Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of Photobiomodulation on Ecchymosis after Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial

  • Original Article
  • Rhinoplasty
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This study was conducted to compare the effect of photobiomodulation therapy (low-level laser therapy) on ecchymosis after rhinoplasty.

Subjects and Methods

Sixty rhinoplasty candidates were randomly divided into two groups. Photobiomodulation, including red light (660 nm), infrared light (840 nm), and infrared laser, was used in the first group on the first postoperative day, and its effect on periorbital ecchymosis was evaluated.

Results

The findings showed that low-power laser reduced ecchymosis significantly (p = 0.005*).

Conclusion

Photobiomodulation may be effectively used for reducing ecchymosis after rhinoplasty.

Level of Evidence II

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

RCT registration number is IRCT20080820001056N3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saedi B, Amali A, Arabpor M (2017) Comparison of two concentrations of triamcinolone injection in the prevention of supratip edema after external rhinoplasty: a randomized trial. Am J Rhinol Allergy 31(6):412–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saedi B, Sadeghi M, Fekri K (2011) Comparison of the effect of corticosteroid therapy and decongestant on reducing rhinoplasty edema. Am J Rhinol Allergy 25(4):e141–e144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ofo E, Singh A, Marais J (2006) Steroids in rhinoplasty: a survey of current UK otolaryngologists’ practice. J Laryngol Otol 120(2):108–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoffmann DF et al (1992) Steroids and rhinoplasty. A double-blind study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 118(12):1365

    Google Scholar 

  5. Griffies WS et al (1989) Steroids in rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 99(11):1161–1164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Alajmi M et al (2009) Results of intravenous steroid injection on reduction of postoperative edema in rhinoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 61(4):266–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kargi E et al (2003) Effect of steroids on edema, ecchymosis, and intraoperative bleeding in rhinoplasty. Ann Plastic Surg 51(6):570–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Habal MB (1985) Prevention of postoperative facial edema with steroids after facial surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 9(2):69–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Griffies S, Kennedy K, Gasse C (2009) Steroids in rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 99(11):1161–1164

    Google Scholar 

  10. Suchonwanit P, Chalermroj N, Khunkhet S (2018) Low-level laser therapy for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in Thai men and women: a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, sham device-controlled trial. Lasers Med Sci 2018:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alegre-Sánchez A et al (2018) Pulsed dye laser on ecchymoses: clinical and histological assessment. Lasers Med Sci 33(3):683–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Santos FT et al (2019) Is low-level laser therapy effective on sensorineural recovery after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy? Randomized trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 77(1):164–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mussttaf RA, Jenkins DF, Jha AN (2019) Assessing the impact of low level laser therapy (LLLT) on biological systems: a review. Int J Radiat Biol 95(2):120–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kazemikhoo N et al (2018) Evaluation of the effects of low level laser therapy on the healing process after skin graft surgery in burned patients (a randomized clinical trial). J Lasers Medi Sci 9(2):139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. He M et al (2018) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in pediatric and young patients. Eur J Pediatr 177(1):7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tchanque-Fossuo CN et al (2016) A systematic review of low-level light therapy for treatment of diabetic foot ulcer. Wound Repair Regen 24(2):418–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hersant B et al (2015) Current indications of low-level laser therapy in plastic surgery: a review. Photomed Laser Surg 33(5):283–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Costa MS et al (2010) Effect of low-level laser therapy with output power of 30 mW and 60 mW in the viability of a random skin flap. Photomed Laser Surg 28(1):57–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. DeFatta RJ, Krishna S, Williams EF (2009) Pulsed-dye laser for treating ecchymoses after facial cosmetic procedures. Arch Facial Plastic Surg 11(2):99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kosins AM, Obagi ZE (2017) Managing the difficult soft tissue envelope in facial and rhinoplasty surgery. Aesthetic Surg J 37(2):143–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Totonchi A, Guyuron B (2007) A randomized, controlled comparison between arnica and steroids in the management of postrhinoplasty ecchymosis and edema. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:271–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang W et al (2019) Clinical efficacy of low-level laser therapy in plantar fasciitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 98(3):e14088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Enwemeka CS et al (2004) The efficacy of low-power lasers in tissue repair and pain control: a meta-analysis study. Photomed Laser Therapy 22(4):323–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Babak Saedi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

The protocol of this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tehran University of Medical Science. All aspects of the study were conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed Consent

All participants provided informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karimi, S., Sadeghi, M., Amali, A. et al. Effect of Photobiomodulation on Ecchymosis after Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial. Aesth Plast Surg 44, 1685–1691 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01760-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-020-01760-9

Keywords

Navigation