialty shown nationally and based on the national population. The index year is based on the national population and shown by the orange square and line. (JPG 470 kb)

Figure S4

SMR for non-operative mortalities deaths under a surgeon in each state and territory by year based on each state’s own population. The index year for each state is shown by the orange square and line. (JPG 479 kb)

Supplementary file 5 (DOCX 13 kb)

Supplementary file 6 (DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hansen, D., Itotoh, F., Helena, K. et al. Observations from Australia’s National Surgical Mortality Audit. World J Surg 47, 3140–3148 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-07205-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-023-07205-z

Navigation