Abstract
Background
Approximately 30% of patients with apparent sporadic pheochromocytoma (Pheo) may later prove to have an inherited predisposition syndrome, most commonly Von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) disease. Our aim was to compare the clinical and biochemical features of Pheo in VHL to those in sporadic disease to identify differences that may be used to guide management and surveillance of Pheo in VHL patients.
Methods
Data of all patients who had adrenalectomy for histologic Pheo from 2000 to 2018 (QIIRB1749) were retrospectively reviewed. VHL patients were diagnosed by standard clinical criteria and/or genetic testing. Patients were classified as having sporadic Pheo (sPheo) if they had no family/personal history consistent with an associated genetic disorder and/or had negative testing for VHL, MAX, MEN1, NF1, RET and SDHAF2/B/C/D/A mutations.
Results
Of 175 patients, 38 (22%) had VHL and 137 (78%) had sPheo including 27 (20%) with negative genetic testing. Compared to sPheo, VHL Pheo patients were younger (mean 25.9 vs. 51.2 years, p < 0.001), less symptomatic (55% vs. 72%, p = 0.074), less hypertensive (46% vs. 64%, p = 0.043) and were more likely to have normal plasma metanephrines (85% vs. 25%, p < 0.001). VHL-related Pheos were smaller (median 2.8 cm vs. 4.4 cm, p < 0.001) but more often multifocal (>1 adrenal Pheo) (16% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Recurrence >6 months from initial resection was common in VHL (40% vs. 0%, p < 0.001), median time to recurrence 15 years, (range 1–38 years).
Conclusions
Compared to those with sporadic Pheo, patients with VHL are more likely to be young, asymptomatic and normotensive and to have small, multifocal, normetanephrine-secreting tumors. Because recurrence is common in VHL and arises up to 38 years later, continued surveillance is advised.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen H, Sippel RS, O’Dorisio MS et al (2013) The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors: pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma, and medullary thyroid cancer. Pancreas 42:557–577
Lenders JW, Eisenhofer G, Mannelli M et al (2005) Phaeochromocytoma. Lancet 366:665–675
Guerrero MA, Schreinemakers JMJ, Menno VR et al (2009) Clinical spectrum of pheochromocytoma. J Am Coll Surg 209:727–732
Cron J, Taieb D, Pacak K (2017) New perspectives on pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: toward a molecular classification. Endocr Rev 38:489–515
Pillai S, Gopalan V, Smith RA et al (2016) Updates on the genetics and the clinical impacts on phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma in the new era. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 100:190–208
Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Dahia PL, Robledo M (2012) An update on the genetics of paraganglioma, pheochromocytoma, and associated hereditary syndromes. Horm Metab Res 44:328–333
Karasek D, Zdenek F, Pacak K (2011) Genetic testing for pheochromocytoma. Curr Hypertens Rep 12:456–464
Buffet A, Aim LB, Leboulleux S et al (2019) Positive impact of genetic test on the management and outcome of patients with paraganglioma and/or pheochromocytoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 104:1109–1118
Neumann HPH, Bausch B, McWhinney SR et al (2002) Germ-line mutations in nonsyndromic pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 346:1459–1466
Iacobone M, Schiavi F, Bottussi M et al (2011) Is genetic screening indicated in apparently sporadic pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas? Surgery 150:1194–1201
Brito JP, Asi N, Bancos I et al (2015) Testing for germline mutations in sporadic pheochromocytoma/paraganlioma: a systematic review. Clin Endocrinol 82:338–345
Bryant J, Farmer J, Kessler LJ et al (2003) Pheochromocytoma: the expanding genetic differential diagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1196–1204
Fishbein L, Leshchiner I, Walter V et al (2017) Comprehensive molecular characterization of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Cancer Cell 31:181–193
Favier J, Amar L, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP (2015) Paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma: from genetics to personalized medicine. Nat Rev Endocrinol 11:101–111
Muth A, Crona J, Gimm O et al (2019) Genetic testing and surveillance guidelines in hereditary pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. J Intern Med 285:187–204
Nielsen SM, Rhodes L, Blanco I et al (2016) Von Hippel-Lindau disease: genetics and role of genetic counseling in a multiple neoplasia syndrome. J Clin Oncol 34:2172–2181
Nielsen SM, Rubinstein WS, Thull DL et al (2011) Genotype–Phenotype correlations of Pheochromocytoma in two large von Hippel-Lindau type 2A kindreds with different missense mutations. Am J Med Genet A 155A:168–173
Baghai M, Thompson GB, Young WF et al (2002) Pheochromoytomas and paragangliomas in von Hippel-Lindau disease: a role for laparoscopic and cortical-sparing surgery. Arch Surg 137:682–689
Walther MM, Reiter R, Keiser HR et al (1999) Clinical and genetic characterization of pheochromocytoma in von Hippel-Lindau families: comparison with sporadic pehochromocytoma gives insight into natural history of pheochromocytoma. J Urol 162:659–664
Eisenhofer G, Walther MM, Thanh-Truc H et al (2001) Pheochromocytomas in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 display distinct biochemical and clinical phenotypes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:1999–2008
Aufforth RD, Ramakant P, Sadowski SM et al (2015) Pheochromocytoma screening initiation and frequency in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100:4498–4504
Eisenhofer G, Lenders JWM, Linehan WM et al (1999) Plasma normetanephrine and metanephrine for detecting pheochromocytoma in von Hippel-Lindau disease and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. N Engl J Med 340:1872–1879
Neumann H, Berger DP, Sigmund G et al (1993) Pheochromocytomas, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2, and von Hippel-Lindau disease. N Engl J Med 329:1531–1538
Richard S, Beigelman C, Duclos JM et al (1994) Pheochromocytoma as the first manifestation of von Hippel-Lindau disease. Surgery 166:1076–1081
Lenders JW, Duh QY, Eisenhofer G et al (2014) Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:1915–1942
Funding
No external funding for this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, S.R., Nicholson, K.J., Mccoy, K.L. et al. Clinical and Biochemical Features of Pheochromocytoma Characteristic of Von Hippel–Lindau Syndrome. World J Surg 44, 570–577 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05299-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05299-y