Skip to main content
Log in

Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Posterosuperior Liver Segments

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) is mostly performed to treat solitary tumors in the anterolateral liver segments (II, III, IVb, V, and VI). Few reports are available on LH for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the posterosuperior liver segments (I, IVa, VII, and VIII), especially in association with cirrhosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and feasibility of LH in this clinical setting.

Methods

From January 2008 to January 2011, LH was conducted in 56 patients with HCC in the posterosuperior liver segments (PS group) and 70 patients with HCC in the anterolateral liver segments (AL group) who were admitted to Southwest Hospital of the Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. The clinical data and follow-up results in the two groups of patients were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

No patient in either group died during the perioperative period. Statistically significant differences were found between the PS and AL groups in terms of the operation time (217.5 ± 63.7 vs 176.8 ± 48.4 min, P = 0.000), volume of blood loss (295.5 ± 186.8 vs 220.4 ± 164.2 ml, P = 0.001), conversion rate from laparoscopy to laparotomy (17.9 vs 7.1 %, P = 0.031), transfusion rate (16.1 vs 4.3 %, P = 0.025), cases of hepatic inflow occlusion (38/18 vs 28/42, P = 0.002), and duration of inflow occlusion (41.3 ± 16.3 vs 31.3 ± 12.2 min, P = 0.005). Parameters with no significant differences between the two groups of patients included tumor size (4.0 ± 1.5 vs 3.9 ± 1.7 cm, P = 0.894), resection margin (1.7 ± 0.7 vs 1.8 ± 0.6 cm, P = 0.102), postoperative complication rate (16.1 vs 17.1 %, P = 0.873), postoperative anal exhaust time (3.2 ± 0.6 vs 3.0 ± 0.6 days, P = 0.361), and postoperative hospital stay (10.5 ± 2.7 vs 10.0 ± 0.6 days, P = 0.102). The serum alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels on postoperative days 1 and 3 were significantly higher in the PS group than in the AL group. There were no significant differences in the postoperative levels of the serum total bilirubin, albumin, ALT, or AST levels on postoperative days 5 and 7. After 2–48 months of follow-up, no significant differences in the 1- and 3-year overall survival rates (92.9 vs 95.7 %, P = 0.487 and 76.0 vs 76.8 %, P = 0.878, respectively) or 1- and 3-year disease-free survival rates (85.7 vs 87.1 %, P = 0.797 and 57.6 vs 56.4 %, P = 0.806, respectively) were noted between the two groups.

Conclusions

LH is safe and feasible for selected patients with HCC in the posterosuperior segments of the liver.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koffron AJ, Auffenberg G, Kung R et al (2007) Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more. Ann Surg 246:385–394

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Edwin B, Nordin A, Kazaryan AM (2011) Laparoscopic liver surgery: new frontiers. Scand J Surg 100:54–65

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA (2009) World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Review 10:831–840

    Google Scholar 

  4. Joseph FB, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The International Position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250:825–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS et al (2008) Experiences of laparoscopic liver resection including lesions in the posterosuperior segments of the liver. Surg Endosc 22:2344–2349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Airazat M, Kazaryan BI, Marangos RP et al (2011) Comparative evaluation of laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior and anterolateral segments. Surg Endosc 25:3881–3889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen H, Jeng KS, Huang SH et al (2013) Laparoscopic caudate hepatectomy for cancer—an innovative approach to the no-man’s land. J Gastrointest Surg 17:522–526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yoon YS, Han HS, Cho JY et al (2010) Total laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma located in all segments of the liver. Surg Endosc 24:1630–1637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ishizawa T, Andrew A, Kokudo N et al (2012) Laparoscopic segmentectomy of the liver from segment I to VIII. Ann Surg 256:959–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fuchs BC, Hoshida Y, Fujii T et al (2014) Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition attenuates liver fibrosis and development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 59:1577–1590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gagner M (2010) Small incision, big surgeon: laparoscopic liver resection for tumors without a doubt: comment on “laparoscopic liver resection for malignant and benign lesions: ten-year norwegian single-center experience”. Arch Surg 145:40–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Imamura H, Sano K, Sugawara Y et al (2005) Assessment of hepatic reserve for indication of hepatic resection:decision tree incorporating indocyanine green test. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 12:16–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clavien PA, Petrowsky H, DeOliveira ML et al (2007) Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation. N Engl J Med 356(15):1545–1559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Si Y, Lau WY, Li GG et al (2011) A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare Pringle maneuver, hemihepatic vascular inflow occlusion, and main portal vein inflow occlusion in partial hepatectomy. Am J Surg 201:62–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Stabilini C et al (2006) Isolated laparoscopic resection of the hepatic caudate lobe: surgical technique and a report of 2 cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 16:32–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Foundation of Clinical Innovation Scientific Research, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (No. SWH2012LC10).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no potential or real conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuguo Zheng.

Additional information

Lunjian Xiang and Le Xiao have contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiang, L., Xiao, L., Li, J. et al. Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Posterosuperior Liver Segments. World J Surg 39, 1202–1209 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-2946-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-2946-3

Keywords

Navigation