Skip to main content
Log in

Damage Control Surgery may be a Safe Option for Severe Non-Trauma Peritonitis Management: Proposal of a New Decision-Making Algorithm

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Damage control surgery (DCS) has emerged as a new option in the management of non-traumatic peritonitis patients to increase survival in critically ill patients. The purpose of this study was to compare DCS with conventional strategy (anastomosis/ostomies in the index laparotomy) for severe non-traumatic peritonitis regarding postoperative complications, ostomy rate, and mortality and to propose a useful algorithm in the clinical practice.

Methods

Patients who underwent an urgent laparotomy for non-trauma peritonitis at a single level I trauma center in Colombia between January 2003 and December 2018, were retrospectively included. We compared patients who had DCS management versus definitive initial surgical management (DISM) group. We evaluated clinical outcomes and morbidities among groups.

Results

290 patients were included; 81 patients were treated with DCS and 209 patients underwent DISM. Patients treated with DCS had a worse critical status before surgery with higher SOFA score [median, DCS group: 5 (IQR: 3–8) vs. DISM group: 3 (IQR: 1–6), p < 0.001]. The length of hospital stay and overall mortality rate of DCS group were not significant statistical differences with DISM group. Complications rate related to primary anastomosis or primary ostomy was similar. There is not difference in ostomy rate among groups. At multivariate analysis, SOFA > 6 points and APACHE-II > 20 points correlated with a higher probability of DCS.

Conclusion

DCS in severe non-trauma peritonitis patients is feasible and safe as surgical strategy management without increasing mortality, length hospital of stay, or complications. DCS principles might be applied in the non-trauma scenarios without increase the stoma rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weber DG, Bendinelli C, Balogh ZJ (2014) Damage control surgery for abdominal emergencies. Br J Surg 101:e109–e118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Waibel BH, Rotondo MF (2012) Damage control for intra-abdominal sepsis. Surg Clin North Am 92:243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ordoñez CA, Badiel M, Pino LF et al (2012) Damage control resuscitation: early decision strategies in abdominal gunshot wounds using an easy “ABCD” mnemonic. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73:1074–1078. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31826fc780

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Girard E, Abba J, Boussat B et al (2017) Damage control surgery for non-traumatic abdominal emergencies. World J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4262-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gruen RL, Brohi K, Schreiber M et al (2012) Haemorrhage control in severely injured patients. Lancet 380:1099–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61224-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Voiglio EJ, Dubuisson V, Massalou D et al (2016) Abbreviated laparotomy or damage control laparotomy: Why, when and how to do it? J Visc Surg 153:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.07.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beldowicz BC (2018) The evolution of damage control in concept and practice. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 31:30–35. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1602177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moore FA, McKinley BA, Moore EE (2004) The next generation in shock resuscitation. Lancet 363:1988–1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16415-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ordoñez C, Pino L, Badiel M et al (2012) The 1-2-3 approach to abdominal packing. World J Surg 36:2761–2766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1745-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stawicki SP, Brooks A, Bilski T et al (2008) The concept of damage control: extending the paradigm to emergency general surgery. Injury 39:93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.06.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Girard E, Abba J, Boussat B et al (2018) Damage control surgery for non-traumatic abdominal emergencies. World J Surg 42:965–973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4262-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morgan K, Mansker D, Adams DB (2010) Not just for trauma patients: damage control laparotomy in pancreatic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 14:768–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1186-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Banieghbal B, Davies MR (2004) Damage control laparotomy for generalized necrotizing enterocolitis. World J Surg 28:183–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-003-7155-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Coccolini F, Roberts D, Ansaloni L et al (2018) The open abdomen in trauma and non-trauma patients: WSES guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0167-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ordóñez CA, Pineda JA, Arias RH et al (2008) Curso clínico de la peritonitis grave en pacientes críticamente enfermos tratados con sutura primaria diferida. Rev Colomb Cirugía 23:22–30

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ordóñez Delgado CA, Arias Gómez RH, Pineda Alzate JA et al (2006) Mortalidad y morbilidad de la peritonitis secundaria con relaparotomía planeada. Rev Colomb Cirugía 21:124–132

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ordóñez CA, Sánchez ÁI, Pineda JA et al (2010) Deferred primary anastomosis versus diversion in patients with severe secondary peritonitis managed with staged laparotomies. World J Surg 34:169–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0285-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ordoñez CA, Puyana JC (2006) Management of peritonitis in the critically ill patient. Surg Clin North Am 86:1323–1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R Core Team (2019) R: a language and environment for statistical computing

  20. Khan A, Hsee L, Mathur S, Civil I (2013) Damage-control laparotomy in nontrauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 75:365–368. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31829cb65e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ordoñez CA, Pino LF, Badiel M et al (2011) Safety of performing a delayed anastomosis during damage control laparotomy in patients with destructive colon injuries. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 71:1512–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tartaglia D, Costa G, Camillò A et al (2019) Damage control surgery for perforated diverticulitis with diffuse peritonitis: saves lives and reduces ostomy. World J Emerg Surg 14:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-019-0238-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gasser E, Alexander P, Reich-Weinberger S et al (2019) Damage control surgery for perforated diverticulitis: a two center experience with two different abdominal negative pressure therapy devices. Acta Chir Belg 119:370–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2018.1534397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bruns BR, Ahmad SA, Meara LO et al (2016) Nontrauma open abdomens: a prospective observational study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 80:631–636. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, Faris PD et al (2015) Active negative pressure peritoneal therapy after abbreviated laparotomy: the intraperitoneal vacuum randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 262:38–46. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001095

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos A. Ordoñez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Animals or human rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of institutional research committee from Fundación Valle del Lili under the number 554 in 2014 and has been updated annually since its approval.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ordoñez, C.A., Parra, M., García, A. et al. Damage Control Surgery may be a Safe Option for Severe Non-Trauma Peritonitis Management: Proposal of a New Decision-Making Algorithm. World J Surg 45, 1043–1052 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05854-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05854-y

Navigation