Skip to main content
Log in

Breastfeeding Ability After Breast Reductions: What does the Literature Tell us in 2023?

  • Original Articles
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Reduction mammaplasties are routinely performed on women of child-bearing age, yet there still exists some uncertainty regarding a patient’s ability to breastfeed following the procedure. This is due to inconsistent definitions of “successful” breastfeeding, a variety of pedicles implemented, and inadequate follow-up in the published literature. Our aim was to summarize the current data and provide clear recommendations for counseling patients on expected breastfeeding outcomes following reduction mammaplasty.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines was conducted. We included papers that reported proportion of breastfeeding ability following reduction mammaplasty.

Results

We identified 33 papers that met our inclusion criteria. We found that women who undergo reduction mammaplasty are at a 3.5 times increased odds of not being able to breastfeed compared to controls. Overall, reduction mammaplasty patients have a breastfeeding success rate of 62%. The breastfeeding success rate for patients with inferior pedicles was 64%, superior pedicles was 59%, and lateral pedicles was 55%. No conclusions could be drawn regarding medial, central, vertical, and horizontal pedicles on breastfeeding ability.

Conclusion

Current data suggest that women undergoing reduction mammaplasty have an increased odds of unsuccessful breastfeeding when compared to similar women who have not undergone the procedure. Based on the current literature, pedicle type does play a role in rate of breastfeeding success, although there is a need for further research on the aforementioned pedicles. Physicians should be aware of the likelihood of successful breastfeeding following reduction mammaplasty so that patients can be more thoroughly counseled prior to a decision for surgery.

Level of Evidence I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Society of Plastic Surgeons (2019) Plastic surgery statistics report. ASPS National clearinghouse of plastic surgery procedural statistics.

  2. Chadbourne EB, Zhang S, Gordon MJ, Ro EY, Ross SD, Schnur PL, Schneider-Redden PR (2001) Clinical outcomes in reduction mammaplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. Mayo Clin Proc 76:503–510. https://doi.org/10.4065/76.5.503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sachs D, Szymanski KD (2023) Breast reduction [Updated 2023 Jun 27]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441974/

  4. Daane SP, Rockwell WB (1999) Breast reduction techniques and outcomes: a meta-analysis. Aesthetic Surg J 19:293–303. https://doi.org/10.1053/aq.1999.v19.100635001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marshall DR, Callan PP, Nicholson W (1994) Breastfeeding after reduction mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 47:167–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(94)90048-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiummariello S, Cigna E, Buccheri EM, Dessy LA, Alfano C, Scuderi N (2008) Breastfeeding after reduction mammaplasty using different techniques. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32:294–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9023-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brzozowski D, Niessen M, Evans HB, Hurst LN (2000) Breast-feeding after inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:530–534. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200002000-00008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hefter W, Lindholm P, Elvenes OP (2003) Lactation and breast-feeding ability following lateral pedicle mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg 56:746–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-1226(03)00368-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sinno H, Botros E, Moufarrege R (2013) The effects of Moufarrege total posterior pedicle reduction mammaplasty on breastfeeding: a review of 931 cases. Aesthetic Surg J 33:1002–1007. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X13501857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Asimaki E, Dagla M, Sarantaki A, Iliadou M (2022) Main biopsychosocial factors influencing breastfeeding: a systematic review. Maedica (Bucur). 17:955–962. https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2022.17.4.955

  11. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Thibaudeau S, Sinno H, Williams B (2010) The effects of breast reduction on successful breastfeeding: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:1688–1693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2009.07.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kraut RY, Brown E, Korownyk C, Katz LS, Vandermeer B, Babenko O, Gross MS, Campbell S, Allan GM (2017) The impact of breast reduction surgery on breastfeeding: systematic review of observational studies. PLoS One 12(10):e0186591. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186591 (PMID: 29049351; PMCID: PMC5648284)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Covidence systematic review software.

  15. Nyaga VN, Arbyn M, Aerts M (2014) Metaprop: a stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch Public Heal. 72:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-3258-72-39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Review Manager Web.

  17. Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Abboud N, Abboud M (2022) Power-assisted liposuction mammaplasty (PALM): a short scar mammaplasty in gigantomastia. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98816

  19. Aboudib JH Jr, de Castro CC, Coelho RS, Cupello AM (1991) Analysis of late results in postpregnancy mammoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 26(2):111–116. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199102000-00001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brown JR, Holton LH, Chung TL, Slezak S (2008) Breast-feeding, self-exam, and exercise practices before and after reduction mammoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 61:375–379. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e318160223f

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Camargo JdF, Modenesi TdSS, Brandão MAG, Cabral IE, de Pontes MB, Primo CC (2018) Breastfeeding experience of women after mammoplasty. Rev Esc Enferm USP 52: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2017020003350 (PMID: 30043930; in Portuguese)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cherchel A, Azzam C (2007) A DM: Breastfeeding after vertical reduction mammaplasty using a superior pedicle. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60:465–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2006.05.023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Copcu E (2009) A versatile breast reduction technique: Conical plicated central U shaped (COPCUs) mammaplasty. Ann Surg Innov Res 3:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-1164-3-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Harris L, Morris SF, Freiberg A (1992) Is breast feeding possible after reduction mammaplasty? Plast Reconstr Surg 89:836–839. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199205000-00009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jørgensen MG, Albertsdottir E, Dalaei F, Hesselfeldt-Nielsen J, Schmidt VJ, Sørensen JA, Toyserkani NM (2021) Superomedial reduction mammoplasty affects patients’ ability to breastfeed in a distinct manner: a multicenter study of 303 patients. Aesthet Surg J 41(11):NP1498–NP1507. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjab263 (PMID: 34173823)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mandrekas AD, Zambacos GJ, Anastasopoulos A, Hapsas DA (1996) Reduction mammaplasty with the inferior pedicle technique: early and late complications in 371 patients. British J Plast Surg 49(7):442–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Marshall DR, Callan P, Nicholson W (1993) Breast feeding after reduction mammoplasty. Med J Aust 159:428–429. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1993.tb137944.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jt N, Palladino H (2013) AJ S, PM P: long-term satisfaction of reduction mammaplasty for bilateral symptomatic macromastia in younger patients. J Adolesc Heal 53:112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.01.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Souto GC, Giugliani ERJ, Giugliani C, Schneider MA (2003) The impact of breast reduction surgery on breastfeeding performance. J Hum Lact 19:43–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334402239733

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zambacos GJ, Mandrekas AD (2001) Breast-feeding after inferior pedicle reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:294–295. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200101000-00071

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Witte PM, van der Lei B, van der Biezen JJ, Spronk CA (2004) Successful breastfeeding after reduction mammaplasty. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 148:1291–1293 (PMID: 15279213)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Fryzek JP, Weiderpass E, Signorello LB et al (2000) Characteristics of women with cosmetic breast augmentation surgery compared with breast reduction surgery patients and women in the general population of Sweden. Ann Plast Surg 45:349–356. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-200045040-00001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tairych G, Worseg A, Kuzbari R, Deutinger M, Holle J (2000) A comparison of long-term outcome of 6 techniques of breast reduction. Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, Plast Chir Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripher Nerven und Gefasse Organ der 32:159–165. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2000-10926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Davis GM, Ringler SL, Short K, Sherrick D, Bengtson BP (1995) Reduction mammaplasty: long-term efficacy, morbidity, and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 96(5):1106–1110 (PMID: 7568486)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Deutinger M, Deutinger J (1993) Breast feeding after aesthetic mammary operations and cardiac operations through horizontal submammary skin incision. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 176:267–270 (PMID: 8438199)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Caouette-Laberge L, Duranceau LA (1992) Breast feeding after breast reduction. Ann Chir 46:826–829 (PMID: 1299162)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sandsmark M, Amland PF, Abyholm F, Traaholt L (1992) Reduction mammaplasty. A comparative study of the Orlando and Robbins methods in 292 patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg hand Surg 26:203–209. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844319209016013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Deutinger M, Deutinger J (1990) Breast feeding following breast reduction-plasty and mastopexy? Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 50:220–222. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1026467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lossing C, Holmström H (1985) Reduction mammaplasty with preserved breast-feeding function. Lakartidningen 82:2878–2881 (PMID: 4046675)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bretteville-Jensen G (1976) Reduction mammaplasty with a vertical bipedicle and transverse scar: a follow-up. Br J Plast Surg 29:142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(76)90041-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Müller FE (1986) Late results of 1,046 breast reduction-plasties. Langenbecks Arch Chir 369:273–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01274368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ragnell A (1957) Further experience of preservation of lactation capacity and nipple sensitivity in breast reduction. Transactions of the international society of plastic surgeons. The Williams and Wilkins Company, Baltimore, pp 379–383

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cruz NI, Korchin L (2007) Lactational performance after breast reduction with different pedicles. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:35–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000263371.37596.49

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kakagia D, Tripsiannis G, Tsoutsos D (2005) Breastfeeding after reduction mammaplasty: a comparison of 3 techniques. Ann Plast Surg 55:343–345. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000179167.18733.97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Aillet S, Watier E, Chevrier S (2002) JP P, JY G: Breast feeding after reduction mammaplasty performed during adolescence. Eur J Obs Gynecol Reprod Biol. 101:79–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00517-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Perdikis G, Dillingham C, Boukovalas S, Ogunleye AA, Casambre F, Dal Cin A et al (2022) American Society of Plastic Surgeons evidence-based clinical practice guideline revision: reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 149(3):392e–409e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008860 (PMID: 35006204)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2021) National immunization survey. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

  48. Wong C, Vucovich M, Rohrich R (2014) Mastopexy and reduction mammoplasty pedicles and skin resection patterns. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2:e202. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000125

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bilal Koussayer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights Statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study informed consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1881 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koussayer, B., Taylor, J., Warner, J. et al. Breastfeeding Ability After Breast Reductions: What does the Literature Tell us in 2023?. Aesth Plast Surg 48, 1142–1155 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03690-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03690-8

Keywords

Navigation