Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcomes of Fat-Augmented Latissimus Dorsi (FALD) Flap Versus Implant-Based Latissimus Dorsi Flap for Delayed Post-radiation Breast Reconstruction

  • Original Article
  • Breast Surgery
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although free abdominal flaps constitute the gold standard in post-radiation delayed breast reconstruction, latissimus dorsi-based methods offer alternative reconstructive options. This retrospective study aims to compare outcomes of delayed breast reconstruction using the fat-augmented latissimus dorsi (FALD) autologous reconstruction and the latissimus dorsi-plus-implant reconstruction in irradiated women.

Methods

We reviewed the files of 47 post-mastectomy irradiated patients (aged 29–73 years), who underwent delayed latissimus dorsi-based breast reconstruction between 2010 and 2016. Twenty-three patients (Group A) had an extended FALD flap and twenty-four patients (Group B) an implant-based latissimus dorsi reconstruction. Patients’ age, BMI, pregnancies, volume of injected fat, implant size, postoperative complications, and secondary surgical procedures were recorded and analyzed.

Results

Age, BMI, pregnancies, and donor-site complications were similar in both groups (p > 0.05). Mean fat volume injected initially was 254 cc (ranged 130–380 cc/session); mean implant volume was 323 cc (ranged 225–420 cc). Breast complications were significantly fewer in Group A (one wound dehiscence, two oily cysts) compared to Group B (three cases with wound dehiscence, two extrusions, thirteen severe capsular contractions). Non-statistically significant difference was documented for secondary procedures between groups; although the mean number of additional surgeries/patient was higher in Group A, they referred to secondary lipofilling, whereas in Group B they were revision surgeries for complications.

Conclusions

The FALD flap constitutes an alternative method for delayed autologous reconstruction after post-mastectomy irradiation, avoiding implant-related complications. Although additional fat graft sessions might be required, it provides an ideal autogenous reconstructive option for thin nulliparous women, with a small opposite breast and adequate fat donor sites.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lee KT, Mun GH (2015) Prosthetic breast reconstruction in previously irradiated breasts: a meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol 112:468–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McCraw JB, Maxwell GP (1988) Early and late capsular “deformation” as a cause of unsatisfactory results in the latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 15:717–726

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moore TS, Farrell LD (1992) Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction: long-term results. Plast Reconstr Surg 89:666–672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Højvig JB, Bonde CT (2015) Breast reconstruction using a latissimus dorsi flap after mastectomy. Dan Med J 62:A5155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim B, Roth C, Chung KC, Young VL, van Busum K, Schnyer C, Mattke S (2011) Anaplastic large cell lymphoma and breast implants: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:2141–2150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hokin JA (1983) Mastectomy reconstruction without a prosthetic implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 72:810–818

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hokin JA, Silfverskiold KL (1987) Breast reconstruction without an implant: results and complications using an extended latissimus dorsi flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 79:58–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McCraw JB, Papp CT, Edwards A, McMellin A (1994) The autogenous latissimus breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 21:279–288

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Delay E, Gounot N, Bouillot A, Zlatoff P, Rivoire M (1998) Autologous latissimus breast reconstruction: a 3-year clinical experience with 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:1461–1478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Delay E (2006) Lipomodelling of the reconstructed breast. In: Spear SL, Willey SC, Robb GL et al (eds) Surgery of the breast: principles and art. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 930–946

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sinna R, Delay E, Garson S, Delaporte T, Tousson G (2010) Breast fat grafting (lipomodelling) after extended latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction: a preliminary report of 200 consecutive cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:1769–1777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Veber M, Guerin AN, Faure C, Delay E, Mojallal A (2012) Reconstruction mammaire par lambeau dorsal à prelevement minimal (LDPM) et transfer graisseux. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 57:366–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Santanelli F, Laporta R, Sorotos M, Pagnoni M, Falesiedi F, Longo B (2014) Latissimus dorsi for total autologous immediate breast reconstruction without implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:871e–879e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu L, Mohan AT, Vijayasekaran A, Hou C, Sur YJ, Morsy M, Saint-Cyr M (2016) Maximizing the volume of latissimus dorsi flap in autologous breast reconstruction with simultaneous multisite fat grafting. Aesthet Surg J 36:169–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Delay E, Garson S, Tousson G, Sinna R (2009) Fat injection to the breast: technique, results, and indications based on 880 procedures over 10 years. Aesthet Surg J 29:360–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Niddam J, Vidal L, Hersant B, Meningaud J-P (2016) Primary fat grafting to the pectoralis muscle during latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4:e1059

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Heerdt AH, Petrek JA, Borgen PJ, Hidalgo DA (2003) Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous tissue reconstruction after whole-breast irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:118–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kronowitz SJ, Robb GL (2009) Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:395–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Levine SM, Patel N, Disa JJ (2012) Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients. Ann Plast Surg 69:380–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hanson SE, Smith BD, Liu J, Robb GL, Kronowitz SJ, Garvey PB (2016) Fewer revisions in abdominal-based free flaps than latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction after radiation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4:e866

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Santanelli F, Longo B, Cagli B, Pugliese P, Sorotos M, Paolini G (2015) Predictive and protective factors for partial necrosis in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: does nulliparity bias flap viability? Ann Plast Surg 74:47–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Delay E, Guerid S (2015) The role of fat grafting in breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 42:315–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Evans GR, Schusteramn MA, Kroll SS, Miller MJ, Reece GP, Robb GL, Ainslie N (1995) Reconstruction and the radiated breast: is there a role for implants? Plast Reconstr Surg 96:1111–1115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang DW, Barnea Y, Robb GL (2008) Effects of an autologous flap combined with an implant for breast reconstruction: an evaluation of 1000 consecutive reconstructions of previously irradiated breasts. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:356–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cordeiro PG, Snell L, Heerdt A, McCarthy C (2012) Immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction after salvage mastectomy for cancer recurrence following lumpectomy/irradiation. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:341–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Peltoniemi H, Asko-Seljavaara S, Härmä M, Sundell B (1992) Latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction. Long term results and return of sensibility. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 27:127–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Thorarinsson A, Fröjd V, Kölby L, Lewin R, Molinder N, Lundberg J, Elander A, Mark H (2016) A retrospective review of the incidence of various complications in different delayed breast reconstruction methods. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 50:25–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Efterpi C. Demiri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demiri, E.C., Dionyssiou, D.D., Tsimponis, A. et al. Outcomes of Fat-Augmented Latissimus Dorsi (FALD) Flap Versus Implant-Based Latissimus Dorsi Flap for Delayed Post-radiation Breast Reconstruction. Aesth Plast Surg 42, 692–701 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1081-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-018-1081-6

Keywords

Navigation