Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Agro-hydrologic Landscapes in the Upper Mississippi and Ohio River Basins

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A critical part of increasing conservation effectiveness is targeting the “right practice” to the “right place” where it can intercept pollutant flowpaths. Conceptually, these flowpaths can be inferred from soil and slope characteristics, and in this study, we developed an agro-hydrologic classification to identify N and P loss pathways and priority conservation practices in small watersheds in the U.S. Midwest. We developed a GIS framework to classify 11,010 small watersheds in the Upper Mississippi and Ohio River basins based on soil permeability and slope characteristics of agricultural cropland areas in each watershed. The amount of cropland in any given watershed varied from <10 to >60 %. Cropland areas were classified into five main categories, with slope classes of <2, 2–5, and >5 %, and soil drainage classes of poorly and well drained. Watersheds in the Upper Mississippi River basin (UMRB) were dominated by cropland areas in low slopes and poorly drained soils, whereas less-intensively cropped watersheds in Wisconsin and Minnesota (in the UMRB) and throughout the Ohio River basin were overwhelmingly well drained. Hydrologic differences in cropped systems indicate that a one-size-fits-all approach to conservation selection will not work. Consulting the classification scheme proposed herein may be an appropriate first-step in identifying those conservation practices that might be most appropriate for small watersheds in the basin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander RB, Smith R, Schwarz G, Boyer E, Nolan J, Brakebill J (2008) Differences in phosphorus and nitrogen delivery to the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River Basin. Environ Sci Technol 42:822–830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burkart MR, James DE (1999) Agricultural-nitrogen contributions to hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. J Environ Qual 28:850–859

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costello C, Griffin WM, Landis AE, Matthews HS (2009) Impact of biofuel crop production on the formation of hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. Environ Sci Technol 43:7985–7991

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crumpton WG, Kovacic DA, Hey DL, Kostel JA (2008) Potential of restored and constructed wetlands to reduce nutrient export from agricultural watersheds in the Corn Belt. In: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, Final report: Gulf hypoxia and local water quality concerns workshop. St. Joseph, MI. pp 29–42

  • David MB, Drinkwater LE, McIsaac GF (2010) Sources of nitrate yields in the Mississippi River Basin. J Environ Qual 39:1657–1667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dinnes DL, Karlen DL, Jaynes DB, Kasper TC, Hatfield JL, Colvin TS, Cambardella CA (2002) Nitrogen management strategies to reduce nitrate leaching in tile-drained Midwestern soils. Agron J 94:153–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds WK, Welch EB (2000) Establishing nutrient criteria in streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 19:186–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donner SD, Kucharik CJ, Foley JA (2003) Impact of changing land use practices on nitrate export by the Mississippi River. Global Biogeochem Cycles 18:GB1028

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosskey MG (2001) Toward quantifying water pollution abatement in response to installing buffers on crop land. Environ Manage 28:577–698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Evans RO, Bass KL, Burchell MR, Hinson RD, Johnson R, Doxey M (2007) Management alternatives to enhance water quality and ecological functions of channelized streams and drainage canals. J Soil Water Conserv 62(4):308–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Goolsby DA, Battaglin WA, Lawrence GB, Artz RS, Aulenbach BT, Hooper RP, Keeney DR, Stensland GJ (1999) Fluxes and sources of nutrients in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin. Topic 3 Report for the Integrated Assessment on Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico

  • Gooseff MN, Hall RO Jr, Tank JL (2007) Relating transient storage to channel complexity in streams of varying land use in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. Water Resour Res 43:W01417

    Google Scholar 

  • Groffman PM, Dorey AM, Mayer PM (2005) N processing within geomorphic structures in urban streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 24:613–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iowa Nutrient Reduction Strategy (INRS) (2013) http://www.nutrientstrategy.iastate.edu/ (Accessed March 19, 2013)

  • Iyengar SS, Lepper MR (2000) When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? J Pers Soc Psychol 79:995–1006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • James WF (2010) Nitrogen retention in a floodplain backwater of the upper Mississippi River (USA). Aquat Sci 72:61–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaynes DB, Isenhart T (2013) Reconnecting tile drainage to riparian buffer hydrology for enhanced nitrate removal. J Environ Qual (in press)

  • Jaynes DB, Kasper TC, Moorman TB, Parkin TB (2008) In situ bioreactors and deep drain-pipe installation to reduce nitrate losses in artificially drained fields. J Environ Qual 37:429–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kasper TC, Kladivko EJ, Singer JW, Morse S, Mutch DR (2008) Potential and limitations of cover crops, living mulches, and perennials to reduce nutrient losses to water sources from agricultural fields in the Upper Mississippi River basin, In: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, Final report: Gulf hypoxia and local water quality concerns workshop, St. Joseph, MI. pp 129–148

  • Kleinman PJA, Sharpley AN, McDowell RW, Flaten DN, Buda AR, Tao L et al (2011) Managing agricultural phosphorus for water quality protection: principles for progress. Plant Soil. doi:10.1007/s11104-011-0832-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovacic DA, David MB, Gentry LE, Starks KM, Cooke RA (2000) Effectiveness of constructed wetlands in reducing nitrogen and phosphorus export from agricultural tile drainage. J Environ Qual 29:1262–1274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kroger R, Moore MT, Farris JL, Gopalan M (2011) Evidence for the use of low-grade weirs in drainage ditches to improve nutrient reductions from agriculture. Water Air Soil Pollut 221:223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Evans ME, Scavia D (2010) Gulf of Mexico hypoxia: explaining increased sensitivity to nitrogen loads. Environ Sci Technol 44:5836–5841

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrence R, Vellidis G, Hubbard RK (1995) Denitrification in a restored riparian forest wetland. J Environ Qual 24:808–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLellan E, Robertson D, Schilling K, Tomer M, Kostel J, Smith D, King K (in press) Reducing nitrogen export from the Corn Belt to the Gulf of Mexico: agricultural strategies for reducing hypoxia. J Am Water Resour Assoc

  • McManamay R, Orth DJ, Dolloff CA, Frimpong EA (2012) Regional frameworks applied to hydrology: can landscape-based frameworks capture the hydrologic variability? River Res Appl 28:1325–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch WJ, Day WJ Jr, Zhang L, Lane R (2005) Nitrate-nitrogen retention in wetlands in the Mississippi River Basin. Ecol Eng 24:267–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noe G, Hupp CR (2009) Retention of riverine sediment and nutrient loads by Coastal Plain floodplains. Ecosystems 12:728–746

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll MA, DeWalle DR (2009) Seeps regulate stream nitrate concentration in a forested Appalachian catchment. J Environ Qual 39:420–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olden JD, Kennard MJ, Pusey BJ (2012) A framework for hydrologic classification with a review of methodologies and applications in ecohydrology. Ecohydrology 4:503–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omernick JM (1987) Ecoregions of the contemporaneous United States. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 77:118–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oudin L, Andreassian V, Perrin C, Michel C, Le Moine N (2008) Spatial proximity, physical similarity, regression and ungauged catchments: A comparison of regionalization approaches based on 913 French catchments. Water Resour Res 44:W03413

    Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Richter BD, and others (2010) The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology 55:147-170

  • Prior JC (1991) Landforms of Iowa. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City IA,154 p

  • Ramachandra Rao A, Srinivas VV (2006) Regionalization of watersheds by hybrid cluster analysis. J Hydrol 318:37–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DM, Saad DA (2013) SPARROW models used to understand nutrient sources in the Mississippi/Atchafalaya River basin. J Environ Qual 42:1422–1440

  • Roberson DM, Saad DA, Schwarz GE (2014) Spatial variability in nutrient transport by HUC8, state and subbasin based on Mississippi/Atchafalaya River basin SPARROW models. J Am Water Resourc Assoc 50:988–1009

  •  Roley S, Tank J, Stephen M, Johnson L, Beaulieu J, Witter J (2012) Floodplain restoration enhances denitrification and reach-scale nitrogen removal in an agricultural stream. Ecol Appl 22:281–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell MJ, Weller DE, Jordan TE, Sigwart KJ, Sullivan KJ (2008) Net anthropogenic phosphorus inputs: spatial and temporal variability in the Chesapeake Bay region. Biogeochemistry 88:285–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santhi C, Allen PM, Muttiah RS, Arnold JG, Tuppad P (2008) Regional estimation of base flow for the conterminous United States by hydrologic landscape region. J Hydrol 351:139–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawicz K, Wagener T, Sivapalan M, Troch PA, Carrillo G (2011) Catchment classification: empirical analysis of hydrologic similarity based on catchment function in the eastern USA. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:2895–2911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling KE, Jones CS, Seeman A, Bader E, Filipiak J (2012) Nitrate-nitrogen patterns in engineered catchments in the Upper Mississippi River basin. Ecol Eng 42:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling KE, McLellan E, Bettis EA III (2013) Letting wet spots be wet: restoring natural bioreactors in the dissected glacial landscape. Environ Manage 52:1440–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz B (2000) Self determination the tyranny of freedom. Am Psychol 55:79–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strock JS, Kleinman PJA, King KW, Delgado JA (2010) Drainage water management for water quality protection. J Soil Water Conserv 65:131A–136A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorp KR, Jaynes DB, Malone RW (2008) Simulating the long-term performance of drainage water management across the Midwestern United States. Trans ASABE 51:961–976

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomer MD, Moorman TB, Rossi CG (2008) Assessment of the Iowa River’s South Fork watershed: part 1. Water quality. J Soil Water Conserv 63:360–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tomer MD, Porter SA, James DE, Boomer KMB, Kostel JA, McLellan E (2013) Combining precision conservation technologies into a flexible framework to facilitate agricultural watershed planning. J Soil Water Conserv 68:113A–120A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner RE, Rabalais NN, Justic D (2008) Gulf of Mexico hypoxia: altered states and a legacy. Environ Sci Technol 42:2323–2327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner RE, Rabalais NN, Justic D (2012) Predicting summer hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico: redux. Mar Pollut Bull 64:319–324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2008) Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico, an update by the EPA Science Advisory Board. EPA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2013) National rivers and streams assessment, 2008–2009, Draft Report. EPA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagener T, Sivapalan M, Troch PA, Woods RA (2007) Catchment classification and hydrologic similarity. Geogr Compass 1(4):901–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White MJ, Santhi C, Kannan N, Arnold JG, Harmel D, Norfleet L, Allen P, DiLuzio M, Wang X, Atwood J, Haney E, Vaughn Johnson M (2014) Nutrient delivery from the Mississippi River to the Gulf of Mexico and effect of cropland conversion. J Soil Water Conserv 69:26–40

  • Winter TC (2001) The concept of hydrologic landscapes. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37:335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolock DM, Winter TC, McMahon G (2004) Delineation and evaluation of hydrologic-landscape regions in the United States using geographic information system tools and multivariate statistical analysis. Environ Manage 34:71–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Helmers MJ, Asbjornsen H, Kolka R, Tomer MD (2010) Perennial filter strips reduce nitrate levels in soil and shallow groundwater after grassland-to-cropland conversion. J Environ Qual 39:2006–2014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Walton Family Foundation for support of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith E. Schilling.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schilling, K.E., Wolter, C.F. & McLellan, E. Agro-hydrologic Landscapes in the Upper Mississippi and Ohio River Basins. Environmental Management 55, 646–656 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0420-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0420-x

Keywords

Navigation