Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ptosis and Bottoming out Following Mastopexy and Reduction Mammoplasty. Is Synthetic Mesh Internal Breast Support the Solution? A Systematic Review of the Literature

  • Review
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Relying on soft tissues with low structural strength to provide long-term support of the breasts following aesthetic mammoplasty may be inadequate in many instances. To address the inherent weakness of tissues still present after surgery, use of synthetic non-autologous additional tissue reinforcement has been described. The current review is aimed at analyzing available evidence about safety and effectiveness of mesh support in various reduction mammoplasty, mastopexy, or augmentation–mastopexy.

Methods

An advanced PubMed and Medline search was conducted to identify clinical studies about the use of synthetic mesh in aesthetic breast surgery. An additional search of breast symmetrization and synthetic mesh was also conducted. Ten studies were identified and judged to be relevant to this review.

Results

Retrieved studies were relatively few, characterized by marked heterogeneity, lack of well-defined outcome end points, poor outcome measures, and inherent bias in outcome documentation providing low level of evidence.

Conclusion

Despite reported relative safety and some promising results, available data indicate that meshes do not effectively prevent recurrent ptosis and bottoming out; they may not be superior to described techniques with superior pedicle and hammocks or “balcony” flaps. Well-conducted studies are yet to be conducted comparing internal bra technique to procedures with innovative autologous tissue support.

Level of Evidence III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Bruijn HP, Johannes S (2008) Mastopexy with 3D preshaped mesh for long-term results: development of the internal bra system. Aesthetic Plast Surg 32(5):757–765

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. de la Plaza R, de la Cruz L, Moreno C (2005) Mastopexy utilizing a dermoglandular hammock flap. Aesthet Surg J 25(1):31–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hickman DM (2011) Application of the goes double-skin peri-areolar mastopexy with and without implants: a 14-year experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(2):164–173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zeiderman MR, Schulz S, Riccio CA, Nguyen J, Chowdhry S, Wilhelmi BJ (2016) Pseudoptosis correction with the 270° pedicle reduction mammoplasty: an anatomic and clinical study. Eplasty 16:e16

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hudson DA, Moodley S (2017) Breast reduction: decreasing complications and improving long-term aesthetic results with parenchymal sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5(9):e1470

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Xue AS, Dayan E, Rohrich RJ (2020) Achieving predictability in augmentation mastopexy: an update. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 8(9):e2784

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Colicchia GM, Di Pietro V, Cervelli V (2019) Mastoplasty after massive weight loss: redefinition and stabilization of the breast mound with submuscular autoprosthesis. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 12(3):164–173

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Atiyeh B, Chahine F (2018) Correction to: metrics of the aesthetically perfect breast. Aesthetic Plast Surg 42(6):1718

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson GW (1981) Central core reduction mammoplasties and marlex suspension of breast tissue. Aesthetic Plast Surg 5(1):77–84

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van Deventer PV, Graewe FR, Würinger E (2012) Improving the longevity and results of mastopexy and breast reduction procedures: reconstructing an internal breast support system with biocompatible mesh to replace the supporting function of the ligamentous suspension. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(3):578–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9845-2 (Epub 2011 Nov 20)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hall-Findlay EJ (2010) The three breast dimensions: analysis and effecting change. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(6):1632–1642

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mallucci P, Branford OA (2012) Concepts in aesthetic breast dimensions: analysis of the ideal breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(1):8–16

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bitik O, Uzun H (2016) Analysis of lower breast pole length and nipple-areola complex position following superior pedicle, short horizontal scar breast reduction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 40(5):690–698

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Qureshi AA, Myckatyn TM, Tenenbaum MM (2018) Mastopexy and mastopexy-augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 38(4):374–384

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sozer SO, Phillips PM (2021) Myo-glandular flap breast reduction: preventing the bottoming out deformity—a novel technique. Aesth Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02189-4

  16. Brown RH, Izaddoost S, Bullocks JM (2010) Preventing the “bottoming out” and “star-gazing” phenomena in inferior pedicle breast reduction with an acellular dermal matrix internal brassiere. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34(6):760–767

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Adams WP Jr, Moses AC (2017) Use of Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate Mesh to Optimize Soft-Tissue Support in Mastopexy: A Single-Site Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(1):67–75

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pacifico MD (2021) Lower pole mastopexy-augmentation: indications and applications. Aesthet Surg J 41(1):16–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pompei S, Evangelidou D, Arelli F, Ferrante G (2018) The use of TIGR matrix in breast aesthetic and reconstructive surgery: is a resorbable synthetic mesh a viable alternative to acellular dermal matrices? Clin Plast Surg 45(1):65–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sapino G, Haselbach D, Watfa W, Baudoin J, Martineau J, Guillier D, di Summa PG (2021) Evaluation of long-term breast shape in inferior versus superomedial pedicle reduction mammoplasty: a comparative study. Gland Surg 10(3):1018–1028

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Manero I, Rodriguez-Vega A, Labanca T (2019) Combined breast reduction augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 43(3):571–581

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Loonen M, Tahir A (2019) Modification of the superomedial pedicle in wise-pattern breast reduction: new sling suspension technique to prevent (pseudo) ptosis. World J Plast Surg. 8(3):305–310

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lutfi D, Turkof E (2020) B-technique with dermis suspension: a new approach toward reduction mammaplasty combining short-scar with durability of results. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 73(5):876–884

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. di Summa PG, Oranges CM, Watfa W, Sapino G, Keller N, Tay SK, Chew BK, Schaefer DJ, Raffoul W (2019) Systematic review of outcomes and complications in nonimplant-based mastopexy surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 72(2):243–272

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nava M, Rancati A, Rocco N, Catanuto G, Irigo M (2017) Improving aesthetic outcomes in mastopexy with the “autoprosthesis” technique. Gland Surg 6(2):141–147

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Aquinati A, Tuttolomondo A, Ruocco G, Riccio M (2019) Improvement of superomedial breast reduction and mastopexy with a new “hammock” flap. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(7):e2309

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Dixon JM, Arnott I, Schaverien M (2010) Chronic abscess formation following mesh mastopexy: case report. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(7):1220–1222

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Góes JCS (1992) Periareolarmammaplasty: double skin technique with application of polyglactine 910 mesh. Rev Soc Bras Cir Plast 7:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  29. de Bruijn HP, Ten Thije RHW, Johannes S (2009) Mastopexy with mesh reinforcement: the mechanical characteristics of polyester mesh in the female breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(2):364–371

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Grewal NS, Fisher J (2013) Why do patients seek revisionary breast surgery? Aesthet Surg J 33(2):237–244

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mansur AEC, Graf RM, Fadul R Jr, Balbinot P, Nasser IG, de Paula DR, Maschio AG, Chahine F, Atiyeh B (2020) Simultaneous augmentation mastopexy: an innovative anatomical approach-the fascioglandular flap for improved lower pole support. Aesthetic Plast Surg 44(5):1414–1420

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. de Vita R, Zoccali G, Buccheri EM (2017) The balcony technique of breast augmentation and inverted-T mastopexy with an inferior dermoglandular flap. Aesthet Surg J 37(10):1114–1123

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Watfa W, Zaugg P, Baudoin J, Bramhall RJ, Raffoul W, di Summa PG (2019) Dermal triangular flaps to prevent pseudoptosis in mastopexy surgery: the Hammock technique. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(11):e2473. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002473

  34. Lang Stümpfle R, Piccinini PS, Pereira-Lima LF, Valiati AA (2019) Muscle-splitting augmentation-mastopexy: implant protection with an inferior dermoglandular flap. Ann Plast Surg 82(2):137–144

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Abdelaal MM, Aboelatta YA (2015) Dermo-fascial suspension for better contouring and long lasting results in reduction mammoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 39(1):78–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yilmaz KB (2021) A Modified superior pedicle mastopexy technique with an inferolateral-based auto augmentation flap. Aesthetic Plast Surg 45(3):884–892

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nair NM, Mills DC (2019) Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) scaffold internal support: preliminary experience with direct implant opposition during complex breast revisions. Aesthet Surg J 39(11):1203–1213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Becker H, Lind Ii JG (2020) The use of synthetic mesh in reconstructive, revision, and cosmetic breast surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 44(4):1120–1127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Salgarello M, Visconti G (2020) Short-scar augmentation mastopexy in massive-weight loss patients: four-step surgical principles for reliable and reproducible results. Aesthetic Plast Surg 44(2):272–282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Góes JC (2003) Periareolar mastopexy: double skin technique with mesh support. Aesthet Surg J 23(2):129–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e1000097

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. ASPS Evidence Rating Scales (2011). http://www.plasticsurgery.org/Documents/medical-professionals/health-policy/evidence-practice/ASPS-Rating-Scale-March-2011.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2021

  44. Tool to Assess Risk of Bias in Cohort Studies (2021) Available from: http://www.methods.cochrane.org/bias/sites/methods.cochrane.org.bias/files/public/uploads/Tool%20to%20Assess%20Risk%20of%20Bias%20in%20Cohort%20Studies.pdf. Accessed 10 Mar 2021

  45. Adams WP Jr, Baxter R, Glicksman C, Mast BA, Tantillo M, Van Natta BW (2018) The use of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) scaffold in the ptotic breast: a multicenter clinical study. Aesthet Surg J 38(5):502–518

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Góes JC (1996) Periareolar mammaplasty: double skin technique with application of polyglactine or mixed mesh. Plast Reconstr Surg 97(5):959–968

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Góes JC, Landecker A, Lyra EC, Henríquez LJ, Góes RS, Godoy PM (2004) The application of mesh support in periareolar breast surgery: clinical and mammographic evaluation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 28(5):268–274

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Goes JC, Bates D (2010) Periareolar mastopexy with FortaPerm. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34(3):350–358

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. József Z, Újhelyi M, Ping O, Domján S et al (2020) Long-term dynamic changes in cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction after implant-based postmastectomy breast reconstruction and contralateral mastopexy with or without an ultrapro mesh sling used for the inner bra technique. Retrosp Correl Study Cancer (Basel) 13(1):73

    Google Scholar 

  50. Fígallo E (1977) Surgical treatment of mammary ptosis without hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg 60(2):189–196

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Swanson E (2018) Evaluating the effect of implantable mesh in mammaplasty. Aesthet Surg J 38(7):103

    Google Scholar 

  52. Auclair E, Mitz V (1993) Cure de la ptose mammaire par mise en place d’un soutien-gorge interne résorbable et cicatrice périaréolaire [repair of mammary ptosis by insertion of an internal absorbable support and periareolar scar]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 38(1):107–113

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Swanson E (2017) The limitations of implantable mesh in mastopexy. Ann Plast Surg 79(4):327–328

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Faulkner HR, Shikowitz-Behr L, McLeod M, Wright E, Hulsen J, Austen WG Jr (2020) The use of absorbable mesh in implant-based breast reconstruction: a 7-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg 146(6):731e–736e

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Williams SF, Martin DP, Moses AC (2016) The history of GalaFLEX P4HB scaffold. Aesthet Surg J 36(suppl 2):S33–S42

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Sun JM, Qiao Q, Liu ZF, Zhao R (2003) Breast ptosis correction with a knitted polypropylene mesh. Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi 19(1):27–29

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Mayer HF, Perez Colman M, Stoppani I (2020) Red breast syndrome (rbs) associated to the use of polyglycolic mesh in breast reconstruction: a case report. Acta Chir Plast 62(1–2):50–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Graf R, Ricardo Dall Oglio Tolazzi A, Balbinot P, Pazio A, Miguel Valente P, da Silva Freitas R (2016) Influence of the pectoralis major muscle sling in chest wall-based flap suspension after vertical mammaplasty: ten-year follow-up. Aesthet Surg J 36(10):1113–1121

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Adams WP Jr, Toriumi DM, Van Natta BW (2016) Clinical use of GalaFLEX in facial and breast cosmetic plastic surgery. Aesthet Surg J 36(suppl 2):S23–S32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Ahmad J, Lista F (2008) Vertical scar reduction mammaplasty: the fate of nipple-areola complex position and inferior pole length. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(4):1084–1091

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon

    Bishara Atiyeh, Fadi Ghieh & Ahmad Oneisi

  2. Trad Hospital Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon

    Fadel Chahine

Authors
  1. Bishara Atiyeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fadi Ghieh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fadel Chahine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmad Oneisi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Oneisi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Atiyeh, B., Ghieh, F., Chahine, F. et al. Ptosis and Bottoming out Following Mastopexy and Reduction Mammoplasty. Is Synthetic Mesh Internal Breast Support the Solution? A Systematic Review of the Literature. Aesth Plast Surg 46, 25–34 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02398-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02398-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation