Skip to main content
Log in

Incidence of Appendiceal Malignancies in Sweden Between 1970 and 2012

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is limited knowledge about the epidemiology of the major histological subtypes of appendiceal malignancy: adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine neoplasm of the appendix (A-NEN). The aims of this national cohort study were to assess the prevalence, incidence and trends of appendiceal malignancies in Sweden.

Method

All individuals who underwent appendicectomy and all diagnosed with appendiceal malignancy from 1970 to 2012 were identified from the National Patient Register and the Swedish Cancer Registry. Demographic data of the background population were obtained from Statistics Sweden. The incidence rate (IR) and the prevalence of appendiceal malignancy per performed appendicectomy were calculated.

Results

We identified 3774 patients with appendiceal malignancy. IR of A-NEN was 5.8/106 person-years with a peak of 8.4/106 at age 20–30 years, whereafter it plateaued at a somewhat lower level. IR for adenocarcinoma was 3.7/106 person-years, starting at a very low level among the youngest and increasing to 15.4/106 at age 80–89 years. The IR of adenocarcinoma increased from 2.6/106 in 1970–1979 to 5.4/106 in 2010–2012. The IR of A-NEN was stable during the study period. The prevalence per appendicectomy was low for both types of malignancies among the young but increased with age, most dramatically for adenocarcinoma. There was a trend during the study period towards more extensive surgery.

Conclusion

Adenocarcinoma is most common and increasing in the elderly, whereas A-NEN affects all ages with a peak in young age. This peak probably reflects removal of occult A-NEN due to the higher appendicectomy frequency in the young.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tang LH (2010) Epithelial neoplasms of the appendix. Arch Pathol Lab Med 134:1612–1620

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Misdraji J (2010) Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: controversial issues. Arch Pathol Lab Med 134:864–870

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McCusker ME, Coté TR, Clegg LX et al (2002) Primary malignant neoplasms of the appendix: a population-based study from the surveillance, epidemiology and end-results program, 1973–1998. Cancer 94:3307–3312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Turaga KK, Pappas SG, Gamblin T (2012) Importance of histologic subtype in the staging of appendiceal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 19:1379–1385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marmor S, Portschy PR, Tuttle TM et al (2015) The rise in appendiceal cancer incidence: 2000–2009. J Gastrointest Surg 19:743–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mullen JT, Savarese DM (2011) Carcinoid tumors of the appendix: a population-based study. J Surg Oncol 104:41–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nielsen GP, Isaksson HJ, Finnbogason H et al (1991) Adenocarcinoma of the vermiform appendix. A population study. APMIS 99:653–656

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smeenk RM, van Velthuysen ML, Verwaal VJ et al (2008) Appendiceal neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei: a population based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 34:196–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D et al (2017) Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol 3:1335–1342

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ellis L, Shale MJ, Coleman MP (2010) Carcinoid tumors of the gastrointestinal tract: trends in incidence in England since 1971. Am J Gastroenterol 105:2563–3569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Swank HA, Eshuis EJ, Ubbink DT et al (2011) Is routine histopathological examination of appendectomy specimens useful? A systematic review of the literature. Colorectal Dis 13:1214–1221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Statistics CBo (2017) Statistikdatabasen. https://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/pxweb/sv/ssd/START__BE__BE0101__BE0101A/BefolkningR1860/?rxid=6fe9e41d-f130-44da-928b-43eb297669b3. Accessed 21 Aug 2018

  13. Surveillance E, End Results program. Standard populations—19 age groups. https://seer.cancer.gov/stdpopulations/stdpop.19ages.html. Accessed 21 Aug 2018

  14. van den Heuvel MG, Lemmens VE, Verhoeven RH et al (2013) The incidence of mucinous appendiceal malignancies: a population-based study. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:1307–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nyström G (1932) Wachsende appendicitismortalität. Acta Chir Scand 72:236–260

    Google Scholar 

  16. Andersson R, Hugander A, Thulin A et al (1994) Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation. BMJ 308:107–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. National Patient Register. Cited 07 July 2020

  18. Pape UF et al (2016) ENETS consensus guidelines for neuroendocrine neoplasms of the appendix (Excluding goblet cell carcinomas). Neuroendocrinology 2016(103):144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hatch QM, Gilbert EW (2018) Appendiceal neoplasms. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 31:278–287

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fleischmann I et al (2017) Improved survival after retrieval of 12 or more regional lymph nodes in appendiceal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:1876–1885

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by Futurum, Academy for Health and Care, Region Jönköping County, Sweden.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Redéen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board at Linköping University.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johansson, J., Andersson, R.E., Landerholm, K. et al. Incidence of Appendiceal Malignancies in Sweden Between 1970 and 2012. World J Surg 44, 4086–4092 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05758-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05758-x

Navigation