Skip to main content
Log in

Double Eyelid Shape Preference: A Large Sample Survey

  • Survey
  • Oculoplastic
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Double eyelid blepharoplasty is a popular procedure among Asian population. Double eyelid shape is important to achieving high satisfaction rate. Currently, there lacks large sample survey and detailed analysis on preferred double eyelid shape. This study aims to investigate the double eyelid shape preference using the “in-fold,” “on-fold,” and “out-fold” classification and analyze the preferred shape of different demographic groups.

Methods

A large sample survey was conducted with a questionnaire of nine questions in three sections: demographic characteristics, desired double eyelid shape, and assessment of the classification. The preference for each type of double eyelid shape was analyzed and compared among different groups.

Results

A total of 11153 (9698 female and 1455 male) respondents finished the questionnaire, including 382 plastic surgeons. In-fold double eyelid was the most popular choice overall. Out-fold was the least preferred, except for specific groups such as actors and heavy makeup wearers. No significant difference was observed between the preference of patients and plastic surgeons. The majority of respondents cared much about postoperative double eyelid shape and considered the classification useful.

Conclusions

In-fold was the most preferred double eyelid shape, especially for patients who met one or more of the following criteria: male, older than 40, divorced, or housewives. However, heavy makeup wearers or actors/actresses tend to prefer out-fold double eyelids. The “in-fold,” “on-fold,” and “out-fold” classification was precise and beneficial to doctor–patient communication.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burusapat C, Thanapurirat S, Wanichjaroen N, Pruksapong C, Attainsee A, Jankajorn S (2020) Anthropometry analysis of beautiful upper eyelids in oriental: new eyelid crease ratio and clinical application. Aesthetic Plast Surg 44(2):392–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01536-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hwang HS, Spiegel JH (2014) The effect of “single” vs “double” eyelids on the perceived attractiveness of Chinese women. Aesthet Surg J 34(3):374–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820x14523020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Paik JS, Lee JH, Uppal S, Choi WC (2020) intricacies of Upper blepharoplasty in Asian burden Lids. Facial Plast Surg 36(5):563–574. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1718391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang HC, Ting W, Tong D, Dong R, Long X, Huang J, Cao H, Tianyu Sun E, Yu N, Wang X, Zhao R (2021) Will the patient’s double eyelid shape be like that of the surgeon performing the procedure? A study of surgeons’ aesthetics in East Asian Blepharoplasty. J Cosmet Dermatol 20(4):1208–1213. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen SN, Chen SH, Chen CC, Huang CL, Tai HC, Wang YP (2017) Chen’s double eyelid fold illusion: an eye size assimilation illusion induced by a supratarsal fold in the brow-eye unit, A preliminary report. Aesthetic Plast Surg 41(6):1375–1381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0961-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Suo L, Li J, Fu R, Xie Y, Huang RL (2020) A four-step technique for creating individual double-eyelid crease shapes: a free-style design. Plast Reconstr Surg 146(4):756–765. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000007185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen WP (2020) The eyelid crease height, depth, and shape: a scoring system for revisional asian blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8(5):e2802. https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000002802

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang C, Mei X, Pu LLQ (2021) Asian upper blepharoplasty in women: a comprehensive approach for a natural and aesthetically pleasing outcome. Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjab021

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang G, Zhang S, Ma J, Li D, Xue H (2018) Cosmetic and structural outcomes of two different techniques of medial epicanthoplasty according to epicanthal fold classification and severity: a cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 71(10):1453–1461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2018.05.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gaofeng L, Jun T, Zihan W, Wei D, Huawei O, Fan Z, Mingcan L (2015) Therapeutic strategy for different types of epicanthus Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi. Chin J Plast Surg 31(6):428–431

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rhee SC, Woo KS, Kwon B (2012) Biometric study of eyelid shape and dimensions of different races with references to beauty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(5):1236–1245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-012-9937-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Er Pan, Xiao Long or Jiuzuo Huang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Z., Zhang, S., Yu, J. et al. Double Eyelid Shape Preference: A Large Sample Survey. Aesth Plast Surg 46, 2287–2294 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02880-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02880-0

Keywords

Navigation