Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of 5-Fluorouracil Metabolic Enzymes as Predictors of Response to Adjuvant Chemotherapy Outcomes in Patients with Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer: A Decision-Curve Analysis

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based adjuvant chemotherapy is reported in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), but the usefulness of 5-FU metabolic enzymes as predictive biomarkers of the efficacy of this chemotherapy remains unclear.

Objective

This study aims to verify whether 5-FU metabolic enzymes are predictive biomarkers in the clinical setting of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III CRC.

Methods

In total, 179 patients with stage II/III CRC who were treated at our institute between 2000 and 2010 were enrolled. Messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of major 5-FU metabolic enzymes, namely thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, thymidine phosphorylase (TP), orotate phosphoribosyl transferase, and β-actin (control) was evaluated using the Danenberg Tumor Profile method. mRNA expression and other clinicopathological data were investigated with regard to CRC relapse.

Results

A total of 78 patients underwent surgery alone, while 101 underwent adjuvant chemotherapy (5-FU plus leucovorin [LV] or tegafur plus uracil /LV) following surgery. Relapse-free survival was longer and risk of recurrence was lower in association with high TP mRNA expression than in association with low TP mRNA expression in the adjuvant chemotherapy group (hazard ratio 0.66; 95 % confidence interval 0.47–0.92; p = 0.016), but not in the surgery alone group. mRNA expression of no other enzymes was associated with relapse in both groups. In decision-curve analyses, the predictive efficiency of TP mRNA expression plus clinicopathological factors was slightly better than that of clinicopathological factors only.

Conclusions

TP mRNA expression in tumors predicted the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III CRC, although the beneficial effects were marginal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scheithauer W, Rosen H, Kornek GV et al (1993) Randomised comparison of combination chemotherapy plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. BMJ 306:752–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C et al (2000) Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan study group. N Engl J Med 343:905–914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mayer RJ (2000) Moving beyond fluorouracil for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 343:963–964

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M et al (2000) Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:2938–2947

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Punt CJ (2004) New options and old dilemmas in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 15:1453–1459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lokich J (1998) Infusional 5-FU: historical evolution, rationale, and clinical experience. Oncology 12:19–22

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Longley DB, Harkin DP, Johnston PG (2003) 5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat Rev Cancer 3:330–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Andre T, Boni C, Mounedji-Boudiaf L et al (2004) Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2343–2351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hobday TJ (2005) An overview of approaches to adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer in the United States. Clin colorectal Cancer 5(Suppl 1):S11–S18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lembersky BC, Wieand HS, Petrelli NJ et al (2006) Oral uracil and tegafur plus leucovorin compared with intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin in stage II and III carcinoma of the colon: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol C-06. J Clin Oncol 24:2059–2064

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Labianca R, Nordlinger B, Beretta GD et al (2010) Primary colon cancer: eSMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 21(Suppl 5):v70–v77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Twelves C, Wong A, Nowacki MP et al (2005) Capecitabine as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer. N Engl J Med 352:2696–2704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cascinu S, Aschele C, Barni S et al (1999) Thymidylate synthase protein expression in advanced colon cancer: correlation with the site of metastasis and the clinical response to leucovorin-modulated bolus 5-fluorouracil. Clin Cancer Res 5:1996–1999

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Leichman CG, Lenz HJ, Leichman L et al (1997) Quantitation of intratumoral thymidylate synthase expression predicts for disseminated colorectal cancer response and resistance to protracted-infusion fluorouracil and weekly leucovorin. J Clin Oncol 15:3223–3229

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lenz HJ, Hayashi K, Salonga D et al (1998) p53 point mutations and thymidylate synthase messenger RNA levels in disseminated colorectal cancer: an analysis of response and survival. Clin Cancer Res 4:1243–1250

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Paradiso A, Simone G, Petroni S et al (2000) Thymidilate synthase and p53 primary tumour expression as predictive factors for advanced colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer 82:560–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ichikawa W, Uetake H, Shirota Y et al (2003) Both gene expression for orotate phosphoribosyltransferase and its ratio to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase influence outcome following fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 89:1486–1492

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Soong R, Shah N, Salto-Tellez M et al (2008) Prognostic significance of thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidine phosphorylase protein expression in colorectal cancer patients treated with or without 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 19:915–919

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Boskos CS, Liacos C, Korkolis D et al (2010) Thymidine phosphorylase to dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase ratio as a predictive factor of response to preoperative chemoradiation with capecitabine in patients with advanced rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 102:408–412

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamada H, Iinuma H, Watanabe T (2008) Prognostic value of 5-fluorouracil metabolic enzyme genes in Dukes’ stage B and C colorectal cancer patients treated with oral 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Oncol Rep 19:729–735

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ikeguchi M, Makino M, Kaibara N (2002) Thymidine phosphorylase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity in colorectal carcinoma and patients prognosis. Langenbeck Arch Sur 387:240–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vignoli M, Nobili S, Napoli C et al (2011) Thymidylate synthase expression and genotype have no major impact on the clinical outcome of colorectal cancer patients treated with 5-fluorouracil. Pharmacol Res 64:242–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Westra JL, Hollema H, Schaapveld M et al (2005) Predictive value of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase protein expression on survival in adjuvantly treated stage III colon cancer patients. Ann Oncol 16:1646–1653

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nii A, Shimada M, Ikegami T et al (2009) Significance of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidylate synthase mRNA expressions in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 39:274–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vickers AJ, Elkin EB (2006) Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making 26:565–574

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Oka H, Ikeda K, Yoshimura H et al (2006) Relationship between p53 status and 5-fluorouracil sensitivity in 3 cell lines. Mutation Res 606:52–60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Van Triest B, Pinedo HM, Giaccone G et al (2000) Downstream molecular determinants of response to 5-fluorouracil and antifolate thymidylate synthase inhibitors. Ann Oncol 11:385–391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Diasio RB, Lu Z (1994) Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity and fluorouracil chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 12:2239–2242

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sadahiro S, Suzuki T, Tanaka A et al (2012) Association of right-sided tumors with high thymidine phosphorylase gene expression levels and the response to oral uracil and tegafur/leucovorin chemotherapy among patients with colorectal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 70:285–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. van Triest B, Pinedo HM, Blaauwgeers JL et al (2000) Prognostic role of thymidylate synthase, thymidine phosphorylase/platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor, and proliferation markers in colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 6:1063–1072

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kumamoto K, Kuwabara K, Tajima Y et al (2012) Thymidylate synthase and thymidine phosphorylase mRNA expression in primary lesions using laser capture microdissection is useful for prediction of the efficacy of FOLFOX treatment in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastasis. Oncol Lett 3:983–989

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jensen SA, Vainer B, Witton CJ et al (2008) Prognostic significance of numeric aberrations of genes for thymidylate synthase, thymidine phosphorylase and dihydrofolate reductase in colorectal cancer. Acta Oncol 47:1054–1061

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tokunaga Y, Sasaki H, Saito T (2007) Clinical role of orotate phosphoribosyl transferase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in colorectal cancer treated with postoperative fluoropyrimidine. Surgery 141:346–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lassmann S, Hennig M, Rosenberg R et al (2006) Thymidine phosphorylase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidylate synthase mRNA expression in primary colorectal tumors-correlation to tumor histopathology and clinical follow-up. Int J Colorect Dis 21:238–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Donada M, Bonin S, Nardon E et al (2011) Thymidilate synthase expression predicts longer survival in patients with stage II colon cancer treated with 5-flurouracil independently of microsatellite instability. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137:201–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ruckhaberle E, Karn T, Engels K et al (2010) Prognostic impact of thymidine phosphorylase expression in breast cancer–comparison of microarray and immunohistochemical data. Eur J Cancer 46:549–557

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Chisato Saito for her technical support. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Keio University.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshiyuki Ishii.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shigeta, K., Ishii, Y., Hasegawa, H. et al. Evaluation of 5-Fluorouracil Metabolic Enzymes as Predictors of Response to Adjuvant Chemotherapy Outcomes in Patients with Stage II/III Colorectal Cancer: A Decision-Curve Analysis. World J Surg 38, 3248–3256 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2738-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2738-1

Keywords

Navigation