Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of Chest Tube Management to Expedite Rehabilitation of Lung Cancer Patients After Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this meta-analysis and systematic review of published evidence was to optimize chest tube management for fast-track rehabilitation of lung cancer patients after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).

Methods

The PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched to identify all studies that addressed the issue of chest tube management after VATS for lung cancer. Finally, 35 articles were included for analysis, i.e., 29 randomized controlled trials and 6 clinical trials.

Results

After synthesis of the published evidence, the following protocol for chest tube drainage was formulated: (1) after VATS lung wedge resection, chest tube drainage can be omitted in selected cases; (2) normally, one 28Fr chest tube (or 19Fr Blake drain) is placed; (3) the use of a digital monitoring system is recommended; (4) in case of increasing pneumothorax or severe air leakage supported by digital recording system, the tube should be placed with active suction; and (5) the chest tube can be removed within 48 h postoperatively when air leakage is resolved and fluid drainage is <400 mL/day.

Conclusions

Further multicenter studies are warranted based on the variations of body sizes among different ethnicities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miller KS, Sahn SA (1987) Chest tubes. Indications, technique, management and complications. Chest 91:258–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nomori H, Horio H, Suemasu K (2001) Early removal of chest drainage tubes and oxygen support after a lobectomy for lung cancer facilitates earlier recovery of the 6-minute walking distance. Surg Today 31:395–399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lima VP, Bonfim D, Risso TT et al (2008) Influence of pleural drainage on postoperative pain, vital capacity and six-minute walk test after pulmonary resection. Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia 34:1003–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Refai M, Brunelli A, Salati M et al (2012) The impact of chest tube removal on pain and pulmonary function after pulmonary resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardiothorac Surg 41:820–822 discussion 823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanaka M, Sagawa M, Usuda K et al (2014) Postoperative drainage with one chest tube is appropriate for pulmonary lobectomy: a randomized trial. Tohoku J Exp Med 232:55–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brunelli A, Beretta E, Cassivi SD et al (2011) Consensus definitions to promote an evidence-based approach to management of the pleural space. A collaborative proposal by ESTS, AATS, STS, and GTSC. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardiothorac Surg 40:291–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sakakura N, Fukui T, Mori S et al (2009) Fluid drainage and air evacuation characteristics of Blake and conventional drains used after pulmonary resection. Ann Thorac Surg 87:1539–1545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ishikura H, Kimura S (2006) The use of flexible silastic drains after chest surgery: novel thoracic drainage. Ann Thorac Surg 81:331–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakamura H, Taniguchi Y, Miwa K et al (2009) The 19Fr Blake drain versus the 28Fr conventional drain after a lobectomy for lung cancer. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 57:107–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dango S, Sienel W, Passlick B et al (2010) Impact of chest tube clearance on postoperative morbidity after thoracotomy: results of a prospective, randomised trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardiothorac Surg 37:51–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS (2010) The management of chest tubes after pulmonary resection. Thorac Surg Clin 20:399–405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ueda K, Hayashi M, Tanaka T et al (2013) Omitting chest tube drainage after thoracoscopic major lung resection. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardiothorac Surg 44:225–229 discussion 229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakashima S, Watanabe A, Mishina T et al (2011) Feasibility and safety of postoperative management without chest tube placement after thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung. Surg Today 41:774–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Watanabe A, Watanabe T, Ohsawa H et al (2004) Avoiding chest tube placement after video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardiothorac Surg 25:872–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shields TW (2009) General thoracic surgery Philadelphia. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  17. Clark G, Licker M, Bertin D et al (2007) Small size new silastic drains: life-threatening hypovolemic shock after thoracic surgery associated with a non-functioning chest tube. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardiothorac Surg 31:566–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Icard P, Chautard J, Zhang X et al (2006) A single 24F Blake drain after wedge resection or lobectomy: a study on 100 consecutive cases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardiothorac Surg 30:649–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stouby A, Neckelmann K, Licht PB (2011) Reverse airflow in certain chest drains may be misinterpreted as prolonged air leakage. World J Surg 35:596–599. doi:10.1007/s00268-010-0943-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brunelli A, Sabbatini A, Xiume F et al (2005) Alternate suction reduces prolonged air leak after pulmonary lobectomy: a randomized comparison versus water seal. Ann Thorac Surg 80:1052–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Refai M, Brunelli A, Varela G et al (2012) The values of intrapleural pressure before the removal of chest tube in non-complicated pulmonary lobectomies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardiothorac Surg 41(831–83):3

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the important comments from Dr. John Hunter and the anonymous reviewers, which helped to significantly improve the quality of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qun-You Tan.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deng, B., Qian, K., Zhou, JH. et al. Optimization of Chest Tube Management to Expedite Rehabilitation of Lung Cancer Patients After Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. World J Surg 41, 2039–2045 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3975-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3975-x

Keywords

Navigation