Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Burden of High-Energy Musculoskeletal Trauma in High-Income Countries

  • Surgical Symposium Contribution
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction to the problem

Though declining in the recent decades, high-energy musculoskeletal trauma remains a major contributor to the burden of disease in high-income countries (HICs). However, due to limitations in the available body of the literature, evaluation of this burden is challenging. The purpose of this review is to assess: (1) the current epidemiologic data on the surgical burden of high-energy musculoskeletal trauma in HICs; (2) the current data on the economic impact of high-energy musculoskeletal trauma; and (3) potential strategies for addressing gaps in musculoskeletal trauma care for the future.

Review of literature

In 2016, mortality from road traffic injuries (RTIs) between the ages of 15–49 was reported to be 9.5% (9.0–9.9) in high-income countries, accounting for approximately 255 million DALYs. While RTIs do not fully capture the extent of high-energy musculoskeletal trauma, as the most common mechanism, they serve as a useful indicator of the impact on the surgical and economic burden. In 2009, the global losses related to RTIs were estimated to be 518 billion USD, costing governments between 1 and 3% of their gross domestic product (GDP). In the last decade, both the total direct per-person healthcare cost and the incremental direct per-person costs for those with a musculoskeletal injury in the USA rose 75 and 58%, respectively.

Future directions: addressing the gaps

While its impact is large, research on musculoskeletal conditions, including high-energy trauma, is underfunded compared to other fields of medicine. An increased awareness among policy makers and healthcare professionals of the importance of care for the high-energy musculoskeletal trauma patient is critical. Full implementation of trauma systems is imperative, and metrics such as the ICD–DALY have the potential to allow for real-time evaluation of prevention and treatment programs aimed to reduce injury-related morbidity and mortality. The dearth in knowledge in optimal and cost-effective post-acute care for high-energy musculoskeletal trauma is a reason for concern, especially since almost half of the costs are attributed to this phase of care. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation teams as part of a musculoskeletal trauma system may be of interest to decrease further the long-term negative effects and the economic burden of high-energy musculoskeletal trauma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). Data visualizations. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/. Accessed 6 June 2018

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nonfatal injury data. http://www.cdcgov/injury/wisqars/nonfatalhtml. Accessed 6 June 2018

  3. Mock C, Cherian MN (2008) The global burden of musculoskeletal injuries: challenges and solutions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2306–2316

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Mock C, Joshipura M, Arreola-Risa C et al (2012) An estimate of the number of lives that could be saved through improvements in trauma care globally. World J Surg 36:959–963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1459-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mock CLJ, Goosen J, Joshipura M, Peden M (2004) Guidelines for essential trauma care. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  6. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Trauma system agenda for the future. https://one.nhtsa.gov/people/injury/ems/emstraumasystem03/traumasystem.htm. Accessed 6 June 2018

  7. MacKenzie EJ, Bosse MJ, Pollak AN et al (2005) Long-term persistence of disability following severe lower-limb trauma. Results of a seven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1801–1809

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morshed S, Knops S, Jurkovich GJ et al (2015) The impact of trauma-center care on mortality and function following pelvic ring and acetabular injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97:265–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stinner DJ, Edwards D (2017) Surgical management of musculoskeletal trauma. Surg Clin North Am 97:1119–1131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weinstein SYE (2018) United States Bone and Joint Initiative: The burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the United States, 4th edn. (forthcoming). Rosemont, IL. Available at http://www.boneandjointburden.org. Accessed 6 June 2018

  11. Mortality GBD, Causes of Death C (2015) Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 385:117–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gansslen A, Pohlemann T, Paul C et al (1996) Epidemiology of pelvic ring injuries. Injury 27(Suppl 1):S-A13–S-A20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Melton LJ 3rd, Sampson JM, Morrey BF et al (1981) Epidemiologic features of pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 155:43–47

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ragnarsson B, Jacobsson B (1992) Epidemiology of pelvic fractures in a Swedish county. Acta Orthop Scand 63:297–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Balogh Z, King KL, Mackay P et al (2007) The epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures: a population-based study. J Trauma 63:1066–1073 (discussion 1072–1063)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Winkler D, Goudie ST, Court-Brown CM (2018) The changing epidemiology of open fractures in vehicle occupants, pedestrians, motorcyclists and cyclists. Injury 49:208–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Passias PG, Poorman GW, Segreto FA et al (2018) Traumatic fractures of the cervical spine: analysis of changes in incidence, cause, concurrent injuries, and complications among 488,262 patients from 2005 to 2013. World Neurosurg 110:e427–e437

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Laird A, Keating JF (2005) Acetabular fractures: a 16-year prospective epidemiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:969–973

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rinne PP, Laitinen MK, Huttunen T et al (2017) The incidence and trauma mechanisms of acetabular fractures: a nationwide study in Finland between 1997 and 2014. Injury 48:2157–2161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hu R, Mustard CA, Burns C (1996) Epidemiology of incident spinal fracture in a complete population. Spine 21:492–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fredo HL, Rizvi SA, Lied B et al (2012) The epidemiology of traumatic cervical spine fractures: a prospective population study from Norway. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 20:85

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Weiss RJ, Montgomery SM, Al Dabbagh Z et al (2009) National data of 6409 Swedish inpatients with femoral shaft fractures: stable incidence between 1998 and 2004. Injury 40:304–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Enninghorst N, McDougall D, Evans JA et al (2013) Population-based epidemiology of femur shaft fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74:1516–1520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Weiss RJ, Montgomery SM, Ehlin A et al (2008) Decreasing incidence of tibial shaft fractures between 1998 and 2004: information based on 10,627 Swedish inpatients. Acta Orthop 79:526–533

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Thur CK, Edgren G, Jansson KA et al (2012) Epidemiology of adult ankle fractures in Sweden between 1987 and 2004: a population-based study of 91,410 Swedish inpatients. Acta Orthop 83:276–281

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ekholm R, Adami J, Tidermark J et al (2006) Fractures of the shaft of the humerus: an epidemiological study of 401 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1469–1473

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Robinson CM, Hill RM, Jacobs N et al (2003) Adult distal humeral metaphyseal fractures: epidemiology and results of treatment. J Orthop Trauma 17:38–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Diamantopoulos AP, Rohde G, Johnsrud I et al (2012) The epidemiology of low- and high-energy distal radius fracture in middle-aged and elderly men and women in Southern Norway. PLoS ONE 7:e43367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Dijkink S, Nederpelt CJ, Krijnen P et al (2017) Trauma systems around the world: a systematic overview. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 83:917–925

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zetlen HL, LaGrone LN, Foianini JE et al (2017) Status of trauma quality improvement programs in the Americas: a survey of trauma care providers. J Surg Res 220:213–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. World Health Organization (WHO). GDB data. http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/metrics_daly/en/. Accessed 6 June 2018

  32. DALYs GBD, Collaborators H (2017) Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 390:1260–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Beck B, Cameron PA, Fitzgerald MC et al (2017) Road safety: serious injuries remain a major unsolved problem. Med J Aust 207:244–249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim YJ, Shin SD, Park HS et al (2016) International classification of diseases 10th edition-based disability adjusted life years for measuring of burden of specific injury. Clin Exp Emerg Med 3:219–238

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Thorpe KE, Florence CS, Howard DH et al (2005) The rising prevalence of treated disease: effects on private health insurance spending. Health Aff 24:W5-317–W315-325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Dalal K, Lin Z, Gifford M et al (2013) Economics of global burden of road traffic injuries and their relationship with health system variables. Int J Prev Med 4:1442–1450

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hemmila MR, Jakubus JL, Maggio PM et al (2008) Real money: complications and hospital costs in trauma patients. Surgery 144:307–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Court-Brown CM, Aitken SA, Duckworth AD et al (2013) The relationship between social deprivation and the incidence of adult fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:e321–e327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Palmera-Suarez R, Lopez-Cuadrado T, Fernandez-Cuenca R et al (2018) Inequalities in the risk of disability due to traffic injuries in the Spanish adult population, 2009–2010. Injury 49:549–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Charters KE, Gabbe BJ, Mitra B (2017) Population incidence of pedestrian traffic injury in high-income countries: a systematic review. Injury 48:1331–1338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tominaga GT, Dandan IS, Schaffer KB et al (2017) Trauma resource designation: an innovative approach to improving trauma system overtriage. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open 2:e000102

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Castillo RC, Raja SN, Frey KP et al (2017) Improving pain management and long-term outcomes following high-energy orthopaedic trauma (pain study). J Orthop Trauma 31(Suppl 1):S71–S77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Phillips TD, Shoemaker MJ (2017) Early access to physical therapy and specialty care management for american workers with musculoskeletal injuries. J Occup Environ Med 59:402–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Scholz SM, Andermatt P, Tobler BL et al (2016) Work incapacity and treatment costs after severe accidents: standard versus intensive case management in a 6-year randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabilit 26:319–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Trauma Institute, Institute of Global Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of California, San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, 2550 23rd St, San Francisco, CA, 94110, USA

    P. Hoogervorst, D. W. Shearer & T. Miclau

Authors
  1. P. Hoogervorst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. W. Shearer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. Miclau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Miclau.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest related to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoogervorst, P., Shearer, D.W. & Miclau, T. The Burden of High-Energy Musculoskeletal Trauma in High-Income Countries. World J Surg 44, 1033–1038 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4742-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4742-3

Search

Navigation