Skip to main content
Log in

Combined Bimaxillary Distraction Osteogenesis Associated with Orthognathic Surgery for Hemifacial Microsomia in Adults

  • Original Article
  • Craniofacial/Maxillofacial
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Hemifacial microsomia (HFM) is one of the most common congenital craniofacial asymmetries. Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is always recommended as an effective option for the treatment of HFM, but some studies showed that the asymmetry remained after DO. In comparison with DO, stable clinical outcomes could be achieved by orthognathic surgery approach as well. However, soft tissue expansion cannot be performed. In this study, we aim to assess the radiographic and clinical results of bimaxillary DO associated with staged orthognathic surgery in the treatment of craniofacial asymmetry for adult HFM patients.

Methods

Twelve HFM patients who had been treated with bimaxillary DO and secondary orthognathic surgery between 2006 and 2013 were included in this study. Bimaxillary DO and staged orthognathic surgery were performed according to the particular condition. Clinical and cephalometric photographs were carried out pre- and postoperatively to evaluate the outcomes.

Results

No significant complications occurred postoperatively. Excellent cosmetic outcomes such as notable improvement in facial pattern and occlusion were achieved. Cephalometrically, the height ratios of the affected/unaffected ramus were improved by 23.81% on average, and the photographic analysis demonstrated a rotation of the chin point toward the mid-line. Moreover, the occlusal cant was corrected from the slant to level by 8.95° on average.

Conclusion

The application of bimaxillary DO associated with staged orthognathic surgery in correcting the asymmetry of adult patients with HFM could have satisfactory aesthetic results, and it should be considered an alternative option for these patients.

Level of evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murray JE, Kaban LB, Mulliken JB (1984) Analysis and treatment of hemifacial microsomia. Plast Reconstr Surg 74:186–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaban LB, Mulliken JB, Murray JE (1981) Three-dimensional approach to analysis and treatment of hemifacial microsomia. Cleft Palate J 18:90–99

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Molina F, Ortiz Monasterio F (1995) Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction: a farewell to major osteotomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:825–840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Peterson-Falzone SJ (1996) An introduction to complex craniofacial disorders. In: Berkowitz S (ed) Cleft lip and palate: perspectives in management, vol 2. Singular Publishing Group Inc, San Diego, pp 112–148

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gorlin RJ, Pindborg J (1965) Syndromes of the head and neck. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 261–265

    Google Scholar 

  6. Travieso R, Terner J, Chang C et al (2012) Mandibular volumetric comparison of Treacher Collins syndrome and hemifacial microsomia. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:749e–751e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Henkel J, Woodruff MA, Epari DR, Glatt V, Dickinson IC et al (2013) Bone regeneration based on tissue engineering conceptions—a 21st century perspective. Bone Res 1(3):216–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamauchi K, Takahashi T (2006) Maxillary distraction osteogenesis combined with mandibular osteotomy to correct asymmetry of the maxillomandibular complex. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:39e–45e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fattah AY, Caro C, Khechoyan DY, Tompson B, Forrest CR, Phillips JH (2014) Cephalometric outcomes of orthognathic surgery in hemifacial microsomia. J Craniofac Surg 25(5):1734–1739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Luo E, Yang S, Du W, Chen Q, Liao C, Fei W, Hu J (2016) Bimaxillary orthognathic approach to correct skeletal facial asymmetry of hemifacial microsomia in adults. Aesthetic Plast Surg 40(3):400–409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, Thorne CH, Grayson BH (1992) Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89:1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ortiz Monasterio F, Molina F, Andrade L, Rodriguez C, Sainz Arregui J (1997) Simultaneous mandibular and maxillary distraction in hemifacial microsomia in adults: avoiding occlusal disasters. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:852–861

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pluijmers BI, Caron CJ, Dunaway DJ, Wolvius EB, Koudstaal MJ (2014) Mandibular reconstruction in the growing patient with unilateral craniofacial microsomia: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43(3):286–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ascenço AS, Balbinot P, Junior IM, Doro U, Busato L (2014) Da SFR (2014) Mandibular distraction in hemifacial microsomia is not a permanent treatment: a long-term evaluation. J Craniofac Surg 25(2):352–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sant’Anna EF, Lau GW, Marquezan M, de Souza Araújo MT, Polley JW, Figueroa AA (2015) Combined maxillary and mandibular distraction osteogenesis in patients with hemifacial microsomia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 147(5):566–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tiner BD, Quaroni AL (1996) Facial asymmetries in hemifacial microsomia, Goldenhar syndrome, and Treacher Collins syndrome. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 4(1):37–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kusnoto B, Figueroa A, Polley J (1999) A longitudinal three dimensional evaluation of the growth pattern in hemifacial microsomia treated by mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a preliminary report. J Craniofac Surg 10:480–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Satoh K, Suzuki H, Uemura T, Hosaka Y (2002) Maxillo-mandibular distraction osteogenesis for hemifacial microsomia in children. Ann Plast Surg 49(49):578–579

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu SS, Feng G, Li JH, Luo E, Hu J (2012) Correction of mandibular deficiency by inverted-L osteotomy of ramus and iliac crest bone grafting. Int J Oral Sci 4(4):214–217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sonego CL, Bobrowski ÂN, Chagas OL Jr, Torriani MA (2014) Aesthetic and functional implications following rotation of the maxillomandibular complex in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43(1):40–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cousley R, Calvert ML (1997) Current concepts in the understanding and management of hemifacial microsomia. Br J Plast Surg 50(7):536–551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baek SH, Kim S (2005) The determinants of successful distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in hemifacial microsomia from longitudinal results. J Craniofac Surg 16(4):549–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Imai Y, Yamada A, Kochi S, Kita H (2000) Limitation of mandibular gradual distraction for hemifacial microsomia patients : long term results. Journal of Japan Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 20:509–515

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kempton SJ, Mccarthy JE, Afifi AM (2014) A systematic review of distraction osteogenesis in hand surgery: what are the benefits, complication rates, and duration of treatment? Plast Reconstr Surg 133(5):1120–1130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamauchi K, Takahashi T (2006) Maxillary distraction osteogenesis combined with mandibular osteotomy to correct asymmetry of the maxillomandibular complex. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(2):39e–45e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nemeth DZ, Rodrigues-Garcia RC, Sakai S, Hatch JP, Van Sickels JE, Bays RA, Clark GM, Rugh JD (2000) Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and temporomandibular disorders: rigid fixation versus wire fixation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:29–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Samchukov M, Cope J, Cherkashin A (2001) Biological basis of new bone formation under the influence of tension stress. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis. Mosby, St Louis, pp 21–36

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by Grants from the NSFC 81621062.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to En Luo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, H., Zhang, X., Liu, L. et al. Combined Bimaxillary Distraction Osteogenesis Associated with Orthognathic Surgery for Hemifacial Microsomia in Adults. Aesth Plast Surg 41, 650–660 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0818-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-017-0818-y

Keywords

Navigation