Skip to main content
Log in

Autologous but not Fibrin Sealant Patches for Stump Coverage Reduce Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula in Distal Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) causes significant morbidity and mortality after distal pancreatectomy. Patch coverage of the pancreatic stump is often used with the intention to prevent POPF. Despite numerous investigations, the effects of patch coverage remain unclear. The present meta-analysis aims to clarify the effects of patch coverage in distal pancreatectomy on the incidence of POPF.

Methods

A systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed and the Cochrane Database according to the PRISMA Statement was performed. Subsequently a meta-analysis on rates and overall incidence of POPF and length of hospital stay was carried out. By applying the inverse variance weighting method, the combined effect size and 95 % confidence interval were calculated. Heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistics.

Results

Five randomized controlled trials and six observational clinical studies were included for final analysis. A cumulative incidence of 43 % of POPF grades A–C was identified. Patch coverage in distal pancreatectomy is significantly associated with a decreased rate of POPF grade C (p = 0.006). Patches of autologous vascularized tissue significantly reduce the overall incidence of POPF (p = 0.04) and clinically relevant POPF grade B and C (p = 0.002). Fibrin sealant patches do not influence rates of POPF after distal pancreatectomy. None of the outcomes evaluated showed adverse results for the patch group.

Conclusions

Patch coverage after distal pancreatectomy can reduce the rate of POPF. Patch coverage with autologous vascularized tissue but not fibrin sealant patches may be used to reduce clinically relevant POPF and postoperative morbidity in distal pancreatectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BMI:

Body mass index

CI:

Confidence interval

IPMN:

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

LOS:

Length of postoperative hospital stay

NET:

Neuroendocrine tumor

OCS:

Observational clinical studies

PCa:

Pancreatic cancer

POPF:

Postoperative pancreatic fistula

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

References

  1. Park JS, Lee DH, Jang JY et al (2016) Use of TachoSil((R)) patches to prevent pancreatic leaks after distal pancreatectomy: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 23:110–117

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hartwig W, Werner J, Jager D et al (2013) Improvement of surgical results for pancreatic cancer. Lancet Oncol 14:e476–e485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Allen PJ, Gonen M, Brennan MF et al (2014) Pasireotide for postoperative pancreatic fistula. N Engl J Med 370:2014–2022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Diener MK, Seiler CM, Rossion I et al (2011) Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial. Lancet 377:1514–1522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carter TI, Fong ZV, Hyslop T et al (2013) A dual-institution randomized controlled trial of remnant closure after distal pancreatectomy: does the addition of a falciform patch and fibrin glue improve outcomes? J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 17:102–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Olah A, Issekutz A, Belagyi T et al (2009) Randomized clinical trial of techniques for closure of the pancreatic remnant following distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg 96:602–607

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Montorsi M, Zerbi A, Bassi C et al (2012) Efficacy of an absorbable fibrin sealant patch (TachoSil) after distal pancreatectomy: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 256:853–859 discussion 859–860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pavlik Marangos I, Rosok BI, Kazaryan AM et al (2011) Effect of TachoSil patch in prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula. J Gastrointest Surg Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 15:1625–1629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sa Cunha A, Carrere N, Meunier B et al (2015) Stump closure reinforcement with absorbable fibrin collagen sealant sponge (TachoSil) does not prevent pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: the FIABLE multicenter controlled randomized study. Am J Surg 210:739–748

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Silvestri S, Franchello A, Gonella F et al (2015) Role of TachoSil(R) in distal pancreatectomy: a single center experience. Minerva Chir 70:175–180

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hassenpflug M, Hartwig W, Strobel O et al (2012) Decrease in clinically relevant pancreatic fistula by coverage of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy. Surgery 152:S164–s171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fujii T, Yamada S, Murotani K et al (2016) Modified blumgart suturing technique for remnant closure after distal pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Gastrointest Surg: Off J Soc Surg Aliment Tract 20:374–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Akca A, Goretzki PE, Wirowski D et al (2013) Is the covering of the resection margin after distal pancreatectomy advantageous? Eur J Med Res 18:33

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu CT, Xu WY, Liu L et al (2013) Ligamentum teres hepatis patch enhances the healing of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 12:651–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, 2015

  16. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Werner Hartwig.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Maximilian Weniger and Jan Goesta D’Haese have contributed equally.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 34 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (PPTX 184 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weniger, M., D’Haese, J.G., Crispin, A. et al. Autologous but not Fibrin Sealant Patches for Stump Coverage Reduce Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula in Distal Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World J Surg 40, 2771–2781 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3612-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3612-0

Keywords

Navigation