Skip to main content
Log in

Minimally Invasive Parathyroidectomy without Intraoperative PTH Performed after Positive Ultrasonography as the only Diagnostic Method in Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A positive and concordant result of at least two diagnostic modalities is generally recommended prior to focused parathyroidectomy. The aim of this study was to analyze the results of surgery and the accurateness of preoperative ultrasonography (US) as single localization modality in patients who underwent parathyroidectomy without the adjunct of intraoperative Parathormone (PTH) measurement.

Methods

The cases with a preoperative US as the only localization technique, who underwent parathyroidectomy between 10/1999 and 12/2017, were selected from a prospectively maintained database. Therefore, a total number of 242 patients with a mean age of 58.6 ± 13.7 years were included in the present study. US was performed by referral endocrinologist or by the surgeon during office visits.

Results

The overall “cure rate” was 99.2% (240 out of 242 patients). In 228/242 patients (94.2%), a drop of perioperative PTH levels consistent with the definition of cure was observed on the day of surgery. In four of the remaining 14 patients, healing was confirmed by PTH level dropping into the normal range on the first postoperative day. Eight patients were cured after a reoperation was performed at our department. Postoperative complications included one case of permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (0.4%).

Conclusions

If performed by an experienced endocrinologist and/or endocrine surgeon, a positive US could be the only preoperative localization study in patients with pHPT. Moreover, the add-value of intraoperative PTH is limited. Major advantages of US are a very high accuracy, the ease of performance (accessibility) and its cost-effectiveness compared with Sesta-MIBI scintigraphy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mollerup CL, Bollerslev J, Blichert-Toft M et al (1994) Primary hyperparathyroidism: incidence and clinical and biochemical characteristics. A Demographic study. Eur J Surg 160:485–489

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rubin MR, Bilezikian JP, McMahon DJ et al (2008) The natural history of primary of primary hyperparathyroidism with or without parathyroid surgery after 15 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:3462–3470

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Butt HZ, Husainy MA, Bolia A et al (2015) Ultrasonography alone can reliably locate parathyroid tumours and facilitates minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97:420–424

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ruda JM, Hollenbeak CS, Stack BC Jr (2005) A systematic review of the diagnosis and treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism from 1995 to 2003. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 132:359–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jabiev AA, Lew JI, Solorzano CC (2009) Surgeon-performed ultrasound: a single institution experience in parathyroid localization. Surgery 146:569–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaplan EL, Yashiro T, Salti G (1992) Primary hyperparathyroidism in the 1990s. Choice of surgical procedures for this disease. Ann Surg 215:300–317

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Miccoli P, Bendinelli C, Vignali E et al (1998) Endoscopic parathyroidectomy: report of an initial experience. Surgery 124:1077–1080

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sackett WR, Barraclough B, Reeve TS et al (2002) Worldwide trends in the surgical treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism in the era of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Arch Surg 137:1055–1059

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Alesina PF, Hinrichs J, Heuer M et al (2013) Feasibility of video-assisted bilateral neck exploration for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and failed or discordant localization studies. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:107–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alesina PF, Singaporewalla RM, Walz MK (2010) Video-assisted bilateral neck exploration in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and failed localization studies. World J Surg 34:2344–2349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0700-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Purcell GP, Dirbas FM, Jeffrey RB et al (1999) Parathyroid localization with high-resolution ultrasound and technetium Tc-99m sestamibi. Arch Surg 134:824–828

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Siperstein A, Berber E, Mackey R et al (2004) Prospective evaluation of sestamibi scan, ultrasonography, and rapid PTH to predict the success of limited exploration for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery 136:872–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Reeder SB, Desser TS, Weigel RJ et al (2002) Sonography in primary hyperparathyroidism. J Ultrasound Med 21:539–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tublin ME, Pryma DA, Yim JH et al (2009) Localization of parathyroid adenomas by sonography and technetium Tc 99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography before minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. J Ultrasound Med 28:183–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mihai R, Simon D, Hellman P (2009) Imaging for primary hyperparathyroidism—an evidence-based analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394:765–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Solorzano CC, Carneiro-Pla DM, Irvin GL (2006) Surgeon-performed ultrasonography as the initial and only localizing study in sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. J Am Coll Surg 202:18–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Prasannan S, Davies G, Bochner M et al (2007) Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy using surgeon-performed ultrasound and sestamibi. ANZ J Surg 77:774–777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kairys JC, Daskalakis C, Weigel RJ (2006) Surgeon-performed ultrasound for preoperative localization of abnormal parathyroid glands in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. World J Surg 30:1658–1663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0660-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Steward DL, Danielson GP, Afman CE et al (2006) Parathyroid adenoma localization: surgeon-performed ultrasound versus sestamibi. Laryngoscope 116:1380–1384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Husen R, Kim LT (2004) Accuracy of surgeon-performed ultrasound in parathyroid localization. World J Surg 28:1122–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-004-7485-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kebapci M, Entok E, Kebapci N et al (2004) Preoperative evaluation of parathyroid lesions in patients with concomitant thyroid disease: role of high resolution ultrasonography and dual phase technetium 99 m sestamibi scintigraphy. J Endocrinol Invest 27:24–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Allendorf J, Kim L, Chabot J et al (2003) The impact of sestamibi scanning on the outcome of parathyroid surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:3015–3018

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mortenson MM, Evans DB, Lee JE et al (2008) Parathyroid exploration in the reoperative neck: improved preoperative localization with 4D-computed tomography. J Am Coll Surg 206:888–895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fraker DL, Harsono H, Lewis R (2009) Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: benefits and requirements of localisation, diagnosis, and intraoperative PTH monitoring. Long term results. World J Surg 33:2256–2265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0166-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sebag F, Hubbard JG, Maweja S et al (2003) Negative preoperative localisation studies are highly predictive of multiglandular disease in sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery 134:1038–1041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen H, Pruhs Z, Starling JR et al (2005) Intraoperative parathyroid hormone testing improves cure rates in patients undergoing minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Surgery 138:583–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Miccoli P, Berti P, Materazzi G et al (2004) Results of video-assisted Parathyroidectomy: single institution’s six year experience. World J Surg 28:1216–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-004-7638-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Paek SH, Kim SJ, Choi JY et al (2018) Clinical usefulness of intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring for primary hyperparathyroidism. Ann Surg Treat Res 94:69–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Dobrinja C, Santandrea G, Giacca M et al (2017) Effectiveness of intraoperative parathyroid monitoring (ioPTH) in predicting a multiglandular or malignant parathyroid disease. Int J Surg 41(Suppl 1):S26–S33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Miccoli P, Berti P, Conte M et al (2000) Minimally invasive video-assisted parathyroidectomy: lesson learned from 137 cases. J Am Coll Surg 191:613–618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Grassetto G, Rubello D (2013) The increasing role of minimal invasive radioguided parathyroidectomy for treating single parathyroid adenoma. J Postgrad Med 59:1–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rubello D, Al-Nahhas A, Mariani G et al (2006) Feasibility and long-term results of focused radioguided parathyroidectomy usin a low 37 MBq(1mCI) 99mTc-sestamibi protocol. Int Semin Surg Oncol 3:30

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Najafian A, Kahan S, Olson MT et al (2017) Intraoperative PTH may not be necessary in the management of primary hyperparathyroidism even with only one positive or only indeterminate preoperative localization study. World J Surg 41:1500–1505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3871-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. ZawawiF Mlynarek AM, Canto A et al (2013) Intraoperative parathyroid hormone level in parathyroidectomy: which patients benefit from it? J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 42:56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Morris LF, Zanocco K, Ituasrte PHG et al (2009) The value of intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring in localized primary hyperparathyroidism: a cost analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 17:679–685

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Berber E, Parikh RT, Ballem N et al (2008) Factors contributing to negative parathyroid localisation: an analysis of 1000 patients. Surgery 144:74–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph Schneider.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schneider, R., Hinrichs, J., Meier, B. et al. Minimally Invasive Parathyroidectomy without Intraoperative PTH Performed after Positive Ultrasonography as the only Diagnostic Method in Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism. World J Surg 43, 1525–1531 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-04944-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-04944-w

Navigation