Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of Water Resources Sustainability in Mainland China in Terms of Water Intensity and Efficiency

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Investigation into water resources sustainability (WRS) is vital for a regional sustainable development strategy. This paper aimed to quantitatively evaluate the WRS in mainland China using a three-layer indicator system. Three important factors significantly affecting WRS are: water resources quantity (WRQ), water intensity (WI) and water efficiency (WE). Assessment of the three indicators was carried out in 356 cities where each indicator was graded from “very low” to “very high” according to the value magnitude. China was then classified into four zones to differentiate regional variations of the impact of water intensity and efficiency on sustainability. Results showed that 34% of the areas had “medium” to “high” WI indicator values and 58% of the areas had “low” to “very low” WE indicator values. The indicator values of WI were ordered as Zone I > Zone II > Zone III > Zone IV; whereas the WRS were ordered as: Zone I < Zone II < Zone III < Zone IV. It is recommended that water resource policies be turned to a more sustainable management strategy in areas with high WI and low WE. Zone I regions should be focused on particularly with limited resources and extreme exploitation. The results provide a valuable basis for macro-level decision-making concerned with regional sustainable development strategy for the entire mainland China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan R (2012) Water sustainability and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive - a European perspective: policy paper. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 12(2):171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai X, McKinney DC, Lasdon LS (2002) A framework for sustainability analysis in water resources management and application to the Syr Darya Basin. Water Resour Res 38(6):1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves HM, Alipaz S (2007) An integrated indicator based on basin hydrology, environment, life, and policy: the watershed sustainability index. Water Resour Manage 21(5):883–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Hu Y, Zhao J (2009) Meeting China’s water shortage crisis: current practices and challenges. Environ Sci Technol 43(2):240–244. https://doi.org/10.1021/es801934a

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • China MOCA. (2010). Administrative Division of the People's Republic of China, 2010. SinoMaps Press: Beijing, China

  • Falkenmark M, Lundqvist J, Widstrand C (1989) Macro-scale water scarcity requires micro-scale approaches. Nat Resour Forum 13(4):258–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.1989.tb00348.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark M, Widstrand C (1992) Population and water resources: a delicate balance. Popul Bull 47(3):1–36

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Xu X, Wang H, Yin X (2013) New model for water use efficiency evaluation of China and its application. Syst Eng- Theory Pract 3(33):776–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Giupponi C, Sgobbi A (2013) Decision support systems for water resources management in developing countries: learning from experiences in Africa. Water 5(2):798–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick PH (1996) Basic water requirements for human activities: meeting basic needs. Water Int 21(2):83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heintz Jr HT (2004) Applying the concept of sustainability to water resources management. Water Resour Updat (127):6–10

  • Initiative P (2007) Canadian Water Sustainability Index (CWSI). Policy Research Initiative (PRI) project: Sustainable development. Government of Canada, Ottawa. http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/PH4-38-2007E.pdf Accessed 15 May, 2015

  • Jønch-Clausen T (2004) Integrated water resources management (IWRM) and water efficiency plans by 2005: Why, what and how. Global Water Partnership, Stockholm, Sweden, 4–5

  • Juwana I, Muttil N, Perera BJC (2012) Indicator-based water sustainability assessment - a review. Sci Total Environ 438(0):357–371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Juwana I, Perera B, Muttil N (2010) A water sustainability index for West Java-Part 2: refining the conceptual framework using Delphi technique. Water Sci Technol 62(7):1641–1652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kang MG, Lee GM (2011) Multicriteria evaluation of water resources sustainability in the context of watershed management. J Am Water Resour Assoc 47(4):813–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raskin P, Gleick P, Kirshen P, Pontius G, Strzepek K. (1997) Comprehensive Assessment of the Freshwater Resources of the World. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden https://www.ircwash.org/sites/default/files/210-97CO-14035.pdf Accessed 15 May, 2015

  • Kranz R, Gasteyer SP, Heintz T, Shafer R, Steinman A (2004) Conceptual foundations for the sustainable water resources roundtable. Water Resour Updat (127):11–19

  • Kumar R, Vaid U, Mittal S (2018) Water crisis: issues and challenges in Punjab. Springer Singapore, Singapore, p 93–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundzewim ZW (2001) Some for all, forever — sustainable development and management of water resources. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 8(4):290–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson KL, White DD, Gober P, Harlan S, Wutich A (2009) Divergent perspectives on water resource sustainability in a public–policy–science context. Environ Sci Policy 12(7):1012–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Finlayson B, Webber M, Barnett J, Webber S, Rogers S, Chen Z, Wei T, Chen J, Wu X, Wang M (2017) Estimating urban water demand under conditions of rapid growth: the case of Shanghai. Reg Environ Change 17(4):1153–1161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1100-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luyanga S, Miller R, Stage J (2006) Index number analysis of Namibian water intensity. Ecol Econ 57(3):374–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxmen A (2018) As Cape Town water crisis deepens, scientists prepare for ‘Day Zero’. Nature 554(7690):13–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China (2010) China Water Resources Bulletin.

  • National Bureau of Statistics of the People's Republic of China (2010) China Statistical Yearbook.

  • OECD (2014). Water intensity. http://www.oecd.org/innovation/green/toolkit/o1waterintensity.htm

  • Pires A, Morato J, Peixoto H, Botero V, Zuluaga L, Figueroa A (2017) Sustainability assessment of indicators for integrated water resources management. Sci Total Environ 578:139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Popawala R, Shah NC (2011) Evaluation of sustainability index for urban water management system. 2nd international conference on environmental science and development. IPCBEE IACSIT Press: Singapore, p 267–270

  • Ravetz J (2000) Integrated assessment for sustainability appraisal in cities and regions. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20(1):31–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryu JH, Contor B, Johnson G, Allen R, Tracy J (2012) System dynamics to sustainable water resources management in the Eastern Snake Plain Aquifer under water supply uncertainty. J Am Water Resour Assoc 48(6):1204–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz M (2013) Sustainable water systems. Water 5(1):239–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan C (2002) Calculating a water poverty index. World Dev 30(7):1195–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun S, Wang Y, Liu J, Cai H, Wu P, Geng Q, Xu L (2016) Sustainability assessment of regional water resources under the DPSIR framework. J Hydrol 532:140–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2010) Water for a sustainable world. http://www.unesco.org

  • White DJ, Feng K, Sun L, Hubacek K (2015) A hydro-economic MRIO analysis of the Haihe River Basin's water footprint and water stress. Ecol Model 318:157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu X (2016) Lexicon of Chinese natural resources. Inner Mongolia Education Press: Huhhot, China

  • Xu X, Wang H, Liu H, Li J, Pang B, Xu F (2010) China water use efficiency assessment report. Beijing Normal University Publishing Group, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao H, Zhang T, Liu B, Lu F, Fang S, You Z (2016) Analysis of surface water pollution accidents in China: characteristics and lessons for risk management. Environ Manage 57(4):868–878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0654-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye Q, Li Y, Zhuo L, Zhang W, Xiong W, Wang C, Wang P (2018) Optimal allocation of physical water resources integrated with virtual water trade in water scarce regions: a case study for Beijing, China. Water Res 129:264–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Zhong L, Liang S, Sanders KT, Wang J, Xu M (2017) Virtual scarce water embodied in inter-provincial electricity transmission in China. Appl Energ 187:438–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51509179) and Tianjin Municipal Natural Science Foundation (17JCQNJC08900). The authors acknowledge the assistance of anonymous reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lingling Bin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, K., Bin, L. & Xu, X. Assessment of Water Resources Sustainability in Mainland China in Terms of Water Intensity and Efficiency. Environmental Management 63, 309–321 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1098-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1098-2

Keywords

Navigation